An interventional study of Standard patients with VRNET and standard patients in Medical Students, sponsored by Yonsei University. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 23 Years to 30 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-19.
Sponsored by Yonsei University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of the virtual reality based neurologic examination teaching tool(VRNET) for medical students. VRNET is a new teaching tool for neurologic examinations by offering different neurologic signs of the face, with which medical students can experience more realistic patients.
Yonsei University is the lead sponsor of 1,387 studies on the registry; 232 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
The medical students examine the standardized patients who have neurological deficits which presented by VRNET.
Other: Standard patients with VRNET
The medical students examine the standardized patients who have neurological deficits which presented by words or pictures.
Other: standard patients
In group of standard patients with VRNET, the medical students examine the standard patient of neurologic deficits. When they examine, they get some information of neurologic signs via the VRNET which presents neurologic deficits directly by alternating facial expressions. The students should interpret that signs to have a diagnosis.
In group of standard patients, those neurological deficits are presented only by words or pictures which are not realistic.
Neurologic physical exam(NPE) score
NPE score is consist of 6 neurologic examination parts; cranial nerve, motor, sensory, cerebellar function, gait. Each part has 1 points, so NPE score ranges from 0 to 6. NPE score of students is evaluated by neurologist viewing video clips which recorded during the last day of 2 weeks clerkship rotation.
Time frame: after 2 weeks clinical clerkship rotation.
Satisfaction of students for VRNET
Satisfaction of VRNET are evaluated by students' answer to the question below with Likert scale (0 to 5) after completion examination of standard patient. "I am satisfied with VRNET for neurologic examination training. 0 (not at all)---1----2----3-----4-----5 (very helpful)"
Time frame: after 2 weeks clinical clerkship rotation.
Reality of VRNET by students
Reality of VRNET are evaluated by students' answer to the question below with Likert scale (0 to 5) after completion examination of standard patient. "VRNET is very realistic. 0 (not at all)---1----2----3-----4-----5 (very realistic)"
Time frame: after 2 weeks clinical clerkship rotation.
Evaluation of students by standardized patients
Evaluation of students by standard patients is also using Likert scale (0 to 5) based on the pre-made check lists. "How do you feel as a standard patient that the student did good job?" 0 (not at all)---1----2----3-----4-----5 (very competent)
Time frame: after 2 weeks clinical clerkship rotation.
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Yonsei University