ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03627767Updated Sep 20, 2021Results posted

Study to Investigate Efficacy and Safety of PF-04965842 in Subjects Aged 12 Years and Over With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis With the Option of Rescue Treatment in Flaring Subjects

A Phase 3 interventional study of PF-04965842 100 mg and PF-04965842 200 mg in Dermatitis, Dermatitis, Atopic and Eczema, sponsored by Pfizer. Completed at 235 sites in 21 countries. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-09-20.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,235
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

B7451014 is a Phase 3 study to investigate PF-04965842 in patients aged 12 years and over with a minimum body weight of 40 kg who have moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Subjects responding well to an initial open-label 12 week treatment of PF-04965842 (200 mg) taken orally once daily (QD) will be identified and randomized in a double-blind manner to receive 200 mg QD PF-04965842, 100 mg QD PF-04965842, or QD placebo. Efficacy and safety of 2 doses of PF-04965842 will be evaluated relative to placebo over 40 weeks. Subjects experiencing significant worsening of their symptoms, i.e., protocol-defined flare, enter 12 weeks rescue treatment and receive 200 mg PF-04965842 together with a marketed topical medicine. Eligible patients will have the option to enter a long-term extension study after completing the initial 12 week treatment, the 12 week rescue treatment, and the 40 week blinded treatment.

Read the detailed description

Responder criteria for randomization at week 12 are defined as a) achieving an IGA of clear (0) or almost clear (1) (on a 5 point scale), b) a reduction from IGA baseline of 2 or more points, and c) reaching an EASI-75 response compared to baseline. Flare requiring rescue treatment is defined as a loss of at least 50% of the EASI response at Week 12 and an IGA score of 2 or higher.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dermatitis
  • Dermatitis, Atopic
  • Eczema
  • Skin Diseases
  • Skin Diseases, Genetic
  • Genetic Diseases, Inborn
  • Skin Diseases, Eczematous
  • Hypersensitivity
  • Hypersensitivity, Immediate
  • Immune System Diseases

Keywords

  • atopic dermatitis
  • atopic eczema
  • eczema
  • JAK
  • janus kinase
03

In context

Dermatitis

238 studies on the registry are indexed under Dermatitis; 34 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,235 is above the median of 68 across 191 interventional studies indexed under Dermatitis.

Browse Dermatitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,334 studies on the registry; 149 are open to participants now.

Of its 601 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 391 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 12 years of age or older with a minimum body weight of 40 kg
  • Diagnosis of atopic dermatitis (AD) for at least 1 year and current status of moderate to severe disease (>= the following scores: BSA10%, IGA 3, EASI 16, Pruritus NRS 4)
  • Recent history of inadequate response or inability to tolerate topical AD treatments or require systemic treatments for AD control

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwilling to discontinue current AD medications prior to the study or require treatment with prohibited medications during the study
  • Prior treatment with JAK inhibitors
  • Other active nonAD inflammatory skin diseases or conditions affecting skin
  • Medical history including thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy or dysfunction, Q wave interval abnormalities, current or history of certain infections, cancer, lymphoproliferative disorders and other medical conditions at the discretion of the investigator
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women of who are unwilling to use
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,235 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PF-04965842 100 mg QD

    Double-blind randomized treatment following open label run-in period.

    Drug: PF-04965842 100 mg

  • Experimental
    PF-04965842 200 mg QD

    Double-blind randomized treatment following open label run-in period.

    Drug: PF-04965842 200 mg

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo QD

    Double-blind randomized treatment following open label run-in period.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • PF-04965842 100 mg, administered as two tablets to be taken orally once daily for 40 weeks

    Also known as: Abrocitinib

  • PF-04965842 200 mg, administered as two tablets to be taken orally once daily for 40 weeks

    Also known as: Abrocitinib

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo, administered as two tablets to be taken orally once daily for 40 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Loss of Response: Double-blind (DB) Period

    Percentage of participants with loss of response requiring rescue treatment during double blind period was determined. Loss of response denoted as flare and was define as a loss of at least 50% of EASI total score at Week 12 and with an IGA score of 2 or higher. EASI quantifies severity of participant's atopic dermatitis (AD) based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and % of body surface area (BSA) affected. EASI is a composite scoring by AD clinical evaluator of degree of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification for each of 4 body regions. EASI total score range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. IGA assesses severity of AD on 5-point scale (0 to 4, higher scores = more severity), reflecting global consideration of erythema, induration and scaling. Where, 0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.

    Time frame: From Day 1 of up to Week 40 of double blind period

  2. Time to Loss of Response: Double-blind Period

    Time (in days) to loss of response based on achieving IGA \>=2 was measured from date of first dose of randomized treatment until last dose of randomized treatment (if not entered rescue) or first day of rescue treatment (if entered rescue) and based on EASI, loss of at least 50% of EASI response at Week 12 and IGA score of 2 or higher. IGA assesses severity of AD on 5-point scale (0 to 4, higher scores=more severity), reflecting global consideration of erythema, induration and scaling with scores 0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe. EASI quantifies severity of AD based on severity of lesion clinical signs and % of BSA affected. EASI composite score evaluates degree of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification.

    Time frame: From date of first dose of randomized treatment until the last dose of randomized treatment (if not entered rescue) or first day of rescue treatment (if entered rescue) (maximum up to Week 40, visit window was extended +/- 45 Days due to COVID 19)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to First Loss of Response Based on Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 2 or Higher: Double-blind Period

    Time (in days) to loss of response based on achieving IGA \>=2 (for the first time) as measured from date of first dose of randomized treatment until the last dose of randomized treatment (if not entered rescue) or first day of rescue treatment (if entered rescue). IGA assesses severity of AD on a 5-point scale (0 to 4, higher scores indicated more severity), reflecting global consideration of erythema, induration and scaling. Where, 0 = clear, AD is cleared; 1 = almost clear, AD not entirely cleared, light pink residual lesions; 2 = mild, AD with light red lesions; 3 = moderate, AD with red lesions; 4 = severe, AD with deep, dark red lesions.

    Time frame: From date of first dose of randomized treatment until the last dose of randomized treatment (if not entered rescue) or first day of rescue treatment (if entered rescue) (maximum up to Week 40, visit window +/- 7 Days)

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and a Reduction of Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2 Points From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40, and 52: Double-blind Period

    IGA assessed severity of AD on a 5-point scale (0 to 4, higher scores indicated more severity), reflecting global consideration of erythema, induration and scaling. Where, 0 = clear, AD is cleared; 1 = almost clear, AD not entirely cleared, light pink residual lesions; 2 = mild, AD with light red lesions; 3 = moderate, AD with red lesions; 4 = severe, AD with deep dark red lesions.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Response >=50% Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

    EASI quantifies severity of participant's AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema \[E\], induration/papulation \[I\], excoriation \[Ex\] and lichenification \[L\]) was scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck \[h\], upper limbs \[u\], trunk \[t\] \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[l\] \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0 = absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score = 0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); where A = area score. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores = greater severity of AD.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Response >=75% Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

    EASI quantifies severity of participant's AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0 = absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score = 0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll). Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores = greater severity of AD.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Response >=90% Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

    EASI quantifies severity of participant's AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0 = absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score = 0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll). Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores=greater severity of AD.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52

  6. Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Response >=100% Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

    EASI quantifies severity of participant's AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll). Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores=greater severity of AD.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52

  7. Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal 4 Points Improvement in the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for Severity of Pruritus From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

    Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD over the past 24 hours on an NRS scale ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable), where higher scores indicated worse disease status.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52

  8. Percent Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

    4 body regions evaluated: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk (including axillae, groin/genitals), lower limbs (including buttocks) excluding scalp, palms, soles. BSA calculated by handprint method. Number (No) of handprints (size of participant's hand with fingers in closed position) fitting in affected area of a body region was estimated. Maximum No of handprints were 10, 20, 30, 40 for head and neck, upper limbs, trunk, and lower limbs respectively. Surface area (SA) of body region equivalent to 1 handprint: 1 handprint=10% for head and neck, 5% for upper limbs, 3.33% for trunk and 2.5% for lower limbs. %Change BSA for a body region was calculated as=total No of handprints in a body region\* %SA equivalent to 1 handprint. %BSA for an individual: arithmetic mean of %BSA of all 4 body regions, ranged from 0-100%, higher values=greater AD severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52

  9. Percent Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Total Score at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

    SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent (A), severity (B), subjective symptoms (C). A: rule of 9 used to calculate BSA affected by AD as % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; genitals 1%. Score of each body region added to determine A (0-100). B: severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3); severity scores added to give B (0-18). C: pruritus and sleep loss, each of these 2 were scored by participant/caregiver using VAS where, 0=no itch/no sleep loss and 10=worst imaginable itch/sleep loss, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleep loss added to give 'C' (0-20). SCORAD calculated as: A/5+7\*B/2+C; range (0-103); higher values=worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52

  10. Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Itch and Sleep Loss at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

    SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent (A), severity (B), subjective symptoms (C). A: rule of 9 used to calculate BSA affected by AD as % of whole BSA for each body region-head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; genitals 1%. Score of each body region added to determine A (0-100). B: severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3). Severity scores added to give B (0-18). C: pruritus and sleep loss, each were scored by participant/caregiver using VAS where, 0=no itch/no sleep loss and 10=worst imaginable itch/sleep loss, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleep loss added to give 'C' (0-20). SCORAD calculated as: A/5+7\*B/2+C; range (0-103); higher values=worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52

  11. Percentage of Participants With >=50% Improvement From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Response at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

    SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent (A), severity (B), subjective symptoms (C). A: rule of 9 used to calculate BSA affected by AD as % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; genitals 1%. Score of each body region added to determine A (0-100). B: severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3). Severity scores added to give B (0-18). C: pruritus and sleep loss, each were scored by participant/caregiver using VAS where, 0=no itch/no sleep loss and 10=worst imaginable itch/sleep loss, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleep loss added to give 'C' (0-20). SCORAD calculated as: A/5+7\*B/2+C; range (0-103); higher values=worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52

  12. Percentage of Participants With >=75% Improvement From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Response at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

    SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent (A), severity (B), subjective symptoms (C). A: rule of 9 used to calculate BSA affected by AD as % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; genitals 1%. Score of each body region added to determine A (0-100). B: severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3). Severity scores added to give B (0-18). C: pruritus and sleep loss, each were scored by participant/caregiver using VAS where, 0=no itch/no sleep loss and 10=worst imaginable itch/sleep loss, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleep loss added to give 'C' (0-20). SCORAD calculated as: A/5+7\*B/2+C; range (0-103); higher values=worse outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52

  13. Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Response of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2 Points Improvement From Rescue Baseline at Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Rescue Period

    IGA assessed severity of AD on a 5-point scale (0-4, higher scores indicated more severity), reflecting global consideration of erythema, induration and scaling. Where, 0=clear, AD is cleared; 1 = almost clear, AD not entirely cleared, light pink residual lesions; 2 = mild, AD with light red lesions; 3 = moderate, AD with red lesions; 4 = severe, AD with deep, dark red lesions.

    Time frame: Rescue Baseline: last observation collected between last dose of blinded treatment and Day 1 (first dose day) of rescue treatment, Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

  14. Percent Change From Rescue Baseline in Total Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Rescue Period

    EASI quantifies severity of participant's AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll). Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores=greater severity of AD.

    Time frame: Rescue Baseline: last observation collected between last dose of blinded treatment and Day 1 (first dose day) of rescue treatment, Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

  15. Percentage of Participants Achieving Greater Than or Equal to 4 Points Improvement From Rescue Baseline in Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS) at Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Rescue Period

    Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD over the past 24 hours on an NRS scale ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable), where higher scores indicated greater severity.

    Time frame: Rescue Baseline: last observation collected between last dose of blinded treatment and Day 1 (first dose day) of rescue treatment, Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

  16. Percent Change From Rescue Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) at Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Rescue Period

    4 body regions were evaluated: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk (including axillae and groin/genitals) and lower limbs (including buttocks). Scalp, palms and soles were excluded. BSA was calculated using handprint method. Number of handprints (size of participant's hand with fingers in a closed position) fitting in affected area of a body region was estimated. Maximum number of handprints were 10 for head and neck, 20 for upper limbs, 30 for trunk and 40 for lower limbs. Surface area of body region equivalent to 1 handprint: 1 handprint was equal to 10% for head and neck, 5% for upper limbs, 3.33% for trunk and 2.5% for lower limbs. Overall % BSA for an individual % BSA of all 4 body regions, ranged from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD.

    Time frame: Rescue Baseline: last observation collected between last dose of blinded treatment and Day 1 (first dose day) of rescue treatment, Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

  17. Percent Change From Rescue Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score of Itch and Sleep Loss at Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Rescue Period

    SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent (A), severity (B), subjective symptoms (C). A: rule of 9 used to calculate BSA affected by AD as % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; genitals 1%. Score of each body region added to determine A (0-100). B: severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3). Severity scores added to give B (0-18). C: pruritus and sleep loss, each were scored by participant/caregiver using VAS where, 0=no itch/no sleep loss and 10=worst imaginable itch/sleep loss, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleep loss added to give 'C' (0-20). SCORAD calculated as: A/5+7\*B/2+C; range (0-103); higher values=worse outcome.

    Time frame: Rescue Baseline: last observation collected between last dose of blinded treatment and Day 1 (first dose day) of rescue treatment, Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

  18. Percentage of Participants With 50% Improvement in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Rescue Baseline at Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Rescue Period

    SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent (A), severity (B), subjective symptoms (C). A: rule of 9 used to calculate BSA affected by AD as % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; genitals 1%. Score of each body region added to determine A (0-100). B: severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3). Severity scores added to give B (0-18). C: pruritus and sleep loss, each were scored by participant/caregiver using VAS where, 0=no itch/no sleep loss and 10=worst imaginable itch/sleep loss, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleep loss added to give 'C' (0-20). SCORAD calculated as: A/5+7\*B/2+C; range (0-103); higher values=worse outcome.

    Time frame: Rescue Baseline: last observation collected between last dose of blinded treatment and Day 1 (first dose day) of rescue treatment, Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

  19. Percentage of Participants With 75% Improvement in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Rescue Baseline at Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Rescue Period

    SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent (A), severity (B), subjective symptoms (C). A: rule of 9 used to calculate BSA affected by AD as % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; genitals 1%. Score of each body region added to determine A (0-100). B: severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3). Severity scores added to give B (0-18). C: pruritus and sleep loss, each were scored by participant/caregiver using VAS where, 0=no itch/no sleep loss and 10=worst imaginable itch/sleep loss, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleep loss added to give 'C' (0-20). SCORAD calculated as: A/5+7\*B/2+C; range (0-103); higher values=worse outcome.

    Time frame: Rescue Baseline: last observation collected between last dose of blinded treatment and Day 1 (first dose day) of rescue treatment, Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

  20. Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Response of 'Clear (0)' or 'Almost Clear (1)' and Greater Than or Equal to 2 Points Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

    Participant responded to the following question: "Overall, how would you describe your Atopic Dermatitis right now?" on a 5-point scale: 0= clear; 1= almost clear; 2= mild; 3= moderate; and 4= severe. Higher scores indicated more severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52

  21. Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score for Adults at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

    DLQI was a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale (range 0 to 3) where, 0 = not at all, 1= a little, 2= a lot, 3= very much, where higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life. Scores from all 10 questions were added up to give DLQI total score range from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of participants.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52

  22. Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score for Adolescents at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

    CDLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on adolescents (aged 12-17 years) quality of life over the last week. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale (range 0 to 3) where, 0 = not at all , 1 = only a little, 2 = quite a lot, 3 = very much, where higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life. Scores from all 10 questions were added up to give CDLQI total score range from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of children.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52

  23. Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Anxiety Scale at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

    HADS: participant rated 14-item questionnaire. HADS consisted of 2 subscales: HADS-Anxiety (HADS-A) scale and HADS-Depression (HADS-D) scale, both of these subscales comprised of 7 items each. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale, score range from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicates more anxiety/depression symptoms. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks). HADS-A: sum of all 7 items resulted in score range of 0 (no presence of anxiety) to 21 (severe feeling of anxiety); higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52

  24. Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Depression Scale at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

    HADS: participant rated 14-item questionnaire. HADS consisted of 2 subscales: HADS-A scale and HADS-D scale, both of these subscales comprised of 7 items each. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale, score range from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicates more anxiety/depression symptoms. HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). HADS-D: sum of all 7 items resulted in score range of 0 (no presence of depression) to 21 (severe feeling of depression); higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52

  25. Change From Baseline in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Score at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

    POEM was a 7-item participant reported outcome (PRO) measure used to assess the impact of AD (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) over the past week. Each item scored as following: no days = 0, 1-2 days = 1, 3-4 days = 2, 5-6 days = 3 and, every day = 4. The total POEM score ranges from 0 to 28, where higher score indicated greater severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52

  26. Change From Baseline in Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) Score at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

    PSAAD is a daily participant reported symptom electronic diary. Participants rated their symptoms of AD over the past 24 hours, using 11 items (itchy skin, painful skin, dry skin, flaky skin, cracked skin, bumpy skin, red skin, discolored skin \[darker or lighter\], bleeding from skin, seeping or oozing fluid from skin \[other than blood\], and skin swelling). Participants had to think about all the areas of their body affected by their skin condition and chose the number that best described their experience for each of the 11 items, from 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extreme symptoms), higher scores signified worse skin condition. Total PSAAD score = arithmetic mean of 11 items, 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extreme symptoms), where higher score = worse skin condition.

    Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52

07

Results

Posted Sep 20, 2021
Limitations and caveats
For outcome measure, Time to loss of response, the data collection window was extended for 45 days beyond the scheduled visit due to COVID 19.

Participant flow

Total 1235 participants were enrolled in 236 sites in 21 countries. Study started from 11 June 2018 and completed on 07 October 2020.

Open-label (OL) Run-in Period (12 Weeks)
Participant flow — Open-label (OL) Run-in Period (12 Weeks)
MilestonePF-04965842 200 mg OLPF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DBPF-04965842 200 mg Rescue Period
Started12350000
Treated12330000
Completed7980000
Not completed4370000
Withdrew: Adverse event480000
Withdrew: Death10000
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy3150000
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up130000
Withdrew: Protocol violation110000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject400000
Withdrew: Medication error without associated adverse event10000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by parent/guardian20000
Withdrew: Other40000
Withdrew: Randomized but not treated20000
Double-blind Treatment Period (40 Weeks)
Participant flow — Double-blind Treatment Period (40 Weeks)
MilestonePF-04965842 200 mg OLPF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DBPF-04965842 200 mg Rescue Period
Started02672652660
Participants entered rescue period0208109440
Completed after entering rescue period020199410
Completed without entering rescue period0431341870
Completed02512432310
Not completed01622350
Withdrew: Adverse event067190
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up00230
Withdrew: Protocol violation01520
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject096100
Withdrew: Withdrawal by parent/guardian00100
Withdrew: Other00110
Open-label Rescue Period (12 Weeks)
Participant flow — Open-label Rescue Period (12 Weeks)
MilestonePF-04965842 200 mg OLPF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DBPF-04965842 200 mg Rescue Period
Started0000361
Met protocol-defined flare criteria0000351
Completed0000341
Not completed000020
Withdrew: Adverse event00009
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up00001
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject00009
Withdrew: Other00001

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Participants With Loss of Response: Double-blind (DB) Period

Percentage of participants with loss of response requiring rescue treatment during double blind period was determined. Loss of response denoted as flare and was define as a loss of at least 50% of EASI total score at Week 12 and with an IGA score of 2 or higher. EASI quantifies severity of participant's atopic dermatitis (AD) based on both severity of lesion clinical signs and % of body surface area (BSA) affected. EASI is a composite scoring by AD clinical evaluator of degree of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification for each of 4 body regions. EASI total score range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of AD. IGA assesses severity of AD on 5-point scale (0 to 4, higher scores = more severity), reflecting global consideration of erythema, induration and scaling. Where, 0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate and 4 = severe.

Time frame:
From Day 1 of up to Week 40 of double blind period
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Loss of Response: Double-blind (DB) Period
percentage of participantsPF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB
Percentage of Participants With Loss of Response: Double-blind (DB) Period77.539.616.5
SecondaryTime to First Loss of Response Based on Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 2 or Higher: Double-blind Period

Time (in days) to loss of response based on achieving IGA \>=2 (for the first time) as measured from date of first dose of randomized treatment until the last dose of randomized treatment (if not entered rescue) or first day of rescue treatment (if entered rescue). IGA assesses severity of AD on a 5-point scale (0 to 4, higher scores indicated more severity), reflecting global consideration of erythema, induration and scaling. Where, 0 = clear, AD is cleared; 1 = almost clear, AD not entirely cleared, light pink residual lesions; 2 = mild, AD with light red lesions; 3 = moderate, AD with red lesions; 4 = severe, AD with deep, dark red lesions.

Time frame:
From date of first dose of randomized treatment until the last dose of randomized treatment (if not entered rescue) or first day of rescue treatment (if entered rescue) (maximum up to Week 40, visit window +/- 7 Days)
Reported as:
Median · days
Time to First Loss of Response Based on Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 2 or Higher: Double-blind Period
daysPF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB
Time to First Loss of Response Based on Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 2 or Higher: Double-blind Period27.0 ± 26.078.0 ± 32.0201.0 ± 177.0
Statistical analysis
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Log Rank · p = < 0.0001 (A stratified log-rank test with age group and disease severity as stratification variables was performed to evaluate P value.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.35 · 95% CI 0.286 to 0.424
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Log Rank · p = < 0.0001 (A stratified log-rank test with age group and disease severity as stratification variables was performed to evaluate P value.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.22 · 95% CI 0.176 to 0.270
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Log Rank · p = < 0.0001 (A stratified log-rank test with age group and disease severity as stratification variables was performed to evaluate P value.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.63 · 95% CI 0.503 to 0.780
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and a Reduction of Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2 Points From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40, and 52: Double-blind Period

IGA assessed severity of AD on a 5-point scale (0 to 4, higher scores indicated more severity), reflecting global consideration of erythema, induration and scaling. Where, 0 = clear, AD is cleared; 1 = almost clear, AD not entirely cleared, light pink residual lesions; 2 = mild, AD with light red lesions; 3 = moderate, AD with red lesions; 4 = severe, AD with deep dark red lesions.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Response of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and a Reduction of Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2 Points From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40, and 52: Double-blind Period
percentage of participantsPF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB
Week 1299.6 (98.9 to 100.0)99.6 (98.9 to 100.0)99.2 (98.2 to 100.0)
Week 1615.4 (11.0 to 19.7)55.5 (49.5 to 61.5)77.8 (72.8 to 82.8)
Week 2810.5 (6.8 to 14.2)45.0 (39.0 to 51.0)61.8 (55.9 to 67.7)
Week 4010.6 (6.9 to 14.3)42.3 (36.3 to 48.3)57.1 (51.1 to 63.2)
Week 5211.7 (7.9 to 15.6)36.8 (30.9 to 42.7)54.1 (48.0 to 60.2)
Statistical analysis
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = = 0.9495 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 0.0 · 95% CI -1.0 to 1.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = = 0.5717 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: -0.4 · 95% CI -1.6 to 0.9
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: -0.4 · 95% CI -1.7 to 0.9
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata) · Difference in percentage: 40.5 · 95% CI 33.1 to 47.8
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 62.6 · 95% CI 56.1 to 69.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 22.1 · 95% CI 14.3 to 29.9
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 35.1 · 95% CI 28.1 to 42.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 51.5 · 95% CI 44.6 to 58.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 16.5 · 95% CI 8.1 to 24.8
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 32.2 · 95% CI 25.2 to 39.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 46.9 · 95% CI 39.9 to 53.8
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 14.2 · 95% CI 5.9 to 22.6
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 25.5 · 95% CI 18.5 to 32.5
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 42.5 · 95% CI 35.3 to 49.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 17.1 · 95% CI 8.6 to 25.5
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Response >=50% Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

EASI quantifies severity of participant's AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema \[E\], induration/papulation \[I\], excoriation \[Ex\] and lichenification \[L\]) was scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck \[h\], upper limbs \[u\], trunk \[t\] \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[l\] \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0 = absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score = 0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll); where A = area score. Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores = greater severity of AD.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Response >=50% Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period
percentage of participantsPF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB
Week 12100.0 (98.6 to 100.0)100.0 (98.6 to 100.0)100.0 (98.6 to 100.0)
Week 1640.8 (34.9 to 46.7)83.3 (78.8 to 87.8)96.2 (94.0 to 98.5)
Week 2822.8 (17.8 to 27.9)68.1 (62.4 to 73.7)85.9 (81.7 to 90.1)
Week 4016.6 (12.1 to 21.1)57.3 (51.3 to 63.3)74.9 (69.6 to 80.2)
Week 5215.9 (11.5 to 20.3)50.8 (44.7 to 56.9)71.2 (65.7 to 76.7)
Statistical analysis
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Difference in percentage: 0.0 · 95% CI 0.0 to 0.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 0.0 · 95% CI 0.0 to 0.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 0.0 · 95% CI 0.0 to 0.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 42.7 · 95% CI 35.3 to 50.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 55.4 · 95% CI 49.1 to 61.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 12.9 · 95% CI 7.9 to 17.9
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 45.5 · 95% CI 37.9 to 53.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 63.0 · 95% CI 56.4 to 69.5
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 17.7 · 95% CI 10.7 to 24.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 41.0 · 95% CI 33.6 to 48.5
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 58.3 · 95% CI 51.3 to 65.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 17.5 · 95% CI 9.6 to 25.5
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 35.3 · 95% CI 27.8 to 42.8
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 55.3 · 95% CI 48.3 to 62.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 20.3 · 95% CI 12.1 to 28.5
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Response >=75% Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

EASI quantifies severity of participant's AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0 = absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score = 0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll). Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores = greater severity of AD.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Response >=75% Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period
percentage of participantsPF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB
Week 1299.2 (98.2 to 100.0)100.0 (98.6 to 100.0)99.6 (98.9 to 100.0)
Week 1627.0 (21.6 to 32.3)76.0 (70.9 to 81.2)92.5 (89.3 to 95.7)
Week 2818.0 (13.4 to 22.6)60.4 (54.4 to 66.3)80.5 (75.7 to 85.3)
Week 4015.1 (10.8 to 19.4)54.2 (48.2 to 60.3)71.8 (66.3 to 77.3)
Week 5214.0 (9.8 to 18.2)46.5 (40.4 to 52.6)65.8 (60.0 to 71.6)
Statistical analysis
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = = 0.1848 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 0.7 · 95% CI -0.3 to 1.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = = 0.5971 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 0.3 · 95% CI -0.9 to 1.6
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: -0.4 · 95% CI -1.1 to 0.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 49.4 · 95% CI 42.0 to 56.8
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 65.5 · 95% CI 59.3 to 71.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 16.3 · 95% CI 10.3 to 22.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 42.7 · 95% CI 35.2 to 50.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 62.6 · 95% CI 56.0 to 69.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 19.8 · 95% CI 12.3 to 27.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 39.5 · 95% CI 32.1 to 46.9
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 56.7 · 95% CI 49.8 to 63.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 17.4 · 95% CI 9.3 to 25.5
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 33.0 · 95% CI 25.7 to 40.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 51.7 · 95% CI 44.6 to 58.8
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 19.2 · 95% CI 10.8 to 27.6
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Response >=90% Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

EASI quantifies severity of participant's AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0 = absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score = 0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll). Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores=greater severity of AD.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Response >=90% Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period
percentage of participantsPF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB
Week 1284.6 (80.2 to 88.9)87.1 (83.1 to 91.2)86.4 (82.3 to 90.5)
Week 1613.9 (9.7 to 18.0)51.3 (45.3 to 57.4)77.1 (72.0 to 82.1)
Week 2810.5 (6.8 to 14.2)46.9 (40.9 to 53.0)64.5 (58.7 to 70.3)
Week 4012.1 (8.2 to 16.0)41.5 (35.5 to 47.5)58.7 (52.7 to 64.7)
Week 5210.6 (6.9 to 14.3)37.6 (31.7 to 43.5)54.5 (48.4 to 60.6)
Statistical analysis
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = = 0.3994 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 2.6 · 95% CI -3.3 to 8.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = = 0.5542 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 1.8 · 95% CI -4.1 to 7.8
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: -0.8 · 95% CI -6.5 to 5.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 37.5 · 95% CI 30.2 to 44.9
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 63.3 · 95% CI 56.8 to 69.8
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 25.5 · 95% CI 17.7 to 33.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 36.9 · 95% CI 29.9 to 44.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 54.2 · 95% CI 47.3 to 61.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 17.2 · 95% CI 8.9 to 25.5
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 29.8 · 95% CI 22.7 to 37.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 46.7 · 95% CI 39.6 to 53.8
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 16.9 · 95% CI 8.5 to 25.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 27.4 · 95% CI 20.4 to 34.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 43.8 · 95% CI 36.7 to 50.9
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 16.8 · 95% CI 8.4 to 25.2
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Response >=100% Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

EASI quantifies severity of participant's AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll). Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores=greater severity of AD.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Response >=100% Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period
percentage of participantsPF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB
Week 1230.5 (24.9 to 36.0)30.3 (24.8 to 35.8)28.3 (22.9 to 33.7)
Week 163.7 (1.5 to 6.0)15.2 (10.9 to 19.5)28.9 (23.5 to 34.4)
Week 284.1 (1.7 to 6.5)16.5 (12.0 to 21.1)30.2 (24.6 to 35.7)
Week 404.5 (2.0 to 7.0)15.8 (11.3 to 20.2)30.1 (24.5 to 35.7)
Week 524.5 (2.0 to 7.1)18.6 (13.9 to 23.4)28.8 (23.3 to 34.3)
Statistical analysis
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = = 0.9313 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 0.3 · 95% CI -7.5 to 8.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = = 0.6043 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: -2.1 · 95% CI -9.8 to 5.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: -2.3 · 95% CI -10.0 to 5.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 11.6 · 95% CI 6.6 to 16.5
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 25.3 · 95% CI 19.4 to 31.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 13.5 · 95% CI 6.6 to 20.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 12.9 · 95% CI 7.7 to 18.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 26.0 · 95% CI 19.9 to 32.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 13.4 · 95% CI 6.3 to 20.6
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 11.7 · 95% CI 6.5 to 16.8
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 25.7 · 95% CI 19.6 to 31.8
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 14.1 · 95% CI 7.0 to 21.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 14.6 · 95% CI 9.2 to 20.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 24.5 · 95% CI 18.4 to 30.5
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 10.0 · 95% CI 2.7 to 17.2
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal 4 Points Improvement in the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for Severity of Pruritus From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD over the past 24 hours on an NRS scale ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable), where higher scores indicated worse disease status.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal 4 Points Improvement in the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for Severity of Pruritus From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period
percentage of participantsPF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB
Week 1282.2 (77.2 to 87.1)84.0 (79.3 to 88.6)81.9 (76.9 to 86.9)
Week 1615.9 (11.4 to 20.4)54.6 (48.4 to 60.7)75.6 (70.3 to 80.9)
Week 2811.6 (7.7 to 15.5)45.0 (38.9 to 51.2)66.9 (61.0 to 72.8)
Week 4010.1 (6.4 to 13.8)39.4 (33.4 to 45.4)55.7 (49.5 to 61.9)
Week 528.3 (4.9 to 11.7)27.6 (21.7 to 33.6)49.0 (42.2 to 55.9)
Statistical analysis
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = = 0.6082 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 1.8 · 95% CI -5.0 to 8.5
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = = 0.9640 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 0.2 · 95% CI -6.7 to 7.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: -2.4 · 95% CI -9.1 to 4.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 38.9 · 95% CI 31.2 to 46.5
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 59.7 · 95% CI 52.7 to 66.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 20.9 · 95% CI 12.7 to 29.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 33.9 · 95% CI 26.6 to 41.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 55.3 · 95% CI 48.2 to 62.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 21.7 · 95% CI 13.2 to 30.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 29.7 · 95% CI 22.7 to 36.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 45.5 · 95% CI 38.4 to 52.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 16.0 · 95% CI 7.4 to 24.6
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 19.9 · 95% CI 13.0 to 26.8
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 40.5 · 95% CI 32.8 to 48.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 20.9 · 95% CI 11.8 to 30.0
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

4 body regions evaluated: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk (including axillae, groin/genitals), lower limbs (including buttocks) excluding scalp, palms, soles. BSA calculated by handprint method. Number (No) of handprints (size of participant's hand with fingers in closed position) fitting in affected area of a body region was estimated. Maximum No of handprints were 10, 20, 30, 40 for head and neck, upper limbs, trunk, and lower limbs respectively. Surface area (SA) of body region equivalent to 1 handprint: 1 handprint=10% for head and neck, 5% for upper limbs, 3.33% for trunk and 2.5% for lower limbs. %Change BSA for a body region was calculated as=total No of handprints in a body region\* %SA equivalent to 1 handprint. %BSA for an individual: arithmetic mean of %BSA of all 4 body regions, ranged from 0-100%, higher values=greater AD severity.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Reported as:
Median · percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period
percent changePF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB
Change at Week 12-95.6 (-100.0 to -88.5)-96.7 (-100.0 to -91.5)-96.7 (-100.0 to -89.2)
Change at Week 16-68.5 (-89.8 to -37.5)-90.9 (-97.6 to -78.3)-96.3 (-100.0 to -88.7)
Change at Week 28-85.2 (-95.8 to -63.5)-93.8 (-99.5 to -81.4)-96.4 (-100.0 to -85.7)
Change at Week 40-91.2 (-100.0 to -77.9)-95.8 (-100.0 to -83.5)-96.8 (-100.0 to -88.8)
Change at Week 52-91.5 (-100.0 to -77.9)-96.9 (-100.0 to -83.4)-96.9 (-100.0 to -88.2)
SecondaryPercent Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Total Score at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent (A), severity (B), subjective symptoms (C). A: rule of 9 used to calculate BSA affected by AD as % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; genitals 1%. Score of each body region added to determine A (0-100). B: severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3); severity scores added to give B (0-18). C: pruritus and sleep loss, each of these 2 were scored by participant/caregiver using VAS where, 0=no itch/no sleep loss and 10=worst imaginable itch/sleep loss, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleep loss added to give 'C' (0-20). SCORAD calculated as: A/5+7\*B/2+C; range (0-103); higher values=worse outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Reported as:
Median · percent change
Percent Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Total Score at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period
percent changePF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB
Change at Week 12-84.0 (-94.7 to -73.5)-84.4 (-95.2 to -74.9)-84.4 (-93.8 to -74.2)
Change at Week 16-50.4 (-68.3 to -32.1)-71.7 (-87.8 to -60.5)-83.6 (-95.1 to -70.6)
Change at Week 28-63.4 (-81.9 to -48.3)-77.8 (-90.2 to -62.6)-83.8 (-97.4 to -66.4)
Change at Week 40-74.4 (-89.5 to -60.6)-77.1 (-94.1 to -64.3)-84.6 (-98.6 to -68.4)
Change at Week 52-73.3 (-89.8 to -58.0)-82.5 (-97.7 to -64.1)-83.2 (-100.0 to -69.1)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Itch and Sleep Loss at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent (A), severity (B), subjective symptoms (C). A: rule of 9 used to calculate BSA affected by AD as % of whole BSA for each body region-head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; genitals 1%. Score of each body region added to determine A (0-100). B: severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3). Severity scores added to give B (0-18). C: pruritus and sleep loss, each were scored by participant/caregiver using VAS where, 0=no itch/no sleep loss and 10=worst imaginable itch/sleep loss, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleep loss added to give 'C' (0-20). SCORAD calculated as: A/5+7\*B/2+C; range (0-103); higher values=worse outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of Itch and Sleep Loss at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period
units on a scalePF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB
Pruritus VAS: Change at Week 12-6.1 (-6.3 to -5.9)-6.1 (-6.3 to -5.9)-6.1 (-6.3 to -5.9)
Pruritus VAS: Change at Week 163.4 (3.0 to 3.7)1.2 (1.0 to 1.5)0.2 (-0.1 to 0.4)
Pruritus VAS: Change at Week 282.4 (1.9 to 2.9)1.1 (0.8 to 1.4)0.5 (0.3 to 0.8)
Pruritus VAS: Change at Week 402.2 (1.6 to 2.8)1.2 (0.9 to 1.6)0.4 (0.1 to 0.7)
Pruritus VAS: Change at Week 521.8 (1.2 to 2.4)1.3 (0.9 to 1.6)0.5 (0.2 to 0.8)
Sleep Loss VAS: Change at Week 12-5.0 (-5.2 to -4.8)-5.0 (-5.2 to -4.8)-5.1 (-5.3 to -4.9)
Sleep Loss VAS: Change at Week 162.3 (2.0 to 2.6)0.5 (0.3 to 0.8)0.0 (-0.2 to 0.2)
Sleep Loss VAS: Change at Week 281.3 (0.9 to 1.7)0.6 (0.4 to 0.9)0.2 (0.0 to 0.4)
Sleep Loss VAS: Change at Week 401.3 (0.8 to 1.8)0.6 (0.3 to 0.9)0.2 (0.0 to 0.4)
Sleep Loss VAS: Change at Week 521.2 (0.7 to 1.8)0.9 (0.5 to 1.2)0.3 (0.0 to 0.5)
Statistical analysis
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.9207 · Lsm difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -0.3 to 0.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.9998 · Lsm difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -0.3 to 0.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -0.3 to 0.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -2.1 · 95% CI -2.5 to -1.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -3.2 · 95% CI -3.6 to -2.8
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -1.1 · 95% CI -1.4 to -0.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -1.4 · 95% CI -2.0 to -0.8
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -1.9 · 95% CI -2.5 to -1.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -0.5 · 95% CI -0.9 to -0.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.0039 · Lsm difference: -1.0 · 95% CI -1.7 to -0.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -1.8 · 95% CI -2.5 to -1.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -0.8 · 95% CI -1.3 to -0.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.1488 · Lsm difference: -0.5 · 95% CI -1.2 to 0.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.0003 · Lsm difference: -1.3 · 95% CI -2.0 to -0.6
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -0.8 · 95% CI -1.2 to -0.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.9294 · Lsm difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -0.2 to 0.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.4081 · Lsm difference: -0.1 · 95% CI -0.3 to 0.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -0.1 · 95% CI -0.3 to 0.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -1.8 · 95% CI -2.1 to -1.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -2.3 · 95% CI -2.7 to -2.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -0.6 · 95% CI -0.9 to -0.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.0035 · Lsm difference: -0.7 · 95% CI -1.2 to -0.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -1.2 · 95% CI -1.6 to -0.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -0.5 · 95% CI -0.8 to -0.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.0136 · Lsm difference: -0.7 · 95% CI -1.2 to -0.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -1.1 · 95% CI -1.6 to -0.6
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -0.4 · 95% CI -0.8 to 0.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.2887 · Lsm difference: -0.3 · 95% CI -1.0 to 0.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.0025 · Lsm difference: -1.0 · 95% CI -1.6 to -0.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -0.6 · 95% CI -1.0 to -0.2
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With >=50% Improvement From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Response at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent (A), severity (B), subjective symptoms (C). A: rule of 9 used to calculate BSA affected by AD as % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; genitals 1%. Score of each body region added to determine A (0-100). B: severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3). Severity scores added to give B (0-18). C: pruritus and sleep loss, each were scored by participant/caregiver using VAS where, 0=no itch/no sleep loss and 10=worst imaginable itch/sleep loss, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleep loss added to give 'C' (0-20). SCORAD calculated as: A/5+7\*B/2+C; range (0-103); higher values=worse outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With >=50% Improvement From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Response at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period
percentage of participantsPF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB
Week 1297.4 (95.4 to 99.3)98.5 (97.0 to 100.0)97.0 (94.9 to 99.0)
Week 1625.6 (20.3 to 30.8)72.0 (66.6 to 77.4)89.1 (85.4 to 92.8)
Week 2815.8 (11.4 to 20.2)56.8 (50.7 to 62.8)75.7 (70.5 to 80.9)
Week 4014.4 (10.2 to 18.6)51.2 (45.1 to 57.2)69.0 (63.3 to 74.6)
Week 5214.8 (10.5 to 19.1)44.6 (38.5 to 50.6)65.8 (60.0 to 71.6)
Statistical analysis
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = = 0.4244 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 1.0 · 95% CI -1.4 to 3.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = = 0.8092 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: -0.3 · 95% CI -3.1 to 2.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: -1.5 · 95% CI -4.1 to 1.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 46.7 · 95% CI 39.2 to 54.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 63.6 · 95% CI 57.2 to 70.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 17.0 · 95% CI 10.4 to 23.5
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 41.3 · 95% CI 33.9 to 48.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 59.9 · 95% CI 53.1 to 66.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 18.7 · 95% CI 10.8 to 26.6
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 37.0 · 95% CI 29.6 to 44.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 54.6 · 95% CI 47.6 to 61.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 17.7 · 95% CI 9.4 to 26.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 30.0 · 95% CI 22.6 to 37.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 50.9 · 95% CI 43.8 to 58.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 21.1 · 95% CI 12.8 to 29.5
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With >=75% Improvement From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Response at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent (A), severity (B), subjective symptoms (C). A: rule of 9 used to calculate BSA affected by AD as % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; genitals 1%. Score of each body region added to determine A (0-100). B: severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3). Severity scores added to give B (0-18). C: pruritus and sleep loss, each were scored by participant/caregiver using VAS where, 0=no itch/no sleep loss and 10=worst imaginable itch/sleep loss, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleep loss added to give 'C' (0-20). SCORAD calculated as: A/5+7\*B/2+C; range (0-103); higher values=worse outcome.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With >=75% Improvement From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Response at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period
percentage of participantsPF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB
Week 1273.6 (68.3 to 78.9)75.0 (69.8 to 80.2)71.3 (65.9 to 76.8)
Week 169.4 (5.9 to 12.9)38.3 (32.4 to 44.1)67.3 (61.7 to 72.9)
Week 287.5 (4.3 to 10.7)37.8 (31.9 to 43.7)56.3 (50.3 to 62.3)
Week 408.3 (5.0 to 11.7)32.7 (27.0 to 38.4)47.7 (41.6 to 53.8)
Week 527.6 (4.4 to 10.8)31.8 (26.1 to 37.5)45.9 (39.8 to 52.0)
Statistical analysis
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = = 0.7232 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 1.4 · 95% CI -6.1 to 8.8
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = = 0.5694 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: -2.2 · 95% CI -9.8 to 5.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: -3.7 · 95% CI -11.2 to 3.8
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 29.0 · 95% CI 22.2 to 35.8
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 57.9 · 95% CI 51.2 to 64.5
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 28.9 · 95% CI 20.8 to 37.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 30.5 · 95% CI 23.9 to 37.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 48.9 · 95% CI 42.1 to 55.6
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 18.2 · 95% CI 9.8 to 26.6
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 25.0 · 95% CI 18.4 to 31.5
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 39.6 · 95% CI 32.7 to 46.5
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 14.5 · 95% CI 6.3 to 22.8
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 24.7 · 95% CI 18.1 to 31.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 38.5 · 95% CI 31.6 to 45.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 13.9 · 95% CI 5.6 to 22.3
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving IGA Response of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2 Points Improvement From Rescue Baseline at Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Rescue Period

IGA assessed severity of AD on a 5-point scale (0-4, higher scores indicated more severity), reflecting global consideration of erythema, induration and scaling. Where, 0=clear, AD is cleared; 1 = almost clear, AD not entirely cleared, light pink residual lesions; 2 = mild, AD with light red lesions; 3 = moderate, AD with red lesions; 4 = severe, AD with deep, dark red lesions.

Time frame:
Rescue Baseline: last observation collected between last dose of blinded treatment and Day 1 (first dose day) of rescue treatment, Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA Response of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) and Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2 Points Improvement From Rescue Baseline at Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Rescue Period
percentage of participantsPF-04965842 200 mg Rescue Period
Rescue Week 230.7 (25.8 to 35.7)
Rescue Week 454.6 (49.3 to 59.9)
Rescue Week 860.2 (55.0 to 65.4)
Rescue Week 1264.1 (59.0 to 69.2)
SecondaryPercent Change From Rescue Baseline in Total Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Rescue Period

EASI quantifies severity of participant's AD (excluded scalp, palms, soles) based on severity of AD clinical signs and % of BSA affected. Severity of clinical signs of AD (erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification) scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\] and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) on 4-point scale: 0= absent; 1= mild; 2= moderate; 3= severe. EASI area score was based upon % BSA with AD in body region: 0 (0%), 1 (\>0 to \<10%), 2 (10 to \<30%), 3 (30 to \<50%), 4 (50 to \<70%), 5 (70 to \<90%) and 6 (90 to 100%). Total EASI score =0.1\*Ah\*(Eh+Ih+Exh+Lh) + 0.2\*Au\*(Eu+Iu+ExU+Lu) + 0.3\*At\*(Et+It+Ext+Lt) + 0.4\*Al\*(El+Il+Exl+Ll). Total EASI score ranged from 0.0 to 72.0, higher scores=greater severity of AD.

Time frame:
Rescue Baseline: last observation collected between last dose of blinded treatment and Day 1 (first dose day) of rescue treatment, Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percent change
Percent Change From Rescue Baseline in Total Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score at Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Rescue Period
percent changePF-04965842 200 mg Rescue Period
Change at Rescue Week 2-71.1 ± -73.7
Change at Rescue Week 4-82.0 ± -84.2
Change at Rescue Week 8-86.4 ± -88.2
Change at Rescue Week 12-87.3 ± -89.4
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Greater Than or Equal to 4 Points Improvement From Rescue Baseline in Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS) at Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Rescue Period

Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to AD over the past 24 hours on an NRS scale ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable), where higher scores indicated greater severity.

Time frame:
Rescue Baseline: last observation collected between last dose of blinded treatment and Day 1 (first dose day) of rescue treatment, Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Greater Than or Equal to 4 Points Improvement From Rescue Baseline in Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS) at Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Rescue Period
percentage of participantsPF-04965842 200 mg Rescue Period
Rescue Week 256.6 (50.7 to 62.5)
Rescue Week 463.2 (57.2 to 69.2)
Rescue Week 867.2 (61.4 to 73.0)
Rescue Week 1256.2 (48.3 to 64.1)
SecondaryPercent Change From Rescue Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) at Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Rescue Period

4 body regions were evaluated: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk (including axillae and groin/genitals) and lower limbs (including buttocks). Scalp, palms and soles were excluded. BSA was calculated using handprint method. Number of handprints (size of participant's hand with fingers in a closed position) fitting in affected area of a body region was estimated. Maximum number of handprints were 10 for head and neck, 20 for upper limbs, 30 for trunk and 40 for lower limbs. Surface area of body region equivalent to 1 handprint: 1 handprint was equal to 10% for head and neck, 5% for upper limbs, 3.33% for trunk and 2.5% for lower limbs. Overall % BSA for an individual % BSA of all 4 body regions, ranged from 0 to 100%, with higher values representing greater severity of AD.

Time frame:
Rescue Baseline: last observation collected between last dose of blinded treatment and Day 1 (first dose day) of rescue treatment, Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percent change
Percent Change From Rescue Baseline in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) at Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Rescue Period
percent changePF-04965842 200 mg Rescue Period
Change at Rescue Week 2-62.8 (-66.0 to -59.6)
Change at Rescue Week 4-76.4 (-79.1 to -73.7)
Change at Rescue Week 8-82.1 (-84.5 to -79.6)
Change at Rescue Week 12-83.3 (-86.0 to -80.5)
SecondaryPercent Change From Rescue Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score of Itch and Sleep Loss at Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Rescue Period

SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent (A), severity (B), subjective symptoms (C). A: rule of 9 used to calculate BSA affected by AD as % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; genitals 1%. Score of each body region added to determine A (0-100). B: severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3). Severity scores added to give B (0-18). C: pruritus and sleep loss, each were scored by participant/caregiver using VAS where, 0=no itch/no sleep loss and 10=worst imaginable itch/sleep loss, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleep loss added to give 'C' (0-20). SCORAD calculated as: A/5+7\*B/2+C; range (0-103); higher values=worse outcome.

Time frame:
Rescue Baseline: last observation collected between last dose of blinded treatment and Day 1 (first dose day) of rescue treatment, Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · percent change
Percent Change From Rescue Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score of Itch and Sleep Loss at Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Rescue Period
percent changePF-04965842 200 mg Rescue Period
Pruritus VAS: Change at Rescue Week 2-57.3 ± -61.7
Pruritus VAS: Change at Rescue Week 4-67.5 ± -71.3
Pruritus VAS: Change at Rescue Week 8-68.6 ± -73.6
Pruritus VAS: Change at Rescue Week 12-67.3 ± -72.8
Sleep Loss VAS: Change at Rescue Week 2-62.5 ± -69.1
Sleep Loss VAS: Change at Rescue Week 4-72.4 ± -78.6
Sleep Loss VAS: Change at Rescue Week 8-75.8 ± -82.0
Sleep Loss VAS: Change at Rescue Week 12-74.5 ± -81.4
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With 50% Improvement in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Rescue Baseline at Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Rescue Period

SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent (A), severity (B), subjective symptoms (C). A: rule of 9 used to calculate BSA affected by AD as % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; genitals 1%. Score of each body region added to determine A (0-100). B: severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3). Severity scores added to give B (0-18). C: pruritus and sleep loss, each were scored by participant/caregiver using VAS where, 0=no itch/no sleep loss and 10=worst imaginable itch/sleep loss, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleep loss added to give 'C' (0-20). SCORAD calculated as: A/5+7\*B/2+C; range (0-103); higher values=worse outcome.

Time frame:
Rescue Baseline: last observation collected between last dose of blinded treatment and Day 1 (first dose day) of rescue treatment, Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With 50% Improvement in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Rescue Baseline at Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Rescue Period
percentage of participantsPF-04965842 200 mg Rescue Period
Rescue Week 255.0 (49.6 to 60.3)
Rescue Week 476.1 (71.6 to 80.6)
Rescue Week 879.6 (75.3 to 83.9)
Rescue Week 1279.8 (75.5 to 84.1)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With 75% Improvement in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Rescue Baseline at Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Rescue Period

SCORAD: scoring index for AD combining extent (A), severity (B), subjective symptoms (C). A: rule of 9 used to calculate BSA affected by AD as % of whole BSA for each body region- head and neck 9%; upper limbs 9% each; lower limbs 18% each; anterior trunk 18%; back 18%; genitals 1%. Score of each body region added to determine A (0-100). B: severity of each sign (erythema; edema; oozing; excoriation; skin thickening; dryness) was assessed as none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3). Severity scores added to give B (0-18). C: pruritus and sleep loss, each were scored by participant/caregiver using VAS where, 0=no itch/no sleep loss and 10=worst imaginable itch/sleep loss, higher scores=worse symptoms. Scores for itch and sleep loss added to give 'C' (0-20). SCORAD calculated as: A/5+7\*B/2+C; range (0-103); higher values=worse outcome.

Time frame:
Rescue Baseline: last observation collected between last dose of blinded treatment and Day 1 (first dose day) of rescue treatment, Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With 75% Improvement in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Rescue Baseline at Rescue Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Rescue Period
percentage of participantsPF-04965842 200 mg Rescue Period
Rescue Week 216.9 (12.9 to 21.0)
Rescue Week 433.9 (28.9 to 39.0)
Rescue Week 844.4 (39.1 to 49.7)
Rescue Week 1245.4 (40.1 to 50.7)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Achieving Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Response of 'Clear (0)' or 'Almost Clear (1)' and Greater Than or Equal to 2 Points Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

Participant responded to the following question: "Overall, how would you describe your Atopic Dermatitis right now?" on a 5-point scale: 0= clear; 1= almost clear; 2= mild; 3= moderate; and 4= severe. Higher scores indicated more severity.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Response of 'Clear (0)' or 'Almost Clear (1)' and Greater Than or Equal to 2 Points Improvement From Baseline at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period
percentage of participantsPF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB
Week 1261.7 (55.7 to 67.7)64.5 (58.7 to 70.3)59.7 (53.7 to 65.7)
Week 165.9 (3.0 to 8.8)29.8 (24.2 to 35.3)48.3 (42.2 to 54.3)
Week 286.3 (3.3 to 9.3)30.9 (25.3 to 36.5)46.9 (40.8 to 53.0)
Week 407.5 (4.3 to 10.8)26.1 (20.7 to 31.4)42.0 (35.9 to 48.1)
Week 527.6 (4.3 to 10.8)25.8 (20.4 to 31.1)39.7 (33.6 to 45.8)
Statistical analysis
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = = 0.4815 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 3.0 · 95% CI -5.3 to 11.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = = 0.6748 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: -1.8 · 95% CI -10.3 to 6.6
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: -5.1 · 95% CI -13.4 to 3.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 24.0 · 95% CI 17.8 to 30.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 42.3 · 95% CI 35.6 to 49.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 18.4 · 95% CI 10.2 to 26.6
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 24.6 · 95% CI 18.2 to 31.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 40.5 · 95% CI 33.7 to 47.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 15.9 · 95% CI 7.6 to 24.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 18.8 · 95% CI 12.6 to 25.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 34.5 · 95% CI 27.6 to 41.5
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 15.6 · 95% CI 7.5 to 23.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 18.7 · 95% CI 12.4 to 25.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = < 0.0001 (P-value was adjusted by disease severity at baseline and randomization strata.) · Difference in percentage: 32.3 · 95% CI 25.4 to 39.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Difference in percentage: 13.7 · 95% CI 5.6 to 21.7
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score for Adults at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

DLQI was a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale (range 0 to 3) where, 0 = not at all, 1= a little, 2= a lot, 3= very much, where higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life. Scores from all 10 questions were added up to give DLQI total score range from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of participants.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score for Adults at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period
units on a scalePF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB
Change at Week 12-13.5 ± -13.9-13.4 ± -13.8-13.5 ± -14.0
Change at Week 166.9 ± 6.11.9 ± 1.20.4 ± -0.2
Change at Week 286.1 ± 5.02.1 ± 1.40.9 ± 0.3
Change at Week 404.4 ± 3.02.5 ± 1.71.1 ± 0.5
Change at Week 523.6 ± 2.12.8 ± 2.00.9 ± 0.2
Statistical analysis
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.7373 · Lsm difference: 0.1 · 95% CI -0.5 to 0.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.8092 · Lsm difference: -0.1 · 95% CI -0.7 to 0.5
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -0.2 · 95% CI -0.8 to 0.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -5.1 · 95% CI -6.1 to -4.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -6.6 · 95% CI -7.6 to -5.5
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -1.5 · 95% CI -2.4 to -0.6
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -4.0 · 95% CI -5.3 to -2.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -5.2 · 95% CI -6.4 to -3.9
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -1.2 · 95% CI -2.1 to -0.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.0150 · Lsm difference: -1.9 · 95% CI -3.5 to -0.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -3.2 · 95% CI -4.7 to -1.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -1.3 · 95% CI -2.3 to -0.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.3616 · Lsm difference: -0.8 · 95% CI -2.4 to 0.9
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.0012 · Lsm difference: -2.7 · 95% CI -4.3 to -1.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -1.9 · 95% CI -3.0 to -0.8
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score for Adolescents at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

CDLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures the impact of skin disease on adolescents (aged 12-17 years) quality of life over the last week. Each question was evaluated on a 4-point scale (range 0 to 3) where, 0 = not at all , 1 = only a little, 2 = quite a lot, 3 = very much, where higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life. Scores from all 10 questions were added up to give CDLQI total score range from 0 (not at all) to 30 (very much). Higher scores indicated more impact on quality of life of children.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) Score for Adolescents at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period
units on a scalePF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB
Change at Week 12-9.8 ± -10.6-9.2 ± -10.0-9.3 ± -10.2
Change at Week 165.9 ± 4.41.7 ± 0.5-0.3 ± -1.4
Change at Week 281.5 ± -0.21.6 ± 0.60.4 ± -0.5
Change at Week 402.1 ± 0.31.7 ± 0.70.0 ± -0.9
Change at Week 522.3 ± 0.31.3 ± 0.00.4 ± -0.6
Statistical analysis
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.3339 · Lsm difference: 0.6 · 95% CI -0.6 to 1.8
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.4653 · Lsm difference: 0.5 · 95% CI -0.8 to 1.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -0.1 · 95% CI -1.3 to 1.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -4.3 · 95% CI -6.2 to -2.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -6.2 · 95% CI -8.2 to -4.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -2.0 · 95% CI -3.6 to -0.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.9083 · Lsm difference: 0.1 · 95% CI -1.8 to 2.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.2439 · Lsm difference: -1.1 · 95% CI -3.0 to 0.8
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -1.2 · 95% CI -2.6 to 0.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.7405 · Lsm difference: -0.3 · 95% CI -2.4 to 1.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.0410 · Lsm difference: -2.1 · 95% CI -4.1 to -0.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -1.7 · 95% CI -3.1 to -0.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.4026 · Lsm difference: -1.0 · 95% CI -3.5 to 1.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.0944 · Lsm difference: -1.9 · 95% CI -4.2 to 0.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -0.9 · 95% CI -2.5 to 0.7
PrimaryTime to Loss of Response: Double-blind Period

Time (in days) to loss of response based on achieving IGA \>=2 was measured from date of first dose of randomized treatment until last dose of randomized treatment (if not entered rescue) or first day of rescue treatment (if entered rescue) and based on EASI, loss of at least 50% of EASI response at Week 12 and IGA score of 2 or higher. IGA assesses severity of AD on 5-point scale (0 to 4, higher scores=more severity), reflecting global consideration of erythema, induration and scaling with scores 0 = clear; 1 = almost clear; 2 = mild; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe. EASI quantifies severity of AD based on severity of lesion clinical signs and % of BSA affected. EASI composite score evaluates degree of erythema, induration/papulation, excoriation, and lichenification.

Time frame:
From date of first dose of randomized treatment until the last dose of randomized treatment (if not entered rescue) or first day of rescue treatment (if entered rescue) (maximum up to Week 40, visit window was extended +/- 45 Days due to COVID 19)
Reported as:
Median · days
Time to Loss of Response: Double-blind Period
daysPF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB
Time to Loss of Response: Double-blind Period28.0 (28.0 to 29.0)323.0 (282.0 to 323.0)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Log Rank · p = < 0.0001 (A stratified log-rank test with age group and disease severity as stratification variables was performed to evaluate p-value.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.27 · 95% CI 0.211 to 0.341
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Log Rank · p = < 0.0001 (A stratified log-rank test with age group and disease severity as stratification variables was performed to evaluate P value.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.10 · 95% CI 0.070 to 0.136
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Log Rank · p = < 0.0001 (A stratified log-rank test with age group and disease severity as stratification variables was performed to evaluate P value.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.36 · 95% CI 0.255 to 0.516
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Anxiety Scale at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

HADS: participant rated 14-item questionnaire. HADS consisted of 2 subscales: HADS-Anxiety (HADS-A) scale and HADS-Depression (HADS-D) scale, both of these subscales comprised of 7 items each. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale, score range from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicates more anxiety/depression symptoms. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks). HADS-A: sum of all 7 items resulted in score range of 0 (no presence of anxiety) to 21 (severe feeling of anxiety); higher score indicating greater severity of anxiety.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Anxiety Scale at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period
units on a scalePF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB
Change at Week 12-2.7 ± -3.0-2.6 ± -2.9-2.6 ± -2.9
Change at Week 161.4 ± 1.00.3 ± 0.00.0 ± -0.3
Change at Week 281.0 ± 0.50.4 ± 0.10.1 ± -0.2
Change at Week 401.0 ± 0.40.4 ± 0.10.1 ± -0.3
Change at Week 520.8 ± 0.20.4 ± 0.10.2 ± -0.1
Statistical analysis
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.7556 · Lsm difference: 0.1 · 95% CI -0.4 to 0.6
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.7484 · Lsm difference: 0.1 · 95% CI -0.4 to 0.6
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -0.5 to 0.5
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -1.1 · 95% CI -1.6 to -0.6
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -1.4 · 95% CI -1.9 to -0.9
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -0.3 · 95% CI -0.7 to 0.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.0242 · Lsm difference: -0.6 · 95% CI -1.2 to -0.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.0012 · Lsm difference: -0.9 · 95% CI -1.4 to -0.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -0.3 · 95% CI -0.6 to 0.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.1240 · Lsm difference: -0.6 · 95% CI -1.3 to 0.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.0107 · Lsm difference: -0.9 · 95% CI -1.6 to -0.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -0.3 · 95% CI -0.8 to 0.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.3139 · Lsm difference: -0.4 · 95% CI -1.1 to 0.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.0853 · Lsm difference: -0.6 · 95% CI -1.3 to 0.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -0.2 · 95% CI -0.7 to 0.2
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Depression Scale at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

HADS: participant rated 14-item questionnaire. HADS consisted of 2 subscales: HADS-A scale and HADS-D scale, both of these subscales comprised of 7 items each. Each item was rated on a 4-point scale, score range from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicates more anxiety/depression symptoms. HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). HADS-D: sum of all 7 items resulted in score range of 0 (no presence of depression) to 21 (severe feeling of depression); higher score indicating greater severity of depression symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Depression Scale at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period
units on a scalePF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB
Change at Week 12-2.0 ± -2.3-1.6 ± -1.9-1.7 ± -2.0
Change at Week 161.4 ± 1.00.0 ± -0.30.0 ± -0.2
Change at Week 280.7 ± 0.20.3 ± 0.00.1 ± -0.2
Change at Week 400.8 ± 0.2-0.1 ± -0.40.2 ± -0.1
Change at Week 520.4 ± -0.1-0.1 ± -0.40.1 ± -0.2
Statistical analysis
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.0674 · Lsm difference: 0.4 · 95% CI 0.0 to 0.8
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.1437 · Lsm difference: 0.3 · 95% CI -0.1 to 0.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -0.1 · 95% CI -0.5 to 0.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -1.4 · 95% CI -1.8 to -0.9
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -1.4 · 95% CI -1.8 to -0.9
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -0.4 to 0.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.1136 · Lsm difference: -0.4 · 95% CI -1.0 to 0.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.0276 · Lsm difference: -0.6 · 95% CI -1.1 to -0.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -0.2 · 95% CI -0.5 to 0.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.0108 · Lsm difference: -0.9 · 95% CI -1.5 to -0.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.0677 · Lsm difference: -0.6 · 95% CI -1.3 to 0.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: 0.3 · 95% CI -0.2 to 0.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.1320 · Lsm difference: -0.5 · 95% CI -1.1 to 0.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.2975 · Lsm difference: -0.3 · 95% CI -0.9 to 0.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: 0.2 · 95% CI -0.2 to 0.6
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Score at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

POEM was a 7-item participant reported outcome (PRO) measure used to assess the impact of AD (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) over the past week. Each item scored as following: no days = 0, 1-2 days = 1, 3-4 days = 2, 5-6 days = 3 and, every day = 4. The total POEM score ranges from 0 to 28, where higher score indicated greater severity.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Score at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period
units on a scalePF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB
Change at Week 12-15.4 ± -16.0-15.8 ± -16.4-15.4 ± -16.0
Change at Week 169.8 ± 8.93.7 ± 3.00.6 ± -0.1
Change at Week 288.3 ± 6.93.7 ± 2.81.6 ± 0.8
Change at Week 407.4 ± 5.84.8 ± 3.91.9 ± 1.1
Change at Week 527.3 ± 5.44.9 ± 3.82.2 ± 1.3
Statistical analysis
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.3531 · Lsm difference: -0.4 · 95% CI -1.3 to 0.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.9282 · Lsm difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -0.8 to 0.9
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: 0.4 · 95% CI -0.4 to 1.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -6.1 · 95% CI -7.3 to -5.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -9.2 · 95% CI -10.3 to -8.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -3.1 · 95% CI -4.0 to -2.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -4.6 · 95% CI -6.2 to -2.9
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -6.7 · 95% CI -8.3 to -5.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -2.1 · 95% CI -3.3 to -0.9
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.0082 · Lsm difference: -2.6 · 95% CI -4.5 to -0.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -5.5 · 95% CI -7.4 to -3.6
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -2.9 · 95% CI -4.2 to -1.6
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.0313 · Lsm difference: -2.4 · 95% CI -4.5 to -0.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -5.1 · 95% CI -7.1 to -3.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -2.7 · 95% CI -4.1 to -1.3
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) Score at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period

PSAAD is a daily participant reported symptom electronic diary. Participants rated their symptoms of AD over the past 24 hours, using 11 items (itchy skin, painful skin, dry skin, flaky skin, cracked skin, bumpy skin, red skin, discolored skin \[darker or lighter\], bleeding from skin, seeping or oozing fluid from skin \[other than blood\], and skin swelling). Participants had to think about all the areas of their body affected by their skin condition and chose the number that best described their experience for each of the 11 items, from 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extreme symptoms), higher scores signified worse skin condition. Total PSAAD score = arithmetic mean of 11 items, 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (extreme symptoms), where higher score = worse skin condition.

Time frame:
Baseline, Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Pruritus and Symptoms Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (PSAAD) Score at Weeks 12, 16, 28, 40 and 52: Double-blind Period
units on a scalePF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB
Change at Week 12-4.1 ± -4.3-4.2 ± -4.4-4.2 ± -4.4
Change at Week 162.1 ± 1.90.8 ± 0.60.1 ± -0.1
Change at Week 282.3 ± 2.01.0 ± 0.80.1 ± -0.1
Change at Week 402.0 ± 1.71.0 ± 0.80.3 ± 0.0
Change at Week 521.9 ± 1.51.2 ± 0.90.2 ± 0.0
Statistical analysis
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.4832 · Lsm difference: -0.1 · 95% CI -0.4 to 0.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.6553 · Lsm difference: -0.1 · 95% CI -0.3 to 0.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: 0.0 · 95% CI -0.2 to 0.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -1.3 · 95% CI -1.5 to -1.1
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -2.0 · 95% CI -2.2 to -1.7
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -0.7 · 95% CI -0.9 to -0.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -1.3 · 95% CI -1.7 to -1.0
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -2.2 · 95% CI -2.5 to -1.8
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -0.8 · 95% CI -1.1 to -0.5
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -1.0 · 95% CI -1.4 to -0.6
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -1.8 · 95% CI -2.2 to -1.4
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -0.8 · 95% CI -1.1 to -0.5
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = = 0.0020 · Lsm difference: -0.8 · 95% CI -1.2 to -0.3
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Mixed Models Analysis · p = < 0.0001 · Lsm difference: -1.7 · 95% CI -2.2 to -1.2
  • PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB vs PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB · Lsm difference: -0.9 · 95% CI -1.3 to -0.6

Adverse events

Collected over From screening up to 28 days after last dose of study treatment (maximum up to Week 56). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
PF-04965842 200 mg OL1/1,233 (0.1%)20/1,233 (1.6%)482/1,233 (39.1%)
PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DB0/267 (0%)3/267 (1.1%)158/267 (59.2%)
PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DB0/265 (0%)9/265 (3.4%)130/265 (49.1%)
PF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DB0/266 (0%)14/266 (5.3%)152/266 (57.1%)
PF-04965842 200 mg Rescue Period0/351 (0%)4/351 (1.1%)75/351 (21.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 40
Most frequent serious events
EventPF-04965842 200 mg OLPF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DBPF-04965842 200 mg Rescue Period
Dermatitis atopicSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3/12330/2671/2651/2662/351
Retinal vein thrombosisEye disorders0/12330/2671/2650/2660/351
MyositisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/12330/2671/2650/2660/351
HypokalaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/12330/2671/2650/2660/351
Eczema herpeticumInfections and infestations0/12330/2671/2651/2660/351
PharyngitisInfections and infestations1/12330/2671/2650/2661/351
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/12331/2671/2650/2660/351
Papillary thyroid cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/12330/2671/2650/2660/351
Chest painGeneral disorders1/12330/2671/2650/2660/351
Vitello-intestinal duct remnantCongenital, familial and genetic disorders0/12330/2670/2651/2660/351
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPF-04965842 200 mg OLPF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DBPF-04965842 200 mg Rescue Period
Dermatitis atopicSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders45/123388/26756/26536/26613/351
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders199/123344/26735/26549/26612/351
HeadacheNervous system disorders119/123331/26724/26531/26612/351
AcneSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders68/123319/26722/26531/2667/351
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations77/123326/26727/26528/26617/351
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations63/123326/26722/26522/26621/351
Blood creatine phosphokinase increasedInvestigations43/123311/26718/26525/2669/351
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders42/12337/26712/26515/2664/351

Baseline characteristics

Full analysis set-randomized (FAS-RA) included as all participants who were randomized at Week 12 and received at least 1 dose of study medication within Double-blind (DB) phase.

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DBTotal
<18 years494947145
Between 18 and 65 years210206207623
>=65 years8101230
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DBTotal
Female126117116359
Male141148150439
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DBTotal
Hispanic or Latino656252179
Not Hispanic or Latino200203214617
Unknown or Not Reported2002
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PF-04965842 200 mg OL to Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 100 mg+Placebo DBPF-04965842 200 mg OL to PF-04965842 200 mg DBTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native4217
Asian384145124
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American1491033
White209208204621
More than one race23510
Unknown or Not Reported0213
08

Study locations

235 sites
  • Total Skin and Beauty Dermatology Center, PC
    Birmingham, Alabama 35205, United States
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham, Dermatology at the Whitaker Clinic
    Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
  • Clinical Research Center of Alabama, LLC
    Birmingham, Alabama 35244, United States
  • Tien Q Nguyen MD Inc dba First OC Dermatology
    Fountain Valley, California 92708, United States
  • Center for Dermatology Clinical Research, Inc.
    Fremont, California 94538, United States
  • Beach Allergy and Asthma Specialty Group, A Medical Corporation
    Long Beach, California 90808, United States
  • Dermatology Specialists, Inc.
    Oceanside, California 92056, United States
  • University of California San Diego
    San Diego, California 92122, United States
  • San Luis Dermatology and Laser Clinic
    San Luis Obispo, California 93405, United States
  • Southern California Dermatology, Inc.
    Santa Ana, California 92701, United States
  • Mosaic Dermatology
    Santa Monica, California 90403, United States
  • Bay Pines VAHCS
    Bay Pines, Florida 33744, United States
  • Skin Care Research, LLC
    Boca Raton, Florida 33486, United States
  • Skin Research Institute
    Coral Gables, Florida 33146, United States
  • Baumann Cosmetic and Research Institute
    Miami, Florida 33137, United States
  • Park Avenue Dermatology
    Orange Park, Florida 32073, United States
  • USF Asthma, Allergy & Immunology Clinical Research Unit
    Tampa, Florida 33613, United States
  • Emory University
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Dermatologic Surgery Specialists, PC
    Macon, Georgia 31217, United States
  • Midwest Allergy Sinus Asthma, SC
    Normal, Illinois 61761, United States
  • NorthShore University HealthSystem Dermatology Clinical Trials Unit
    Skokie, Illinois 60077, United States
  • Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group, LLC
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46250, United States
  • Ds Research
    New Albany, Indiana 47150, United States
  • The Indiana Clinical Trials Center
    Plainfield, Indiana 46168, United States
  • Kansas City Dermatology, P.A.
    Overland Park, Kansas 66215, United States
  • DXP Imaging
    Louisville, Kentucky 40216, United States
  • Skin Sciences PLLC
    Louisville, Kentucky 40217, United States
  • Qualmedica Research, LLC
    Owensboro, Kentucky 42301, United States
  • Owensboro Dermatology Associates
    Owensboro, Kentucky 42303, United States
  • Meridian Clinical Research, LLC
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808, United States
  • Tulane University Health Sciences Center
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, United States
  • Tufts Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02111, United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • MediSearch Clinical Trials
    Saint Joseph, Missouri 64506, United States
  • Saint Louis University Dermatology
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63104, United States
  • Forest Hills Dermatology Group
    Kew Gardens, New York 11374, United States
  • Juva Skin and Laser Center
    New York, New York 10022, United States
  • UR Dermatology at College Town
    Rochester, New York 14620, United States
  • M3 - Wake Research, Inc.
    Raleigh, North Carolina 27612, United States
  • Bexley Dermatology Research
    Bexley, Ohio 43209, United States
  • Lynn Health Science Institute
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73112, United States
  • Newton Clinical Research
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73120, United States
  • Oregon Medical Research Center
    Portland, Oregon 97223, United States
  • Paddington Testing Co, Inc.
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103, United States
  • Health Concepts
    Rapid City, South Dakota 57702, United States
  • Dermatology Treatment & Research Center, PA
    Dallas, Texas 75230, United States
  • Innovate Research, LLC
    Fort Worth, Texas 76244, United States
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Ventavia Research Group Hurst
    Hurst, Texas 76054, United States
  • Virginia Clinical Research, Inc
    Norfolk, Virginia 23502, United States
  • Dermatology Associates of Seattle
    Seattle, Washington 98101, United States
  • Dermatology Specialists of Spokane
    Spokane, Washington 99202, United States
  • Framingham Centro Medico
    La Plata, Buenos Aires B1902COS, Argentina
  • Hospital Universitario Austral
    Pilar, Buenos Aires B1629ODT, Argentina
  • Servicio de Investigacion de Patolog-ias Alergicas del Instituto ABC
    Rosario, Santa FE 2000, Argentina
  • CINME Centro de Investigaciones Metabolicas
    C.a.b.a., C1027AAP, Argentina
  • Buenos Aires Skin
    C.a.b.a., C1055AAO, Argentina
  • Psoriahue Medicina Interdisciplinaria
    C.a.b.a, C1425DKG, Argentina
  • University Hospital Brussels
    Brussels, 1090, Belgium
  • Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
    Brussels, 1200, Belgium
  • University Hospital Antwerp
    Edegem, 2650, Belgium
  • CETI - Centro de Estudos em Terapias Inovadoras LTDA.
    Curitiba, PR 80030-110, Brazil
  • Instituto de Dermatologia e Estética do Brasil LTDA
    Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22470-220, Brazil
  • Hospital De Clinicas De Porto Alegre
    Porto Alegre, RS 90035-003, Brazil
  • Associacao dos Funcionarios Públicos do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul - Hospital Ernesto Dornelles
    Porto Alegre, RS 90160-093, Brazil
  • Pesquisare Saude S/S Ltda
    Santo Andre, SP 09.080-110, Brazil
  • Fundacao do ABC - Faculdade de Medicina do ABC
    Santo Andre, SP 09060-870, Brazil
  • IBPClin Pesquisa Clinica
    Rio de Janeiro, 20241-180, Brazil
  • MC Asklepii" OOD
    Dupnitsa, 2600, Bulgaria
  • MHAT "Dr. Tota Venkova" AD
    Gabrovo, 5300, Bulgaria
  • "Center of skin-venereal diseases" EOOD, Sofia
    Sofia, 1404, Bulgaria
  • "DCC Fokus-5-Medical Establishment for OutpatientCare"EOOD
    Sofia, 1463, Bulgaria
  • "Mc Sinexus Sofia" Eood
    Sofia, 1784, Bulgaria
  • ACIBADEM City Clinic Diagnostic-Consultative Center EOOD
    Sofia, 1784, Bulgaria
  • "ACIBADEM City Clinic Medical Center Varna" EOOD
    Varna, 9000, Bulgaria
  • Dermatology Research Institute
    Calgary, Alberta T1Y0B4, Canada
  • Stratica Medical
    Edmonton, Alberta T5K 1X3, Canada
  • Alberta Dermasurgery Center
    Edmonton, Alberta T6G1C3, Canada
  • Wiseman Dermatology Research Inc.
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3M 3Z4, Canada
  • Karma Clinical Trials, Inc.
    St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador A1A 4Y3, Canada
  • CCA Medical Research
    Ajax, Ontario L1S 7K8, Canada
  • SimcoDerm Medical and Surgical Dermatology Center
    Barrie, Ontario L4M 7G1, Canada
  • Lynderm Research Inc.
    Markham, Ontario L3P 1X2, Canada
  • DermEdge Research
    Mississauga, Ontario L5H 1G9, Canada
  • Dermatology Ottawa Research Centre
    Ottawa, Ontario K2C 3N2, Canada
  • SKiN Centre for Dermatology
    Peterborough, Ontario K9J 5K2, Canada
  • Office of Dr. Paul Adam
    Scarborough, Ontario M1B 4Z8, Canada
  • AvantDerm
    Toronto, Ontario M5A 3R6, Canada
  • K. Papp Clinical Research
    Waterloo, Ontario N2J 1C4, Canada
  • XLR8 Medical Research Inc.
    Windsor, Ontario N8W 1E6, Canada
  • Centre de Recherche Dermatologique du Quebec Metropolitain (CRDQ)
    Quebec, G1V 4X7, Canada
  • Centro Medico SkinMed Limitada
    Santiago, Region Metropolitana 7580206, Chile
  • Clinica Dermacross S.A.
    Santiago, Region Metropolitana 7640881, Chile
  • Centro Internacional de Estudios Clinicos - CIEC
    Santiago, Region Metropolitana 8420383, Chile
  • Hospital Clinico Universidad de Chile
    Santiago, Región Metropolitana 8380456, Chile
  • Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University
    Beijing, Beijing 100050, China
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, PLA
    Chongqing, Chongqing 400037, China
  • The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510080, China
  • The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China
  • The University of Hong Kong - Shenzhen Hospital
    Shenzhen, Guangdong 518053, China

Showing the first 100 of 235 sites across 21 countries. Choose a country and city above to see the rest.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Wojciechowski J, Malhotra BK, Wang X, Fostvedt L, Valdez H, Nicholas T. Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of platelet time-courses following administration of abrocitinib. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Aug;88(8):3856-3871. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15334. Epub 2022 Apr 11. PubMed 35342978 ↗
  • Simpson EL, Silverberg JI, Nosbaum A, Winthrop KL, Guttman-Yassky E, Hoffmeister KM, Egeberg A, Valdez H, Zhang M, Farooqui SA, Romero W, Thorpe AJ, Rojo R, Johnson S. Integrated Safety Analysis of Abrocitinib for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis From the Phase II and Phase III Clinical Trial Program. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021 Sep;22(5):693-707. doi: 10.1007/s40257-021-00618-3. Epub 2021 Aug 18. Erratum In: Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021 Nov;22(6):905. doi: 10.1007/s40257-021-00638-z. PubMed 34406619 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

Data sharing details ↗ · www.pfizer.com

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jun 2018 to primary completion in Sep 2020, 26 months.

Results were first posted in Sep 2021, 1 year after primary completion.

Of 28 industry-sponsored phase 3 interventional studies under Dermatitis, half reached primary completion within 20 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 28. This study's 26 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 29 studies reached it within 20 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 35.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 29, 2018
First posted
Aug 13, 2018
StartActual
Jun 11, 2018
Primary completionActual
Sep 2, 2020
CompletionActual
Oct 7, 2020
Results first posted
Sep 20, 2021
Last update
Sep 20, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 20, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03627767
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 13, 2018
Start date
Jun 11, 2018
Primary completion
Sep 2, 2020
Completion
Oct 7, 2020
Results posted
Sep 20, 2021
Last update
Sep 20, 2021

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Abrocitinib

Start the discussion