CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03684642AMPLITUDE-DUpdated Nov 1, 2021Results posted

Efficacy and Safety of Efpeglenatide Versus Dulaglutide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled With Metformin

A Phase 3 interventional study of Efpeglenatide and Dulaglutide in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by Sanofi. Terminated at 45 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-01.

Sponsored by Sanofi · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Sponsor decision to cancel TRIAL, not related to safety concern.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
908
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Primary Objective:

To demonstrate the non-inferiority of once weekly injection of efpeglenatide in comparison to once weekly injection of dulaglutide on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) change in participants with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled with metformin.

Secondary Objectives:

  • To demonstrate the superiority of once weekly injection of efpeglenatide with once weekly injection of dulaglutide on glycemic control.
  • To demonstrate the superiority of once weekly injection of efpeglenatide with once weekly injection of dulaglutide on body weight.
  • To evaluate the safety of once weekly injection of efpeglenatide and once weekly injection of dulaglutide.
Read the detailed description

Study duration per participant was approximately 65 weeks including an up to 3-week Screening Period, a 56-week Treatment Period and a 6-week safety Follow-up Period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,925 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 908 is above the median of 80 across 8,367 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

Sanofi is the lead sponsor of 1,508 studies on the registry; 90 are open to participants now.

Of its 198 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 118 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant must be greater than or equal to (>=) 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent.
  • Participants with T2DM.
  • Diabetes diagnosed at least 1 year before screening.
  • Participants on stable dose of at least 1500 milligram per day (mg/day) of metformin, or tolerated maximum dose, or as per country regulation if less, for at least 3 months prior to screening.
  • HbA1c between 7.0 percent (%) and 10.0% (inclusive) measured by the central laboratory at screening.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Retinopathy or maculopathy with one of the following treatments, either recent (within 3 months prior to screening) or planned: intravitreal injections or laser or vitrectomy surgery.
  • Clinically relevant history of gastrointestinal (GI) disease associated with prolonged nausea and vomiting, including (but not limited to) gastroparesis, unstable and not controlled gastroesophageal reflux disease requiring medical treatment within 6 months prior to screening or history of surgery affecting gastric emptying.
  • History of pancreatitis (unless pancreatitis was related to gallstones and cholecystectomy had been performed), pancreatitis during previous treatment with incretin therapies, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatectomy.
  • Personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) or genetic conditions that predisposes to MTC (e.g., multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes).
  • Body weight change of greater than or equal to (>=) 5 kilogram within the last 3 months prior to screening.
  • Systolic blood pressure greater than (>)180 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) and/or diastolic blood pressure >100 mmHg at randomization.
  • Severe renal disease as defined by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD)] of less than (\<)30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2.
  • Laboratory findings at the screening visit:
  • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >3 * upper limit of normal (ULN) or total bilirubin >1.5 * ULN (except in case of documented Gilbert's syndrome);
  • Amylase and/or lipase: >3 * ULN;
  • Calcitonin >=5.9 picomoles per liter (pmol/L) (20 picograms per milliliter).
  • Gastric surgery or other gastric procedures intended for weight loss within 2 years prior to screening, or planned during study period.
  • Pregnant (confirmed by serum pregnancy test at screening) or breast-feeding women.
  • Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) not willing to use highly effective method(s) of birth control or who are unwilling to be tested for pregnancy during the study period and for at least 5 weeks after the last dose of study intervention.

The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
908 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Efpeglenatide 4 mg

    Participants received Efpeglenatide subcutaneous (SC) injection once weekly up to Week 56 on top of metformin. Participants initiated dosing at 2 mg once weekly and increased every 2 weeks to the maximum of 4 mg once weekly for the treatment duration.

    Drug: Efpeglenatide · Drug: Background therapy Metformin

  • Experimental
    Efpeglenatide 6 mg

    Participants received Efpeglenatide SC injection once weekly up to Week 56 on top of metformin. Participants initiated dosing at 2 mg once weekly and increased every 2 weeks to the maximum of 6 mg once weekly for the treatment duration.

    Drug: Efpeglenatide · Drug: Background therapy Metformin

  • Active comparator
    Dulaglutide 1.5 mg

    Participants received Dulaglutide SC injection once weekly up to Week 56 on top of metformin. Participants initiated dosing at 0.75 mg once weekly and increased after 2 weeks to 1.5 mg once weekly for the treatment duration.

    Drug: Dulaglutide · Drug: Background therapy Metformin

Interventions

  • DrugEfpeglenatide

    Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection; Route of administration: SC

    Also known as: SAR439977

  • DrugDulaglutide

    Pharmaceutical form: solution for injection; Route of administration: SC

    Also known as: Trulicity™

  • DrugBackground therapy Metformin

    Pharmaceutical form: tablet; Route of administration: oral; Dose to be kept stable throughout the study.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 56 in HbA1c

    Adjusted Least square (LS) means and Standard errors (SE) were obtained from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model to account for missing data. Missing values were imputed by baseline observation carried forward (BOCF)-like multiple imputation method.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 56

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 56 in Body Weight

    Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model to account for missing data. Missing values were imputed by BOCF-like multiple imputation method.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 56

  2. Number of Participants With HbA1c < 7.0 %

    Participants who had no available assessment for HbA1c at Week 56 were considered as non-responders.

    Time frame: Week 56

  3. Change From Baseline to Week 56 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

    Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model to account for missing data. Missing values were imputed by BOCF-like multiple imputation method.

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 56

  4. Number of Participants With At Least One Hypoglycemic Events (Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia <3.0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL], Severe Hypoglycemia)

    Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of \<54 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (\<3.0 mmol/L). Severe hypoglycemia was an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 56

  5. Number of Hypoglycemic Events (Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia <3.0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL] and Severe Hypoglycemia) Per Participant-Year

    Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of \<54 mg/dL (\<3.0 mmol/L). Severe hypoglycemia was an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 56

07

Results

Posted Nov 1, 2021
Limitations and caveats
The study was terminated early by the Sponsor on 09 September 2020. Due to early termination of the study, model-based efficacy analyses were performed in the mITT population instead of the ITT population originally planned and data was carefully considered given that the study was terminated early.

Participant flow

The study was conducted at 45 active sites in 4 countries. A total of 1608 participants were screened between 26 September 2018 and 17 December 2019, out of which 700 were screen failures. Screen failures were mainly due to inclusion criteria not met.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEfpeglenatide 4 mgEfpeglenatide 6 mgDulaglutide 1.5 mg
Started303302303
Treated303302302
Safety population313292302
Completed200169197
Not completed103133106
Withdrew: Adverse event61511
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject355323
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy001
Withdrew: Poor compliance to protocol041
Withdrew: Other than specified626067
Withdrew: Randomized and not treated001
Withdrew: Missing completion status but alive at last contact012

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline to Week 56 in HbA1c

Adjusted Least square (LS) means and Standard errors (SE) were obtained from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model to account for missing data. Missing values were imputed by baseline observation carried forward (BOCF)-like multiple imputation method.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 56
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percentage of HbA1c
Change From Baseline to Week 56 in HbA1c
percentage of HbA1cEfpeglenatide 4 mgEfpeglenatide 6 mgDulaglutide 1.5 mg
Change From Baseline to Week 56 in HbA1c-1.12 ± 0.06-1.17 ± 0.06-1.09 ± 0.06
Statistical analysis
  • Efpeglenatide 4 mg vs Dulaglutide 1.5 mg · Least square (ls) mean difference: -0.03 · 95% CI -0.20 to 0.14
  • Efpeglenatide 6 mg vs Dulaglutide 1.5 mg · Ls mean difference: -0.08 · 95% CI -0.25 to 0.09
  • Efpeglenatide 4 mg vs Dulaglutide 1.5 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.7064 (Threshold for significance at the level of 0.05.)
  • Efpeglenatide 6 mg vs Dulaglutide 1.5 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.3427 (Threshold for significance at the level of 0.05.)
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 56 in Body Weight

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model to account for missing data. Missing values were imputed by BOCF-like multiple imputation method.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 56
Reported as:
Least squares mean · kilogram
Change From Baseline to Week 56 in Body Weight
kilogramEfpeglenatide 4 mgEfpeglenatide 6 mgDulaglutide 1.5 mg
Change From Baseline to Week 56 in Body Weight-2.87 ± 0.64-3.04 ± 0.67-2.81 ± 0.66
SecondaryNumber of Participants With HbA1c < 7.0 %

Participants who had no available assessment for HbA1c at Week 56 were considered as non-responders.

Time frame:
Week 56
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With HbA1c < 7.0 %
ParticipantsEfpeglenatide 4 mgEfpeglenatide 6 mgDulaglutide 1.5 mg
Number of Participants With HbA1c < 7.0 %155157150
SecondaryChange From Baseline to Week 56 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Adjusted LS means and SE were obtained from ANCOVA model to account for missing data. Missing values were imputed by BOCF-like multiple imputation method.

Time frame:
Baseline to Week 56
Reported as:
Least squares mean · millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Change From Baseline to Week 56 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
millimoles per liter (mmol/L)Efpeglenatide 4 mgEfpeglenatide 6 mgDulaglutide 1.5 mg
Change From Baseline to Week 56 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)-1.81 ± 0.15-1.57 ± 0.15-1.71 ± 0.15
SecondaryNumber of Participants With At Least One Hypoglycemic Events (Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia <3.0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL], Severe Hypoglycemia)

Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of \<54 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (\<3.0 mmol/L). Severe hypoglycemia was an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 56
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With At Least One Hypoglycemic Events (Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia <3.0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL], Severe Hypoglycemia)
ParticipantsEfpeglenatide 4 mgEfpeglenatide 6 mgDulaglutide 1.5 mg
Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (<54 mg/dL)310
Severe hypoglycemia000
SecondaryNumber of Hypoglycemic Events (Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia <3.0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL] and Severe Hypoglycemia) Per Participant-Year

Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was an event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia were accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration of \<54 mg/dL (\<3.0 mmol/L). Severe hypoglycemia was an event requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Week 56
Reported as:
Number · events per participant-year
Number of Hypoglycemic Events (Documented Symptomatic Hypoglycemia <3.0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL] and Severe Hypoglycemia) Per Participant-Year
events per participant-yearEfpeglenatide 4 mgEfpeglenatide 6 mgDulaglutide 1.5 mg
Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (<54 mg/dL)0.010.010
Severe hypoglycemia000

Adverse events

Collected over All Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from signature of the informed consent up to end of study. Time frame for reporting of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was from first dose up to 30 days after the last injection of the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) (Week 60).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Efpeglenatide 4 mg0/313 (0%)20/313 (6.4%)202/313 (64.5%)
Efpeglenatide 6 mg0/292 (0%)23/292 (7.9%)180/292 (61.6%)
Dulaglutide 1.5 mg1/302 (0.3%)20/302 (6.6%)178/302 (58.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 62
Most frequent serious events
EventEfpeglenatide 4 mgEfpeglenatide 6 mgDulaglutide 1.5 mg
Acute Myocardial InfarctionCardiac disorders1/3132/2920/302
Atrioventricular Block CompleteCardiac disorders0/3132/2920/302
CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders1/3132/2920/302
Atrial FibrillationCardiac disorders1/3131/2922/302
Pulmonary EmbolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/3130/2922/302
Coronary Artery DiseaseCardiac disorders2/3130/2920/302
DiverticulitisInfections and infestations1/3131/2920/302
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations1/3131/2920/302
SepsisInfections and infestations0/3131/2921/302
Benign Salivary Gland NeoplasmNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/3131/2920/302
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent other events
EventEfpeglenatide 4 mgEfpeglenatide 6 mgDulaglutide 1.5 mg
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders93/31383/29290/302
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders85/31383/29278/302
Decreased AppetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders38/31350/29236/302
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders41/31345/29237/302
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders32/31334/29219/302
Abdominal PainGastrointestinal disorders24/31330/29216/302
Lipase IncreasedInvestigations27/31319/29224/302
DyspepsiaGastrointestinal disorders26/31317/29215/302
Abdominal Pain UpperGastrointestinal disorders22/31316/29218/302
Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestations21/31318/29220/302

Baseline characteristics

Analysis was performed on intent-to-treat (ITT) population, which included all randomized participants, analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Efpeglenatide 4 mgEfpeglenatide 6 mgDulaglutide 1.5 mgTotal
Mean60.3 ± 9.660.0 ± 10.159.4 ± 10.159.9 ± 9.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Efpeglenatide 4 mgEfpeglenatide 6 mgDulaglutide 1.5 mgTotal
Female142157153452
Male161145150456
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Efpeglenatide 4 mgEfpeglenatide 6 mgDulaglutide 1.5 mgTotal
White271263275809
Black or African American24301872
Asian53614
Other3429
Not reported0224
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2))Efpeglenatide 4 mgEfpeglenatide 6 mgDulaglutide 1.5 mgTotal
Mean33.4 ± 6.133.4 ± 6.233.4 ± 6.433.4 ± 6.2
Baseline Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c %)
Baseline Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c %)(percentage of HbA1c)Efpeglenatide 4 mgEfpeglenatide 6 mgDulaglutide 1.5 mgTotal
Mean8.12 ± 0.828.07 ± 0.788.11 ± 0.818.10 ± 0.81
08

Study locations

45 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 8400038
    Birmingham, Alabama 35211, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400035
    Chandler, Arizona 85224, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400005
    Glendale, Arizona 85306, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400054
    Peoria, Arizona 85381, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400057
    Huntington Park, California 90255, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400009
    Los Angeles, California 90057, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400007
    San Diego, California 92120, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400045
    Spring Valley, California 91978, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400040
    Tustin, California 92780, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400026
    Van Nuys, California 91405, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400050
    Waterbury, Connecticut 06708, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400055
    Orlando, Florida 32825, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400041
    Pembroke Pines, Florida 33026, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400025
    Lawrenceville, Georgia 30044, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400060
    Meridian, Idaho 83642, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400059
    Skokie, Illinois 60077, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400044
    Lexington, Kentucky 40503, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400061
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400001
    Bridgeton, New Jersey 08302, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400039
    New Windsor, New York 12553, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400028
    Burlington, North Carolina 27215, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400036
    Morehead City, North Carolina 28557, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400013
    Maumee, Ohio 43537, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400014
    Goose Creek, South Carolina 29445, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400030
    Dallas, Texas 75230, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400020
    San Antonio, Texas 78218, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400043
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400053
    San Antonio, Texas 78258, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400037
    Layton, Utah 84041, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 8400049
    Manassas, Virginia 20110, United States
  • Investigational Site Number 3480004
    Budapest, 1036, Hungary
  • Investigational Site Number 3480003
    Debrecen, 4025, Hungary
  • Investigational Site Number 3480001
    Gyula, 5700, Hungary
  • Investigational Site Number 3480005
    Hatvan, 3000, Hungary
  • Investigational Site Number 3480002
    Nyíregyháza, 4400, Hungary
  • Investigational Site Number 6160008
    Gdansk, 80-382, Poland
  • Investigational Site Number 6160004
    Gdynia, 81-537, Poland
  • Investigational Site Number 6160010
    Katowice, 40-040, Poland
  • Investigational Site Number 6160009
    Poznan, 60-702, Poland
  • Investigational Site Number 6160003
    Warszawa, 01-192, Poland
  • Investigational Site Number 6160001
    Wroclaw, 50-381, Poland
  • Investigational Site Number 8040003
    Kyiv, 02002, Ukraine
  • Investigational Site Number 8040001
    Kyiv, 03037, Ukraine
  • Investigational Site Number 8040002
    Kyiv, 03049, Ukraine
  • Investigational Site Number 8040004
    Vinnytsia, 21050, Ukraine
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jul 31, 2019
  • Statistical analysis plan · Oct 2, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No plan to share individual participant data (IPD) by SANOFI: Product rights transferred to Hanmi Pharmaceutical.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 1, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03684642
Lead sponsor
Sanofi
Collaborators
Hanmi Pharmaceutical Company Limited
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 26, 2018
Start date
Sep 26, 2018
Primary completion
Oct 13, 2020
Completion
Nov 17, 2020
Results posted
Nov 1, 2021
Last update
Nov 1, 2021

Study contacts

Clinical Sciences & Operations
study director · Sanofi

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion