CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03560492Updated Feb 8, 2021

Postural Garment Versus Exercises for Women With Cervical Pain

An interventional study of Exercises and Posture garment in Posture and Cervical Pain, sponsored by University of Andorra. Completed at 1 site in Andorra. Open to female participants aged 21 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-08.

Sponsored by University of Andorra · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2017, registered May 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 55 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study aim to compare a new postural garment (Posture Plus Force ®) versus exercises in women with non specific cervical pain. The investigators focus on nurses and allied health professionals due to the importance of posture in work related musculoskeletal disorders.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of a postural garment versus exercises in nurses with non-specific cervical pain.

DESIGN: Randomized cross over clinical trial with a 3 months sequence treatment and a 3 months washout period..

PARTICIPANTS: Nurses and allied health professionals with cervical pain aged 21 to 55 years.

INTERVENTIONS:

Participants are allocated at random to receive interventions in two groups:

  • P+ : a postural garment (Posture Plus Force - FGP srl ® - Italy) to be worn from 2 to 4 hours per day, during 90 days.
  • Ex: five physiotherapy sessions to learn stretching and strengthening exercises (20 minutes) with instructions to continue at home on a daily basis for 90 days.

The subjects in each group will be cross over after three months of wash out period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

The primary outcomes are postural control and pain intensity. Pictures on sagittal and frontal plane as well as measurements of static posturography with a scan (SpinalMouse ®) are conducted at T0 (pre-intervention), T1 immediately after garment fitting for P+ group and after the 5th session for Ex group, T30, T60 and T90 at day 30, day 60 and day 90 of follow-up. Pain is measured by visual analogue scale (VAS) on the same assessment days.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:

Statistical analysis is conducted following intention-to-treat principles, and the treatment effects calculated using linear mixed models.

02

Conditions studied

  • Posture
  • Cervical Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • posture
  • cervical pain
  • exercise
03

In context

Neck Pain

1,232 studies on the registry are indexed under Neck Pain; 255 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 70 is above the median of 52 across 1,004 interventional studies indexed under Neck Pain.

Browse Neck Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Andorra is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Nurses and health allied professionals females with cervical pain
  • Voluntarily signed informed consent
  • Able to wear the garment and to do exercises and follow up assessments

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Malignancy or other severe disease
  • Cervical pain with significant extremity symptoms and/or neurological dysfunction (cervical radiculopathy and cervical spondylotic myelopathy)
  • Unable to perform exercises
  • Unwilling to do follow up assessments
  • Psychiatric disorders
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
70 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Posture Plus Force

    Participants are provided with the posture garment. They have to wear it 2 to 4 h per day for a 3 month period. Participants receive a logbook that should be filled every day.

    Device: Posture garment

  • Active comparator
    Exercise

    A physiotherapist teaches exercises to participants (5 sessions of 20 minutes each of stretching and strengthening exercises). Exercises are focused on cervical and dorsal areas, Participants receive instructions to continue at home on a daily basis for 3 months. Participants receive a logbook that should be filled every day.

    Other: Exercises

Interventions

  • OtherExercises

    5 sessions of exercises of 20 minutes each. Participants have to do a set of cervical, dorsal and abdominal stretching and strengthening exercises. Participants receive instructions to continue at home on a daily basis for 3 months and record compliance in a logbook.

  • DevicePosture garment

    Participants are provided with the appropriate size of a posture garment which includes thoracic and abdominal tensional bands. They are instructed to wear it 2 to 4 h per day for a 3 month period and record compliance in a logbook daily.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline cervical Pain measured with a visual analog scale at 3 months

    Visual analogue scale is a psychometric measuring instrument designed to document cervical pain severity in individual subjects. It achieves a rapid (statistically measurable and reproducible) classification of symptom severity. A 100-mm long horizontal line with verbal descriptors is used to grade the amount of pain that a patient feels from no pain (left 0 mm) to an extreme amount of pain (right 100 mm).

    Time frame: Pain is assessed pre-intervention (Day 0) and at Month 3 of follow-up.

  2. Change from baseline cervical Pain at 3 months (after the wash out period)

    Visual analogue scale is a psychometric measuring instrument designed to document cervical pain severity in individual subjects. It achieves a rapid (statistically measurable and reproducible) classification of symptom severity. A 100-mm long horizontal line with verbal descriptors is used to grade the amount of pain that a patient feels from no pain (left 0 mm) to an extreme amount of pain (right 100 mm).

    Time frame: After the washout period, pain is assessed at baseline (Month 6) and after 3 months of intervention (Month 9)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Posture measured by angle of Kyphosis and angle of lordosis with a computerized device (SpinalMouse® )

    SpinalMouse ® is a device that, combined with a computer program, assesses the curvatures of the spine without applying radiation. The device is guided manually on the skin along the spinous process apophysis from C7 to S3. The measuring head follows their contour in the sagittal plane and records clinically relevant data. A software program using an algorithm uses this information to calculate the angle of kyphosis and angle of lordosis. Data obtained have been proved to be reliable and accurate

    Time frame: Posture is assessed pre-intervention (Day 0))

  2. Posture measured by angle of Kyphosis and angle of lordosis with a computerized device (SpinalMouse® )

    SpinalMouse ® is a device that, combined with a computer program, assesses the curvatures of the spine without applying radiation. The device is guided manually on the skin along the spinous process apophysis from C7 to S3. The measuring head follows their contour in the sagittal plane and records clinically relevant data. A software program using an algorithm uses this information to calculate the angle of kyphosis and angle of lordosis. Data obtained have been proved to be reliable and accurate

    Time frame: Posture is assessed at Month 3 of follow-up.

  3. Posture measured by angle of Kyphosis and angle of lordosis with a computerized device (SpinalMouse® )

    SpinalMouse ® is a device that, combined with a computer program, assesses the curvatures of the spine without applying radiation. The device is guided manually on the skin along the spinous process apophysis from C7 to S3. The measuring head follows their contour in the sagittal plane and records clinically relevant data. A software program using an algorithm uses this information to calculate the angle of kyphosis and angle of lordosis. Data obtained have been proved to be reliable and accurate

    Time frame: Posture measurement is repeated after the 3-month washout period (Month 6)

  4. Posture measured by angle of Kyphosis and angle of lordosis with a computerized device (SpinalMouse® )

    SpinalMouse ® is a device that, combined with a computer program, assesses the curvatures of the spine without applying radiation. The device is guided manually on the skin along the spinous process apophysis from C7 to S3. The measuring head follows their contour in the sagittal plane and records clinically relevant data. A software program using an algorithm uses this information to calculate the angle of kyphosis and angle of lordosis. Data obtained have been proved to be reliable and accurate

    Time frame: Posture is assessed at Month 9 (end of study) after the washout period and the cross over 3 months intervention

  5. Neck Disability Index

    Cervical pain-related disability will be assessed with the validated Spanish version of Neck Disability Index. The Neck Disability Index is a ten-item questionnaire based on the Oswestry Low Back Pain Index that assesses disability associated with neck pain and whiplash. There are four items that relate to subjective symptomatology (pain intensity, headache, concentration, sleeping) and six items that relate to activities of daily living (lifting, work, driving, recreation, personal care, reading). The questionnaire is self and administered requires only 5-10 minutes to complete. It is scored from 0 (no disability) to 50 (maximum disability). Each subject select from one of six potential responses for each item ranging from no disability (0) to total disability (5). The ten items are summed to gain the total score.

    Time frame: Neck disability is assessed pre-intervention (Day 0)

  6. Neck Disability Index

    Cervical pain-related disability will be assessed with the validated Spanish version of Neck Disability Index. The Neck Disability Index is a ten-item questionnaire based on the Oswestry Low Back Pain Index that assesses disability associated with neck pain and whiplash. There are four items that relate to subjective symptomatology (pain intensity, headache, concentration, sleeping) and six items that relate to activities of daily living (lifting, work, driving, recreation, personal care, reading). The questionnaire is self and administered requires only 5-10 minutes to complete. It is scored from 0 (no disability) to 50 (maximum disability). Each subject select from one of six potential responses for each item ranging from no disability (0) to total disability (5). The ten items are summed to gain the total score.

    Time frame: Neck disability is assessed at Month 3 of follow-up.

  7. Neck Disability Index

    Cervical pain-related disability will be assessed with the validated Spanish version of Neck Disability Index. The Neck Disability Index is a ten-item questionnaire based on the Oswestry Low Back Pain Index that assesses disability associated with neck pain and whiplash. There are four items that relate to subjective symptomatology (pain intensity, headache, concentration, sleeping) and six items that relate to activities of daily living (lifting, work, driving, recreation, personal care, reading). The questionnaire is self and administered requires only 5-10 minutes to complete. It is scored from 0 (no disability) to 50 (maximum disability). Each subject select from one of six potential responses for each item ranging from no disability (0) to total disability (5). The ten items are summed to gain the total score.

    Time frame: Neck disability is repeated after the 3-month washout period (Month 6)

  8. Neck Disability Index

    Cervical pain-related disability will be assessed with the validated Spanish version of Neck Disability Index. The Neck Disability Index is a ten-item questionnaire based on the Oswestry Low Back Pain Index that assesses disability associated with neck pain and whiplash. There are four items that relate to subjective symptomatology (pain intensity, headache, concentration, sleeping) and six items that relate to activities of daily living (lifting, work, driving, recreation, personal care, reading). The questionnaire is self and administered requires only 5-10 minutes to complete. It is scored from 0 (no disability) to 50 (maximum disability). Each subject select from one of six potential responses for each item ranging from no disability (0) to total disability (5). The ten items are summed to gain the total score.

    Time frame: Neck disability is assessed at Month 9 (end of study) after the washout period and the cross over 3 months intervention

  9. Pain Catastrophizing Scale

    In order to assess the catastrophizing dimension related to pain, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale is used. It is a 13-item scale, with each item rated on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (all the time) that yields a total score and three subscale scores assessing rumination, magnification and helplessness. Total score ranges from 0 to 52. It is a self-report measurement tool that provided a valid index of catastrophizing in clinical populations.

    Time frame: Assessed pre-intervention (Day 0)

  10. Pain Catastrophizing Scale

    In order to assess the catastrophizing dimension related to pain, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale is used. It is a 13-item scale, with each item rated on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (all the time) that yields a total score and three subscale scores assessing rumination, magnification and helplessness. Total score ranges from 0 to 52. It is a self-report measurement tool that provided a valid index of catastrophizing in clinical populations.

    Time frame: Assessed at Month 3 of follow-up.

  11. Pain Catastrophizing Scale

    In order to assess the catastrophizing dimension related to pain, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale is used. It is a 13-item scale, with each item rated on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (all the time) that yields a total score and three subscale scores assessing rumination, magnification and helplessness. Total score ranges from 0 to 52. It is a self-report measurement tool that provided a valid index of catastrophizing in clinical populations.

    Time frame: Pain Catastrophizing scale is repeated after the 3-month washout period (Month 6)

  12. Pain Catastrophizing Scale

    In order to assess the catastrophizing dimension related to pain, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale is used. It is a 13-item scale, with each item rated on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (all the time) that yields a total score and three subscale scores assessing rumination, magnification and helplessness. Total score ranges from 0 to 52. It is a self-report measurement tool that provided a valid index of catastrophizing in clinical populations.

    Time frame: Catastrophizing is assessed at Month 9 (end of study) after the washout period and the cross over 3 months intervention

Other outcomes

  1. Garment comfort

    Garment comfort is evaluated with a 5-point Likert scale with the following anchors • 1 - Very dissatisfied • 2 - dissatisfied • 3 - unsure • 4 - satisfied • 5 - Very satisfied

    Time frame: garment comfort is assessed at Month 1 when allocated to the garment group intervention.

  2. Garment comfort

    Garment comfort is evaluated with a 5-point Likert scale with the following anchors • 1 - Very dissatisfied • 2 - dissatisfied • 3 - unsure • 4 - satisfied • 5 - Very satisfied

    Time frame: garment comfort is assessed at Month 3 when allocated to the garment group intervention.

  3. Assessment of global perceived effect of treatment

    Assessment of global perceived effect of treatment is performed with a Visual Analog Scale . Visual analogue scale is a psychometric measuring instrument designed to document perceived effect of the treatment in individual subjects. A 100-mm long horizontal line with verbal descriptors is used to grade the perceived effect that a patient feels from no improvement (left 0 mm) to an great improvement (right 100 mm).

    Time frame: Perceived effect of treatment is assessed at Month 3 of follow-up.

  4. Assessment of global perceived effect of treatment

    Assessment of global perceived effect of treatment is performed with a Visual Analog Scale . Visual analogue scale is a psychometric measuring instrument designed to document perceived effect of the treatment in individual subjects. A 100-mm long horizontal line with verbal descriptors is used to grade the perceived effect that a patient feels from no improvement (left 0 mm) to an great improvement (right 100 mm).

    Time frame: Perceived effect of treatment is assessed at Month 9 (end of study)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital N Sra de Meritxell - Rehabilitation Department
    Escaldes-engordany, Spanish AD700, Andorra
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Avellanet M, Boada-Pladellorens A, Perrot JC, Loro L, Rodrigo Cansado L, Monterde D, Romagosa J, Gea E. Comparative Study of Postural Garment Versus Exercises for Patients With Nonspecific Cervical Pain: Protocol for a Randomized Crossover Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Apr 16;9(4):e14807. doi: 10.2196/14807. PubMed 32297876 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 8, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03560492
Lead sponsor
University of Andorra
Responsible party
Merce AVELLANET (Head of Rehabilitation Department - Adjunct professor, University of Andorra) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 18, 2018
Start date
Apr 20, 2017
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2019
Completion
Jan 30, 2021
Last update
Feb 8, 2021

Study contacts

Merce Avellanet, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Universitat d'Andorra

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion