An interventional study of Exercises in Whiplash Injuries, sponsored by Linkoeping University. Completed at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 63 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-03.
Sponsored by Linkoeping University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
The knowledge of pathophysiological mechanisms behind prolonged Whiplash Associated Disorders (WAD) is insufficient and whether changes can be restored by rehabilitation or not is unknown. The aim of these studies are to investigate different parameters to further learn about pathophysiological mechanisms (neck muscle fatty infiltration, cross-sectional area, volume, inflammation and function, brain structure and activity, biomarkers for stress and inflammation, cervical kinaesthesia and balance before and after intervention) and the association for clinical outcomes in individuals with chronic WAD (n=30) compared with age and gender matched healthy individuals (n=30). Measurements will be made at baseline (patients and healthy) and at 3 months (patients only, at the end of treatment). However, for the blood and saliva samples, they will be re-investigated in the healthy group as well. The study results may contribute to the development of improved understanding and diagnostics in chronic WAD that may improve future rehabilitation.
BACKGROUND There is no consensus regarding the injury mechanism in complex prolonged Whiplash Associated Disorders (WAD) cases. Often, tissue damage and physiological alterations is not detectable. In order to improve future rehabilitation, a greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying whiplash injury and their importance for treatment success is required. It is also important to investigate if pathophysiological changes can be restored by rehabilitation.
AIM The projects aims to investigate neck muscle structure and function, biomarkers and the association with pain, disability and other outcomes before and after neck-specific exercises.
METHODS Design These are sub-group trials, each one independent of the others, in a prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two parallel treatment arms conducted according to a protocol established before recruitment started (ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol ID: NCT03022812). Physiotherapist-led neck-specific exercise previously shown to be effective for the current population constitutes the control treatment for the new Internet-based neck-specific exercise treatment. In the RCT, a total of 140 patients will be included (70 from each group), whereof 30 (both randomization arms equally) consecutively will be asked to participate in the present sub-group study. The sub-group studies aims to start September 2019. Independent physiotherapists in primary health care will distribute the treatment.
In sub-group of individuals, additional measurements will be performed before and after interventions end (3 months follow-up). The physical measurements will be performed by independent specially trained test-leaders blinded to randomization.
Additionally, 30 neck healthy individuals without serious diseases matched for age and gender will consecutively be investigated.
Study population
The inclusion criteria for patients are:
For the present sub group study additional criteria were:
Inclusion criteria for healthy controls:
Exclusion criteria for patients:
Additional criteria in the present sub group:
Exclusion criteria for healthy controls:
Recruitment and randomization Information about the study will be provided by healthcare providers, reports in newspapers, social media, and the university's website. Interested patients will contact the research team through the project website. After completing a small survey on the website, a project team member (physiotherapist) will perform a telephone interview and ask about the patient's medical history. An appointment for a physical examination and additional interview for the present sub-group study is made as a last step to ensure that the criteria for study participation are met. If the study criteria are met, written and oral informed consent are obtained, and the patient will fill out a questionnaire and undergo physical measurements of neck-related function. Baseline measurements must be completed for inclusion.
Healthy individuals will consecutively be recruited among friends, family and staff at the university or the university hospital to suit the age and gender of a patient.
Intervention for the patient group The intervention consists of neck-specific exercises distributed in two different ways, twice a week at the physiotherapist clinic for 3 months (NSE group) or with 4 physiotherapy visits only combined with a web-based system (NSEIT group).
A. In the NSE group, patients will get an explanation and justification for the exercise consisting of basic information about the musculoskeletal anatomy of the neck relevant to the exercises given by the physiotherapist in order to motivate the patient and help make them feel safe and reassured. The patients undergo a 12-week training programme with a physiotherapist 2 days/week (total 24 times). Exercises are chosen from a clear and written frame of exercises. The training includes exercises for the deep neck muscles, continuing with the endurance training of neck and shoulder muscles. The exercises are individually adjusted according to the individual's physical conditions and progressively increased in severity and dose. Exercise-related pain provocation is not accepted. The patient may also perform exercises at home. At the end of the treatment period, the participants are encouraged to continue practising on their own. The exercises have been used with good results in previous RCTs.
B. In the NSEIT group, patients will receive the same information and training programmes as the NSE group, but with 4 visits to the physiotherapist instead of 24. Exercises are introduced, progressed, and followed up to ensure correct performance. The exercises are performed and most of the information is given with the help of Internet support outside the healthcare system. Photos and videos of the exercises (a clear stepwise progression) and information are available on the Web-based system. A SMS reminder is automatically available if the exercise diary is not completed. The time required for training is the same as in group A, but without the patient having to go to the physiotherapy clinic. The Internet programme was developed by experienced physiotherapists/ researchers together with technicians and clinicians. Technicians are available to assist the participants if any technical difficulties arise. The patients will be introduced to the exercises and get information and support at the physiotherapy visits.
Variables and measurements Background data and data in the RCT include personal details, questionnaires and test results regarding pain, physical and psychological functioning, health and cost-effectiveness described elsewhere (ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol ID: NCT03022812).
Measurements will be done at baseline for both groups and at 3 months follow-up for the patient when treatment ends. Except for blood and saliva samples that will be collected twice (baseline and repeated after 3 months), the measurements will be performed at baseline only for the healthy individuals.
68 studies on the registry are indexed under Whiplash Injuries; 8 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 68 across 49 interventional studies indexed under Whiplash Injuries.
Browse Whiplash Injuries studies →Linkoeping University is the lead sponsor of 189 studies on the registry; 40 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Study population
The inclusion criteria for patients are:
For the present sub group study additional criteria were:
Inclusion criteria for healthy controls:
Exclusion criteria for patients:
Additional criteria in the present sub group:
Exclusion criteria for healthy controls:
Patients before and after neck-specific exercises, subgroup to NCT01528579 with additional measures
Other: Exercises
Healthy controls, no treatment
Neck-specific exercises for chronic whiplash associated disorders
Also known as: No treatment, controls only
Speckle tracking analyses of neck and shoulder muscle function
Measured with medical ultrasonography during neck and arm exercises
Time frame: Baseline and at 3 months follow-up when intervention ended. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.
Cross-sectional area, volume, fatty infiltration and inflammation of neck muscles
Neck and some whole body imaging measured with 3.0 T MRI scanner
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.
Brain function in cortical networks related to pain
Measured with a resting-state fMRI protocol with an echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.
Biomarkers for inflammation and stress
Measured with blood samples and saliva
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.
Cervikal kinaesthesia
Neck-eye coordination
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.
Balance test
Postural sway during single and double leg stance
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months. The outcome measure is going to report a change over time for patients.
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Self-reported neck-specific function. Score 0 to 50 (or in percentages 0% to 100%); 0p/0%=no disability, 50p/100%=complete activity limitation
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Whiplash Disability Questionnaire
Disability associated with whiplash, in patients. Score 0 to 130; 0=no disability, 130=maximum disability.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Patient-specific functional scale (PSFS)
Individual ratings of function to quantify activity limitations, in patients. Score 0-10 score; 0= Unable to perform activity, 10= Able to perform activity at the same level as before injury or problem. Total score=sum of the activity scores/ number of activities.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Pain intensity in neck, head, and arm and dizziness by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (0-100 mm; where 0=no pain, 100= worst imaginable pain )
Pain intensity. Score 0 to 100 mm; 0=no pain, 100=worst imaginable pain
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Distribution of pain by a pain drawing assessed with images
Distribution of pain, in patients
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Frequency of pain
Frequency of pain, in patients
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Use of pain medications
Use of pain medications, in patients
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Dizziness/balance by the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI)
Dizziness questionnaire, in patients
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Headache Questions by VAS and the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6)
Impact of headache, in patients
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), total scores range from 0 - 52; 0=no catastrophizing, 52= maximum catastrophizing
Self-reported pain catastrophizing, in patients
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
EuroQuol five dimensions
Self-reported health, in patients
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Effort Reward Imbalance questionnaire
Work related balance between effort and reward, in patients
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Symptoms Satisfaction scale
Satisfaction with present symptoms, in patients. 1 to 7 scale; 1=delighted, 7=terrible.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Physical activity score, a combination score of the 2 questions (everyday physical activity and exercise/sport/open-air activity) to a combined 4-point score
Physical activity. Score 0 to 4; 0=inactivity, 4=high activity.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Health care consumption, number of visits
Health care consumption, in patients
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Self-Efficacy Scale (SES)
Self-reported self-efficacy, in patients. Score 0-200; 0=no self-efficacy, 200=strong self-efficacy
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)
Fear Avoidance Beliefs, in patients
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD)
Depression and anxiety. Each subscale (depression and anxiety) range from 0 to 21; 0=normal, 21=severe
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder checklist (PCL-S)
Post Traumatic Stress, in patients
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Range of neck motion
Range of motion, in patients
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Ergonomics questions and how work is perceived
Work ergonomics, in patients
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Sickness presence by the Stanford presenteeism scale (SPS-6)
Sickness presence at work, impact of health problems on individual work performance and overall perceived productivity , in patients. Scores 6-30, with lower scores indicting lower Presenteeism, and higher scores indicating higher Presenteeism.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) questionnaire
Patient enablement, in patients
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Consumption of analgesic drugs prescribed through the drug registry
Consumption of analgesic drugs, in patients
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Sick-leave registration, number of days and episodes
Sick-leave, in patients
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ)
Cognitive function, in patients
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Sensorimotor control of the neck muscles, mm Hg
Sensorimotor control, in patients
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Neck muscle endurance of ventral and dorsal neck muscles in seconds
Neck muscle endurance, in patients
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Balance measured in seconds, standing on one leg with eyes closed
Balance, in patients
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Neurology
Clinical examination of neurology, in patients, such as reflexes, sensibility, muscle weakness, Spurling´s test, neural tension test.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Work Ability Index (WAI)
Self-reported work ability, in patients
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Global rating of change scale
Overall change because of the treatment, in patients. Score -5 (very much worse to +5 completely recovered and importance of change 0=not at all important, 100= very important.
Time frame: Change from baseline to 3 months (the end of treatment) and 15 months (1 year after study treatment is finalized) follow-up
Background data such as age and gender, living circumstances
Background data such as age, gender, living circumstances
Time frame: Baseline
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: Undecided — Unidentified data may be available upon resonable request (may need approval from the ethics comittee as it contains data about health).
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Linkoeping University