CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03500094Updated Nov 30, 2021Results posted

Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of Migalastat in Pediatric Subjects (Aged 12 to <18 Years)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Migalastat HCl 150 mg in Fabry Disease, sponsored by Amicus Therapeutics. Completed at 8 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-30.

Sponsored by Amicus Therapeutics · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
22
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
12 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This was an open-label study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and efficacy of migalastat treatment in pediatric participants 12 to \<18 years of age with Fabry disease and amenable gene encoding α-galactosidase A (GLA) variants.

Read the detailed description

This was a Phase 3b, 2-stage, open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter study to evaluate the safety, PK, PD, and efficacy of migalastat treatment in pediatric participants 12 to \<18 years of age and weighing ≥ 45 kilograms (99 pounds) with Fabry disease and amenable GLA variants. Participants must have been naïve to enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) or have stopped ERT at least 14 days at the time of screening.

Stage 1 was a treatment period of approximately 1 month (4 weeks); Stage 2 was a treatment period of 11 months and a 30-day (untreated) safety follow-up period. There was no break in treatment between Stages 1 and 2. Prior to Stage 1, there was a screening period lasting at least 14 days and up to 30 days (or more, if GLA genotyping was required). Stages 1 and 2 together consisted of a 12-month treatment period, and a 30-day safety follow-up period, for a total of approximately 13 months. Upon study completion, participants had the option to enroll in a long-term extension study conducted under a separate protocol (NCT04049760).

Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to 1 of 3 PK sampling groups using interactive response technology (IRT). Four blood samples for the determination of migalastat concentrations in plasma were collected during Stage 1 study drug administration, and 1 PK (trough) sample was collected at Month 6 and again at Month 12.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fabry Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Lysosomal storage disease
  • migalastat
  • AT1001
  • Galafold
03

In context

Fabry Disease

242 studies on the registry are indexed under Fabry Disease; 54 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 22 is close to the median of 22 across 105 interventional studies indexed under Fabry Disease.

Browse Fabry Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Amicus Therapeutics is the lead sponsor of 42 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria

  • Willing and able to provide written consent or assent (participant and parent/legal guardian, as applicable)
  • Male or female between 12 and \<18 years of age diagnosed with Fabry disease
  • Confirmed, amenable GLA variant
  • Participant weighed at least 45 kg (99 pounds) at screening
  • Participant had never been treated with ERT or had not received ERT for 14 days prior to screening
  • Participant had at least 1 complication (such as, laboratory abnormality and/or sign/symptom) of Fabry disease
  • Participant was able to swallow study medication whole

Key Exclusion Criteria

  • Had moderate or severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<60 milliliter/minute/1.73 meter squared (m\^2) at screening)
  • Had advanced kidney disease requiring dialysis or kidney transplantation
  • History of allergy or sensitivity to study medication (including excipients) or other iminosugars (for example, miglustat, miglitol)
  • Had received any gene therapy at any time or anticipated starting gene therapy during the study period
  • Required treatment with Glyset (miglitol) and/or Zavesca (miglustat) within 6 months before screening or throughout the study
  • Required treatment with Replagal (agalsidase alfa), or Fabrazyme (agalsidase beta) within 14 days before screening or throughout the study
  • Participant was treated or had been treated with any investigational/experimental drug, biologic or device within 30 days before screening
  • Any intercurrent illness or condition or concomitant medication use considered to be a contraindication at screening or baseline or that may have precluded the participant from fulfilling the protocol requirements or suggested to the investigator that the potential participant may have had an unacceptable risk by participating in this study
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding or planned to become pregnant during the study period
  • Otherwise unsuitable for the study in the opinion of the investigator
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
22 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    migalastat HCl 150 mg

    One migalastat 123 milligrams (mg) capsule equivalent to 150 mg migalastat hydrochloride (HCl) (herein referred to as "migalastat") was administered every other day for 12 months.

    Drug: Migalastat HCl 150 mg

Interventions

  • DrugMigalastat HCl 150 mg

    migalastat HCl 150 mg capsule

    Also known as: AT1001, Galafold

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number Of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-related Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    TEAEs included adverse events that began on or after the first dose of study drug until 30 days after the last dose. Treatment-related TEAEs were defined as TEAEs that had an investigator-defined relationship to study drug of "Definite," "Probable," or "Possible." A summary of serious and all other non-serious adverse events, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.

    Time frame: Day 1 (after dosing) through Month 12 and follow-up (30 days after last dose)

  2. Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under The Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over The Dosing Interval (AUCtau) Of Migalastat

    PK sampling was performed on 1 occasion at steady-state during the first month of the study. Adolescent participants were randomized to 3 sparse PK sampling groups based on optimal sampling theory. Each blood sample could have been taken at any time within the following time point ranges. Time point ranges for all 3 sparse sampling groups are arranged here in chronological order: 1 to 1.25 hours (h), 1.5 to 2h, 2.75 to 3.25h, 3.25 to 3.75h, 3.75 to 4.25h, 5 to 5.5h, 5.25 to 5.75h, 6.5 to 7h, 8.25 to 8.75h, 8.75 to 9.25h, and 10.75 to 11.25h post-dose. The combined sampling scheme resulted in rich data over an approximate 12-hour time course for AUC estimation. Additional trough samples were taken at Months 6 and 12. These trough samples (48h) assisted in estimating the terminal elimination phase for the AUC. Simulations were conducted to predict steady-state PK profiles and parameters for adolescent age subgroups 12 to \<16 years, 16 to \<18 years, and overall, 12 to \<18 years.

    Time frame: 0 to 12 hours postdose during the first month of study and trough samples at Months 6 and 12

  3. PK: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) Of Migalastat

    PK sampling was performed on 1 occasion at steady-state during the first month of the study. Adolescent participants were randomized to 3 sparse PK sampling groups based on optimal sampling theory. Each blood sample could have been taken at any time within the following time point ranges. Time point ranges for all 3 sparse sampling groups are arranged here in chronological order: 1 to 1.25h, 1.5 to 2h, 2.75 to 3.25h, 3.25 to 3.75h, 3.75 to 4.25h, 5 to 5.5h, 5.25 to 5.75h, 6.5 to 7h, 8.25 to 8.75h, 8.75 to 9.25h, and 10.75 to 11.25h post-dose. The combined sampling scheme resulted in rich data over an approximate 12-hour time course for AUC and Cmax estimation. Additional trough samples were taken at Months 6 and 12. These trough samples (48h) assisted in estimating the terminal elimination phase for the AUC. Simulations were conducted to predict steady-state PK profiles and parameters for adolescent age subgroups 12 to \<16 years, 16 to \<18 years, and overall, 12 to \<18 years.

    Time frame: 0 to 12 hours postdose during the first month of study and trough samples at Months 6 and 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change In eGFR From Baseline To Month 12

    eGFR was calculated using the modified Schwartz formula for creatinine clearance.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and last observation (up to Month 12)

  2. Annualized Rate Of Change From Baseline

    Annualized rate of change from baseline of eGFR was defined as change from baseline to last visit divided by the duration from baseline to the last visit (Last assessment date - First dose date +1) and multiplied by 365.25. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment prior to the first dose of study drug.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Month 12

  3. Change From Baseline In Total Urine Protein And Urine Albumin Levels At Month 12

    Renal function was assessed by urine protein and urine albumin levels. Urine samples were collected as part of urinalysis to measure protein and albumin levels.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and last observation (up to Month 12)

  4. Change From Baseline In Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMi)

    LVMi was assessed as a measure of cardiac impairment in the study participants. LVMi values for both M Mode and 2D views are presented.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and last observation (up to Month 12)

  5. Change In Plasma Levels Of Globotriaosylsphingosine (Lyso-Gb3)

    Blood samples were collected for measurement of lyso-Gb3 levels in plasma. Plasma levels of lyso-Gb3 were measured using a validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and last observation (up to Month 12)

  6. FABPRO-GI And Pain Scores

    The Fabry Disease Patient-Reported Outcome - Gastrointestinal Signs And Symptoms (FABPRO-GI) And Pain Questionnaire For Clinical Trials (24-hr Version) consists of questions regarding gastrointestinal signs and symptoms and pain relative to the past 24 hours. Participants rated the severity of their symptoms and pain from 0 (none) to 10 (worst possible). The monthly average score at Month 12 and at last observation are presented. A higher score indicated higher levels of symptoms and pain.

    Time frame: Month 12 and last observation (up to Month 12)

  7. Patient's Global Impression Of Change (PGI-C) Scores

    The PGI-C consists of 4 questions regarding diarrhea, abdominal pain, overall pain, and daily living. Participants rated their status based on improvement, worsening, or the same. Improved status includes "Much better", "Better" and "A little better"; worsened status includes "A little worse", "Worse" and "Much worse".

    Time frame: Month 12

  8. Number Of Participants Who Experienced Sudden Onset Of Pain As Assessed Using The Fabry-Specific Pediatric Health And Pain Questionnaire (FPHPQ)

    The assessment of "In the last 3 months how many times did you experience sudden onset of pain?" using the FPHPQ for ages 13 to 18 is presented.

    Time frame: Month 12

  9. Change From Baseline In FPHPQ Score For Pain Intensity

    The assessment of "How bad is your pain today?" using the FPHPQ for ages 13 to 18 is presented. Pain intensity was measured on a 10-point scale, 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). A decrease from baseline indicates an improvement in the condition.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and last observation (up to Month 12)

  10. Change From Baseline In Pediatric Quality Of Life (PedsQL) At Month 12

    The PedsQL is a modular approach to measuring health-related quality of life in healthy children and adolescents and those with acute and chronic health conditions. The psychosocial score for the PedsQL encompassed 15 questions relating to the participants' feelings, social interaction with others, and school. The physical score was derived from answers to 8 questions about the participants' ease of managing physical activity. All components of the PedsQL were scored based on a scale of 0 (never) to 4 (almost always) and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0 = 100, 1 = 75, 2 = 50, 3 = 25, 4 = 0. Both categories were combined for a total score. Total scores for the child report ages 13 to 18 years old and parent report are presented at Month 12.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

07

Results

Posted Nov 30, 2021

Participant flow

Participants must have been either naïve to enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) or have stopped ERT at least 14 days at the time of screening.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMigalastat HCl 150 mg
Started22
Received at least 1 dose of study drug21
Completed19
Not completed3
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1
Withdrew: Withdrawal by parent or legally-authorized representative1
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber Of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-related Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

TEAEs included adverse events that began on or after the first dose of study drug until 30 days after the last dose. Treatment-related TEAEs were defined as TEAEs that had an investigator-defined relationship to study drug of "Definite," "Probable," or "Possible." A summary of serious and all other non-serious adverse events, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.

Time frame:
Day 1 (after dosing) through Month 12 and follow-up (30 days after last dose)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number Of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-related Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsMigalastat HCl 150 mg
Number Of Participants Who Experienced Treatment-related Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)5
PrimaryPharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under The Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over The Dosing Interval (AUCtau) Of Migalastat

PK sampling was performed on 1 occasion at steady-state during the first month of the study. Adolescent participants were randomized to 3 sparse PK sampling groups based on optimal sampling theory. Each blood sample could have been taken at any time within the following time point ranges. Time point ranges for all 3 sparse sampling groups are arranged here in chronological order: 1 to 1.25 hours (h), 1.5 to 2h, 2.75 to 3.25h, 3.25 to 3.75h, 3.75 to 4.25h, 5 to 5.5h, 5.25 to 5.75h, 6.5 to 7h, 8.25 to 8.75h, 8.75 to 9.25h, and 10.75 to 11.25h post-dose. The combined sampling scheme resulted in rich data over an approximate 12-hour time course for AUC estimation. Additional trough samples were taken at Months 6 and 12. These trough samples (48h) assisted in estimating the terminal elimination phase for the AUC. Simulations were conducted to predict steady-state PK profiles and parameters for adolescent age subgroups 12 to \<16 years, 16 to \<18 years, and overall, 12 to \<18 years.

Time frame:
0 to 12 hours postdose during the first month of study and trough samples at Months 6 and 12
Reported as:
Geometric mean · h*ng/mL
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under The Plasma Concentration-time Curve Over The Dosing Interval (AUCtau) Of Migalastat
h*ng/mLMigalastat HCl 150 mg
12 to <16 years old8920 ± 47.2
16 to <18 years old8430 ± 41.7
12 to <18 years old8740 ± 44.2
PrimaryPK: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) Of Migalastat

PK sampling was performed on 1 occasion at steady-state during the first month of the study. Adolescent participants were randomized to 3 sparse PK sampling groups based on optimal sampling theory. Each blood sample could have been taken at any time within the following time point ranges. Time point ranges for all 3 sparse sampling groups are arranged here in chronological order: 1 to 1.25h, 1.5 to 2h, 2.75 to 3.25h, 3.25 to 3.75h, 3.75 to 4.25h, 5 to 5.5h, 5.25 to 5.75h, 6.5 to 7h, 8.25 to 8.75h, 8.75 to 9.25h, and 10.75 to 11.25h post-dose. The combined sampling scheme resulted in rich data over an approximate 12-hour time course for AUC and Cmax estimation. Additional trough samples were taken at Months 6 and 12. These trough samples (48h) assisted in estimating the terminal elimination phase for the AUC. Simulations were conducted to predict steady-state PK profiles and parameters for adolescent age subgroups 12 to \<16 years, 16 to \<18 years, and overall, 12 to \<18 years.

Time frame:
0 to 12 hours postdose during the first month of study and trough samples at Months 6 and 12
Reported as:
Geometric mean · ng/mL
PK: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) Of Migalastat
ng/mLMigalastat HCl 150 mg
12 to <16 years old1220 ± 60.9
16 to <18 years old1160 ± 39.2
12 to <18 years old1200 ± 52.7
SecondaryChange In eGFR From Baseline To Month 12

eGFR was calculated using the modified Schwartz formula for creatinine clearance.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 12 and last observation (up to Month 12)
Reported as:
Mean · mL/min x 1.73 m^2
Change In eGFR From Baseline To Month 12
mL/min x 1.73 m^2Migalastat HCl 150 mg
Month 12-1.6 ± 15.40
Last observation (up to Month 12)-1.6 ± 14.99
SecondaryAnnualized Rate Of Change From Baseline

Annualized rate of change from baseline of eGFR was defined as change from baseline to last visit divided by the duration from baseline to the last visit (Last assessment date - First dose date +1) and multiplied by 365.25. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment prior to the first dose of study drug.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Month 12
Reported as:
Mean · mL/min x 1.73 m^2/year
Annualized Rate Of Change From Baseline
mL/min x 1.73 m^2/yearMigalastat HCl 150 mg
Annualized Rate Of Change From Baseline-1.5 ± 15.11
SecondaryChange From Baseline In Total Urine Protein And Urine Albumin Levels At Month 12

Renal function was assessed by urine protein and urine albumin levels. Urine samples were collected as part of urinalysis to measure protein and albumin levels.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 12 and last observation (up to Month 12)
Reported as:
Mean · mg/L
Change From Baseline In Total Urine Protein And Urine Albumin Levels At Month 12
mg/LMigalastat HCl 150 mg
Total Urine Protein: Month 1236.0 ± 111.61
Total Urine Protein: Last observation (up to Month 12)36.2 ± 108.64
Urine Albumin: Month 1216.2 ± 28.27
Urine Albumin: Last observation (up to Month 12)15.6 ± 27.67
SecondaryChange From Baseline In Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMi)

LVMi was assessed as a measure of cardiac impairment in the study participants. LVMi values for both M Mode and 2D views are presented.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 12 and last observation (up to Month 12)
Reported as:
Mean · g/m^2
Change From Baseline In Left Ventricular Mass Index (LVMi)
g/m^2Migalastat HCl 150 mg
M Mode: Month 12-3.9 ± 13.53
2D: Month 124.9 ± 9.12
M Mode: Last observation (up to Month 12)-4.4 ± 13.31
2D: Last observation (up to Month 12)4.3 ± 9.34
SecondaryChange In Plasma Levels Of Globotriaosylsphingosine (Lyso-Gb3)

Blood samples were collected for measurement of lyso-Gb3 levels in plasma. Plasma levels of lyso-Gb3 were measured using a validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 12 and last observation (up to Month 12)
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Change In Plasma Levels Of Globotriaosylsphingosine (Lyso-Gb3)
ng/mLMigalastat HCl 150 mg: ERT NaiveMigalastat HCl 150 mg: ERT Experienced
Month 12-14.0 ± 23.1312.5 ± 36.33
Last Observation (up to Month 12)-14.0 ± 23.1311.3 ± 34.67
SecondaryFABPRO-GI And Pain Scores

The Fabry Disease Patient-Reported Outcome - Gastrointestinal Signs And Symptoms (FABPRO-GI) And Pain Questionnaire For Clinical Trials (24-hr Version) consists of questions regarding gastrointestinal signs and symptoms and pain relative to the past 24 hours. Participants rated the severity of their symptoms and pain from 0 (none) to 10 (worst possible). The monthly average score at Month 12 and at last observation are presented. A higher score indicated higher levels of symptoms and pain.

Time frame:
Month 12 and last observation (up to Month 12)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
FABPRO-GI And Pain Scores
units on a scaleMigalastat HCl 150 mg
Daily Ratings of Severity in Constipation: Month 120.9 ± 1.91
Daily Ratings of Severity in Constipation: Last observation (up to Month 12)0.4 ± 1.00
Daily Ratings of Severity in Diarrhea: Month 121.0 ± 1.65
Daily Ratings of Severity in Diarrhea: Last Observation (up to Month 12)0.4 ± 0.91
Overall Pain: Month 120.6 ± 0.71
Overall Pain: Last Observation (up to Month 12)1.2 ± 1.50
Worst Tummy Pain: Month 120.3 ± 0.38
Worst Tummy Pain: Last Observation (up to Month 12)0.9 ± 1.52
SecondaryPatient's Global Impression Of Change (PGI-C) Scores

The PGI-C consists of 4 questions regarding diarrhea, abdominal pain, overall pain, and daily living. Participants rated their status based on improvement, worsening, or the same. Improved status includes "Much better", "Better" and "A little better"; worsened status includes "A little worse", "Worse" and "Much worse".

Time frame:
Month 12
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Patient's Global Impression Of Change (PGI-C) Scores
ParticipantsMigalastat HCl 150 mg
Diarrhea: Status Improved12
Diarrhea: Status Same7
Diarrhea: Status Worse0
Abdominal pain: Status Improved10
Abdominal pain: Status Same8
Abdominal pain: Status Worse1
Overall pain: Status Improved10
Overall pain: Status Same8
Overall pain: Status Worse1
Daily living: Status Improved10
Daily living: Status Same8
Daily living: Status Worse1
SecondaryNumber Of Participants Who Experienced Sudden Onset Of Pain As Assessed Using The Fabry-Specific Pediatric Health And Pain Questionnaire (FPHPQ)

The assessment of "In the last 3 months how many times did you experience sudden onset of pain?" using the FPHPQ for ages 13 to 18 is presented.

Time frame:
Month 12
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number Of Participants Who Experienced Sudden Onset Of Pain As Assessed Using The Fabry-Specific Pediatric Health And Pain Questionnaire (FPHPQ)
ParticipantsMigalastat HCl 150 mg
0 times4
1-3 times5
4-6 times4
> 6 times3
SecondaryChange From Baseline In FPHPQ Score For Pain Intensity

The assessment of "How bad is your pain today?" using the FPHPQ for ages 13 to 18 is presented. Pain intensity was measured on a 10-point scale, 0 (no pain) to 10 (pain as bad as you can imagine). A decrease from baseline indicates an improvement in the condition.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 12 and last observation (up to Month 12)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline In FPHPQ Score For Pain Intensity
units on a scaleMigalastat HCl 150 mg
Month 120.4 ± 1.82
Last observation (up to Month 12)0.4 ± 1.77
SecondaryChange From Baseline In Pediatric Quality Of Life (PedsQL) At Month 12

The PedsQL is a modular approach to measuring health-related quality of life in healthy children and adolescents and those with acute and chronic health conditions. The psychosocial score for the PedsQL encompassed 15 questions relating to the participants' feelings, social interaction with others, and school. The physical score was derived from answers to 8 questions about the participants' ease of managing physical activity. All components of the PedsQL were scored based on a scale of 0 (never) to 4 (almost always) and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0 = 100, 1 = 75, 2 = 50, 3 = 25, 4 = 0. Both categories were combined for a total score. Total scores for the child report ages 13 to 18 years old and parent report are presented at Month 12.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 12
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline In Pediatric Quality Of Life (PedsQL) At Month 12
units on a scaleMigalastat HCl 150 mg
Child Report2.2 ± 6.13
Parent Report3.1 ± 10.29

Adverse events

Collected over Day 1 (after dosing) through Month 12 and follow-up (30 days after last dose). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Migalastat HCl 150 mg0/21 (0%)1/21 (4.8%)20/21 (95.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventMigalastat HCl 150 mg
Suicidal ideationPsychiatric disorders1/21
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventMigalastat HCl 150 mg
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations6/21
InfluenzaInfections and infestations3/21
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations3/21
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/21
HeadacheNervous system disorders3/21
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders2/21
Complication associated with deviceGeneral disorders2/21
Pharyngitis streptococcalInfections and infestations2/21
ParaesthesiaNervous system disorders2/21
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders2/21

Baseline characteristics

All participants who enrolled in the study.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Migalastat HCl 150 mg
Mean14.6 ± 1.62
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Migalastat HCl 150 mg
Female12
Male10
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)Migalastat HCl 150 mg
White20
Other2
Hispanic or Latino3
Not Hispanic or Latino19
08

Study locations

8 sites
  • Clinical Study Site
    Tampa, Florida 33606, United States
  • Clinical Study Site
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Clinical Study Site
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454, United States
  • Clinical Study Site
    Columbia, Missouri 65212, United States
  • Clinical Study Site
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, United States
  • Clinical Study Site
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15224, United States
  • Clinical Study Site
    Fairfax, Virginia 22030, United States
  • Clinical Study Site
    London, NW3 2QG, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jun 13, 2019
  • Statistical analysis plan · Oct 20, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 30, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03500094
Lead sponsor
Amicus Therapeutics
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 17, 2018
Start date
Sep 27, 2018
Primary completion
Feb 2, 2021
Completion
Feb 6, 2021
Results posted
Nov 30, 2021
Last update
Nov 30, 2021

Study contacts

Medical Monitor Clinical Research
study director · Amicus Therapeutics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion