An interventional study of Open Reduction Internal Fixation superior plate and Open Reduction Internal Fixation anteroinferior plate in Closed Fracture of Shaft of Clavicle, sponsored by UMAE Hospital de Traumatologia y Ortopedia de Puebla. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-23.
Sponsored by UMAE Hospital de Traumatologia y Ortopedia de Puebla · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome in patients with a midshaft clavicle fracture treated with to different techniques. the first one was placing a 3.5mm reconstruction plate in the superior side of the clavicle and the second one placing the same 3.5mm reconstruction plate in the anteroinferior side of the clavicle. the patients had the same rehabilitation program and evaluated with functional scores at 30, 60, 90 and 365 days after surgery. biomechanical studies have demonstrated more stable construct using an anteroinferior plate in clavicle fractures and we were trying to find out if it has a clinical relevance in patients with midshaft clavicle fractures.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome in patients with a midshaft clavicle fracture treated with to different techniques.
the first technique was placing a 3.5mm reconstruction plate in the superior side of the clavicle and the second one placing the same 3.5mm reconstruction plate in the anteroinferior side of the clavicle.
the patients had the same rehabilitation program and evaluated with Disabilities Arm Shoulder and Hand functional outcome score and Visual Analogue Score for pain at 30, 60, 90 and 365 days after surgery.
biomechanical studies have demonstrated more stable construct using an anteroinferior plate in clavicle fractures and we were trying to find out if it has a clinical relevance in patients with midshaft clavicle fractures.
44 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Closed; 4 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 28 is below the median of 45 across 34 interventional studies indexed under Fractures, Closed.
Browse Fractures, Closed studies →This is the only study on the registry with UMAE Hospital de Traumatologia y Ortopedia de Puebla as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
this group with midshaft clavicle fracture were treated with superior reconstruction plate
Procedure: Open Reduction Internal Fixation superior plate
this group with midshaft clavicle fracture were treated with anteroinferior reconstruction plate
Procedure: Open Reduction Internal Fixation anteroinferior plate
3.5mm superior reconstruction plate
3.5mm anteroinferior reconstruction plate
Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand score (DASH)
we applied the Disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand score a score from 0 to 100 where 0 is no disability and 100 the worst disability
Time frame: 30 days after surgery
Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand score (DASH)
we applied the Disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand score a score from 0 to 100 where 0 is no disability and 100 the worst disability
Time frame: 60 days after surgery
Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand score (DASH)
we applied the Disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand score a score from 0 to 100 where 0 is no disability and 100 the worst disability
Time frame: 90 days after surgery
Disabilities of Arm Shoulder and Hand score (DASH)
we applied the Disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand score a score from 0 to 100 where 0 is no disability and 100 the worst disability
Time frame: 365 days after surgery
Visual Analogue Scale score (VAS)
we applied Visual Analogous Scale pain score a 0 to 10 score where 0 is no pain and 10 the maximum grade of pain
Time frame: 30 days after surgery
Visual Analogue Scale score (VAS)
we applied Visual Analogous Scale pain score a 0 to 10 score where 0 is no pain and 10 the maximum grade of pain
Time frame: 60 days after surgery
Visual Analogue Scale score (VAS)
we applied Visual Analogous Scale pain score a 0 to 10 score where 0 is no pain and 10 the maximum grade of pain
Time frame: 90 days after surgery
Visual Analogue Scale score (VAS)
we applied Visual Analogous Scale pain score a 0 to 10 score where 0 is no pain and 10 the maximum grade of pain
Time frame: 365 days after surgery
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in May 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.