CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03578549Updated Oct 19, 2020Results posted

Diagnostic Device for the Assessment of Pulpal Blood Flow

An observational study in Dental Pulp Test, sponsored by University of Michigan. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-19.

Sponsored by University of Michigan · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
30
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to assess tooth health by using a pulse oximeter which measures the blood flow within the tooth. This method is not currently being used in dentistry. We hypothesize that if we can measure both sensation and blood flow in a tooth, we will be able to better determine if the tooth is "alive or dead". In the future, this method may help determine which teeth are diseased and require dental treatments.

Read the detailed description

The vitality of the pulp is determined according to the health of the vascular supply not the sensory fibers. Conventional subjective tooth assessments (percussion, palpation, cold, and electrical pulp testing) and objective pulpal blood flow measurements will be used for teeth that are planned for extraction and also up to 2-5 additional teeth in each participant. The correlation between a single combined score from collective conventional subjective tooth assessments and the objective pulse oximetry reading for selected teeth will be used to evaluate if pulse oximeter measurements are a reliable marker for patient's reported symptoms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dental Pulp Test

Keywords

  • Dental Pulp Test
  • Vitality Testing
  • Pulpal Blood Flow Measure
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Michigan is the lead sponsor of 1,475 studies on the registry; 196 are open to participants now.

Of its 162 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 128 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

30 healthy individuals with 2-5 non-endodonticaly treated teeth in addition to the tooth planned for the extraction with intact non-metallic crown

Inclusion criteria

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, you must meet the following criteria:

  1. Must be a patient of the Oral Surgery Clinic at the University of Michigan School of Dentistry
  2. Must be scheduled for at least one tooth extraction at Oral Surgery Clinic
  3. Must be able to understand and willing to cooperate with all study procedures
  4. Must be able to sign an IRB-approved written consent
  5. Must have at least two teeth with an intact crown, without any full metallic crown coverage, and/or previous root canal treatments
  6. Must have no history of spontaneous pain, and/or lingering pain to cold/hot in teeth that are not going to be extracted on that day.
  7. If one of the teeth mentioned in inclusion #6 is being extracted, be willing to give your extracted tooth/teeth for further analysis to determine of the tooth is "alive or dead"

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

    • If participant self-reports liver, kidney, heart, blood, metabolic or systemic disease which may make execution of the protocol or interpretation of the results difficult
    • If participant has severe physical impairments (e.g., complete blindness or deafness) and/or cognitive impairments (e.g., dementia) that precludes participation in the procedures outlined in this proposal
    • If participant is or could be pregnant
    • If participant is currently receiving radiation
    • If participant not able to hold mouth open for extended period of time
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Oximetry testing of healthy teeth and those requiring removal

    To assess the ability of pulse oximeter to assess the presence of pulse in teeth and to correlate pulse oximeter readings with conventional pulp testing measures including cold test, electrical pulp test, percussion and palpation testings, pulse oximeter will be used with a special holding frame, for 15-30 seconds. Note: the reading will not affect clinical practice; it is simply to gather data to see if pulse oximetry can facilitate diagnostic practices in the future

    Device: Pulse Oximetry

Interventions

  • DevicePulse Oximetry

    Pulse Oximeter is being applied with a special holding tool to test the oximeter for its ability to measure pulpal blood flow, but no effect of the oximeter is being measured. Thus, to that degree the use is observational rather than interventional.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Subjective Tooth Assessment: Number of Teeth With Normal and Abnormal Pulp

    Conventional subjective tooth assessments (percussion, palpation, cold, and electrical pulp testing) will be used for teeth that are planned for extraction and also upto 2-5 additional teeth in each participant. Pulp status is determined as "normal" or "abnormal" according to the classification system from the American Academy of Endodontics.

    Time frame: Single visit, less than one hour testing

Secondary outcomes

  1. Objective Tooth Assessment: Pulse Oximetry Reading for Selected Teeth

    Objective plural blood flow measurements will be used for teeth that are planned for extraction and also up to 2-5 additional teeth in each participant. Average objective plural blood flow was determined by pulse oximetry-reading for selected teeth (measured as SpO2).

    Time frame: Single visit, less than one hour testing

07

Results

Posted Oct 19, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOximetry Testing of Healthy Teeth and Those Requiring Removal
Started30
Completed29
Not completed1

Outcome measures

PrimarySubjective Tooth Assessment: Number of Teeth With Normal and Abnormal Pulp

Conventional subjective tooth assessments (percussion, palpation, cold, and electrical pulp testing) will be used for teeth that are planned for extraction and also upto 2-5 additional teeth in each participant. Pulp status is determined as "normal" or "abnormal" according to the classification system from the American Academy of Endodontics.

Time frame:
Single visit, less than one hour testing
Reported as:
Count of units · Teeth
Subjective Tooth Assessment: Number of Teeth With Normal and Abnormal Pulp
TeethOximetry Testing of Healthy Teeth and Those Requiring Removal
Normal Pulp111
Abnormal Pulp32
SecondaryObjective Tooth Assessment: Pulse Oximetry Reading for Selected Teeth

Objective plural blood flow measurements will be used for teeth that are planned for extraction and also up to 2-5 additional teeth in each participant. Average objective plural blood flow was determined by pulse oximetry-reading for selected teeth (measured as SpO2).

Time frame:
Single visit, less than one hour testing
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of saturation
Objective Tooth Assessment: Pulse Oximetry Reading for Selected Teeth
Percentage of saturationOximetry Testing of Healthy Teeth and Those Requiring Removal
Objective Tooth Assessment: Pulse Oximetry Reading for Selected Teeth87.9 ± 11.8
Statistical analysis
  • Oximetry Testing of Healthy Teeth and Those Requiring Removal · ANOVA · p = 0.92 · Correlation coefficient: 0.01

Adverse events

Collected over Through study completion an average of one day. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Oximetry Testing of Healthy Teeth and Those Requiring Removal0/29 (0%)0/29 (0%)0/29 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Oximetry Testing of Healthy Teeth and Those Requiring Removal
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years29
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Oximetry Testing of Healthy Teeth and Those Requiring Removal
Mean32.7 ± 13.35
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Oximetry Testing of Healthy Teeth and Those Requiring Removal
Female20
Male9
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Oximetry Testing of Healthy Teeth and Those Requiring Removal
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White0
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported29
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Oximetry Testing of Healthy Teeth and Those Requiring Removal
United States29
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Oral and Maxiofacial Surgery Clinic, U of Michigan School of Dentistry
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jul 3, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 19, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03578549
Lead sponsor
University of Michigan
Responsible party
Darya Dabiri (Post Doc Research Fellow, Faculty of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 6, 2018
Start date
Jul 12, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2019
Completion
Jun 30, 2019
Results posted
Oct 19, 2020
Last update
Oct 19, 2020

Study contacts

Darya Dabiri, DMD, MS
principal investigator · University of Michigan

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion