CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03537820Post op NOISEUpdated Oct 29, 2018

Noise Impact in the Post-anesthesia Care Unit

An observational study in All Surgery, sponsored by CHU de Reims. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-10-29.

Sponsored by CHU de Reims · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
816
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

World health organization recommends noise level should be less than 30db in hospital. However many analysis conclude to an average of 67dB in the post anesthesia care unit. No many studies were reported about noise impact in a post-anesthesia care unit. Only one was published by B.Allaouchiche in 2002. However, noise is a complaint reported by patients and it could be responsible for physiological and psychological troubles. In this prospective study, the main objective is to determine patients' satisfaction in the post anesthesia care unit, before and after installation of a noise warning device. Between the two parts, a short training about noise consequences on health will be presented to nurses. Improvement off anti-noise actions on patient's satisfaction will analysed.

Read the detailed description

Although the post- anesthesia care unit can be noisy, the effect of noise on patients recovering from anesthesia is unknown. Indeed, many studies are achieved in reanimation or ICU. That's why this prospective study is about patients' satisfaction after their stay in the post-anesthesia care unit. In a first part, noise is just measured with a sound level meter and patients are asked about their experience. Before the second part, during few days, nurses will be informed about noise consequences on heath. With some precaution, a decrease of the sound level in a room (ex: decrease scope alarms, speaking quietly, not slamming the drawer, noise warning device...) will be expected. The main objective is to determine the patient's satisfaction in the post-anesthesia care unit before and after installation of a noise warning device.

02

Conditions studied

  • All Surgery
03

In context

Lead sponsor

CHU de Reims is the lead sponsor of 267 studies on the registry; 50 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

patient with scheduled surgery

Inclusion criteria

  • patient who have a scheduled surgery in University hospital of Reims
  • patient who stay in the post-anesthesia care unit
  • patient consenting to participate to the study
  • patient older than 18 years

Exclusion criteria

exclusion criteria :

  • Emergency surgery
  • Patients who have been hearing disorders (notice in the preoperative consultation)
  • Patients who have cognitive disorders (notice in the preoperative consultation)
  • Patients who have a medical history of ear/cerebral surgery
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
816 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • before nurses formation/installation of a noise warning device

    ambulatory or hospitalized patients, who go in post-anesthesia care unit, before nurses formation and installation of a noise warning device

    Other: questionnaire

  • after nurses formation/installation of a noise warning device

    ambulatory or hospitalized patients, who go in post-anesthesia care unit, after nurses formation and installation of a noise warning device

    Other: questionnaire

Interventions

  • Otherquestionnaire

    questionnaire EVAN-G

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. patient's unpleasantness due to the noise

    visual analog scale EVAN-G

    Time frame: day 1

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Chu Reims
    Reims, 51092, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 29, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03537820
Lead sponsor
CHU de Reims
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 25, 2018
Start date
Mar 5, 2018
Primary completion
May 4, 2018
Completion
May 4, 2018
Last update
Oct 29, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion