CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03518463ERAS-MbararaUpdated May 8, 2018

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Emergency Caesarean Deliveries

An interventional study of Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in Pregnancy Related, sponsored by Mbarara University of Science and Technology. Completed at 1 site in Uganda. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-08.

Sponsored by Mbarara University of Science and Technology · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2017, registered Apr 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Caesarean section (CS) constitutes a large proportion of the total surgical volume in low-income countries. This rate comes with challenges including surgical complications, shortage of beds, and consequently long waiting time for operations and high costs. These have led to the adoption of ERAS in developed countries in a bid to save costs by reducing hospital length of stay without compromising the health of the mother and her baby.

Read the detailed description

CS is the most common major surgery at Mbarara Hospital (56.2%). This rate comes with challenges including surgical complications, shortage of beds, and consequently long waiting time for operations. Enhanced recovery programs are composed of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative strategies combined to form a multi-modal pathway. ERAS requires a multidisciplinary team of anesthetists, surgeons and nurses for successful implementation and realization of its advantages. ERAS has been seen to reduce duration of hospital stay, complications and costs. Although many of the elements of enhanced recovery after surgery are similar, it has not been tested in emergency CS and there is limited data about its applicability in low income settings like Uganda where 95% of CS are emergencies. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of ERAS protocols following emergency caesarean delivery in a low resource setting.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pregnancy Related

Browse trials for

03

In context

Emergencies

1,692 studies on the registry are indexed under Emergencies; 332 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 160 is above the median of 145 across 930 interventional studies indexed under Emergencies.

Browse Emergencies studies →

Lead sponsor

Mbarara University of Science and Technology is the lead sponsor of 31 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • We included women who were ASA 1 and 2 mothers who were delivering by emergency caesarean section using spinal anesthetic technique.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria included refusal to consent, pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia, antepartum hemorrhage, malaria, gestational diabetes mellitus, physical disability that would prevent postoperative mobilization and mental illness precluding comprehension of protocols.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
160 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    ERAS arm received; Preoperative:1. Intravenous (IV) cefazoline 1g 2. IV metoclopromide 10mg, dexamethasone 8mg, ranitidine 150mg Intraoperative: 1. Hyperbaric bupivacaine 10-15mg plus intrathecal morphine 100mcg 2. Adrenaline 100mcg in 500ml of ringers lactate 3. Individualized goal directed fluid therapy 4. Reinforced counseling and education 5. wound infiltration with isobaric bupivacaine 2mg/kg 6. Rectal diclofenac 100mg and misoprostol 400mcg stat Postoperative: 1. Feeding within 1 hour 2. urethral catheter removal at 6-8 hours 3. Mobilization at 8-10 hours 4. A single fixed dose combination of ibuprofen 400 mg and paracetamol 500 mg 8 hourly 5. Tablets Amoxicillin-clavulunate 850mg 12 hourly

    Combination Product: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)

  • Active comparator
    Control

    Standard care arm received; 1. IV ceftriaxone 2g or ampiclox 2g 2. Anesthetists administered IV fluids, vasopressors, and managed hypothermia based on their clinical impressions. 3. Oral feeding and breastfeeding were allowed any time after transfer to postnatal ward. 4. Urethral catheters were removed between 12-24 hours after surgery. 5. Ward nurses and obstetricians made decisions regarding treatment without study staff input or oversight.

    Combination Product: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)

Interventions

  • Combination productEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)

    The ERAS arm was exposed to standard preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative ERAS protocols of care. However, some were modified to our local resources and requirements as well as to the emergency nature of the surgeries.

    Also known as: Accelerated recovery, Fast track surgery

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Length of hospital stay

    Length of hospital stay was measured in hours

    Time frame: Measured from surgery up to 120 hours.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Complication rates

    These included pain, PONV, headache, pruritus, urine retention, wound infection, puerperal sepsis and readmission

    Time frame: Pain was assessed after 6 hours postoperative; PONV, pruritus and urine retention were assessed for 24 hours; headache was assessed for 1 week; wound infection, puerperal sepsis and readmission were assessed up to 30 days postoperative

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Mbarara university of Science and Technology
    Mbarara, Uganda
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Data will be shared after obtaining all necessary permission.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 8, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03518463
Lead sponsor
Mbarara University of Science and Technology
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 8, 2018
Start date
Jun 20, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 30, 2017
Completion
Nov 27, 2017
Last update
May 8, 2018

Study contacts

Baluku Moris, MD
principal investigator · Mbarara University of Science and Technology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion