An interventional study of video intervention (therapy expectation violation) and video intervention (symptoms+ expectation) in Negative Therapy Expectation, sponsored by Philipps University Marburg. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-11-08.
Sponsored by Philipps University Marburg · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a video intervention, which was designed to improve therapy expectation of persons with critical attitudes towards psychotherapy via violating their expectations about therapy. Therefore, 120 participants will be recruited and randomized to two groups:
(1) An experimental group that is watching a video with patients (actors) that are giving oral information about their therapy and the mostly positive therapy outcome, (2) a control group that is watching a video with the same patients before therapy or after the first therapy session who are giving information about symptoms and their expectation on therapy. The primary outcome is the Milwaukee Psychotherapy Expectation Questionnaire (MPEQ) collected before and after the video.
Therapy expectation is one of the main predictors of therapy outcome. This could be shown through many results in the medical sector as well as in studies that are focusing on psychotherapeutic interventions across different mental disorders. Although psychotherapy is a successful treatment for many disorders it is still hold in low esteem by some parts of the population and from some patient groups in particular. This can cause (that) patients who are in need of treatment not being recommended to the right therapy. Furthermore patients with low therapy expectation are more likely to (prematurely) abandon their therapy or having a lower therapy outcome. So therapy expectation should definitely be addressed in the very first therapy sessions because of it´s high impact.
The Violex-model gives an overview on how expectations in general are developed, maintained or modified. The model postulates that a process called immunization can lead to maintenance of expectation even if they receive information that contradicts their expectation. However no trial has yet examined weather the suggestions of the model are adaptable to therapy expectation. Therefore the investigators are recruiting participants with critical attitudes towards psychotherapy and trying to provoke expectation violation via an online experiment containing videos with patients reporting about their mostly positive outcome of psychotherapy. A control group is watching a video with patients who are just giving information about their symptoms and their first impressions on psychotherapy. The primary outcome is the Milwaukee Psychotherapy Expectation Questionnaire (MPEQ) collected before and after the video. Furthermore the participants are asked about their attitudes towards psychotherapeutic treatment (QAPT, German Version FEP), their own experience with psychotherapy and experiences of relevant others, behavioral intensions towards seeking psychotherapy, their mental wellbeing and demographic data. Before watching the video participants are also asked to formulate one to three individual expectations on psychotherapy. After watching the video they are asked how much they still believe in their individual expectation.
The investigators are aiming to modify low therapy expectation by generating expectation violation and paying particular attention to the issue of persistence of expectations via having a closer look on possible immunization strategies. For doing so they developed immunization items (data- and construct-orientated) that are shown at the end of the experiment.
Philipps University Marburg is the lead sponsor of 114 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Experimental: patients' report about therapy outcome Video with patients giving information about (mostly) positive therapy outcome
Behavioral: video intervention (therapy expectation violation)
Control group: patient´s report about symptoms and therapy expectations Participants in the control group are watching a video with the same patients (actors) as in the experimental video. In this video patients are shown before or after the first therapy session. They are giving information about symptoms and their expectation on therapy but NOT about therapy outcome.
Behavioral: video intervention (symptoms+ expectation)
The investigators asked experts (psychotherapist and scientists in the area of clinical psychology) about typical therapy expectation violations in therapy and searched the literature for information about typical therapy processes and outcomes. Having these information they designed a script for the experimental video. The patients in the video are played by actors aged from 28 to 58 years (two male and two female actors). Patients are representing common mental disorders (depression, anxiety disorder, alcohol addiction, depression after physical disease). The abbreviated name, age and disorder of the patients is displayed for 3 seconds in the video. The patients are giving information about the mostly positive outcome and the process of their therapy. All participants are watching a video with all patients (7 minutes). The videos (control and experimental group) have been evaluated by 12 experts (psychotherapist and scientists in the area of clinical psychology).
Participants in the control group are watching a video with the same patients (actors) as in the experimental video. In this video patients are shown before or after the first therapy session. They are giving information about symptoms and their expectation on therapy but NOT about therapy outcome.
Milwaukee Expectation Questionnaire (MPEQ)
Therapy expectation measured by the Milwaukee Expectation Questionnaire (MPEQ) - 13 items, German translation, self-report, subscales: process expectation and outcome expectation, total mean from min. 0 to max.10.
Time frame: changes from baseline to after watching the video (approx. 20 minutes later)
FEP/ QAPT
Self-report measure of attitudes towards psychotherapeutic treatments FEP (Fragebogen zu Einstellungen gegenüber der Inanspruchnahme psychotherapeutischer Hilfe) / Attitudes towards Psychotherapeutic Treatment (QAPT); total score from min. 11 to max. 44
Time frame: changes from baseline to after watching the video (approx. 20 minutes later)
Self-report of individual expectations towards psychotherapy; mean from min. 1 to max. 7
Time frame: changes from baseline to after watching the video (approx. 20 minutes later)
Self-report of behavioral intensions towards seeking psychotherapy (self-developed items); mean from min. 1 to max.7
Time frame: changes from baseline to after watching the video (approx. 20 minutes later)
Brief symptom inventory (BSI-18); total score from min.0 to max. 72
moderator
Time frame: Baseline
Self-report measure of own experiences with psychotherapy, reports of experiences with psychotherapy of relevant others and perceived cultural reputation of psychotherapy; single scores from min 1. to max. 5.
moderator
Time frame: Baseline
Self-report of possible immunization strategies while or after watching the video (data- and concept-orientated); mean from min. 1 to max. 5
moderator
Time frame: After watching the video (approx. 20 minutes after baseline)
Self-report of perceived sympathy, attractiveness, friendliness and identification with the patients in the video; single scores from min. 1 to max. 5
moderator
Time frame: After watching the video (approx. 20 minutes after baseline)
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Undecided
This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Philipps University Marburg