CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03619486Updated Feb 1, 2021

Low Energy Shock Wave for the Treatment of Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome (IC/BPS)

An interventional study of Low energy shock wave and Placebo in Interstitial Cystitis, sponsored by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-01.

Sponsored by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
49
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To investigate the efficacy and safety of LESW on participants with IC/BPS

Read the detailed description

Low energy shock wave (LESW) is known to facilitate tissue regeneration with analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. LESW has been proved to have therapeutic effects in patients with nonbacterial prostatitis and chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS). Investigator's previous study has demonstrated that LESW treatment inhibited nerve growth factor (NGF), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression, and blocked the bladder pain, inflammation and overactivity in a cyclophosphamide induced cystitis model in rats. These findings suggest that a potential clinical benefit of LESW treatment for patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS).

A total of 50 participants with IC/BPS will be enrolled to receive LESW (transcutaneous applied to the suprapubic bladder region with 2000 shocks, frequency of 3 pulses per second and maximum total energy flow density 0.25 millijoule/mm2) once a week for 4 weeks or placebo (same condition but with no energy) treatment.

All participants should have IC symptoms for at least 6 months, and have received cystoscopy to rule out other bladder lesion. Participants should not have urinary tract infection (UTI) in recent 3 months, and no urinary tract stone. Participants should not receive intravesical hyaluronic acid treatment in recent 3 months, or intravesical Botox injection in recent 12 months. Retreatment with LESW at 3 months if participants reports ineffective.

Primary end-point is the change of the O'Leary-Sant symptom score (OSS), including Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index (ICSI) and Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index (ICPI) from baseline to 1 month after treatment. Secondary endpoints include Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), daily frequency, nocturia and functional bladder capacity (FBC) as record in 3-day voiding diary, maximum flow rate (Qmax), voided volume, postvoiding residual (PVR) and global response assessment (GRA). Two visits are required at baseline screening (before first treatment), treatment (V1), 1 week (V2), 2 weeks (V3), 3 weeks (V4) and 1 week post V4 treatment (V5), 1 month post V4 treatment (V6, primary end-point), and 3 months post V4 treatment (V7) . Urine samples will be collected at each time-point for NGF and cytokines tests. Bladder biopsy will be performed at baseline and repeat cystoscopy at 3 months post treatment optional.

02

Conditions studied

  • Interstitial Cystitis

Keywords

  • Low Energy Shock Wave (LESW)
  • Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy
  • interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS)
03

In context

Cystitis

235 studies on the registry are indexed under Cystitis; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 49 is below the median of 60 across 170 interventional studies indexed under Cystitis.

Browse Cystitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,064 studies on the registry; 235 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adults with age of 20 years old or above
  2. Patients with symptoms of unpleasant sensation (pain, pressure, discomfort) perceived to be related to the urinary bladder, associated with lower urinary tract symptoms of more than six months duration, in the absence of infection or other identifiable causes
  3. Patients has received cystoscopy and ruled out other bladder lesion
  4. Free of active urinary tract infection
  5. Free of bladder outlet obstruction on enrollment
  6. Free of overt neurogenic bladder dysfunction and limitation of ambulation
  7. Patient or his/her legally acceptable representative has signed the written informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients had received intravesical hyaluronic acid treatment in recent 3 months, or intravesical Botox injection in recent 12 months Patients with severe cardiopulmonary disease and such as congestive heart failure, arrhythmia, poorly controlled hypertension, not able to receive regular follow-up
  2. Patients with bladder outlet obstruction on enrollment
  3. Patients with PVR >100 ml
  4. Patients with uncontrolled confirmed diagnosis of acute urinary tract infection
  5. Patients have laboratory abnormalities at screening including: alanine aminotransferase (ALT)> 3 x upper limit of normal range, and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 3 x upper limit of normal range
  6. Patients have abnormal serum creatinine level > 2 x upper limit of normal range
  7. Female patients who is pregnant, lactating, or with child-bearing potential without contraception
  8. Patients with any other serious disease considered by the investigator not in the condition to enter the trial
  9. Patients had received intravesical treatment for IC within recent 1 month
  10. Patients had participated investigational drug trial within 1 month before entering this study
  11. Patients with coagulopathy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
49 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo treatment (shock wave probe w/o energy)

    Device: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Low energy shock wave

    Low energy shock wave treatment (shock wave probe w/ energy)

    Device: Low energy shock wave

Interventions

  • DeviceLow energy shock wave

    Probe be transcutaneous applied to the suprapubic bladder region with 2000 shocks, frequency of 3 pulses per second and maximum total energy flow density 0.25 millijoule/mm2 once a week for 4 weeks

  • DevicePlacebo

    Probe be transcutaneous applied to the suprapubic bladder region with 2000 shocks, frequency of 3 pulses per second but no energy once a week for 4 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of the O'Leary-Sant symptom score (OSS, including ICSI and ICPI)

    Change of the O'Leary-Sant symptom score from baseline to 1 month after the treatment day. Subscales ICSI and ICPI are graded from 0 to 20 and 0 to 16, respectively. The items are summed to obtain OSS (range from 0 to 36, higher values represent a worse outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Net changes of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Net changes of the Visual Analog Scale from baseline to 1 month after the treatment day (VAS range from 0 to 10, higher values represent a worse outcome)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

  2. Net changes of the functional bladder capacity (FBC) as assessed by the maximum urine volume (milliliters) as recorded in 3-day voiding diary

    Net changes of the functional bladder capacity (FBC) from baseline to 1 month after the treatment day (higher FBC volumes represent a better outcome)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

  3. Net changes of the voiding frequency at daytime as recorded in 3-day voiding diary

    Net changes of the voiding frequency at daytime as recorded in 3-day voiding diary from baseline to 1 month after the treatment day (higher voiding frequency at daytime represent a worse outcome)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

  4. Net changes of the voiding frequency at night time as recorded in 3-day voiding diary

    Net changes of the voiding frequency at night time as recorded in 3-day voiding diary from baseline to 1 month after the treatment day (higher voiding frequency at night time represent a worse outcome)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

  5. Net changes of the Global response assessment (GRA)

    Global response assessment (GRA) of therapeutic result by the patient (categorized from -3 to +3, indicating markedly worse to markedly improved) at 3 months after the last treatment day

    Time frame: Baseline and 3 month

  6. Net changes of the maximum flow rate

    Net changes of the maximum flow rate from baseline to 1 month after the treatment day (higher maximum flow rate represent a better outcome)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

  7. Net changes of the voided volume

    Net changes of the voided volume from baseline to 1 month after the treatment day (higher voided volumes represent a better outcome)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

  8. Net changes of the PVR

    Net changes of the PVR from baseline to 1 month after the treatment day (higher PVR volumes represent a worse outcome)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

  9. Net changes of the cytokines level

    Net changes of the cytokines level from baseline to 1 month after the treatment day (e.g. NGF and IL-6, higher values represent a worse outcome)

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 month

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine
    Kaohsiung, 833, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hanno PM, Burks DA, Clemens JQ, Dmochowski RR, Erickson D, Fitzgerald MP, Forrest JB, Gordon B, Gray M, Mayer RD, Newman D, Nyberg L Jr, Payne CK, Wesselmann U, Faraday MM; Interstitial Cystitis Guidelines Panel of the American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. AUA guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. J Urol. 2011 Jun;185(6):2162-70. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.064. Epub 2011 Apr 16. PubMed 21497847 ↗
  • Hanno PM, Sant GR. Clinical highlights of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases/Interstitial Cystitis Association scientific conference on interstitial cystitis. Urology. 2001 Jun;57(6 Suppl 1):2-6. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01112-8. PubMed 11378041 ↗
  • Nickel JC, Barkin J, Forrest J, Mosbaugh PG, Hernandez-Graulau J, Kaufman D, Lloyd K, Evans RJ, Parsons CL, Atkinson LE; Elmiron Study Group. Randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study of pentosan polysulfate sodium for interstitial cystitis. Urology. 2005 Apr;65(4):654-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.10.071. PubMed 15833501 ↗
  • Hanno PM, Buehler J, Wein AJ. Use of amitriptyline in the treatment of interstitial cystitis. J Urol. 1989 Apr;141(4):846-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)41029-9. PubMed 2926877 ↗
  • Sairanen J, Forsell T, Ruutu M. Long-term outcome of patients with interstitial cystitis treated with low dose cyclosporine A. J Urol. 2004 Jun;171(6 Pt 1):2138-41. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000125139.91203.7a. PubMed 15126772 ↗
  • Hanno PM, Erickson D, Moldwin R, Faraday MM; American Urological Association. Diagnosis and treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: AUA guideline amendment. J Urol. 2015 May;193(5):1545-53. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.086. Epub 2015 Jan 23. PubMed 25623737 ↗
  • Chancellor MB, Yoshimura N. Treatment of interstitial cystitis. Urology. 2004 Mar;63(3 Suppl 1):85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.10.034. PubMed 15013658 ↗
  • Shie JH, Liu HT, Kuo HC. Increased cell apoptosis of urothelium mediated by inflammation in interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome. Urology. 2012 Feb;79(2):484.e7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.09.049. PubMed 22310775 ↗
  • Lee JD, Lee MH. Increased expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha and vascular endothelial growth factor associated with glomerulation formation in patients with interstitial cystitis. Urology. 2011 Oct;78(4):971.e11-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.05.050. Epub 2011 Aug 2. PubMed 21813166 ↗
  • Chaussy C, Schmiedt E, Jocham D, Brendel W, Forssmann B, Walther V. First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. J Urol. 1982 Mar;127(3):417-20. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)53841-0. PubMed 6977650 ↗
  • Wang CJ. An overview of shock wave therapy in musculoskeletal disorders. Chang Gung Med J. 2003 Apr;26(4):220-32. PubMed 12846521 ↗
  • Di Meglio F, Nurzynska D, Castaldo C, Miraglia R, Romano V, De Angelis A, Piegari E, Russo S, Montagnani S. Cardiac shock wave therapy: assessment of safety and new insights into mechanisms of tissue regeneration. J Cell Mol Med. 2012 Apr;16(4):936-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01393.x. PubMed 21790971 ↗
  • Vardi Y, Appel B, Kilchevsky A, Gruenwald I. Does low intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy have a physiological effect on erectile function? Short-term results of a randomized, double-blind, sham controlled study. J Urol. 2012 May;187(5):1769-75. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.117. Epub 2012 Mar 15. PubMed 22425129 ↗
  • Mariotto S, de Prati AC, Cavalieri E, Amelio E, Marlinghaus E, Suzuki H. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in inflammatory diseases: molecular mechanism that triggers anti-inflammatory action. Curr Med Chem. 2009;16(19):2366-72. doi: 10.2174/092986709788682119. PubMed 19601786 ↗
  • Wang HJ, Lee WC, Tyagi P, Huang CC, Chuang YC. Effects of low energy shock wave therapy on inflammatory moleculars, bladder pain, and bladder function in a rat cystitis model. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Aug;36(6):1440-1447. doi: 10.1002/nau.23141. Epub 2016 Dec 30. PubMed 28035695 ↗
  • Zimmermann R, Cumpanas A, Miclea F, Janetschek G. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome in males: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Eur Urol. 2009 Sep;56(3):418-24. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.043. Epub 2009 Mar 25. Erratum In: Eur Urol. 2020 May;77(5):e140. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.02.011. PubMed 19372000 ↗
  • Al Edwan GM, Muheilan MM, Atta ON. Long term efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy [ESWT] for treatment of refractory chronic abacterial prostatitis. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Jan 6;14:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.12.051. eCollection 2017 Feb. PubMed 28119778 ↗
  • Chuang YC, Meng E, Chancellor M, Kuo HC. Pain reduction realized with extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of symptoms associated with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome-A prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Jun;39(5):1505-1514. doi: 10.1002/nau.24382. Epub 2020 May 11. PubMed 32394478 ↗
  • Imamura M, Scott NW, Wallace SA, Ogah JA, Ford AA, Dubos YA, Brazzelli M. Interventions for treating people with symptoms of bladder pain syndrome: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 30;7(7):CD013325. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013325.pub2. PubMed 32734597 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Mar 16, 2020
  • Statistical analysis plan · Mar 16, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 1, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03619486
Lead sponsor
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 8, 2018
Start date
Jul 4, 2018
Primary completion
Feb 26, 2020
Completion
Jun 30, 2020
Last update
Feb 1, 2021

Study contacts

Tsang-Tang Hsieh, MD
study chair · Institutional Review Board Chang Gung Medical Foundation

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion