CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03584100Updated Dec 13, 2023Results posted

Effect of Pneumatic Tourniquet on Arm Swelling After Lymph Node Removal

An interventional study of Tourniquet 8000 in Healthy Subject, sponsored by Stanford University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-13.

Sponsored by Stanford University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the proposed study is to evaluate the acute impact of swelling caused by low-pressure tourniquet use in the setting of ipsilateral prior axillary lymph node dissection and the change in swelling reduction following tourniquet use in three limb postures versus healthy volunteers.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To evaluate reduction in swelling and safety of tourniquet use in patients with prior axillary lymph node dissection

OUTLINE:

Participants raise their arm for 15 minutes, then wear a tourniquet inflated for 25 minutes. Hand volume is measured by aqueous volumeter at baseline, after use of the tourniquet and every 5 minutes for 30 minutes, while the arm is placed at a raised on head position, shoulder-level brace position, or at waist in a sling position.

PROCEDURE:

Participants raise their arm for 15 minutes, then wear a tourniquet 8000 inflated for 25 minutes. Hand volume is measured by aqueous volumeter at baseline, after use of the tourniquet and every 5 minutes for 30 minutes, while the arm is placed at a raised on head position, shoulder-level brace position, or at waist in a sling position.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy Subject
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Stanford University is the lead sponsor of 2,117 studies on the registry; 425 are open to participants now.

Of its 259 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 197 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Have previously undergone axillary lymph node dissection
  • Or healthy volunteers

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have new-onset lymphedema of the involved limb.
  • Infection including cellulitis
  • Trauma or planned axillary surgery within 6 months of participation
  • Any prior axillary radiation
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Patients with prior axillary lymph node dissection

    Participants raise their arm for 15 minutes, then wear a tourniquet 8000 inflated for 25 minutes. Hand volume is measured by aqueous volumeter at baseline, after use of the tourniquet and every 5 minutes for 30 minutes, while the arm is placed at a raised on head position, shoulder-level brace position, or at waist in a sling position.

    Device: Tourniquet 8000

  • Active comparator
    Healthy Volunteers

    Participants raise their arm for 15 minutes, then wear a tourniquet 8000 inflated for 25 minutes. Hand volume is measured by aqueous volumeter at baseline, after use of the tourniquet and every 5 minutes for 30 minutes, while the arm is placed at a raised on head position, shoulder-level brace position, or at waist in a sling position.

    Device: Tourniquet 8000

Interventions

  • DeviceTourniquet 8000

    Pneumatic tourniquet with appropriate upper extremity cuff, pressure sensing, and ability to set device at 40 mmHg of pressure

    Also known as: Pneumatic tourniquet

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Hand Volume Following Tourniquet Use

    Hand volume, as an indicator of limb edema / fluid accumulation, was determined with an aqueous volumeter at rest and for the sling and elevated arm positions 30 minutes after an arm tourniquet was placed. Measurements were taken for the affected arm \[ie, after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND)\], and the same patient's contralateral arm (control, ie, "other arm"). The mean values for each arm (affected vs control) of the participant group, before (baseline) and 30 minutes after placement of the pneumatic tourniquet were obtained. The difference represents the effect of tourniquet placement. The outcome is reported as the overall mean difference in hand volume from baseline to 30 minutes after tourniquet placement for the ALND arm (affected arm) and the contralateral arm (control arm), with standard deviation. 12 patients only.

    Time frame: 30 minutes after tourniquet use

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in Hand Volume Following Tourniquet Use, Between ALND and Control Limbs

    Hand volume, as an indicator of limb edema / fluid accumulation, was determined with an aqueous volumeter 30 minutes after an arm tourniquet was placed and the arm held in sling and elevated arm positions. Measurements were taken for the affected arm \[ie, after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND)\], and the same patient's contralateral arm (control, ie, "other arm"). Measurements were compared to the participant's contralateral control ("the other arm") in the same positions. The difference represents to effect of ALND on hand volume. The outcome is reported as the absolute change in mean hand volume between the affected and control arms, a number without dispersion.

    Time frame: 30 minutes

07

Results

Posted Jun 24, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTourniquet 8000 Arm
Started12
Completed12
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Hand Volume Following Tourniquet Use

Hand volume, as an indicator of limb edema / fluid accumulation, was determined with an aqueous volumeter at rest and for the sling and elevated arm positions 30 minutes after an arm tourniquet was placed. Measurements were taken for the affected arm \[ie, after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND)\], and the same patient's contralateral arm (control, ie, "other arm"). The mean values for each arm (affected vs control) of the participant group, before (baseline) and 30 minutes after placement of the pneumatic tourniquet were obtained. The difference represents the effect of tourniquet placement. The outcome is reported as the overall mean difference in hand volume from baseline to 30 minutes after tourniquet placement for the ALND arm (affected arm) and the contralateral arm (control arm), with standard deviation. 12 patients only.

Time frame:
30 minutes after tourniquet use
Reported as:
Mean · mL
Change in Hand Volume Following Tourniquet Use
mLChange in Hand Volume Following Tourniquet Use in Axillary Lymph Node Dissection (ALND) ArmChange in Hand Volume Following Tourniquet Use in Contralateral Arm
Mean Difference in Hand Volume, Elevated Position15.0 ± 8.512.1 ± 5.4
Mean Difference in Hand Volume, Sling Position12.5 ± 8.97.9 ± 6.9
SecondaryDifference in Hand Volume Following Tourniquet Use, Between ALND and Control Limbs

Hand volume, as an indicator of limb edema / fluid accumulation, was determined with an aqueous volumeter 30 minutes after an arm tourniquet was placed and the arm held in sling and elevated arm positions. Measurements were taken for the affected arm \[ie, after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND)\], and the same patient's contralateral arm (control, ie, "other arm"). Measurements were compared to the participant's contralateral control ("the other arm") in the same positions. The difference represents to effect of ALND on hand volume. The outcome is reported as the absolute change in mean hand volume between the affected and control arms, a number without dispersion.

Time frame:
30 minutes
Reported as:
Number · mL
Difference in Hand Volume Following Tourniquet Use, Between ALND and Control Limbs
mLDifference in Hand Volume, Axillary Lymph Node Dissection (ALND) vs Contralateral Arms, ElevatedDifference in Hand Volume, Axillary Lymph Node Dissection (ALND) vs Contralateral Arms, Sling
Difference in Hand Volume Following Tourniquet Use, Between ALND and Control Limbs2.94.6

Adverse events

Collected over 1 month. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Tourniquet 8000 Arm0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Tourniquet 8000 Arm
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years5
>=65 years7
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Tourniquet 8000 Arm
Mean66.1 ± 11.2
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Tourniquet 8000 Arm
Female12
Male0
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Tourniquet 8000 Arm
Hispanic or Latino2
Not Hispanic or Latino10
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Tourniquet 8000 Arm
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White10
More than one race1
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Tourniquet 8000 Arm
United States12
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Stanford University School of Medicine
    Palo Alto, California 94304, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Sep 15, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 13, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03584100
Lead sponsor
Stanford University
Responsible party
Jeffrey Yao, MD (Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 12, 2018
Start date
Nov 7, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2020
Completion
Jun 30, 2020
Results posted
Jun 24, 2021
Last update
Dec 13, 2023

Study contacts

Jeffrey Yao
principal investigator · Stanford Cancer Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion