CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03537404Updated Feb 19, 2019Results posted

A Drug Interaction Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics of Narlaprevir and Antiretroviral Drugs

A Phase 1 interventional study of Narlaprevir and Ritonavir in Healthy, sponsored by R-Pharm. Completed at 1 site in Russian Federation. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-19.

Sponsored by R-Pharm · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2017, registered May 2018).
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study purpose is to evaluate the potential for a pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction, safety and tolerability when Narlaprevir, Ritonavir (used as a metabolic inhibitor) and Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (part 1) and Narlaprevir, Ritonavir and Raltegravir (part 2) are administered in combination to healthy volunteers.

Read the detailed description

The current study includes 2 parts, as the following drugs may be used concomitantly to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV)/HIV coinfection:

  • Part 1 of the study is being conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetic effect of coadministration of narlaprevir with ritonavir and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.
  • Part 2 of the study is being conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetic effect of coadministration of narlaprevir/ritonavir and raltegravir.

Each part of the study is designed as a randomized 3-period crossover study and will assess if there is any effect of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or raltegravir on the pharmacokinetics of narlaprevir and vice versa.

Subjects will be screened within 28 days before dosing in this multi-part study. All subjects eligible for protocol criteria will be randomized 1:1:1 to receive one of the following treatment sequences: A/B/C, or B/C/A, or C/A/B. Every subject will receive only one treatment (A or B or C) in one Period. Subjects will be confined to the study center throughout treatment in each period. Following completion of study procedures for each treatment period, subjects will be released from the clinic. After a 7-14 (maximum) days interval between dosing, subjects will return to start hospitalization for the next treatment period. Subjects will be discharged from the study upon completion of all study related procedures in Period 3. Phone call will be conducted after 5-7 days of follow-up period to assess safety data.

This drug interaction study is designed to investigate pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between Narlaprevir coadministered with Ritonavir and antiretroviral drugs (Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and Raltegravir) for labeling and clinical dosing guidance purposes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy

Keywords

  • hepatitis C
  • chronic
  • pharmacokinetics
  • HIV
  • coinfection
  • concomitant therapy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

R-Pharm is the lead sponsor of 55 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria (the subject must meet all the criteria listed below for entry at baseline and at Days -1 and 1 before each treatment Period):

  • Subjects must be willing to give written informed consent for the trial and able to adhere to dose and visit schedules.
  • Subjects having a Body Mass Index (BMI) between 18,5 and 30 kg/m\^2, inclusive.
  • Subjects should diagnosed as "healthy": no pathology of the gastrointestinal tract, liver, kidneys, cardiovascular system, central nervous system (previously carried out by standard clinical and lab tests which did not reveal the presence of any diseases. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) must not exceed the normal range; QT interval calculated by Bazett's formula (QTcB) for men should be ≤ 450 ms and ≤ 470 ms for women, the interval PR should be ≤ 200 ms).
  • Vital sign measurements (taken after \~3 minutes in a supine or sitting position) must be within the following ranges:

    1. systolic blood pressure, 100 - 130 mm Hg;
    2. diastolic blood pressure, 60 -90 mm Hg;
    3. pulse rate, 60-80 bpm.
  • Female subjects must be:

    1. postmenopausal (defined as 12 months with no menses; age > 40 years and with a follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level of >40 u/mL);
    2. surgically sterilized at least 3 months prior to baseline (e.g., documented hysterectomy or tubal ligation).
  • Men must agree to use a medically accepted method of contraception (condom and spermicide) during the trial and for 3 months after stopping the medication.

Exclusion Criteria (the subject will be excluded from entry if any of the criteria listed below are met at baseline):

  • Females with childbearing potential.
  • Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, will not be able to participate optimally in the study.
  • Positive results for hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C antibodies or HIV, positive RW results.
  • Allergic reactions in history.
  • Intolerance to medication.
  • Chronic disease of cardiovascular, bronchopulmonary, and/or neuroendocrine systems, gastrointestinal, liver, pancreas, kidney and/or blood disease.
  • History or presence of impaired renal function, lactase deficiency, lactose intolerance, glucose-galactose malabsorption.
  • History of urinary obstruction or difficulty in voiding.
  • Gastrointestinal surgery in history (except of appendectomy).
  • Acute infections less than 4 weeks before participation in the study.
  • Subjects with a medical history of osteopenia and/or osteoporosis.
  • Regular administration of any medicines less than 4 weeks before participation in the study.
  • Administration of medicines with marked influence on hemodynamics, liver function et al (barbiturates, omeprazole, cimetidine et al) less than 30 days before participation in the study.
  • Blood donation (450 ml or more of blood or plasma) less than 2 months before participation in the study.
  • Intake of more than 10 units of alcohol in a week (1 unit of alcohol is equal to 0.5 L of beer, 200 mL of wine or 50 mL of spirits) or history of drug abuse or alcoholism.
  • Smoking of more than 10 cigarettes or equivalent tobacco use per day.
  • Participation in phase 1 clinical trial less than 3 months before participation in the study.
  • Positive screen for drugs abuse and drugs use.
  • Subjects with a medical history of psychiatric or personality disorders that in the opinion of the investigator and sponsor, affects the subject's ability to participate in the trial.
  • Subjects who are part of the study staff personnel or family members of the study staff personnel.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Treatment A (Part 1/ Part 2)

    Narlaprevir 200 mg once daily with Ritonavir 100 mg once daily for 5 days

    Drug: Narlaprevir · Drug: Ritonavir

  • Active comparator
    Treatment B (Part 1)

    Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg once daily for 5 days

    Drug: Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate

  • Active comparator
    Treatment B (Part 2)

    Raltegravir 400 mg twice daily for 5 days

    Drug: Raltegravir

  • Experimental
    Treatment C (Part 1)

    Narlaprevir 200 mg once daily coadministered with ritonavir 100 mg once daily and Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg once daily for 5 days

    Drug: Narlaprevir · Drug: Ritonavir · Drug: Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate

  • Experimental
    Treatment C (Part 2)

    Narlaprevir 200 mg once daily coadministered with ritonavir 100 mg once daily and 400 mg raltegravir twice daily for 5 days

    Drug: Narlaprevir · Drug: Ritonavir · Drug: Raltegravir

Interventions

  • DrugNarlaprevir

    100 mg, film-coated tablets, taken as 200 mg per os daily

    Also known as: Arlansa

  • DrugRitonavir

    100 mg, film-coated tablets, taken as 100 mg per os daily

    Also known as: Norvir

  • DrugTenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate

    300 mg, film-coated tablets, taken as 300 mg per os daily

    Also known as: Tenofovir-TL, Viread

  • DrugRaltegravir

    400 mg, film-coated tablets, taken as 400 mg per os daily

    Also known as: Isentress

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cmax of Narlaprevir

    Maximum observed Concentration of Narlaprevir at Day 5 of treatment A and C of Part 1 or 2 of the study

    Time frame: Day 5 Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose on Day 5 of treatment A and C (Part 1/ Part 2)

  2. AUCtau of Narlaprevir

    Area Under the Concentration-time curve during a dosing interval τ at steady state of Narlaprevir at Day 5 of treatment A and C of Part 1/ Part 2 of the study

    Time frame: Day 5 Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose on Day 5 of treatment A and C (Part 1/ Part 2)

  3. Cmax of Tenofovir

    Maximum observed Concentration of Tenofovir at Day 5 of treatment B and C of Part 1 of the study

    Time frame: Day 5 Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18 and 24 hrs post-dose on Day 5 of treatment B and C (Part 1)

  4. AUCtau of Tenofovir

    Area Under the Concentration-time curve during a dosing interval τ at steady state of Tenofovir at Day 5 of treatment B and C of Part 1 of the study

    Time frame: Day 5 Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18 and 24 hrs post-dose on Day 5 of treatment B and C (Part 1)

  5. Cmax of Raltegravir

    Maximum observed Concentration of Raltegravir at Day 5 of treatment B and C of Part 2 of the study

    Time frame: Day 5 Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 hrs post-dose of Day 5 of treatment B and C (Part 2)

  6. AUCtau of Raltegravir

    Area Under the Concentration-time curve during a dosing interval τ at steady state of Tenofovir at Day 5 of treatment B and C of Part 2 of the study

    Time frame: Day 5 Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 hrs post-dose of Day 5 of treatment B and C (Part 2)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients With Adverse Events

    Time frame: Up to 14 Days after the last dose of treatment in period 3 of each Part of the Study

  2. Number of Patients With Changes in Vital Signs

    There were no subjects with abnormal changes in vital signs

    Time frame: Up to 14 Days after the last dose of treatment in period 3 of each Part of the Study

  3. Number of Patients With Abnormal Laboratory Values

    Time frame: Up to 14 Days after the last dose of treatment in period 3 of each Part of the Study

  4. Number of Patients With Abnormal ECG Changes

    There were no subjects with abnormal ECG changes during the study

    Time frame: Up to 14 Days after the last dose of treatment in period 3 of each Part of the Study

07

Results

Posted Feb 19, 2019

Participant flow

Healthy adult volunteers were recruited for all Parts of the study in one clinical site (Bessalar clinic) in Moscow between April and June 2017. 36 subjects were randomized so that 18 subjects participated in each Part of the study (6 subjects in each treatment group of each Part).

First Intervention (A or B or C)
Participant flow — First Intervention (A or B or C)
MilestonePart 1Part 2
Started1818
Completed1818
Not completed00
First Washout Period (8 Days)
Participant flow — First Washout Period (8 Days)
MilestonePart 1Part 2
Started1818
Completed1818
Not completed00
Second Intervention (A or B or C)
Participant flow — Second Intervention (A or B or C)
MilestonePart 1Part 2
Started1818
Completed1818
Not completed00
Second Washout Period (8 Days)
Participant flow — Second Washout Period (8 Days)
MilestonePart 1Part 2
Started1818
Completed1818
Not completed00
Third Intervention (A or B or C)
Participant flow — Third Intervention (A or B or C)
MilestonePart 1Part 2
Started1818
Completed1818
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryCmax of Narlaprevir

Maximum observed Concentration of Narlaprevir at Day 5 of treatment A and C of Part 1 or 2 of the study

Time frame:
Day 5 Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose on Day 5 of treatment A and C (Part 1/ Part 2)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng/ml
Cmax of Narlaprevir
ng/mlTreatment A (Part 1)Treatment C (Part 1)Treatment A (Part 2)Treatment C (Part 2)
Cmax of Narlaprevir2130.2742 (1817.4088 to 2731.8348)2172.233 (1895.673 to 2726.557)2946.131 (2617.485 to 3799.642)2880.612 (2412.858 to 4121.871)
Statistical analysis
  • Treatment A (Part 1) vs Treatment C (Part 1) · Geometric mean ratio: 0.020 · 90% CI -0.103 to 0.142Cmax parameters were logarithmically transformed
  • Treatment A (Part 2) vs Treatment C (Part 2) · Geometric mean ratio: -0.022 · 90% CI -0.220 to 0.175Cmax parameters were logarithmically transformed
PrimaryAUCtau of Narlaprevir

Area Under the Concentration-time curve during a dosing interval τ at steady state of Narlaprevir at Day 5 of treatment A and C of Part 1/ Part 2 of the study

Time frame:
Day 5 Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16 and 24 hours post-dose on Day 5 of treatment A and C (Part 1/ Part 2)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng*h/ml
AUCtau of Narlaprevir
ng*h/mlTreatment A (Part 1)Treatment C (Part 1)Treatment A (Part 2)Treatment C (Part 2)
AUCtau of Narlaprevir20504.31 (18265.63 to 24328.95)21366.2 (18664.1 to 26481.9)26199.19 (23136.15 to 33132.53)24458.48 (20738.76 to 33597.42)
Statistical analysis
  • Treatment A (Part 1) vs Treatment C (Part 1) · Geometric mean ratio: 0.041 · 90% CI -0.075 to 0.157AUCtau parameters were logarithmically transformed.
  • Treatment A (Part 2) vs Treatment C (Part 2) · Geometric mean ratio: -0.069 · 90% CI -0.201 to 0.064AUCtau parameters were logarithmically transformed
PrimaryCmax of Tenofovir

Maximum observed Concentration of Tenofovir at Day 5 of treatment B and C of Part 1 of the study

Time frame:
Day 5 Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18 and 24 hrs post-dose on Day 5 of treatment B and C (Part 1)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng/ml
Cmax of Tenofovir
ng/mlTreatment B (Part 1)Treatment C (Part 1)
Cmax of Tenofovir263.037 (233.126 to 313.318)344.796 (302.457 to 415.092)
Statistical analysis
  • Treatment B (Part 1) vs Treatment C (Part 1) · Geometric mean ratio: 0.271 · 90% CI 0.159 to 0.383Cmax parameters were logarithmically transformed
PrimaryAUCtau of Tenofovir

Area Under the Concentration-time curve during a dosing interval τ at steady state of Tenofovir at Day 5 of treatment B and C of Part 1 of the study

Time frame:
Day 5 Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18 and 24 hrs post-dose on Day 5 of treatment B and C (Part 1)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng*h/ml
AUCtau of Tenofovir
ng*h/mlTreatment B (Part 1)Treatment C (Part 1)
AUCtau of Tenofovir2599.95 (2325.72 to 3043.02)2799.72 (2536.67 to 3205.65)
Statistical analysis
  • Treatment B (Part 1) vs Treatment C (Part 1) · Geometric mean ratio: 0.074 · 90% CI 0.016 to 0.132AUCtau parameters were logarithmically transformed
PrimaryCmax of Raltegravir

Maximum observed Concentration of Raltegravir at Day 5 of treatment B and C of Part 2 of the study

Time frame:
Day 5 Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 hrs post-dose of Day 5 of treatment B and C (Part 2)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng/ml
Cmax of Raltegravir
ng/mlTreatment B (Part 2)Treatment C (Part 2)
Cmax of Raltegravir830.204 (520.042 to 2758.109)715.726 (136.163 to 2396.130)
Statistical analysis
  • Treatment B (Part 2) vs Treatment C (Part 2) · Geometric mean ratio: -0.148 · 90% CI -0.450 to 0.153Cmax parameters were logarithmically transformed
PrimaryAUCtau of Raltegravir

Area Under the Concentration-time curve during a dosing interval τ at steady state of Tenofovir at Day 5 of treatment B and C of Part 2 of the study

Time frame:
Day 5 Pre-dose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 hrs post-dose of Day 5 of treatment B and C (Part 2)
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng*h/ml
AUCtau of Raltegravir
ng*h/mlTreatment B (Part 2)Treatment C (Part 2)
AUCtau of Raltegravir2912.45 (1983.01 to 8451.44)2653.65 (1033.88 to 6964.58)
Statistical analysis
  • Treatment B (Part 2) vs Treatment C (Part 2) · Geometric mean ratio: -0.093 · 90% CI -0.354 to 0.168AUCtau parameters were logarithmically transformed
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Adverse Events
Time frame:
Up to 14 Days after the last dose of treatment in period 3 of each Part of the Study
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With Adverse Events
ParticipantsTreatment A (Part 1)Treatment B (Part 1)Treatment C (Part 1)Treatment A (Part 2)Treatment B (Part 2)Treatment C (Part 2)
Number of Patients With Adverse Events104001
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Changes in Vital Signs

There were no subjects with abnormal changes in vital signs

Time frame:
Up to 14 Days after the last dose of treatment in period 3 of each Part of the Study
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With Changes in Vital Signs
ParticipantsTreatment A (Part 1)Treatment B (Part 1)Treatment C (Part 1)Treatment A (Part 2)Treatment B (Part 2)Treatment C (Part 2)
Number of Patients With Changes in Vital Signs000000
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Abnormal Laboratory Values
Time frame:
Up to 14 Days after the last dose of treatment in period 3 of each Part of the Study
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With Abnormal Laboratory Values
ParticipantsTreatment A (Part 1)Treatment B (Part 1)Treatment C (Part 1)
Part 1002
Part 2001
SecondaryNumber of Patients With Abnormal ECG Changes

There were no subjects with abnormal ECG changes during the study

Time frame:
Up to 14 Days after the last dose of treatment in period 3 of each Part of the Study
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With Abnormal ECG Changes
ParticipantsTreatment A (Part 1/Part 2)Treatment B (Part 1/Part 2)Treatment C (Part 1/Part 2)
Part 1000
Part 2000

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 14 Days after the last dose of treatment in period 3 of each Part of the Study. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment A (Part 1)0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)1/18 (5.6%)
Treatment B (Part 1)0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)
Treatment C (Part 1)0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)4/18 (22.2%)
Treatment A (Part 2)0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)
Treatment B (Part 2)0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)
Treatment C (Part 2)0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)1/18 (5.6%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventTreatment A (Part 1)Treatment B (Part 1)Treatment C (Part 1)Treatment A (Part 2)Treatment B (Part 2)Treatment C (Part 2)
Alanine Aminotransferase IncreasedInvestigations0/180/181/180/180/181/18
Blood Lactate Dehydrogenase DecreasedInvestigations0/180/181/180/180/180/18
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/180/181/180/180/180/18
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders0/180/181/180/180/180/18
Gamma-Glutamyltransferase IncreasedInvestigations0/180/180/180/180/181/18

Baseline characteristics

All 36 subjects randomized to study treatment and received at least one dose of study drug (Safety Population).

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Sequence A/B/CSequence B/C/ASequence C/A/BTotal
Part 124.3 ± 1.7538.3 ± 8.2629.7 ± 1.8630.8 ± 7.57
Part 224.3 ± 4.0338.7 ± 4.5929.5 ± 3.3330.8 ± 7.17
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Sequence A/B/CSequence B/C/ASequence C/A/BTotal
Part 1 — Female0000
Part 1 — Male66618
Part 2 — Female0000
Part 2 — Male66618
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Sequence A/B/CSequence B/C/ASequence C/A/BTotal
Part 1 — White66517
Part 1 — Asian0011
Part 1 — Black0000
Part 1 — Other0000
Part 2 — White65617
Part 2 — Asian0101
Part 2 — Black0000
Part 2 — Other0000
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(kg/m2)Sequence A/B/CSequence B/C/ASequence C/A/BTotal
Part 123.14 ± 1.28724.73 ± 3.02224.20 ± 3.13424.02 ± 2.554
Part 224.26 ± 4.13225.40 ± 2.73225.63 ± 3.40825.10 ± 3.319
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Clinic "Bessalar" JSC
    Moscow, Russian Federation
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Feb 20, 2017

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 19, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03537404
Lead sponsor
R-Pharm
Collaborators
Almedis
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 25, 2018
Start date
Apr 24, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 24, 2017
Completion
Jun 30, 2017
Results posted
Feb 19, 2019
Last update
Feb 19, 2019

Study contacts

Mikhail Samsonov
study director · R-Pharm

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion