ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03486210Updated Jun 18, 2021

Pilot Suty of the Assessment of Food Preferences After Bariatric Surgery (BariaTaste Pilot)

An observational study in Food Preferences Variations Depending on Bariatric Surgery Status, sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-18.

Sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon · Observational

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
96
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 11 studies in Food Preferences with a site in France — 2 open to participants now, 2 under way, none of them phase 3. Food Preferences · France.

Started
2018
the only one that year
Observational
6 of 11
1 open now
Registered
5th of 11
by date
Lead sponsor
3 of 11
Hospices Civils de Lyon

Among the 11 studies in Food Preferences with a site in France, this one is the only one that started in 2018, is one of 6 observational ones, and was the 5th registered.

Food Preferences

155 studies on the registry are indexed under Food Preferences; 19 are open to participants now.

Browse Food Preferences studies →

Open to participants now

2 of the 11 studies in Food Preferences with a site in France are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 2 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in France have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in France →

Who these studies take

Of the 15 Food Preferences studies recruiting now, 2 (13%) set no upper age limit and 12 (80%) stop at 75 or younger; 5 take children under 18; 12 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 65 Years · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 11 studies in Food Preferences with a site in France, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

More than 50,000 patients in France benefit from bariatric surgery every year. However, nutritional complications (protein malnutrition, hypoglycaemia) are common and primary or secondary weight failures (weight recovery) account for almost 20% of operated. Weight loss and the metabolic effects of surgery are not related only to a reduction in dietary intakes, but also to mechanisms independent of caloric reduction, such as eating behaviour after bariatric surgery (Gastric Bypass or sleeve gastrectomy). These choices are guided by perceived changes in the properties of the food, resulting in changes in tastes, palatability and more generally food preferences. Among available tools to evaluate dietary preferences we selected the Food Leeds Preference Questionnaire (FLPQ) to assess those modifications. During this test, photographs of food products classified according to predetermined characteristics are presented with different instructions and response design to estimate liking, wanted for food, implicitly or explicitly. Our main hypothesis is that the use of the Food Leeds Preference Questionnaire will highlight differences in dietary preferences according to the type of bariatric surgery performed.

We will be conducted a study observational study on three parallel groups: a control group composed of patients suffering from unoperated obesity, a group of patients operated for a sleeve gastrectomy and a group of patients operated for a gastric bypass. We will include 45 patients per group. The patients will have to pass the Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire (LFPQ). Our judgment criterion will be the degree of food preference assessed using the LFPQ. Participants will also be assessed on behavioural parameters with the Binge Eating Scale, the Yale Food Addiction Scale Version 2.0 and the Urgency, lack of Premeditation, lack of Perseverance and Sensation seeking Impulsive behavior scale (UPPS-P) short version.

03

Conditions studied

  • Food Preferences Variations Depending on Bariatric Surgery Status

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This study will focus on a population of patients who are or have been obese and are being cared for at the Lyon Sud Hospital Center. Patients will either be undergoing initial assessment or being assessed for follow-up after bariatric surgery (after sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient, male or female, between 18 to 65 years old
  • Patient with a between 18.5 and 60 kg / m2: minimum 35 kg / m2 for the obesity group
  • Patient undergoing initial assessment before bariatric surgery for the obesity group
  • Patient being assessed for follow-up after bariatric surgery (after sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass)
  • Patient agreeing to participate in the study.
  • Patient affiliated to a Social Security scheme or beneficiary of such a scheme

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with other psychiatric comorbidities, including a bipolar mood disorder or eating disorder
  • Patient with food eviction, whether medical or cultural
  • Patient with ongoing psychotropic treatment (except anxiolytic treatment)
  • Patient unable to give his agreement, not mastering the French language,
  • Patient under authorship or curators
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
96 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Phase 1 Group 1

    Healthy volunteers

    Behavioral: Food preference

  • Phase 1 Group 2

    Health professionals

    Behavioral: Food preference

  • Phase 2 Group 1

    Control group : patients obese without surgery

    Other: Psychological assesment

  • Phase 2 Group 2

    Patients who have underwent a sleeve gastrectomy

    Other: Psychological assesment

  • Phase 2 Group 3

    Patients who have underwent a gastric bypass

    Other: Psychological assesment

Interventions

  • BehavioralFood preference

    The study will take place in two phases. A first phase will consist in the validation of translations and the selection of images on 20 healthy volunteers and 20 health professionals specialized in nutrition. They will have to fill a form with images of food and evaluate to what extend they think the pictures represent what we can eat in France. This step will adapt the questionnaire to our country.

  • OtherPsychological assesment

    Phase performed with patients fasting for at least 2 hours before the different tests. The FLPQ will be compared between a group of patients suffering from unoperated obesity (OCt), a group of patients operated on a sleeve gastrectomy (OSl) and a group operated by a bypass (OBy) between 6 and 24 months post-surgery, randomized for the 6 combined tests (2 categories). The award can be made in 2 sessions of at least 3 of the 6 tests combined. Each test combines 2 of the 11 categories. The test will consist of 96 pairs of 16 food images presented on a computer screen in color. Participants will be invited to "choose the food they most want to eat", by pressing the corresponding computer button (choices saved by counting the frequency scores in E-prime). The level of hunger will be evaluated by an Analogical Visual Scale, ranging from 0 to 10. Patients should also complete 3 self-questionnaires used routinely (Binge Eating Scale, The Yale Food Addiction Scale, The UPPS-P short version).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Degree of food preference

    The degree of food preference will be measured using the Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire, that the investigator will have previously adapted in French for French population, in the form of counting frequency scores for each category of images.

    Time frame: Day 1

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hôpital Lyon Sud
    Pierre-Bénite, France
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jun 2018 to primary completion in Jul 2019, 13 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 27, 2018
First posted
Apr 3, 2018
StartActual
Jun 4, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jul 10, 2019
CompletionActual
Jul 10, 2019
Last update
Jun 18, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 18, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03486210
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 3, 2018
Start date
Jun 4, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 10, 2019
Completion
Jul 10, 2019
Last update
Jun 18, 2021

Study contacts

Sylvain ICETA, MD
principal investigator · Hospices Civils de Lyon

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion