CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03614598DISPOSITIF LARUpdated Nov 17, 2025

Impact on Postoperative Pain of Three Single-use Adult Supraglottic Airway Devices in Short General Anesthetic Under Controlled Ventilation

An interventional study of Insertion of LMA-UNIQUE(TM) device and Insertion of LMA-SUPREME(TM) device in Pharyngolaryngeal Postoperative Pain, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-17.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 years 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2009, registered Jul 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
546
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators hypothesize that incidence of pharyngolaryngeal postoperative pain caused by the I-gel and LMA-Suprême devices will be ≤ 5%

02

Conditions studied

  • Pharyngolaryngeal Postoperative Pain
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes is the lead sponsor of 587 studies on the registry; 96 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient must have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form
  • The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
  • Adult patients > 18
  • ASA score I-III
  • Patient scheduled to undergo elective surgery lasting less than two hours under general anaesthetic without tracheal intubation
  • The subject is participating in an interventional study, or is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study
  • The subject refuses to sign the consent
  • It is impossible to give the subject informed information
  • The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship
  • The patient is pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Emergency surgery
  • Sore thoat ≤ 1 month
  • Risk of aspiration of gastric contents
  • Body mass index (BMI) > 35
  • Patients with expected airway difficulties
  • Contra-indication for any of the devices (symptomatic hiatal hernias, pathological obesity, poly trauma or serious injury, delayed gastric emptying, use of opiates during fasting)
  • Patients who are not fasting for routine and emergency anesthesia
  • Trismus, limited mouth opening, abscess or pharyngoperilaryngeal mass
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
546 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    LMA-UNIQUE™

    Procedure: Insertion of LMA-UNIQUE(TM) device

  • Active comparator
    LMA-SUPREME™

    Procedure: Insertion of LMA-SUPREME(TM) device

  • Active comparator
    I-GEL®

    Procedure: Insertion of I-GEL(R) device

Interventions

  • ProcedureInsertion of LMA-UNIQUE(TM) device

    LMA-UNIQUE(TM) single-use adult supraglottic airway device inserted during short general anesthesia under controlled ventilation

  • ProcedureInsertion of LMA-SUPREME(TM) device

    LMA-SUPREME(TM) single-use adult supraglottic airway device inserted during short general anesthesia under controlled ventilation

  • ProcedureInsertion of I-GEL(R) device

    I-GEL(R) single-use adult supraglottic airway device inserted during short general anesthesia under controlled ventilation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of pharyngolaryngeal postoperative pain of the three devices

    Sore throat Y/N

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pharyngolaryngeal postoperative pain between groups

    Sore throat Y/N

    Time frame: 2 hours

  2. Time taken to place device

    From first attempt at introduction until acceptable exhaled CO2 curve attained (seconds)

    Time frame: End of surgery (maximum 2 hours)

  3. Number of attempts needed to place device

    Time frame: End of surgery (maximum 2 hours)

  4. Necessity of altering the size of the device

    Y/N

    Time frame: End of surgery (maximum 2 hours)

  5. Any patient movement during procedure

    Y/N

    Time frame: End of surgery (maximum 2 hours)

  6. Difficulty of insertion

    5-point scale: very easy-failure

    Time frame: End of surgery (maximum 2 hours)

  7. Total leakage pressure of the devices

    measured directly by the respirator

    Time frame: End of surgery (maximum 2 hours)

  8. Ventilatory pressure of the devices

    Time frame: End of surgery (maximum 2 hours)

  9. Device stability during surgery

    Need to change the management system airways (orotracheal intubation or others) Y/N

    Time frame: End of surgery (maximum 2 hours)

  10. Difficulty of device removal

    4-point scale: very easy-very difficult

    Time frame: End of surgery (maximum 2 hours)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CHU Nimes
    Nîmes, 30029, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • L'Hermite J, Dubout E, Bouvet S, Bracoud LH, Cuvillon P, Coussaye JE, Ripart J. Sore throat following three adult supraglottic airway devices: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Jul;34(7):417-424. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000539. PubMed 27755181 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 17, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03614598
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 3, 2018
Start date
Apr 22, 2009
Primary completion
Sep 5, 2012
Completion
Sep 6, 2012
Last update
Nov 17, 2025

Study contacts

Joël L'Hermite, MD
principal investigator · CHU Nimes

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion