CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03476343Updated Feb 12, 2025Results posted

Clinical Use of a Neonatal MRI System

An interventional study of GE OPTIMA MR430s with HDx/GE Electronics in NICU MRI, sponsored by Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati. Completed at 1 site in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-12.

Sponsored by Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
386
Allocation
Not applicable
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the present study is to continue clinical scanning on the NICU MRI with improved administrative processes and procedures, thereby making medically indicated, state of the art/high end MRI exams available to all infants treated at CCHMC.

Read the detailed description

There are significant safety and image quality issues associated with transferring neonates from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) to the main Radiology Department for imaging in an adult-sized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. For these reasons, the smallest and/or sickest neonates are typically precluded from receiving an MRI exam. The goal of our research effort is to bring high-performance MRI into the NICU so that all neonates can benefit from the same quality of diagnostic imaging as adults. To accomplish this, we have converted a commercial small-bore 1.5 Tesla (T) MRI scanner designed for orthopedic use into a neonatal MRI system optimized for whole body imaging of neonates (NICU MRI). To expand the imaging capabilities of the NICU MRI system, the measurement control electronics and operating system software of the FDA cleared OPTIMA platform have been augmented with state of the art HDX electronics and software currently used on a conventional commercially available adult sized whole body MRI scanner. The clinical safety of the integrated HDX/OPTIMA NICU MRI system and its ability to produce diagnostic image quality has been shown in 15 pilot patients (CCHMC Protocol 2011-2045). Further we have scanned almost 600 patients under a prior protocol (CCHMC Protocol 2011-2850) without an adverse event.

The present protocol seeks to allow continued performance of clinical MRI exams on the NICU magnet with improved administrative processes and procedures. NICU patients for whom an MRI exam is medically indicated will be recruited for the present study. Images will be obtained using both the FDA cleared OPTIMA NICU MRI platform and the integrated HDX/OPTIMA NICU MRI platform with the additional HDX images augmenting the OPTIMA images and contributing to diagnosis and guidance of subsequent clinical management. The specific MR imaging methods/procedures utilized will be determined by the type of exam to be performed and the medical indication. All of the MR images obtained will be reviewed by a board certified pediatric radiologist as part of clinical care and a clinical report will be generated and included in the infant's medical record.

02

Conditions studied

  • NICU MRI

Keywords

  • NICU
  • MRI
  • Neonatal
  • Cincinnati
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Any infant admitted to CCHMC
  • Have a medical condition for which an MRI exam is indicated, as determined by the attending neonatologist

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants too large to fit in the customized NICU MRI system comfortably (generally infants > 6 kg)
  • Standard MRI exclusion criteria as set forth by the CCHMC Division of Radiology
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
386 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    MRI for Neonates

    MRI

    Device: GE OPTIMA MR430s with HDx/GE Electronics

Interventions

  • DeviceGE OPTIMA MR430s with HDx/GE Electronics

    MRI scan

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events as Observed During and After Scanning.

    Any observed physical changes will be recorded during and after scanning

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Each Infant's Baseline Measurement for Weight Will be Recorded.

    These measures will be used in order to facilitate future design of coils and transport tables for the customized MRI system.

    Time frame: Day 1

  2. Each Infant's Anatomy Scanned Will be Obtained.

    The anatomy used will be used in order to facilitate understand the need for specific coils for the customized MRI system.

    Time frame: Day 1

  3. Baseline Measurement for Days Old Will be Recorded.

    These measures will be used in conjunction with the weight at the time of scan to facilitate future design of coils and transport tables for the customized MRI system.

    Time frame: Day 1

06

Results

Posted Feb 13, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneMRI for Neonates
Started386
Completed374
Not completed12
Withdrew: Clinical exam moved to another scanner7
Withdrew: Clinical order cancelled4
Withdrew: Neonate did not settle down for the scan1

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events as Observed During and After Scanning.

Any observed physical changes will be recorded during and after scanning

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events as Observed During and After Scanning.
ParticipantsMRI for Neonates
Number of Participants With Adverse Events as Observed During and After Scanning.0
SecondaryEach Infant's Baseline Measurement for Weight Will be Recorded.

These measures will be used in order to facilitate future design of coils and transport tables for the customized MRI system.

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Mean · kg
Each Infant's Baseline Measurement for Weight Will be Recorded.
kgMRI for Neonates
Each Infant's Baseline Measurement for Weight Will be Recorded.2.92 (0.54 to 4.89)
SecondaryEach Infant's Anatomy Scanned Will be Obtained.

The anatomy used will be used in order to facilitate understand the need for specific coils for the customized MRI system.

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Each Infant's Anatomy Scanned Will be Obtained.
ParticipantsMRI for Neonates
Brain357
Brain and Neonate Spine1
Chest2
Spine13
Whole Body1
SecondaryBaseline Measurement for Days Old Will be Recorded.

These measures will be used in conjunction with the weight at the time of scan to facilitate future design of coils and transport tables for the customized MRI system.

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Median · days
Baseline Measurement for Days Old Will be Recorded.
daysMRI for Neonates
Baseline Measurement for Days Old Will be Recorded.20 (1 to 155)

Adverse events

Collected over Time that participant was in the NICU scanner for their clinically indicated scan (length of scan varies based on standard of care exam).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
MRI for Neonates0/374 (0%)0/374 (0%)0/374 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Neonates

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)MRI for Neonates
<=18 years386
Between 18 and 65 years0
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(days)MRI for Neonates
Median20 (1 to 155)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)MRI for Neonates
Female170
Male216
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)MRI for Neonates
Anatomy scanned
Anatomy scanned(Participants)MRI for Neonates
Brain365
Brain and Neonate Spine2
Chest4
Spine14
Whole Body1
07

Study locations

1 site
  • NICU, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • McCormick MC, Behrman RE. The quiet epidemic of premature birth: commentary on a recent Institute of Medicine report. Ambul Pediatr. 2007 Jan-Feb;7(1):8-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2006.10.002. No abstract available. PubMed 17261476 ↗
  • Beck S, Wojdyla D, Say L, Betran AP, Merialdi M, Requejo JH, Rubens C, Menon R, Van Look PF. The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: a systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Jan;88(1):31-8. doi: 10.2471/BLT.08.062554. Epub 2009 Sep 25. PubMed 20428351 ↗
  • Arthur R. Magnetic resonance imaging in preterm infants. Pediatr Radiol. 2006 Jul;36(7):593-607. doi: 10.1007/s00247-006-0154-x. Epub 2006 May 19. PubMed 16770664 ↗
  • Hirsch W, Sorge I, Krohmer S, Weber D, Meier K, Till H. MRI of the lungs in children. Eur J Radiol. 2008 Nov;68(2):278-88. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.05.017. Epub 2008 Sep 3. PubMed 18771869 ↗
  • Adams EW, Counsell SJ, Hajnal JV, Allsop JM, Herlihy A, Edwards AD. Investigation of lung disease in preterm infants using magnetic resonance imaging. Biol Neonate. 2000 May;77 Suppl 1:17-20. doi: 10.1159/000047053. PubMed 10828582 ↗
  • Krishnamurthy R. Neonatal cardiac imaging. Pediatr Radiol. 2010 Apr;40(4):518-27. doi: 10.1007/s00247-010-1549-2. PubMed 20225116 ↗
  • Schweigmann G, Gassner I, Maurer K. Imaging the neonatal heart--essentials for the radiologist. Eur J Radiol. 2006 Nov;60(2):159-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.07.017. Epub 2006 Aug 22. PubMed 16930906 ↗
  • Barkovich AJ. MR imaging of the neonatal brain. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2006 Feb;16(1):117-35, viii-ix. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2005.10.003. PubMed 16543088 ↗
  • van Wezel-Meijler G, Leijser LM, de Bruine FT, Steggerda SJ, van der Grond J, Walther FJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in newborn infants: practical aspects. Early Hum Dev. 2009 Feb;85(2):85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2008.11.009. Epub 2009 Jan 12. PubMed 19138830 ↗
  • Saunders DE, Thompson C, Gunny R, Jones R, Cox T, Chong WK. Magnetic resonance imaging protocols for paediatric neuroradiology. Pediatr Radiol. 2007 Aug;37(8):789-97. doi: 10.1007/s00247-007-0462-9. Epub 2007 May 9. PubMed 17487479 ↗
  • Mathur AM, Neil JJ, McKinstry RC, Inder TE. Transport, monitoring, and successful brain MR imaging in unsedated neonates. Pediatr Radiol. 2008 Mar;38(3):260-4. doi: 10.1007/s00247-007-0705-9. Epub 2007 Dec 19. PubMed 18175110 ↗
  • Bluml S, Friedlich P, Erberich S, Wood JC, Seri I, Nelson MD Jr. MR imaging of newborns by using an MR-compatible incubator with integrated radiofrequency coils: initial experience. Radiology. 2004 May;231(2):594-601. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2312030166. PubMed 15128999 ↗
  • Erberich SG, Friedlich P, Seri I, Nelson MD Jr, Bluml S. Functional MRI in neonates using neonatal head coil and MR compatible incubator. Neuroimage. 2003 Oct;20(2):683-92. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00370-7. PubMed 14568444 ↗
  • Foran AM, Fitzpatrick JA, Allsop J, Schmitz S, Franklin J, Pamboucas C, O'Regan D, Hajnal JV, Edwards AD. Three-tesla cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2007 Jul;120(1):78-83. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-3305. PubMed 17606564 ↗
  • Groves AM, Chiesa G, Durighel G, Goldring ST, Fitzpatrick JA, Uribe S, Razavi R, Hajnal JV, Edwards AD. Functional cardiac MRI in preterm and term newborns. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011 Mar;96(2):F86-91. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.189142. Epub 2010 Oct 21. PubMed 20971721 ↗
  • Michael R. Potential of MR-imaging in the paediatric abdomen. Eur J Radiol. 2008 Nov;68(2):235-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.07.017. Epub 2008 Oct 9. PubMed 18848412 ↗
  • Rao P. Neonatal gastrointestinal imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2006 Nov;60(2):171-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.07.021. Epub 2006 Sep 25. PubMed 16997526 ↗
  • Riccabona M. Imaging of the neonatal genito-urinary tract. Eur J Radiol. 2006 Nov;60(2):187-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.07.022. Epub 2006 Sep 7. PubMed 16959460 ↗
  • Darge K, Jaramillo D, Siegel MJ. Whole-body MRI in children: current status and future applications. Eur J Radiol. 2008 Nov;68(2):289-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.05.018. Epub 2008 Sep 16. PubMed 18799279 ↗
  • Olsen OE. Practical body MRI-A paediatric perspective. Eur J Radiol. 2008 Nov;68(2):299-308. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.034. Epub 2008 Sep 2. PubMed 18768278 ↗
  • Seghier ML, Huppi PS. The role of functional magnetic resonance imaging in the study of brain development, injury, and recovery in the newborn. Semin Perinatol. 2010 Feb;34(1):79-86. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2009.10.008. PubMed 20109975 ↗
  • Simbrunner J, Riccabona M. Imaging of the neonatal CNS. Eur J Radiol. 2006 Nov;60(2):133-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.07.019. Epub 2006 Sep 14. PubMed 16973325 ↗
  • Rutherford M, Srinivasan L, Dyet L, Ward P, Allsop J, Counsell S, Cowan F. Magnetic resonance imaging in perinatal brain injury: clinical presentation, lesions and outcome. Pediatr Radiol. 2006 Jul;36(7):582-92. doi: 10.1007/s00247-006-0164-8. Epub 2006 May 16. PubMed 16770663 ↗
  • Bartha AI, Yap KR, Miller SP, Jeremy RJ, Nishimoto M, Vigneron DB, Barkovich AJ, Ferriero DM. The normal neonatal brain: MR imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, and 3D MR spectroscopy in healthy term neonates. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Jun-Jul;28(6):1015-21. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0521. PubMed 17569948 ↗
  • Glass HC, Bonifacio SL, Sullivan J, Rogers E, Ferriero DM, Goldstein R, Barkovich AJ. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound injury in preterm infants with seizures. J Child Neurol. 2009 Sep;24(9):1105-11. doi: 10.1177/0883073809338328. PubMed 19745086 ↗
  • Prager A, Roychowdhury S. Magnetic resonance imaging of the neonatal brain. Indian J Pediatr. 2007 Feb;74(2):173-84. doi: 10.1007/s12098-007-0012-3. PubMed 17337831 ↗
  • Roelants-van Rijn AM, Groenendaal F, Beek FJ, Eken P, van Haastert IC, de Vries LS. Parenchymal brain injury in the preterm infant: comparison of cranial ultrasound, MRI and neurodevelopmental outcome. Neuropediatrics. 2001 Apr;32(2):80-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-13875. PubMed 11414648 ↗
  • Maalouf EF, Duggan PJ, Counsell SJ, Rutherford MA, Cowan F, Azzopardi D, Edwards AD. Comparison of findings on cranial ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2001 Apr;107(4):719-27. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.4.719. PubMed 11335750 ↗
  • Epelman M, Daneman A, Kellenberger CJ, Aziz A, Konen O, Moineddin R, Whyte H, Blaser S. Neonatal encephalopathy: a prospective comparison of head US and MRI. Pediatr Radiol. 2010 Oct;40(10):1640-50. doi: 10.1007/s00247-010-1634-6. Epub 2010 Apr 22. PubMed 20411255 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jan 9, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03476343
Lead sponsor
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 26, 2018
Start date
Feb 11, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 3, 2022
Completion
Sep 9, 2022
Results posted
Feb 13, 2024
Last update
Feb 12, 2025

Study contacts

Beth M Kline-Fath, MD
principal investigator · Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion