ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03662061EROGUpdated Sep 19, 2019

Assessment of a Multidisciplinary Team Meeting (RCP) in Geriatric Oncology

An observational study in Cancer, sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon. Completed at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 70 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-09-19.

Sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
120
Ages
70 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In France, cancer incidence increases over the course of life and therefore it is considered as an important pathology of the elderly. Cancers are the second leading cause of death for patients over 70 years old.

In 2015, 233,343 new cases of cancer were estimated for patients of 65 years and over (60.9% of estimated cancers of all ages), 42,547 new cases for older people over 85 years old (about 11% of all diagnosed cancer cases).

With the expected aging of the population in the coming years, the number of patients over the age of 70 will continue to increase. Life expectancy will also increase (12 years for the people above 75 years old and more than 8 years for the people above 80 years old).

The elderly are a heterogeneous population. Some people age well with few chronic diseases and a preserved autonomy. Others have several pathologies, geriatric syndromes (malnutrition, functional disorders, sensory deficits or psycho-cognitive diseases). Poly-medication is therefore common with an increased risk of iatrogenic disease. All these factors, in addition to social and economic conditions, determine the health status of the elderly. The presence of comorbidities decreases life expectancy and may itself be a contraindication to treatment. Patients in this age group are therefore particularly exposed to the risks of over- or under-treatment.

The multidisciplinary team meeting (RCP) is widely used for decision making in oncology. Various official texts govern it (Plan Cancer, HAS). However, the onco-geriatric decision is usually only a complementary opinion after a RCP of a specific organ.

Since 2006, the E. Herriot Hospital's Multidisciplinary team meeting has been organized to discuss cases of patients over 70 years old. The specificity is the association of a real multidisciplinary geriatric oncology discussion. The latter between medical specialist : geriatrician, oncologist, surgeon, radiotherapist, pharmacist, onco-geriatric nurse allows the development of an appropriate individualized therapeutic project for the patient.

The onco-geriatric multidisciplinary team is implementing a descriptive study of the RCP for the management of patients above 70 with cancer. The Regional Network of Oncology Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes is a partner.

The main aim is to describe the feasibility of the assessment of the follow-up of onco-geriatric recommendations 4 months after the onco-geriatric RCP of E. Herriot Hospital concerning patients with or with suspicion of cancer.

The secondary aims are : 1/ To describe the process of RCP: participants, patient's characteristics and conclusions with recommendations, 2/ To assess the implementation of oncological and geriatric recommendations 4 months after RCP 3/ To assess the survival, autonomy and quality of life of patients 4 months after RCP.

The hypothesis is that onco-geriatric RCP's recommendations improve the outcome for the patient.

The purpose of this pilot study is to ensure that the assessment of the recommendations' follow-up at 4 months is feasible.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer

Browse trials for

03

In context

Neoplasms

9,616 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasms; 2,508 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 120 is below the median of 202 across 1,742 observational studies indexed under Neoplasms.

Browse Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospices Civils de Lyon is the lead sponsor of 1,856 studies on the registry; 442 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
70 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This study concerns patients above 70 years with cancer or suspicion of cancer who benefit from an onco-geriatric case analysis by the multidisciplinary team meeting (RCP).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients over 70 years
  • with cancer or suspicion of cancer,
  • with a systematic collection of oncological and geriatric data in their medical record submitted to the onco-geriatric RCP of E. Herriot hospital.
  • Patients must be able to express their non-opposition to participate in this study or must be accompanied by a trustworthy person able to express his or her opposition.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
120 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • OtherAssessment of the follow-up of oncological and geriatric recommendations 4 months after the RCP

    After inclusion, patient's results are discussed at a weekly onco-geriatric multidisciplinary team meeting including surgeons, geriatrics, oncologists, radiotherapist, nurse, pharmacist. Oncological and geriatric recommendations are given. A phone call is made to the patient to evaluate the follow-up of the oncological and geriatric recommendations defined during the RCP along with their survival, autonomy and quality of life.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients whose recommendations' follow-up at 4 months after RCP, has been feasible.

    Phone call 4 months after RCP to assess if recommendations have been followed.

    Time frame: 4 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Oncologie radiothérapie - Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz Ramsay Général de Santé Lyon
    Lyon, 69008, France
  • Médecine Gériatrique/équipe mobile de gériatrie - Hôpital Edouard Herriot
    Lyon, 69437, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Sep 2018 to primary completion in Jul 2019, 10 months.

Of 792 non-industry observational studies under Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 102 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 32 and three quarters within 352. This study's 10 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 884 studies reached it within 80 months; a quarter within 32 and three quarters within 318.

Neoplasms covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 5, 2018
First posted
Sep 7, 2018
StartActual
Sep 26, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jul 30, 2019
CompletionActual
Jul 30, 2019
Last update
Sep 19, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03662061
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 7, 2018
Start date
Sep 26, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2019
Completion
Jul 30, 2019
Last update
Sep 19, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion