ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03665688HOMECAREUpdated Jul 27, 2023Results posted

Comparing Outpatient to Inpatient Cervical Ripening Using Dilapan-S®

An interventional study of Outpatient Dilapan-S and Inpatient Dilapan-S in Labor, Induced and Cervix Uteri-Diseases, sponsored by The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-27.

Sponsored by The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
338
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The target population for our study is women who present for induction of labor. If there is a decision by the obstetrical team to place a mechanical dilator for cervical ripening, the obstetrical team will notify the research staff so that the patient may be screened for the study. If the subject is eligible for the trial, written informed consent will be obtained by person-to-person contact. The PI, study coordinator, or a collaborator will be responsible for the informed consent procedure. After informed consent is obtained and Dilapan-S is placed, the patient will be randomized to the Outpatient or the Inpatient group.

Read the detailed description

Group Assigned to Outpatient Cervical Ripening After Dilapan-S® placement, subject will be monitored for at least 30 minutes. If no contraindications, such as tachysystole, active vaginal bleeding, rupture of membranes or nonreassuring fetal testing (defined as minimal or absent variability, abnormal baseline, or presence of decelerations) evidence of labor, or other serious medical conditions deemed by the clinical staff or the attending physician to preclude outpatient cervical ripening develop after insertion, the subjects will be randomized. After randomization subject will record the pain she experienced during insertion in the patient's survey (see Appendix 3). Those subjects randomized to outpatient ripening will be given the option to either return home or to stay in a hotel if transportation is an issue. The cost for the hotel will be covered by the study budget. Subjects will be allowed to ambulate, shower and perform regular activity during that period. "Nothing per vagina" will be allowed (incl. intercourse, tampons etc.).

Group Assigned to Inpatient Cervical Ripening Subjects randomized to inpatient management will be admitted to L\&D unit and standard clinical protocol will be initiated for cervical ripening and labor induction. During the period of 12 hours of cervical ripening subject is to remain "nothing per os" (NPO), "nothing per vagina" and undergo continuous fetal heart rate monitoring. No other interventions are to occur during this period of 12 hours, unless clinically indicated.

Labor Induction and Labor Management of the subject after the initial 12 hours of pre-induction or following the earlier removal or spontaneous expulsion of the dilator will be the same for both groups and at the discretion of the clinical team. Additional ripening (mechanical or prostaglandins) and/or oxytocin may or may not be needed. If needed, duration, type and dose of additional ripening agents and oxytocin will be documented.

Routine intrapartum care will be provided and relevant data collected by the subject's managing obstetrical team.

02

Conditions studied

  • Labor, Induced
  • Cervix Uteri-Diseases

Keywords

  • Cervical ripening
  • Labor induction
  • Outpatient
  • Mechanical
  • Hygroscopic
03

In context

Lead sponsor

The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston is the lead sponsor of 256 studies on the registry; 39 are open to participants now.

Of its 32 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 26 (81%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Pregnant woman whose plan of care is induction of labor
  2. Maternal age between 18 and 45 years
  3. Understanding and capable to sign informed consent
  4. Singleton pregnancy
  5. Gestational age ≥ 37 0/7 weeks (based on a sure last menstrual period or a first trimester dating ultrasound)
  6. Live fetus in cephalic presentation
  7. Intact membranes
  8. Pelvic exam (sterile vaginal exam) of less than or equal to 3cm and at most 60% effaced

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Active labor
  2. Active genital herpes
  3. Chorioamnionitis
  4. Transfundal uterine or cervical surgery
  5. Previous cesarean delivery
  6. Non-reassuring fetal status
  7. Need for continuous maternal or fetal monitoring during ripening
  8. Contraindication for vaginal delivery
  9. Active vaginal bleeding
  10. Abnormal placental location or adherence (placenta previa or unresolved low lying placenta)
  11. Estimated fetal weight > 5000 g (non diabetic) or > 4500 g (diabetic)
  12. Intrauterine growth restriction (estimated fetal weight \<10 percentile)
  13. Oligohydramnios (amniotic fluid index \< 5cm or deep vertical pocket of \< 2 cm)
  14. Fetal anomaly
  15. Need for inpatient care (e.g. hypertension, insulin-dependent diabetes)
  16. Poor or no access to a telephone and cannot be placed in the hotel
  17. Absence of support person ( no adult accompanying the subject during outpatient cervical ripening period)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
338 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Outpatient Dilapan-S

    After Dilapan-S® placement, subjects will be given the option to either return home or to stay in a hotel if transportation is an issue. Subjects will also be instructed to return to L\&D unit 12 hours after insertion, or earlier if any excessive bleeding, rupture of membranes, pain or other concerns (contractions, decreased fetal movement) develop before the 12 hours

    Device: Outpatient Dilapan-S

  • Active comparator
    Inpatient Dilapan-S

    After Dilapan-S® placement, subjects will be admitted to L\&D unit and standard clinical protocol will be initiated for cervical ripening and labor induction. During the period of 12 hours of cervical ripening subject is to remain "nothing per os" (NPO), "nothing per vagina" and undergo continuous fetal heart rate monitoring. No other interventions are to occur during this period of 12 hours, unless clinically indicated.

    Device: Inpatient Dilapan-S

Interventions

  • DeviceOutpatient Dilapan-S

    After Dilapan-S placement, subjects will be given the option to either return home or to stay in a hotel if transportation is an issue. Subjects will also be instructed to return to L\&D unit 12 hours after insertion, or earlier if any excessive bleeding, rupture of membranes, pain or other concerns (contractions, decreased fetal movement) develop before the 12 hours. After the designated 12 hours' time or earlier, if indicated, subjects are to return and to be admitted to L\&D unit for standard protocol of labor induction.

    Also known as: Outpatient cervical ripening with Dilapan-S

  • DeviceInpatient Dilapan-S

    After Dilapan-S placement, subjects will be admitted to L\&D unit and standard clinical protocol will be initiated for cervical ripening and labor induction. During the period of 12 hours of cervical ripening subject is to remain "nothing per os" (NPO), "nothing per vagina" and undergo continuous fetal heart rate monitoring. No other interventions are to occur during this period of 12 hours, unless clinically indicated.

    Also known as: Inpatient cervical ripening with Dilapan-S

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Hospital Stay Longer Than 48 Hours

    Rate of hospital stay longer than 48 hours (from admission to discharge)

    Time frame: 72 hours or discharge home time, whichever occurs first

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Vaginal Deliveries 2-4 Days

    Rate of vaginal deliveries (%)

    Time frame: 2-4 days

  2. Number of Participants With Vaginal Deliveries - 24 Hours

    Rate of vaginal deliveries within 24 hours since admission to hospital (%)

    Time frame: 24 hours

  3. Time From Hospital Admission to Active Stage of Labor

    Time from hospital admission to reach active stage of labor defined as cervical dilation of ≥ 6 cm (in minutes)

    Time frame: 1-2 days

  4. Change in Bishop Score From Insertion of Device to Extraction

    Change in Bishop score (based on cervical dilation, position of cervix, effacement of cervix, fetal station and softness of cervix) . Calculated as Bishop score value at 12 hours minus value at baseline. Bishop score ranges from zero to 13, with zero meaning you're not ready for induction and 13 indicating a better chance for successful induction. A higher score means that labor is closer, and that induction has a good chance of being successful.

    Time frame: 12 hours

  5. Number of Participants With Operative Vaginal Delivery

    Rate of operative vaginal deliveries (%)

    Time frame: 1-4 days

  6. Number of Participants With Cesarean Delivery

    Rate of caesarean deliveries (%)

    Time frame: 1-4 days

07

Results

Posted Jul 27, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOutpatient Dilapan-SInpatient Dilapan-S
Started167171
Completed167171
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Hospital Stay Longer Than 48 Hours

Rate of hospital stay longer than 48 hours (from admission to discharge)

Time frame:
72 hours or discharge home time, whichever occurs first
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Hospital Stay Longer Than 48 Hours
ParticipantsOutpatient Dilapan-SInpatient Dilapan-S
Number of Participants With Hospital Stay Longer Than 48 Hours89152
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Vaginal Deliveries 2-4 Days

Rate of vaginal deliveries (%)

Time frame:
2-4 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Vaginal Deliveries 2-4 Days
ParticipantsOutpatient Dilapan-SInpatient Dilapan-S
Number of Participants With Vaginal Deliveries 2-4 Days125128
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Vaginal Deliveries - 24 Hours

Rate of vaginal deliveries within 24 hours since admission to hospital (%)

Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Vaginal Deliveries - 24 Hours
ParticipantsOutpatient Dilapan-SInpatient Dilapan-S
Number of Participants With Vaginal Deliveries - 24 Hours11786
SecondaryTime From Hospital Admission to Active Stage of Labor

Time from hospital admission to reach active stage of labor defined as cervical dilation of ≥ 6 cm (in minutes)

Time frame:
1-2 days
Reported as:
Median · minutes
Time From Hospital Admission to Active Stage of Labor
minutesOutpatient Dilapan-SInpatient Dilapan-S
Time From Hospital Admission to Active Stage of Labor545 (492 to 690)1183 (1141 to 1265)
SecondaryChange in Bishop Score From Insertion of Device to Extraction

Change in Bishop score (based on cervical dilation, position of cervix, effacement of cervix, fetal station and softness of cervix) . Calculated as Bishop score value at 12 hours minus value at baseline. Bishop score ranges from zero to 13, with zero meaning you're not ready for induction and 13 indicating a better chance for successful induction. A higher score means that labor is closer, and that induction has a good chance of being successful.

Time frame:
12 hours
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Change in Bishop Score From Insertion of Device to Extraction
score on a scaleOutpatient Dilapan-SInpatient Dilapan-S
Change in Bishop Score From Insertion of Device to Extraction2 (1 to 4)2 (1 to 4)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Operative Vaginal Delivery

Rate of operative vaginal deliveries (%)

Time frame:
1-4 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Operative Vaginal Delivery
ParticipantsOutpatient Dilapan-SInpatient Dilapan-S
Number of Participants With Operative Vaginal Delivery65
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Cesarean Delivery

Rate of caesarean deliveries (%)

Time frame:
1-4 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Cesarean Delivery
ParticipantsOutpatient Dilapan-SInpatient Dilapan-S
Number of Participants With Cesarean Delivery4243

Adverse events

Collected over at the time the participant are enrolled into the study, up to 3 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Outpatient Dilapan-S0/167 (0%)0/167 (0%)0/167 (0%)
Inpatient Dilapan-S0/171 (0%)0/171 (0%)0/171 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Outpatient Dilapan-SInpatient Dilapan-STotal
Mean25.2 ± 5.625.9 ± 5.625.5 ± 5.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Outpatient Dilapan-SInpatient Dilapan-STotal
Female167171338
Male000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Outpatient Dilapan-SInpatient Dilapan-STotal
Hispanic or Latino120112232
Not Hispanic or Latino4759106
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Outpatient Dilapan-SInpatient Dilapan-STotal
United States167171338
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • UTMB Galveston
    Galveston, Texas 77555, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Thiery M, De Boever J, Merchiers E, Martens G. Hormones and cervical ripening. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 May;160(5 Pt 1):1251-3. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90207-x. No abstract available. PubMed 2524974 ↗
  • Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G, Hill K, Thom EA, El-Sayed YY, Perez-Delboy A, Rouse DJ, Saade GR, Boggess KA, Chauhan SP, Iams JD, Chien EK, Casey BM, Gibbs RS, Srinivas SK, Swamy GK, Simhan HN, Macones GA; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 9;379(6):513-523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566. PubMed 30089070 ↗
  • Wilkinson C, Adelson P, Turnbull D. A comparison of inpatient with outpatient balloon catheter cervical ripening: a pilot randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 May 28;15:126. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0550-z. PubMed 26018581 ↗
  • Wilkinson C, Bryce R, Adelson P, Turnbull D. A randomised controlled trial of outpatient compared with inpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E(2) (OPRA study). BJOG. 2015 Jan;122(1):94-104. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12846. Epub 2014 May 14. PubMed 24824157 ↗
  • Henry A, Madan A, Reid R, Tracy SK, Austin K, Welsh A, Challis D. Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Jan 29;13:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-25. PubMed 23356673 ↗
  • Kruit H, Heikinheimo O, Ulander VM, Aitokallio-Tallberg A, Nupponen I, Paavonen J, Rahkonen L. Foley catheter induction of labor as an outpatient procedure. J Perinatol. 2016 Aug;36(8):618-22. doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.62. Epub 2016 Apr 14. PubMed 27078202 ↗
  • Sciscione AC, Muench M, Pollock M, Jenkins TM, Tildon-Burton J, Colmorgen GH. Transcervical Foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening in an outpatient versus inpatient setting. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Nov;98(5 Pt 1):751-6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01579-4. PubMed 11704164 ↗
  • Diederen M, Gommers J, Wilkinson C, Turnbull D, Mol B. Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review. BJOG. 2018 Aug;125(9):1086-1095. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15047. Epub 2018 Jan 10. PubMed 29211328 ↗
  • Gupta J, Chodankar R, Baev O, Bahlmann F, Brega E, Gala A, Hellmeyer L, Hruban L, Maier J, Mehta P, Murthy A, Ritter M, Saad A, Shmakov R, Suneja A, Zahumensky J, Gdovinova D. Synthetic osmotic dilators in the induction of labour-An international multicentre observational study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Oct;229:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Aug 3. PubMed 30107363 ↗
  • Kuper SG, Jauk VC, George DM, Edwards RK, Szychowski JM, Mazzoni SE, Wang MJ, Files P, Tita AT, Subramaniam A, Harper LM. Outpatient Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor in Parous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;132(1):94-101. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002678. PubMed 29889751 ↗
  • Saad AF, Gavara R, Senguttuvan RN, Goncharov AD, Berry M, Eid J, Goldman B, Nutter A, Moutos CP, Wang AM, Saade GR. Outpatient Compared With Inpatient Preinduction Cervical Ripening Using a Synthetic Osmotic Dilator: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Oct 1;140(4):584-590. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004942. Epub 2022 Sep 7. PubMed 36083097 ↗
  • Alfirevic Z, Gyte GM, Nogueira Pileggi V, Plachcinski R, Osoti AO, Finucane EM. Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 27;8(8):CD007372. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007372.pub4. PubMed 32852803 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Apr 19, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Nov 2018 to primary completion in Nov 2021, 35 months.

Results were first posted in Jul 2023, 1 year 8 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 30, 2018
First posted
Sep 11, 2018
StartActual
Nov 7, 2018
Primary completionActual
Nov 5, 2021
CompletionActual
Nov 5, 2021
Results first posted
Jul 27, 2023
Last update
Jul 27, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 27, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03665688
Collaborators
Medicem International CR s.r.o.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 11, 2018
Start date
Nov 7, 2018
Primary completion
Nov 5, 2021
Completion
Nov 5, 2021
Results posted
Jul 27, 2023
Last update
Jul 27, 2023

Study contacts

Antonio Saad, MD
principal investigator · The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion