CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03503032Updated Apr 18, 2023

Clinical Outcomes in Fenestrated Extra-Cardiac Fontan in Low Preoperative Risk Profiles

An observational study in Fontan Procedure, sponsored by King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Jeddah. Completed at 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-18.

Sponsored by King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Jeddah · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
62
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Evaluation of fenestration benefit in Extra-cardiac total cavo-pulmonary connection (Fontan procedure) in single ventricle anomaly, comparing clinical outcomes of patients with low preoperative risk profiles in prospective study

Read the detailed description

Study Population:

This study will include all patients referred for an elective Fontan procedure at the period of the study, who demonstrated a standard risk profile. An Informed consent will be obtained from the guardians before enrollment in the investigation. All procedures followed will be in accordance with institutional guidelines.

Randomization Technique:

Patients will be assigned to undergo either a fenestrated or non-fenestrated Extra-cardiac Fontan, based on a table of randomly generated numbers. Preoperative clinical data will be collected and compared to ensure appropriate randomization.

Preoperative Evaluation:

Enrolment Criteria:

Preoperative evaluation consists of ECG, transthoracic echocardiogram, and complete cardiac catheterization.

Patients with the following parameters will be eligible for enrollment in the study:

Sinus Rhythm Atriovnetricular valve regurgitation not more than mild Aortic (neoaortic) valve regurgitation not more than mild Normal systolic dominant ventricle function Mean pulmonary artery pressure not more than 15 mmHg (measured directly or estimated by pulmonary vein wedge pressure) Pulmonary vascular resistance not more than 2 woods unit End diastolic ventricular filling pressure not more than 8 mm Hg

Patient with the following will not be eligible for inclusion:

Patients with pulmonary artery distortion, stenosis or thrombus requiring surgical or interventional additional procedures before or during the Fontan operation. Pacemaker insertion before or during Fontan operation. Significant pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) rendering fenestration potentially a cause of excessive cyanosis. Patients for whom the cardiology/cardiac surgery case conference decision is strongly in favor of fenestration for any other cause.

Ventricular filling pressure will be directly measured as the end-diastolic pressure in the dominant systemic ventricle. The degree of systemic atrioventricular valve regurgitation will be assessed semi-quantitatively by echocardiographic color Doppler, primarily based on width of jet origin. The regurgitation jet will be graded as none, mild, moderate, or severe. Rhythm is assessed with preoperative ECG or Holter monitor (if required). Coil occlusion of aortopulmonary collaterals is not an exclusion criterion and is recommended before the Fontan operation.

Operative Technique and postoperative management:

Treatment Patients underwent an extracardiac Fontan operation. The extracardiac Fontan channel will be constructed with a Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tube graft from the inferior vena cava to the pulmonary artery. The size if the graft is determined by the surgeon and ranged from 16 to 22 mm in diameter. The fenestration consists of a single 3- to 6-mm communication between the Fontan channel and the common atrium.

Postoperative treatment will include administration of captopril, and aggressive use of diuretics. All patients will receive aspirin (81 mg per day) and warfarin with a target International Normalized Ration INR of 2-2.5 beginning on the first postoperative day. To maximize caloric intake, patients ill not be fluid restricted after the initial postoperative period. All patients will be placed on fat free diet for 6 weeks. Chest tubes will be left in place until drainage is less than 5 mL/kg in a 24-hour period. A chest tube will be reinserted only if a symptomatic pleural effusion is diagnosed. Steroids and Octreotide will be started after 2 weeks of persistent drainage or immediately if Chylothorax is diagnosed biochemically.

The attending cardiologist and surgeon determined the need for and timing of postoperative cardiac catheterization. Patients will be discharged from the intensive care unit when hemodynamic and respiratory stability is ensured and a stable heart rhythm is maintained. The patients will be discharged from hospital after all chest tubes are removed and when the clinical status permits.

Assessment of Outcomes:

The primary end is the total length of chest tube drainage in days. If chest tube reinsertion is required during the same admission, this time will be added to the primary outcome. Other outcome variables include length of stay in the intensive care unit, total hospital stay in days, total amount of chest tube drainage, occurrence of stroke,readmissions, reoperation, or death within 90 days of discharge. All end points are defined a priori. The day of surgery counted as day 1 for all variables. All reoperations will be assessed including returning to the operating room for bleeding or poor hemodynamics, replacement of chest tubes, cardiac catheterization, and late fenestration.

Statistical Analysis:

Sample size estimates is based on a retrospective analysis of the last 100 patients who underwent the Fontan procedure at out institutionwith 80% power to avoid a type II statistical error. A reduction in total chest tube drainage days of 15% is considered clinically significant. The median length of chest tube drainage (estimated as one day less than the median postoperative length of hospitalization) was 19 days. Given a clinically significant difference of 15%, the calculated days of difference were 19 X 0.15 = 2.85. We set the relevant difference to be 3 days. Using a modified Lehr's equation for sample size in count data, we estimate the number in each group to be, n=4/〖(√(γ_1 )-√(γ_2 ))〗\^2 =4/〖(√19-√16)〗\^2 =31patients.

Descriptive statistics will be calculated for all variables. Medians and ranges describe continuous variables. Categorical variables will be summarized as frequencies. The Mann Whitney U test will be used for all continuous variables; analysis and Fisher's exact test will be applied for all dichotomous variables.

Count data for hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, and length of chest tube drainage will be compared by means of Poisson regression or Cox proportional hazards models. A probability value of 0.05 will indicate statistical significance. All calculations were performed with R-project statistical software (www.r-project.org).

02

Conditions studied

  • Fontan Procedure

Keywords

  • Extracardiac Fontan
  • Total cavo-pulmonary connection
  • Fenestrated
  • Congenital heart defects
  • Pediatrics
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

All patients referred to King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center in Jeddah for an elective (Fontan) Total cavopulmonar connection procedure at the period of the study, who demonstrated a standard risk profile.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • This study will includeall patients referred for an elective TCPC procedure at the period of the study, who demonstrated a standard risk profile
  • Preoperative evaluation consisted of ECG, transthoracic echocardiogram, and complete cardiac catheterization.

Patients with the following parameters will be eligible for enrollment in the study:

  • Sinus Rhythm
  • Atriovnetricular valve regurgitation not more than mild
  • Aortic (neoaortic) valve regurgitation not more than mild
  • Normal systolic dominant ventricle function
  • Mean pulmonary artery pressure not more than 15 mmHg (measured directly or estimated by pulmonary vein wedge pressure)
  • Pulmonary vascular resistance not more than 2 woods unit
  • End diastolic ventricular filling pressure not more than 8 mm Hg

Patient with the following will not be eligible for inclusion:

  • Patients with pulmonary artery distortion, stenosis or thrombus requiring surgical or interventional additional procedures before or during the Fontan operation.
  • Pacemaker insertion before or during Fontan operation.
  • Significant pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) rendering fenestration potentially a cause of excessive cyanosis.
  • Patients for whom the cardiology/cardiac surgery case conference decision is strongly in favor of fenestration for any other cause.
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
62 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Fenestrated

    Standard extracardiac fontan undergoing Fontan fenestration creation

    Procedure: Extracardiac Fontan · Procedure: Fontan fenestration

  • Non fenestrated

    Standard extracardiac fontan without fenestration

    Procedure: Extracardiac Fontan

Interventions

  • ProcedureExtracardiac Fontan

    Extracardiac Fontan (Total cavo-pulmonary connection) will be constructed with a tube graft from the inferior vena cava to the pulmonary artery \[applied to both arms\]

    Also known as: Extracardiac Total cavo-pulmonary connection

  • ProcedureFontan fenestration

    Fontan fenestration created as a single 3 to 6mm communication between fontan channel and pulmonary venous atrium \[Fenestrated arm\]

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Duration of chest tube drainage

    Total duration of days patient has been having chest tube inserted in his pleural cavities

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of hospital stay

    Total duration of days patient spent in the hospital

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Length of intensive care unit stay

    Total duration of days patient needed to stay in intensive care unit

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. Total amount of chest tube drainage

    Total amount of chest tube drainage throughout his post operative period in ml

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. Number of additional procedures

    Any additional procedures were required in the postoperative period

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  5. Stroke

    Any post operative cerebrovascular event

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  6. Readmissions

    Number of readmissions to the hospital within 30 days of discharge

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  7. Death

    Death post operation and through 90 days of discharge

    Time frame: Post operation and through 90 days of discharge from hospital

06

Study locations

1 site
  • KFSHRC
    Jeddah, Westren, Saudi Arabia
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Fontan F, Baudet E. Surgical repair of tricuspid atresia. Thorax. 1971 May;26(3):240-8. doi: 10.1136/thx.26.3.240. PubMed 5089489 ↗
  • de Leval MR, Kilner P, Gewillig M, Bull C. Total cavopulmonary connection: a logical alternative to atriopulmonary connection for complex Fontan operations. Experimental studies and early clinical experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988 Nov;96(5):682-95. PubMed 3184963 ↗
  • Amodeo A, Galletti L, Marianeschi S, Picardo S, Giannico S, Di Renzi P, Marcelletti C. Extracardiac Fontan operation for complex cardiac anomalies: seven years' experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997 Dec;114(6):1020-30; discussion 1030-1. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(97)70016-3. PubMed 9434697 ↗
  • d'Udekem Y, Iyengar AJ, Cochrane AD, Grigg LE, Ramsay JM, Wheaton GR, Penny DJ, Brizard CP. The Fontan procedure: contemporary techniques have improved long-term outcomes. Circulation. 2007 Sep 11;116(11 Suppl):I157-64. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.676445. PubMed 17846297 ↗
  • Bando K, Turrentine MW, Park HJ, Sharp TG, Scavo V, Brown JW. Evolution of the Fontan procedure in a single center. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Jun;69(6):1873-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01316-3. PubMed 10892940 ↗
  • Azakie A, Russell JL, McCrindle BW, Van Arsdell GS, Benson LN, Coles JG, Williams WG. Anatomic repair of anomalous left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery by aortic reimplantation: early survival, patterns of ventricular recovery and late outcome. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 May;75(5):1535-41. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04822-1. PubMed 12735576 ↗
  • de Leval MR, Dubini G, Migliavacca F, Jalali H, Camporini G, Redington A, Pietrabissa R. Use of computational fluid dynamics in the design of surgical procedures: application to the study of competitive flows in cavo-pulmonary connections. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996 Mar;111(3):502-13. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(96)70302-1. PubMed 8601964 ↗
  • Bridges ND, Lock JE, Castaneda AR. Baffle fenestration with subsequent transcatheter closure. Modification of the Fontan operation for patients at increased risk. Circulation. 1990 Nov;82(5):1681-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.82.5.1681. PubMed 2225370 ↗
  • Bridges ND, Mayer JE Jr, Lock JE, Jonas RA, Hanley FL, Keane JF, Perry SB, Castaneda AR. Effect of baffle fenestration on outcome of the modified Fontan operation. Circulation. 1992 Dec;86(6):1762-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.86.6.1762. PubMed 1451248 ↗
  • Hsu DT, Quaegebeur JM, Ing FF, Selber EJ, Lamour JM, Gersony WM. Outcome after the single-stage, nonfenestrated Fontan procedure. Circulation. 1997 Nov 4;96(9 Suppl):II-335-40. PubMed 9386120 ↗
  • Thompson LD, Petrossian E, McElhinney DB, Abrikosova NA, Moore P, Reddy VM, Hanley FL. Is it necessary to routinely fenestrate an extracardiac fontan? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Aug;34(2):539-44. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00228-4. PubMed 10440170 ↗
  • Airan B, Sharma R, Choudhary SK, Mohanty SR, Bhan A, Chowdhari UK, Juneja R, Kothari SS, Saxena A, Venugopal P. Univentricular repair: is routine fenestration justified? Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Jun;69(6):1900-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01247-9. PubMed 10892944 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03503032
Lead sponsor
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Jeddah
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 19, 2018
Start date
Apr 1, 2023
Primary completion
Apr 12, 2023
Completion
Apr 12, 2023
Last update
Apr 18, 2023

Study contacts

Abdulbadee Bogis, MD
principal investigator · King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre, Jeddah

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion