CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03582540DFGUpdated Sep 23, 2019

Early Versus Delayed Double-guidewire Technique in Difficult Biliary Cannulation. (DFG)

An interventional study of Double-guidewire cannulation technique in Catheterization, Cholangiopancreatography and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography, sponsored by Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive. Completed at 8 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-09-23.

Sponsored by Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2016, registered Jun 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective randomized comparative multicentric study. Briefly, we will analyze the technical success, performance and clinical outcomes of early versus delayed double-guidewire technique (DGT) in difficult biliary cannulation.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective study performed in 20 tertiary medical centers in France. We aim to recruit 150 patients from 2016 to 2020. Patients with a native papilla scheduled for ERCP (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) are screened for the study. Patients with a difficult biliary cannulation are included in the study if the guidewire is inserted in the pancreatic duct. At that point, patients are randomized in two arms: early versus delayed DGT. The early arm attempts biliary cannulation using the double-guidewire technique immediately and the delayed arm uses the double-guidewire technique only if 10 more minutes of standard cannulation technique does not allow biliary cannulation. The primary outcome is the biliary cannulation rate success. Secondary outcomes are complications rate and performance of the technique in both arms. Follow-up is 30 days.

02

Conditions studied

  • Catheterization
  • Cholangiopancreatography
  • Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography
  • Biliary Cannulation
  • Difficult Biliary Cannulation
  • Double-guidewire Technique
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients 18 years old and more
  • Native papilla
  • Clinical indications of ERCP
  • Difficult biliary cannulation defined by unintentional guidewire insertion into the pancreatic duct before biliary cannulation is successful
  • Informed consent completed by the patient

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
  • ERCP with direct biliary cannulation success
  • ERCP with inability to cannulate the bile duct nor the pancreatic duct
  • Coagulation or hemostasis disorder (TP \< 60%, TCA> 40 sec. et plaquettes \< 60000/mm3).
  • Patient under active antiaggregant or anticoagulant medication other than aspirin
  • Endoscopic treatment of chronic pancreatitis
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • ERCP performed by another operator than an investigator
  • Patient's voluntary withdrawal
  • Withdrawal decision by the investigator or sponsor
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
150 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    early double-guidewire technique (DGT)

    First arm: early double-guidewire technique The early arm attempts biliary cannulation using the DGT immediately once the guidewire is inserted in the pancreatic duct in cases of difficult biliary cannulation.

    Procedure: Double-guidewire cannulation technique

  • Active comparator
    delayed double-guidewire technique (DGT)

    In the delayed arm, once the guidewire is inserted in the pancreatic duct, the operator continues to attempt biliary cannulation with conventional technique (contrast- or guidewire-assisted). DGT is used only if 10 more minutes of conventional cannulation technique does not allow biliary access.

    Procedure: Double-guidewire cannulation technique

Interventions

  • ProcedureDouble-guidewire cannulation technique

    With the DGT, a guidewire is first inserted deep into the PD. The cannulation device is then withdrawn, reloaded with a second guidewire, and reinserted through the working channel of the endoscope to cannulate the common bile duct.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Biliary cannulation success rate

    The percentage of biliary cannulation success in both arms.

    Time frame: During the ERCP procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Immediate morbidity

    Any complications (procedure related, clinical or anesthesiological) occurring during the procedure or during the immediate post-intervention period.

    Time frame: From the start, until 30 minutes after completion of ERCP

  2. Delayed morbidity

    Morbidities occurring more than 30 minutes and up to 1 month after ERCP completion. Special attention will be taken for bowel perforation, gastrointestinal bleeding and acute pancreatitis

    Time frame: 30 minutes after ERCP completion and up to 30 days

  3. procedural time

    The time taken in minutes between patient randomization (at the first guidewire insertion into the pancreatic duct) and successful biliary cannulation.

    Time frame: time from the first guidewire insertion into the pancreatic duct up to the end of cannulation.

07

Study locations

8 sites
  • Clinique de Bercy
    Charenton-le-Pont, 94220, France
  • Hôpital Dupuytren
    Limoges, 87042, France
  • Hopital Saint Joseph
    Marseille, 13008, France
  • Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses - La Croix Saint-Simon
    Paris, 75020, France
  • Hôpital Haut Lévêque
    Pessac, 33600, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
    Pierre-Bénite, 69495, France
  • Centre Hospitalier de Bigorre
    Tarbes, 65013, France
  • Centre Hospitalier de Vichy
    Vichy, 03207, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Adler DG, Baron TH, Davila RE, Egan J, Hirota WK, Leighton JA, Qureshi W, Rajan E, Zuckerman MJ, Fanelli R, Wheeler-Harbaugh J, Faigel DO; Standards of Practice Committee of American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. ASGE guideline: the role of ERCP in diseases of the biliary tract and the pancreas. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Jul;62(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.04.015. No abstract available. PubMed 15990812 ↗
  • Freeman ML, Guda NM. ERCP cannulation: a review of reported techniques. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Jan;61(1):112-25. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02463-0. No abstract available. PubMed 15672074 ↗
  • Hisa T, Matsumoto R, Takamatsu M, Furutake M. Impact of changing our cannulation method on the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis after pancreatic guidewire placement. World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Dec 28;17(48):5289-94. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i48.5289. PubMed 22219598 ↗
  • Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, Fennerty MB, Lee JG, Bjorkman DJ, Overby CS, Aas J, Ryan ME, Bochna GS, Shaw MJ, Snady HW, Erickson RV, Moore JP, Roel JP. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Oct;54(4):425-34. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.117550. PubMed 11577302 ↗
  • Artifon EL, Sakai P, Cunha JE, Halwan B, Ishioka S, Kumar A. Guidewire cannulation reduces risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and facilitates bile duct cannulation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Oct;102(10):2147-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01378.x. Epub 2007 Jun 20. PubMed 17581267 ↗
  • Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Repici A, Fabbri C, Grilli D, Conio M, D'Imperio N, Bazzoli F. Timing of precut procedure does not influence success rate and complications of ERCP procedure: a prospective randomized comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 1):473-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.037. PubMed 19231488 ↗
  • Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Zagari RM, Eusebi LH, Ceroni L, Laterza L, Fabbri C, Bazzoli F. Can early precut implementation reduce endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complication risk? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy. 2010 May;42(5):381-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1243992. Epub 2010 Mar 19. PubMed 20306386 ↗
  • Parlak E, Cicek B, Disibeyaz S, Kuran S, Sahin B. Early decision for precut sphincterotomy: is it a risky preference? Dig Dis Sci. 2007 Mar;52(3):845-51. doi: 10.1007/s10620-006-9546-x. PubMed 17273923 ↗
  • Slivka A. A new technique to assist in bile duct cannulation. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996 Nov;44(5):636. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(96)70038-x. No abstract available. PubMed 8934189 ↗
  • Gotoh Y, Tamada K, Tomiyama T, Wada S, Ohashi A, Satoh Y, Higashizawa T, Miyata T, Ido K, Sugano K. A new method for deep cannulation of the bile duct by straightening the pancreatic duct. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Jun;53(7):820-2. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.113387. No abstract available. PubMed 11375604 ↗
  • Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TC, Wong RC, Ferrari AP Jr, Montes H, Roston AD, Slivka A, Lichtenstein DR, Ruymann FW, Van Dam J, Hughes M, Carr-Locke DL. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Nov;56(5):652-6. doi: 10.1067/mge.2002.129086. PubMed 12397271 ↗
  • Caletti GC, Vandelli A, Bolondi L, Fontana G, Labo G. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) through artificial endoscopic choledocho-duodenal fistula. Endoscopy. 1978 Aug;10(3):203-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1098295. PubMed 699889 ↗
  • Siegel JH. Precut papillotomy: a method to improve success of ERCP and papillotomy. Endoscopy. 1980 May;12(3):130-3. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1021728. PubMed 7379762 ↗
  • Osnes M, Kahrs T. Endoscopic choledochoduodenostomy for choledocholithiasis through choledochoduodenal fistula. Endoscopy. 1977 Aug;9(3):162-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1098510. PubMed 913369 ↗
  • Dumonceau JM, Deviere J, Cremer M. A new method of achieving deep cannulation of the common bile duct during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy. 1998 Sep;30(7):S80. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1001379. No abstract available. PubMed 9826155 ↗
  • Angsuwatcharakon P, Rerknimitr R, Ridtitid W, Ponauthai Y, Kullavanijaya P. Success rate and cannulation time between precut sphincterotomy and double-guidewire technique in truly difficult biliary cannulation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Feb;27(2):356-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06927.x. PubMed 21916994 ↗
  • Cote GA, Mullady DK, Jonnalagadda SS, Keswani RN, Wani SB, Hovis CE, Ammar T, Al-Lehibi A, Edmundowicz SA, Komanduri S, Azar RR. Use of a pancreatic duct stent or guidewire facilitates bile duct access with low rates of precut sphincterotomy: a randomized clinical trial. Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Dec;57(12):3271-8. doi: 10.1007/s10620-012-2269-2. Epub 2012 Jun 26. PubMed 22732831 ↗
  • Herreros de Tejada A, Calleja JL, Diaz G, Pertejo V, Espinel J, Cacho G, Jimenez J, Millan I, Garcia F, Abreu L; UDOGUIA-04 Group. Double-guidewire technique for difficult bile duct cannulation: a multicenter randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Oct;70(4):700-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.03.031. Epub 2009 Jun 27. PubMed 19560764 ↗
  • Yoo YW, Cha SW, Lee WC, Kim SH, Kim A, Cho YD. Double guidewire technique vs transpancreatic precut sphincterotomy in difficult biliary cannulation. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 7;19(1):108-14. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i1.108. PubMed 23326171 ↗
  • Xinopoulos D, Bassioukas SP, Kypreos D, Korkolis D, Scorilas A, Mavridis K, Dimitroulopoulos D, Paraskevas E. Pancreatic duct guidewire placement for biliary cannulation in a single-session therapeutic ERCP. World J Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr 21;17(15):1989-95. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i15.1989. PubMed 21528077 ↗
  • Lee TH, Hwang SO, Choi HJ, Jung Y, Cha SW, Chung IK, Moon JH, Cho YD, Park SH, Kim SJ. Sequential algorithm analysis to facilitate selective biliary access for difficult biliary cannulation in ERCP: a prospective clinical study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Feb 17;14:30. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-30. PubMed 24529239 ↗
  • Goff JS. Long-term experience with the transpancreatic sphincter pre-cut approach to biliary sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Nov;50(5):642-5. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)80012-1. PubMed 10536319 ↗
  • Tang SJ, Haber GB, Kortan P, Zanati S, Cirocco M, Ennis M, Elfant A, Scheider D, Ter H, Dorais J. Precut papillotomy versus persistence in difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2005 Jan;37(1):58-65. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-826077. PubMed 15657860 ↗
  • Laquiere A, Privat J, Jacques J, Legros R, Urena-Campos R, Belkhodja H, Subtil C, Kanafi L, Lecomte L, Boustiere C, Katsogiannou M, Karsenti D. Early double-guidewire versus repeated single-guidewire technique to facilitate selective bile duct cannulation: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2022 Feb;54(2):120-127. doi: 10.1055/a-1395-7485. Epub 2021 Apr 15. PubMed 33860484 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 23, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03582540
Lead sponsor
Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive
Responsible party
Dr Arthur Laquiere (Gastroenterologist, Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 11, 2018
Start date
Nov 2, 2016
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2019
Completion
Aug 30, 2019
Last update
Sep 23, 2019

Study contacts

ARTHUR LAQUIERE, MD
principal investigator · Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion