CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03642574Updated Oct 4, 2022

Preimplantation DNA Methylation Test (PIMT) in ART

An interventional study of CNV in DNA Methylation, sponsored by Chen Zi-Jiang. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to female participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-04.

Sponsored by Chen Zi-Jiang · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
182
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this clinical trial is to determine the safety and effect of methylation level of DNA methylation in embryos on the outcome of assisted reproductive technology (ART) during blastocyst embryo screening. Subjects with blastocysts on day 5-7 of embryo culture will be biopsied. A Freeze-all strategy and a single frozen blastocyst transfer will be performed till all study-specific embryos have been transferred. Then whole genome bisulfate sequencing will be performed on all cells that obtained from biopsy.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this clinical trial is to determine the safety and affect of DNA methylation level on ART. Subjects with blastocysts on day 5-7 of embryo culture will be biopsied. A Freeze-all strategy and a single frozen blastocyst transfer will be performed till all study-specific embryos have been transferred. Then whole genome bisulfate sequencing will be performed on all cells that obtained from biopsy. The investigators will perform whole genome DNA methylation sequence for two to seven blastocysts from one couple. The methylation level and genomic copy number variation will be analyzed by using the methylome data. Embryos with aneuploid chromosomes will be rejected for embryo transfer to uterus. The study will examine which kind of methylation level can produce the best clinical outcome for ART. Biopsied cells will perform with preimplnatation DNA methylation test (PIMT). DNA methylation level and chromosome copy number variation will be calculated by using whole genome DNA methylation sequencing data. As we do not kown which kind of methylation state can produce the best outcome in ART practice. This study will try to find a standard of selection embryos according to DNA methylation information. Under current stage, the selection of embryo is according to chromosome copy number. The embryo selection will not consider DNA methylation information for this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • DNA Methylation

Keywords

  • Preimplantation Methylome Screening
  • Preimplantation Genetic Screening
  • single embryo transfer
  • cumulative live birth rate
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Chen Zi-Jiang is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Women who are participating in preimplantation screening with PGS indications,defined as maternal age above 38 years, repeated implantation failure (RIF) usually defined as three or more transfers of morphologically high-quality embryos without the establishment of pregnancy, recurrent miscarriage (RM) in patients with normal karyotypes (usually at least three previous consecutive miscarriages) and severe male factor infertility (usually defined as abnormal semen parameters).
  2. Women who obtain 2 or more good-quality blastocysts that defined as morphological score of inner cell mass B or A, trophectoderm C or better, and grade 4 or better on Day five of embryo culture will be randomized.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Women with a uterine cavity abnormality, such as a uterine congenital malformation (uterus unicornate, bicornate, or duplex); untreated uterine septum, adenomyosis, submucous myoma, or endometrial polyp(s); or with history of intrauterine adhesions.
  2. Women with untreated hydrosalpinx.
  3. Women who use donated oocytes or sperm to achieve pregnancy.
  4. Women with contraindication for assisted reproductive technology or for pregnancy, such as poorly controlled Type I or Type II diabetes; undiagnosed liver disease or dysfunction (based on serum liver enzyme testing); renal disease or abnormal serum renal function; significant anemia; history of deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolus, or cerebrovascular accident; uncontrolled hypertension, known symptomatic heart disease; history of or suspected cervical carcinoma, endometrial carcinoma, or breast carcinoma; undiagnosed vaginal bleeding.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
182 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PIMT methylation

    Subjects will have blastocyst biopsy and whole genome DNA methylation sequencing done with 2 or 7 good-quality embryos on Day 5 to 7. Principle of freeze-all and single thawed blastocyst transfer will be applied. Only embryos with euploid chromosome will be transfered to the uterus. The outcome of all euploids transfers within 1 year will be followed up. During study, every subject will have at most one live birth.

    Procedure: CNV

Interventions

  • ProcedureCNV

    Embryo with euploid chromosome will transfer to uterus. The order of transfer is accroding to morphological grade.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The effect of DNA methylation level on live birth rate

    The rate of live birth at different methylation level will be calculated. Live birth is defined as the delivery of any viable infant at 28 weeks or more of gestation, and cumulative live birth rate is calculated by dividing the number of women achieving live birth after transfers (up to 3 transfers of single blastocycst within 1 year).

    Time frame: 22 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. The effect of DNA methylation level on pregnant rate, pregnant loss rate.

    The rate of pregnant and pregnant loss at different methylation level will be calculated. Pregnancy loss refers to a complete spontaneous abortion or a nonviable pregnancy before 28 weeks of gestation.

    Time frame: 22 months

  2. Duration of pregnancy

    The time from the first day of last menstrual period to the day of delivery.

    Time frame: 22 months

  3. Birth weight

    Weight of newborns at delivery.

    Time frame: 22 months

  4. Cumulative incidence of maternal complications during whole

    Number of pregnancies with complications / number of pregnancies over (up to) 3 transfers within 1 year;

    Time frame: 22 months

  5. Cumulative incidence of neonatal complications during whole

    Number of live births with neonatal complications / number of live births over (up to)3 transfers within 1 year

    Time frame: 22 months

  6. Number of embryo transfers to achieve live birth

    Number of embryo transfers the patients have gone through to achieve live birth.

    Time frame: 22 months

Other outcomes

  1. Clinical pregnancy rate after the first transfer

    Number of women with clinical pregnancies after the first transfer / number of women.

    Time frame: 4 months

  2. Pregnancy loss rate after the first transfer

    Number of pregnancy losses / number of clinical pregnancies after the first transfer .

    Time frame: 9 months

  3. Live birth rate after the first transfer

    Number of women with live births after the first transfer / number of women.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Shandong University
    Jinan, Shandong, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Brezina PR, Kutteh WH. Clinical applications of preimplantation genetic testing. BMJ. 2015 Feb 19;350:g7611. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7611. PubMed 25697663 ↗
  • Hassold T, Chen N, Funkhouser J, Jooss T, Manuel B, Matsuura J, Matsuyama A, Wilson C, Yamane JA, Jacobs PA. A cytogenetic study of 1000 spontaneous abortions. Ann Hum Genet. 1980 Oct;44(2):151-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1980.tb00955.x. PubMed 7316468 ↗
  • Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, Audibert F; Genetics Committee; Wilson RD, Audibert F, Brock JA, Campagnolo C, Carroll J, Chong K, Gagnon A, Johnson JA, MacDonald W, Okun N, Pastuck M, Vallee-Pouliot K. RETIRED: Technical Update: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Screening. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 May;37(5):451-63. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(15)30261-9. PubMed 26168107 ↗
  • Kalousek DK, Pantzar T, Tsai M, Paradice B. Early spontaneous abortion: morphologic and karyotypic findings in 3,912 cases. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1993;29(1):53-61. No abstract available. PubMed 8280893 ↗
  • Smith ZD, Meissner A. DNA methylation: roles in mammalian development. Nat Rev Genet. 2013 Mar;14(3):204-20. doi: 10.1038/nrg3354. Epub 2013 Feb 12. PubMed 23400093 ↗
  • Jones PA. Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet. 2012 May 29;13(7):484-92. doi: 10.1038/nrg3230. PubMed 22641018 ↗
  • Jiang L, Zhang J, Wang JJ, Wang L, Zhang L, Li G, Yang X, Ma X, Sun X, Cai J, Zhang J, Huang X, Yu M, Wang X, Liu F, Wu CI, He C, Zhang B, Ci W, Liu J. Sperm, but not oocyte, DNA methylome is inherited by zebrafish early embryos. Cell. 2013 May 9;153(4):773-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.041. PubMed 23663777 ↗
  • Li G, Yu Y, Fan Y, Li C, Xu X, Duan J, Li R, Kang X, Ma X, Chen X, Ke Y, Yan J, Lian Y, Liu P, Zhao Y, Zhao H, Chen Y, Sun X, Liu J, Qiao J, Liu J. Genome wide abnormal DNA methylome of human blastocyst in assisted reproductive technology. J Genet Genomics. 2017 Oct 20;44(10):475-481. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 6. PubMed 29037989 ↗
  • Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Peterson HB, Jeng G, Burnett NM, Wilcox LS. Does assisted hatching pose a risk for monozygotic twinning in pregnancies conceived through in vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril. 2000 Aug;74(2):288-94. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00602-6. PubMed 10927046 ↗
  • Fiorentino F, Biricik A, Bono S, Spizzichino L, Cotroneo E, Cottone G, Kokocinski F, Michel CE. Development and validation of a next-generation sequencing-based protocol for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of embryos. Fertil Steril. 2014 May;101(5):1375-82. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.051. Epub 2014 Mar 6. PubMed 24613537 ↗
  • Shi Y, Sun Y, Hao C, Zhang H, Wei D, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Deng X, Qi X, Li H, Ma X, Ren H, Wang Y, Zhang D, Wang B, Liu F, Wu Q, Wang Z, Bai H, Li Y, Zhou Y, Sun M, Liu H, Li J, Zhang L, Chen X, Zhang S, Sun X, Legro RS, Chen ZJ. Transfer of Fresh versus Frozen Embryos in Ovulatory Women. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 11;378(2):126-136. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1705334. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 4;385(19):1824. doi: 10.1056/NEJMx190017. PubMed 29320646 ↗
  • Chen ZJ, Shi Y, Sun Y, Zhang B, Liang X, Cao Y, Yang J, Liu J, Wei D, Weng N, Tian L, Hao C, Yang D, Zhou F, Shi J, Xu Y, Li J, Yan J, Qin Y, Zhao H, Zhang H, Legro RS. Fresh versus Frozen Embryos for Infertility in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 11;375(6):523-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513873. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 17;375(20):2010. doi: 10.1056/NEJMx160029. PubMed 27509101 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 4, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03642574
Lead sponsor
Chen Zi-Jiang
Collaborators
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Responsible party
Chen Zi-Jiang (Professor, Shandong University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Aug 22, 2018
Start date
Sep 5, 2018
Primary completion
Aug 28, 2021
Completion
Jun 30, 2022
Last update
Oct 4, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion