CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03670641REMIT-DMUpdated Oct 12, 2021Results posted

Remission Through Early Monitored Insulin Therapy - Duration Month

A Phase 4 interventional study of Glargine and Lispro in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by Sandra Sobel. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-12.

Sponsored by Sandra Sobel · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

REMIT-DM is a feasibility pilot study where participants will be recruited soon after their diagnosis of type 2 diabetes to be placed immediately on insulin therapy for maximum of four weeks with titrations of insulin guided by glucose levels and trends provided by a continuous glucose monitor (CGM), with the purpose of achieving diabetes remission.

Read the detailed description

REMIT-DM is a feasibility pilot study that aims to show that previously published diabetes remission through early use and titration of short-term insulin therapy is possible and safe in the ambulatory diverse American population of patients with T2D, with continuous glucose level and trend information provided by CGM. We developed the algorithm based on published diabetes remission studies and include within the algorithm the CGM trend arrows to further refine insulin doses for both safety and efficacy purposes. Data captured by the CGM transmits automatically to the cloud and is accessible at any time of day by the multidisciplinary diabetes team, which includes the certified diabetes educator (CDE) and Endocrinologist. The CGM-guided insulin titration algorithm is designed to achieve euglycemia (defined as fasting CBG \< 100 mg/dL, and 2 hour post-prandial CBG \< 120 mg/dL) within 2 weeks of initiating insulin therapy, then to help maintain euglycemia for 2 weeks before discontinuing insulin entirely. Ten participants will undergo a maximum of 4 weeks of insulin therapy and will be assessed for remission afterwards to confirm enough recovery of beta cell function. (Complete remission is defined as fasting glycemia \<100 mg/dL without use of pharmacological therapy.) Afterwards, we will implement American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines for standard glycemic management, as necessary. We will use the data collected during this feasibility study to sharpen the CGM-guided insulin titration algorithm for creation of a T2DM remission mobile application that could then be tested and studied in a larger sample size.

The feasibility study will also take into account clinically meaningful data points e.g. the number of phone calls between the patient and the diabetes team, the patient experience, and patient satisfaction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

  • Insulin therapy
  • Continuous glucose monitor
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

9,359 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; 1,318 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 80 across 7,525 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Sandra Sobel as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥18
  2. A1C criteria - >7.0
  3. Newly diagnosed with T2D within 4 years
  4. Lifestyle controlled
  5. Subject may be on up to 2 medications for diabetes.
  6. Smart phone or home computer compatible with DEXCOM CLARITY software
  7. English speaking
  8. Assessed by endocrinologist and diabetes educator to be able to perform skills necessary for CGM use and insulin delivery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Autoimmune Type 1 DM, defined as positive GAD65 or islet cell antibodies
  2. Pregnant
  3. Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage IV or greater
  4. Mental and/or cognitive disorder (based on documented disorder and/or assessment of physician or educator)
  5. No access to computer for downloading CGM
  6. BMI \<18.0
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Insulin and CGM Intervention

    10 individuals with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes will be started on basal (glargine) bolus (lispro) insulin therapy for up to 4 weeks with titrations guided by continuous glucose monitor (Dexcom G6) to achieve euglycemia and then insulin stopped after 4 weeks with hopes of diabetes remission.

    Drug: Glargine · Drug: Lispro · Device: Dexcom G6

Interventions

  • DrugGlargine

    Dexcom G6 CGM will be used to guide daily insulin glargine and lispro dose titrations in participants with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. After 4 weeks of CGM and insulin therapy, insulin will be discontinued and participant's labs monitored every 3 months to determine if diabetes remission achieved.

    Also known as: Lantus

  • DrugLispro

    Dexcom G6 CGM will be used to guide daily insulin glargine and lispro dose titrations in participants with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. After 4 weeks of CGM and insulin therapy, insulin will be discontinued and participant's labs monitored every 3 months to determine if diabetes remission achieved.

    Also known as: Humalog

  • DeviceDexcom G6

    Dexcom G6 CGM will be used to guide daily insulin glargine and lispro dose titrations in participants with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. After 4 weeks of CGM and insulin therapy, insulin will be discontinued and participant's labs monitored every 3 months to determine if diabetes remission achieved.

    Also known as: CGM

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Baseline A1C and A1C Measured at 3 Month Intervals up to 12 Months

    Blood test drawn at baseline and after insulin and CGM-guided titration intervention at 3 month intervals to see if improvement in aggregate A1C value is achieved.

    Time frame: Every 3 months up to 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With A1C of <6.5% After CGM-guided Insulin Therapy Intervention

    See if A1C achieves threshold \<6.5% with intensive daily titration of basal bolus insulin therapy, guided by the individual's continuous glucose monitoring value and trend arrow - all guided by our algorithm.

    Time frame: A1C measures every 3 months up to 1 year

  2. Number of Patients With Glucose Values <55 mg/dL During 4 Week of Insulin and CGM Intervention

    We wanted to ensure that during the course of the intensive CGM-guided insulin therapy, our algorithm would be able to avoid severe hypoglycemia, defined as a glucose reading of \<55mg/dL in the study participants

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. See if Diabetes Distress is Affected With Intervention Via Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) - 5 Questionnaire Scale

    Administer the PAID-5 scale, which is a measure of diabetes distress. The scale ranges from a minimum of 0 (not a problem) to a maximum score of 4 (serious problem). The sum of the five questions provides the participant's score with a score range of minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 20. A total score of greater than or equal to 8 indicates possible diabetes related emotional distress, with a higher score indicating more significant distress. This will be given to participants to see if/how distress levels change via the intervention

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Percent Time Glucose Values Remain in Range While Wearing CGM During Insulin Intervention

    Use CGM-captured glucose values to determine how often a participant's glucose levels were in range (percent time in range)

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  5. Number of Participants Achieving Euglycemic Glucose Targets Within a 4 Week Period

    The design of the algorithm was to attempt to achieve glucose values in the normal glycemic range, as defined as fasting BG target 80-95 mg/dL, and 2 hour post prandial BG target 100-120 mg/dL, within 2 weeks of starting insulin and maintaining values until end of 4 week intervention. We wanted to see if our CGM-guided insulin algorithm could help participants achieve pre-defined euglycemic glucose targets in four week period

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Results

Posted Oct 12, 2021
Limitations and caveats
Statistical analyses beyond those reported here were not conducted due to low number of participants enrolled

Participant flow

Participants were identified using Pitt+Me, an online community which notifies patients about research studies they may be interested.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneInsulin and CGM Intervention
Started10
Completed7
Not completed3
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up3

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Baseline A1C and A1C Measured at 3 Month Intervals up to 12 Months

Blood test drawn at baseline and after insulin and CGM-guided titration intervention at 3 month intervals to see if improvement in aggregate A1C value is achieved.

Time frame:
Every 3 months up to 1 year
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
Change in Baseline A1C and A1C Measured at 3 Month Intervals up to 12 Months
percentage of glycosylated hemoglobinInsulin and CGM Intervention
Pre-intervention9.00 ± 1.56
3 months6.81 ± 0.52
6 months7.13 ± 1.43
9 months7.26 ± 1.41
12 months6.88 ± 1.20
SecondaryNumber of Participants With A1C of <6.5% After CGM-guided Insulin Therapy Intervention

See if A1C achieves threshold \<6.5% with intensive daily titration of basal bolus insulin therapy, guided by the individual's continuous glucose monitoring value and trend arrow - all guided by our algorithm.

Time frame:
A1C measures every 3 months up to 1 year
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With A1C of <6.5% After CGM-guided Insulin Therapy Intervention
Participants# of Participants With A1C <6.5%
3 months1
6 months2
9 months2
12 months4
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Glucose Values <55 mg/dL During 4 Week of Insulin and CGM Intervention

We wanted to ensure that during the course of the intensive CGM-guided insulin therapy, our algorithm would be able to avoid severe hypoglycemia, defined as a glucose reading of \<55mg/dL in the study participants

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With Glucose Values <55 mg/dL During 4 Week of Insulin and CGM Intervention
Participants# of Participants Who Had a Continuous Glucose Reading <55mg/dL During Insulin Intervention Week
Number of Patients With Glucose Values <55 mg/dL During 4 Week of Insulin and CGM Intervention4
SecondarySee if Diabetes Distress is Affected With Intervention Via Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) - 5 Questionnaire Scale

Administer the PAID-5 scale, which is a measure of diabetes distress. The scale ranges from a minimum of 0 (not a problem) to a maximum score of 4 (serious problem). The sum of the five questions provides the participant's score with a score range of minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 20. A total score of greater than or equal to 8 indicates possible diabetes related emotional distress, with a higher score indicating more significant distress. This will be given to participants to see if/how distress levels change via the intervention

Time frame:
1 year
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
See if Diabetes Distress is Affected With Intervention Via Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) - 5 Questionnaire Scale
units on a scaleInsulin and CGM Intervention
Pre-intervention8.90 ± 3.66
Post-intervention7.62 ± 4.35
SecondaryPercent Time Glucose Values Remain in Range While Wearing CGM During Insulin Intervention

Use CGM-captured glucose values to determine how often a participant's glucose levels were in range (percent time in range)

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of time in range
Percent Time Glucose Values Remain in Range While Wearing CGM During Insulin Intervention
percentage of time in rangeInsulin and CGM Intervention
Pre-intervention46.3 ± 28.4
Post-intervention80.67 ± 10.7
SecondaryNumber of Participants Achieving Euglycemic Glucose Targets Within a 4 Week Period

The design of the algorithm was to attempt to achieve glucose values in the normal glycemic range, as defined as fasting BG target 80-95 mg/dL, and 2 hour post prandial BG target 100-120 mg/dL, within 2 weeks of starting insulin and maintaining values until end of 4 week intervention. We wanted to see if our CGM-guided insulin algorithm could help participants achieve pre-defined euglycemic glucose targets in four week period

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Achieving Euglycemic Glucose Targets Within a 4 Week Period
Participants# of Participants Achieving Glucose Targets
Fasting Glucose <95 mg/dL6
2hr post prandial glucose <120 mg/dL8

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year post enrollment. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Insulin and CGM Intervention0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)7/10 (70%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventInsulin and CGM Intervention
HypoglycemiaEndocrine disorders7/10
Signal Loss with Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM)Endocrine disorders6/10

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Insulin and CGM Intervention
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years10
>=65 years0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Insulin and CGM Intervention
Female7
Male3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Insulin and CGM Intervention
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino10
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Insulin and CGM Intervention
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American2
White8
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Insulin and CGM Intervention
United States10
08

Study locations

1 site
  • UPMC Falk Diabetes Clinic
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jul 6, 2021
  • Informed consent form · Jul 6, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 12, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03670641
Lead sponsor
Sandra Sobel
Responsible party
Sandra Sobel (Assistant Professor, University of Pittsburgh) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 13, 2018
Start date
Mar 26, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2020
Completion
Jul 31, 2020
Results posted
Oct 12, 2021
Last update
Oct 12, 2021

Study contacts

Sandra I Sobel, MD
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh
David A Rometo, MD
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh
Linda Siminerio, RN PhD
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh
Shari Reynolds
study chair · University of Pittsburgh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion