An interventional study of Neuropsychological tests and Oculometric tests in Attention Deficit-Hyperactivity, sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble. Status unknown at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-06-06.
Sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
The aim of this study is to analyse thanks to eye tracking experiments ocular movement classical parameters in children with attention deficit hyperactivity (ADH) and to compare them to results obtained in healthy children and to results obtained with neuropsychological tests commonly used in standard health care.
We should then be able to compare eye tracking with neuropsychological parameters.
The final objective is to give to health professional a tool for ADH investigation with which they should be able to do a simple and effective follow up of children with ADH.
729 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperkinesis; 25 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 80 across 583 interventional studies indexed under Hyperkinesis.
Browse Hyperkinesis studies →University Hospital, Grenoble is the lead sponsor of 815 studies on the registry; 205 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Oculometric tests and neuropsychological tests
Behavioral: Neuropsychological tests · Behavioral: Oculometric tests
WISC test, BRIEF test, NEPSY-2 test, TAP2.3 test, Teach test
When the subject see a peripheric target, he should take a look not at the target but in the controlateral half-field, at a mirror position. This is called an anti-saccade task.
Correlation between oculometric and neuropsychological tests in ADH evaluation
Differentiation between simple oculomotor disorder and attentional-visual disorder
Time frame: Day 1
Plan to share: No
This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University Hospital, Grenoble