CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03559933Updated Sep 16, 2021Results posted

PEPNS System Feasibility Study

An interventional study of PEPNS System in Ventilator Induced Diaphragmatic Dysfunction (VIDD), sponsored by Stimdia Medical Inc.. Completed at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-09-16.

Sponsored by Stimdia Medical Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this feasibility study is to evaluate the safety and performance of the PEPNS System in patients that need to be mechanically ventilated for at least 48 hours and up to 7 days in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

Read the detailed description

Mechanical ventilation is a life saving technology but can also cause damage to the lungs and diaphragm such as ventilator induced diaphragmatic dysfunction (VIDD). Research has shown that after being on mandatory mechanical ventilation and sedation the diaphragm begins to atrophy within as little as 18 hours. The PEPNS System consists of a console and disposable lead and will be used to stimulate the patient's diaphragm to contract in synchrony with the inspiratory cycle of the ventilator. The proprietary phrenic nerve to diaphragm stimulation (pdSTIM) Lead incorporates multipolar electrodes that align with the left and right phrenic nerves in order to stimulate the nerves to the diaphragm. This feasibility trial will investigate the safety and performance of the PEPNS System as a therapy by stimulating the diaphragm over a 48 hour period to facilitate weaning from the mechanical ventilator. The patient population includes those need to be mechanically ventilated for at least 48 hours and up to 7 days in the ICU.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ventilator Induced Diaphragmatic Dysfunction (VIDD)
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Stimdia Medical Inc. is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. 18 years or older (Adult).
  2. Able and willing to give informed consent or whose legally authorized representative is able and willing to give informed consent.
  3. Subject who in the opinion of the admitting consultant/intensivist is likely to be ventilated for > 48 hours from time of recruitment since study treatment will be for up to 48 hours.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \< 20%.
  2. Subject unlikely to survive 72 hours due to coexisting medical conditions.
  3. Subject has an implanted pulse generator or implanted electronic device:
  4. Subject has experienced an Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) within 72 hours prior to this screening or patient is on high dose inotropic support or subject is deemed to be in cardiogenic shock.
  5. Subject has significant bleeding diathesis, or is at risk of significant haemorrhage, patient is receiving full dose systemic anticoagulation
  6. Subject has a known or suspected phrenic nerve paralysis or neuromuscular or inflammatory muscle diseases where the diaphragm itself may not be functional.
  7. Subject has an active systemic infection or local infection at or around the insertion site. Subject is neutropenic or has signs of significant immunocompromise.
  8. Subject is known or suspected to be pregnant or is lactating.
  9. Subject will be unavailable for, or is unwilling to comply with, follow up requirements of the protocol.
  10. Subject is currently enrolled or is expected to be enrolled in any other study of an investigational drug or device who has received treatment under that protocol with the investigational product during the 30 days prior to screening.
  11. Subject has undergone a surgery or interventional procedure within the neck region aside from placement of an internal jugular (IJ) vein catheter.
  12. Subject has been diagnosed and has been treated for neck cancer within the past 5 years.
  13. Subject is known to have a demonstrated intra cardiac thrombus on echocardiography.
  14. Subject has uncontrolled hyperthyroidism, hypertension.
  15. Subject has had any cerebral ischemic event (Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack TIA) in the 6-month interval preceding the screening date.
  16. Subject has degenerative nerve disorders such as amyotrophic laterals sclerosis (ALS).
  17. Subject has an elevated hemidiaphragm on chest x-ray.
  18. Subject written informed consent not obtained.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PEPNS System

    The pdSTIM lead will be temporarily inserted near the right and left phrenic nerves and connected to the PEPNS system console in order to stimulate the phrenic nerves and activate the diaphragm on the patients until extubated/removed from mechanical ventilation or until 48 hours has elapsed, whichever comes first.

    Device: PEPNS System

Interventions

  • DevicePEPNS System

    PEPNS System therapy will be delivered periodically up to 48 hours or less if patient is no longer being mechanically ventilated.

    Also known as: pdSTIM

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent Capture of Left and/or Right Phrenic Nerve

    Capture of the Left and/or Right Phrenic Nerve \> 80% with an output parameter of \< 10.5 volts. Capture was defined as diaphragmatic movement as a direct consequence of electrical phrenic nerve stimulation. Capture for this analysis was defined as synchrony of the stimulated breath with the output parameter \<10.5 volts and Work of Breath between 0.2 and 2.0 Joules/L. Synchrony was achieved if the lag time between start of inspiration and start of stimulation was less than 88 ms. The proportion of successful capture was analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model accounting for subject and stimulation within subject as random effects, and the outcome of capture was yes/no based on whether the stimulation captures the diaphragm with multiple observations per subject.

    Time frame: Up to 48 hours

  2. Percent of Breaths Within Work of Breathing Range

    Work of Breathing (WOB) kept between 0.2 and 2.0 joules/L for 80% of stimulated breaths. Outcome is measured as a percentage of stimulated breaths that had a WOB between 0.2 joules/L and 2 joules/L and the performance goal was 80%.

    Time frame: Up to 48 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Safe and Successful Lead Placement

    The percentage of patients who receive safe and successful placement of the multipolar lead in the left and right phrenic nerve utilizing ultrasound guidance will be determined.

    Time frame: Up to 48 hours

  2. Phrenic Nerve Stimulation Effectiveness

    Phrenic nerve stimulation in synchrony with Mechanical Ventilation breaths will be measured to verify that is occurs with inspiration.

    Time frame: Up to 48 hours

  3. Serious Device/Procedure Related Adverse Events

    The percentage of patients who experience one or more serious device/procedure-related adverse events during the study will be reported.

    Time frame: Up to 48 hours

07

Results

Posted Sep 16, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTreatment Group: Percutaneous Electrical Phrenic Nerve Stimulation (PEPNS) Therapy
Started12
Completed12
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercent Capture of Left and/or Right Phrenic Nerve

Capture of the Left and/or Right Phrenic Nerve \> 80% with an output parameter of \< 10.5 volts. Capture was defined as diaphragmatic movement as a direct consequence of electrical phrenic nerve stimulation. Capture for this analysis was defined as synchrony of the stimulated breath with the output parameter \<10.5 volts and Work of Breath between 0.2 and 2.0 Joules/L. Synchrony was achieved if the lag time between start of inspiration and start of stimulation was less than 88 ms. The proportion of successful capture was analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model accounting for subject and stimulation within subject as random effects, and the outcome of capture was yes/no based on whether the stimulation captures the diaphragm with multiple observations per subject.

Time frame:
Up to 48 hours
Reported as:
Number · percentage of phernic nerve capture
Percent Capture of Left and/or Right Phrenic Nerve
percentage of phernic nerve captureTreatment Group: Percutaneous Electrical Phrenic Nerve Stimulation (PEPNS) Therapy
Percent Capture of Left and/or Right Phrenic Nerve96.56
Statistical analysis
  • Treatment Group: Percutaneous Electrical Phrenic Nerve Stimulation (PEPNS) Therapy · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0125 · Logistic regression model: 95 · 95% CI 93.15 to 96.66Subject and stimulation within subject as random effects with multiple observations per subject was accounted for.
PrimaryPercent of Breaths Within Work of Breathing Range

Work of Breathing (WOB) kept between 0.2 and 2.0 joules/L for 80% of stimulated breaths. Outcome is measured as a percentage of stimulated breaths that had a WOB between 0.2 joules/L and 2 joules/L and the performance goal was 80%.

Time frame:
Up to 48 hours
Reported as:
Number · percentage of stimulated breaths
Percent of Breaths Within Work of Breathing Range
percentage of stimulated breathsPEPNS System
Percent of Breaths Within Work of Breathing Range96.77 (96.58 to 96.95)
SecondarySafe and Successful Lead Placement

The percentage of patients who receive safe and successful placement of the multipolar lead in the left and right phrenic nerve utilizing ultrasound guidance will be determined.

Time frame:
Up to 48 hours
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients
Safe and Successful Lead Placement
percentage of patientsPEPNS System
Safe and Successful Lead Placement100
SecondaryPhrenic Nerve Stimulation Effectiveness

Phrenic nerve stimulation in synchrony with Mechanical Ventilation breaths will be measured to verify that is occurs with inspiration.

Time frame:
Up to 48 hours
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients
Phrenic Nerve Stimulation Effectiveness
percentage of patientsTreatment Group: Percutaneous Electrical Phrenic Nerve Stimulation (PEPNS) Therapy
Phrenic Nerve Stimulation Effectiveness100
SecondarySerious Device/Procedure Related Adverse Events

The percentage of patients who experience one or more serious device/procedure-related adverse events during the study will be reported.

Time frame:
Up to 48 hours
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients
Serious Device/Procedure Related Adverse Events
percentage of patientsTreatment Group: Percutaneous Electrical Phrenic Nerve Stimulation (PEPNS) Therapy
Serious Device/Procedure Related Adverse Events0

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data was collected during the therapy period (48 hours) and additional 30-37 days until follow-up.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment Group: Percutaneous Electrical Phrenic Nerve Stimulation (PEPNS) Therapy4/12 (33.3%)4/12 (33.3%)0/12 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventTreatment Group: Percutaneous Electrical Phrenic Nerve Stimulation (PEPNS) Therapy
Patient DeathNervous system disorders4/12

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Treatment Group: Percutaneous Electrical Phrenic Nerve Stimulation (PEPNS) Therapy
Mean61.9 ± 7.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Treatment Group: Percutaneous Electrical Phrenic Nerve Stimulation (PEPNS) Therapy
Female1
Male11
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Treatment Group: Percutaneous Electrical Phrenic Nerve Stimulation (PEPNS) Therapy
White12
BMI
BMI(kg/m^2)Treatment Group: Percutaneous Electrical Phrenic Nerve Stimulation (PEPNS) Therapy
Mean29.1 ± 6.6
Neck Circumference at the Cricoid Cartilage
Neck Circumference at the Cricoid Cartilage(centimeter)Treatment Group: Percutaneous Electrical Phrenic Nerve Stimulation (PEPNS) Therapy
Mean44.6 ± 5.3
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Military University Hospital (ÚVN)
    Prague, Czechia
  • Beaumont Hospital
    Dublin, Ireland
09

References and documents

Publications

  • O'Rourke J, Sotak M, Curley GF, Doolan A, Henlin T, Mullins G, Tyll T, Omlie W, Ranieri MV. Initial Assessment of the Percutaneous Electrical Phrenic Nerve Stimulation System in Patients on Mechanical Ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2020 May;48(5):e362-e370. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004256. PubMed 32191413 ↗
  • Sotak M, Roubik K, Henlin T, Tyll T. Phrenic nerve stimulation prevents diaphragm atrophy in patients with respiratory failure on mechanical ventilation. BMC Pulm Med. 2021 Oct 8;21(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01677-2. PubMed 34625059 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Nov 30, 2018
  • Statistical analysis plan · Mar 19, 2019
  • Informed consent form · Nov 30, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There will be no patient identifying information on any of the study case reports forms and all patients will only be identified by a study number.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 16, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03559933
Lead sponsor
Stimdia Medical Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 18, 2018
Start date
Jul 10, 2018
Primary completion
May 29, 2019
Completion
May 29, 2019
Results posted
Sep 16, 2021
Last update
Sep 16, 2021

Study contacts

Michal M Soták, MD
principal investigator · Military University Hospital (UVN) Prague
James O'Rourke, PhD
principal investigator · Beaumont Hospital Dublin, Ireland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion