CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03580915Updated Jan 15, 2019

Effectiveness of a Functional Literacy Program for Formerly Homeless Adults

An interventional study of Functional Literacy Program and Usual Care Management Services in Literacy, sponsored by Columbia University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-15.

Sponsored by Columbia University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
23
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to assess a functional literacy program for formerly homeless adults now residing in supported housing who have difficulty performing daily life skills requiring functional literacy (e.g., bill paying, medication management, community transportation) needed to maintain housing placements. The hypothesis is that intervention group participants will improve in functional literacy compared to the control group that does not receive the intervention.

Read the detailed description

Sixty-five percent of homeless adults are reported to be illiterate or marginally literate. The lack of literacy in a high technological society negatively impacts this population's ability to participate in daily life activities including finding and maintaining employment, renting and maintaining an apartment, seeking health care, using public transportation, and managing finances. Poor literacy marginalizes this population from societal participation and maintains this group in a state of lack and deficiency.

A literacy program will be delivered to participants who are formerly homeless and now residing in supported shelter. Participants will be randomly assigned to an intervention (n=20) or control (n=20) group. The intervention group will receive the functional literacy intervention over 8 weeks, twice weekly. Intervention sessions will allow participants to learn literacy skills within the context of real-life daily activities like grocery shopping, preparing a meal, and purchasing subway cards. Control group participants will not receive intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Literacy

Keywords

  • functional literacy
  • homelessness
  • daily life activities
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Columbia University is the lead sponsor of 1,103 studies on the registry; 193 are open to participants now.

Of its 172 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 142 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Resident of a supported shelter environment (after homelessness)
  • Self-reported difficulty with basic reading skills needed to participate in desired daily life activities
  • English-speaking

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe behavioral management disorder that would make cooperation and direction following problematic
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
23 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Functional Literacy Intervention

    The intervention group will receive the functional literacy program in which, in small groups, participants learn literacy skills in the context of daily life activities such as shopping, meal preparation, and transportation use.

    Behavioral: Functional Literacy Program · Behavioral: Usual Care Management Services

  • Active comparator
    Functional Literacy Control

    The control group will not receive intervention but the Usual Care Management Services.

    Behavioral: Usual Care Management Services

Interventions

  • BehavioralFunctional Literacy Program

    The intervention will be provided twice weekly in 2-hour sessions, over 8 weeks. The 16 intervention sessions will provide the opportunity for participants to learn functional literacy skills to (1) manage an apartment, (2) access community resources, (3) manage finances, (4) access free recreational activities. All sessions will address literacy skills needed to complete basic daily life activities in the home and community environments. Literacy skills will first be learned and practiced within the supported shelter, and then extended to the community.

  • BehavioralUsual Care Management Services

    The control group will receive the usual housing services without additional intervention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) score

    The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is a 5-item, 10-point rating scale (1=most important, 10=least important) designed to be completed conjointly by a therapist and participant, and requires approximately 30 minutes to administer. The scale allows participants to identify and prioritize the most important problems impacting daily function and can be used with clients of all ages and diagnoses. Participants are asked to identify the five most critical problems impeding functional performance in the areas of self-care, productivity, and leisure. After the identification of five problems, participants are asked to rate both performance and satisfaction levels of the identified activities on a 10-point scale (1=not satisfied; 10=extremely satisfied). An open-ended narrative section is provided to allow therapists to record participant comments. The COPM is intended to be used pre- and post-intervention.

    Time frame: 1-week post-intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Inventory of Reading Occupations (IRO) score

    The IRO-Adult identifies reading materials from a list of 14 categories (e.g., financial records, federal/state aid documents, food and nutrition labels) that participants access as part of daily occupations. Two sections include Reading Categories (having 14 items) and Dimensions of Reading Participation (consisting of 5 dimensions with two open-ended questions and three 5-point Likert scale items; scores of 10+ = higher reading proficiency). For each client-identified reading category, participants are asked a series of questions about the 5 dimensions of reading participation: (1) reading material type; (2) frequency of access; (3) effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction; (4) importance of reading material in daily life; and (5) strategies and supports needed to access). The IRO-Adult descriptively assesses participants' relative mastery (effectiveness, efficiency, satisfaction) in functional literacy in relation to occupational participation.

    Time frame: 1-week post-intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Columbia University Medical Center
    New York, New York 10032, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 15, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03580915
Lead sponsor
Columbia University
Responsible party
Sharon Gutman (Professor of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine (Occupatio, Rehab & Regenerative Med OT), Columbia University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 10, 2018
Start date
Sep 24, 2018
Primary completion
Nov 20, 2018
Completion
Dec 28, 2018
Last update
Jan 15, 2019

Study contacts

Sharon Gutman, MD
principal investigator · Columbia University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion