An interventional study of Spaced learning in Mass Learning, Spaced Learning, Microsurgery, sponsored by Hand & Reconstructive Microsurgery. Completed. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 26 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-08-10.
Sponsored by Hand & Reconstructive Microsurgery · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
Title: Randomized prospective study comparing the effectiveness of spaced learning to mass learning in microsurgical procedures.
Background:
Spacing phenomenon occurs when learning outcomes are greater with the teaching process spread out over time (spaced learning), as opposed to having the same total duration of teaching carried out over a single session (mass learning). Spaced learning has been shown to improve explicit memory tasks including free recall, recognition, cued -recall and frequency estimation. It has been used in various medical specialties with promising results and has been shown to be at least as good as mass training in learning clinical skills such as cardio-pulmonary resuscitation and laparoscopy skills.
We aim to test the concept of spaced learning in learning delicate and complex skilled procedures like microsurgery. Our hypothesis is that spaced learning is better than mass learning in acquiring microsurgical suturing skills.
Methodology:
Medical students with no prior exposure to microsurgical training were randomized into control (mass-learning) and treatment (spaced learning) groups. The students were all taught to handle microsurgical instruments and to suture a prefabricated 4mm wide elastic strip under the microscope using Digital Surgicals MicroTrainer. The control group was taught continuously over 8hrs while the treatment group was taught in 2-hour sessions held each week over a span of 4 weeks. The learning outcomes that were measured included duration taken as well as the placement of the sutures in relation to each other, with the latter being objectively assessed with the use of a computer program from Digital Surgicals. In addition to being assessed at the beginning of the sessions, all participants completed another test 1 month after the completion of the sessions.
This is the only study on the registry with Hand & Reconstructive Microsurgery as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants underwent an eight-hour microsurgery training course in a single session under the mass-learning format.
Participants underwent two-hour microsurgery training sessions every week for a total of 4 sessions under the spaced learning format.
Other: Spaced learning
Instead of learning over a single session, teaching is carried out over a few weekly sessions but maintaining the overall total number of hours spent on teaching
Duration
Duration taken to place pre-determined number of sutures on elastic strip
Time frame: For the mass learning group, at the end of the 1-day teaching session; for the spaced learning group, at the end of 1 month of teaching sessions.
Suture density and alignment
Another primary outcome measure is the objective scoring of the placement of sutures using a computer program from Digital Surgicals. In particular, the alignment and spacing of the sutures in relation to each other were assessed.
Time frame: For the mass learning group, at the end of the 1-day teaching session; for the spaced learning group, at the end of 1 month of teaching sessions.
Retention of skills - assessing duration
Duration taken to place pre-determined number of sutures on elastic strip - to assess retention of skills at 1 month after the completion of teaching sessions.
Time frame: 1 month after the end of the final teaching session
Retention of skills - assessing suture density and alignment
Assess retention of skills by assessing the suture density and alignment at 1 month after the completion of teaching sessions.
Time frame: 1 month after the end of the final teaching session
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.