ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03482817Updated Jun 18, 2026Results posted

Drug Cocktail Interaction Study of St. John's Wort Dry Extract Ze 117

A Phase 1 interventional study of Ze 117 and Probe drug cocktail in Drug Interaction Study, sponsored by Max Zeller Soehne AG. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-18.

Sponsored by Max Zeller Soehne AG · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This Study evaluates the Effect of St. John's Wort dry Extract Ze 117 on Several Cytochrome P450 Enzymes and on Transporter P-Glycoprotein in Healthy Volunteers.

Read the detailed description

Current data indicate that St. John's wort preparations may induce hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes and transport proteins. This can result in drug interactions.

The study design is standard for DDI studies and is based on the regulatory guidance of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and of the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

A cocktail approach involving the administration of multiple cytochrome P450 (CYP)- or P-glycoprotein (P-gp)-specific probe drugs is used to simultaneously assess the activities of these enzymes and the transporter P-gp.

02

Conditions studied

  • Drug Interaction Study
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Max Zeller Soehne AG is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • written
  • Caucasian male or female subjects aged between ≥18 and ≤55years
  • Physically and mentally healthy
  • between ≥19 and ≤29 kg/m2, and body weight ≤90 kg
  • Non-smoker
  • If female, the pregnancy test at screening and at admission must be negative

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or suspected to study drugs
  • history of, any diseases
  • Positive test of , or Screening
  • Known photohypersensitivity
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Probe drug cocktail / Ze 117

    One-sequence, Probe drug cocktail alone and in combination with Ze 117.

    Drug: Ze 117 · Drug: Probe drug cocktail

Interventions

  • DrugZe 117

    Subjects will be hospitalized to receive a probe drug cocktail alone and in combination with Ze 117.

    Also known as: St. John's wort dry extract Ze 117

  • DrugProbe drug cocktail

    Subjects will be hospitalized to receive a probe drug cocktail alone and in combination with Ze 117.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ratio AUC0-t, Day 17 (Probe Drug Cocktail Plus Ze117 [Only at Day 17]) vs. Day 1 (Probe Drug Cocktail Alone)

    The "number" as provided in the tables is the ratio (in %) of geometric LS means of AUC of day 17 dosing samples (probe drug cocktail plus Ze117) vs. Day 1 dosing samples (probe drug cocktail alone). A one-way ANOVA model (with terms for subject and treatment) was applied to analyze the effect of Ze117 on the respective probe drug. Log transformed (base e) parameters were used within the model. The estimated treatment difference between day 17 and day 1 was transformed back to original scale and presented as the ratio between treatments including the corresponding 90% confidence interval. Effect limits were predefined as follows: (1) Mild effect limits (50-200%), extended bioequivalence limits (70-143%), bioequivalence limits (80-125%).

    Time frame: PK samples: pre-dose, and 10, 20, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after each cocktail administration (at day 1 and day 17)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Ratio AUC0-t, Day 8 (Probe Drug Cocktail Plus Ze117 [Daily Throughout pk Sampling Period]) vs. Day 1 (Probe Drug Cocktail Alone)

    The "number" as provided in the tables is the ratio (in %) of geometric LS means of AUC of day 8 dosing samples (probe drug cocktail plus Ze117) vs. Day 1 dosing samples (probe drug cocktail alone). A one-way ANOVA model (with terms for subject and treatment) was applied to analyze the effect of Ze117 on the respective probe drug. Log transformed (base e) parameters were used within the model. The estimated treatment difference between day 8 and day 1 was transformed back to original scale and presented as the ratio between treatments including the corresponding 90% confidence interval. Effect limits were predefined as follows: (1) Mild effect limits (50-200%), extended bioequivalence limits (70-143%), bioequivalence limits (80-125%).

    Time frame: PK samples: pre-dose, and 10, 20, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after each cocktail administration (at day 1 and day 8)

  2. Ratio Cmax, Day 17 (Probe Drug Cocktail Plus Ze117 [Only at Day 17]) vs. Day 1 (Probe Drug Cocktail Alone)

    The "number" as provided in the tables is the ratio (in %) of geometric LS means of Cmax from day 17 dosing samples (probe drug cocktail plus Ze117) vs. Day 1 dosing samples (probe drug cocktail alone). A one-way ANOVA model (with terms for subject and treatment) was applied to analyze the effect of Ze117 on the respective probe drug. Log transformed (base e) parameters were used within the model. The estimated treatment difference between day 17 and day 1 was transformed back to original scale and presented as the ratio between treatments including the corresponding 90% confidence interval. Effect limits were predefined as follows: (1) Mild effect limits (50-200%), extended bioequivalence limits (70-143%), bioequivalence limits (80-125%).

    Time frame: PK samples: pre-dose, and 10, 20, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after each cocktail administration (at day 1 and day 17)

  3. Ratio Cmax, Day 8 (Probe Drug Cocktail Plus Ze117 [Daily Throughout pk Sampling Period]) vs. Day 1 (Probe Drug Cocktail Alone)

    The "number" as provided in the tables is the ratio (in %) of geometric LS means of Cmax from day 8 dosing samples (probe drug cocktail plus Ze117) vs. Day 1 dosing samples (probe drug cocktail alone). A one-way ANOVA model (with terms for subject and treatment) was applied to analyze the effect of Ze117 on the respective probe drug. Log transformed (base e) parameters were used within the model. The estimated treatment difference between day 8 and day 1 was transformed back to original scale and presented as the ratio between treatments including the corresponding 90% confidence interval. Effect limits were predefined as follows: (1) Mild effect limits (50-200%), extended bioequivalence limits (70-143%), bioequivalence limits (80-125%).

    Time frame: PK samples: pre-dose, and 10, 20, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after each cocktail administration (at day 1 and day 8)

07

Results

Posted Jun 18, 2026

Participant flow

Healthy volunteers

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneHealthy Volunteers
Started20
Completed19
Not completed1
Withdrew: Adverse event1

Outcome measures

PrimaryRatio AUC0-t, Day 17 (Probe Drug Cocktail Plus Ze117 [Only at Day 17]) vs. Day 1 (Probe Drug Cocktail Alone)

The "number" as provided in the tables is the ratio (in %) of geometric LS means of AUC of day 17 dosing samples (probe drug cocktail plus Ze117) vs. Day 1 dosing samples (probe drug cocktail alone). A one-way ANOVA model (with terms for subject and treatment) was applied to analyze the effect of Ze117 on the respective probe drug. Log transformed (base e) parameters were used within the model. The estimated treatment difference between day 17 and day 1 was transformed back to original scale and presented as the ratio between treatments including the corresponding 90% confidence interval. Effect limits were predefined as follows: (1) Mild effect limits (50-200%), extended bioequivalence limits (70-143%), bioequivalence limits (80-125%).

Time frame:
PK samples: pre-dose, and 10, 20, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after each cocktail administration (at day 1 and day 17)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage
Ratio AUC0-t, Day 17 (Probe Drug Cocktail Plus Ze117 [Only at Day 17]) vs. Day 1 (Probe Drug Cocktail Alone)
PercentageCaffeineBupropionFlurbiprofenOmeprazoleDextromethorphanMidazolamFexofenadine
Ratio AUC0-t, Day 17 (Probe Drug Cocktail Plus Ze117 [Only at Day 17]) vs. Day 1 (Probe Drug Cocktail Alone)99.1 (89.4 to 109.9)107.4 (93.4 to 123.5)103.5 (97.0 to 110.5)101.04 (89.3 to 114.3)147.99 (126.3 to 173.4)111.3 (100.6 to 123.25)101.3 (89 to 115)
SecondaryRatio AUC0-t, Day 8 (Probe Drug Cocktail Plus Ze117 [Daily Throughout pk Sampling Period]) vs. Day 1 (Probe Drug Cocktail Alone)

The "number" as provided in the tables is the ratio (in %) of geometric LS means of AUC of day 8 dosing samples (probe drug cocktail plus Ze117) vs. Day 1 dosing samples (probe drug cocktail alone). A one-way ANOVA model (with terms for subject and treatment) was applied to analyze the effect of Ze117 on the respective probe drug. Log transformed (base e) parameters were used within the model. The estimated treatment difference between day 8 and day 1 was transformed back to original scale and presented as the ratio between treatments including the corresponding 90% confidence interval. Effect limits were predefined as follows: (1) Mild effect limits (50-200%), extended bioequivalence limits (70-143%), bioequivalence limits (80-125%).

Time frame:
PK samples: pre-dose, and 10, 20, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after each cocktail administration (at day 1 and day 8)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage
Ratio AUC0-t, Day 8 (Probe Drug Cocktail Plus Ze117 [Daily Throughout pk Sampling Period]) vs. Day 1 (Probe Drug Cocktail Alone)
PercentageCaffeineBupropionFlurbiprofenOmeprazoleDextromethorphanMidazolamFexofenadine
Ratio AUC0-t, Day 8 (Probe Drug Cocktail Plus Ze117 [Daily Throughout pk Sampling Period]) vs. Day 1 (Probe Drug Cocktail Alone)105.1 (94.3 to 117.2)107.0 (96.0 to 119.3)99.1 (93.8 to 104.6)118.7 (102.6 to 137.2)162.2 (141.0 to 186.6)120.5 (111.1 to 130.8)97.1 (87.5 to 107.8)
SecondaryRatio Cmax, Day 17 (Probe Drug Cocktail Plus Ze117 [Only at Day 17]) vs. Day 1 (Probe Drug Cocktail Alone)

The "number" as provided in the tables is the ratio (in %) of geometric LS means of Cmax from day 17 dosing samples (probe drug cocktail plus Ze117) vs. Day 1 dosing samples (probe drug cocktail alone). A one-way ANOVA model (with terms for subject and treatment) was applied to analyze the effect of Ze117 on the respective probe drug. Log transformed (base e) parameters were used within the model. The estimated treatment difference between day 17 and day 1 was transformed back to original scale and presented as the ratio between treatments including the corresponding 90% confidence interval. Effect limits were predefined as follows: (1) Mild effect limits (50-200%), extended bioequivalence limits (70-143%), bioequivalence limits (80-125%).

Time frame:
PK samples: pre-dose, and 10, 20, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after each cocktail administration (at day 1 and day 17)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage
Ratio Cmax, Day 17 (Probe Drug Cocktail Plus Ze117 [Only at Day 17]) vs. Day 1 (Probe Drug Cocktail Alone)
PercentageCaffeineBupropionFlurbiprofenOmeprazoleDextromethorphanMidazolamFexofenadine
Ratio Cmax, Day 17 (Probe Drug Cocktail Plus Ze117 [Only at Day 17]) vs. Day 1 (Probe Drug Cocktail Alone)99.1 (85.8 to 114.4)111.6 (88.5 to 140.7)111.1 (102.1 to 121.0)100.6 (83.5 to 121.3)154.6 (131.7 to 181.4)117.2 (103.2 to 133.2)116.8 (99.4 to 137.1)
SecondaryRatio Cmax, Day 8 (Probe Drug Cocktail Plus Ze117 [Daily Throughout pk Sampling Period]) vs. Day 1 (Probe Drug Cocktail Alone)

The "number" as provided in the tables is the ratio (in %) of geometric LS means of Cmax from day 8 dosing samples (probe drug cocktail plus Ze117) vs. Day 1 dosing samples (probe drug cocktail alone). A one-way ANOVA model (with terms for subject and treatment) was applied to analyze the effect of Ze117 on the respective probe drug. Log transformed (base e) parameters were used within the model. The estimated treatment difference between day 8 and day 1 was transformed back to original scale and presented as the ratio between treatments including the corresponding 90% confidence interval. Effect limits were predefined as follows: (1) Mild effect limits (50-200%), extended bioequivalence limits (70-143%), bioequivalence limits (80-125%).

Time frame:
PK samples: pre-dose, and 10, 20, 30, 45 minutes and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48 and 72 hours after each cocktail administration (at day 1 and day 8)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage
Ratio Cmax, Day 8 (Probe Drug Cocktail Plus Ze117 [Daily Throughout pk Sampling Period]) vs. Day 1 (Probe Drug Cocktail Alone)
PercentageCaffeineBupropionFlurbiprofenOmeprazoleDextromethorphanMidazolamFexofenadine
Ratio Cmax, Day 8 (Probe Drug Cocktail Plus Ze117 [Daily Throughout pk Sampling Period]) vs. Day 1 (Probe Drug Cocktail Alone)104.3 (93.7 to 116.2)100.8 (84.4 to 120.5)109.7 (100.7 to 119.5)109.7 (91.5 to 131.5)163.3 (144.0 to 185.2)123.5 (108.6 to 140.4)102.1 (89.6 to 116.5)

Adverse events

Collected over AEs have been measured from screening Day -1 until end of study visit Day 18. In case of ongoing AEs at the end of study or if participants terminated the study prematurely a follow up visit was performed within the next 30 days to control whether AE/SAE has been resolved.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
One-sequence, Drug Cocktail and Test Product0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)16/20 (80%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 21
Most frequent other events
EventOne-sequence, Drug Cocktail and Test Product
HeadacheNervous system disorders4/20
FatigueGeneral disorders3/20
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/20
Feeling hotGeneral disorders2/20
PyrexiaGeneral disorders2/20
Abnormal fecesGastrointestinal disorders1/20
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders1/20
Gastric hypertoniaGastrointestinal disorders1/20
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/20
EpitaxisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/20

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Healthy Volunteers
<=18 years20
Between 18 and 65 years0
>=65 years0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Healthy Volunteers
Female10
Male10
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Healthy Volunteers
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White20
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Nuvisan GmbH
    Neu-Ulm, Germany
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03482817
Lead sponsor
Max Zeller Soehne AG
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 29, 2018
Start date
Feb 5, 2018
Primary completion
May 17, 2018
Completion
Jun 23, 2018
Results posted
Jun 18, 2026
Last update
Jun 18, 2026

Study contacts

Michael Lissy
principal investigator · Neu-Ulm

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion