ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03475056Updated Aug 11, 2022Results posted

cAd3-Marburg Vaccine in Healthy Adults

A Phase 1 interventional study of cAd3-Marburg vaccine in Marburg Virus Disease, sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-11.

Sponsored by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) · Phase 1, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

RV 507 was a Phase I, open-label study to examine the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of an investigational Marburg vaccine given by intramuscular (IM) injection to healthy adults. The study was a dose escalation of VRC-MARADC087-00-VP, a chimpanzee adenovirus serotype 3 (cAd3) vector vaccine, which encodes wild type (WT) glycoprotein (GP) from Marburgvirus.

Read the detailed description

A total of 40 participants were evenly split, with 20 in each of the two dosage groups, to receive the investigational cAd3-Marburg vaccine at a dose of either 1x10\^10 particle units (PU) (Group 1) or 1x10\^11 PU (Group 2). The dose escalation plan included daily review of any new safety data by a study clinician, regular review of safety data by the protocol team and a staged enrollment plan with required interim safety reviews. The study began with enrollment of 3 participants into Group 1 (1x10\^10 PU) at a rate of 1 participant per day. After at least 7 days of follow-up for the first 3 vaccinated participants, an interim safety review occurred before enrollment of additional participants into the group. No safety issues were identified; therefore, an additional 17 participants were enrolled to complete Group 1. When there was a minimum of seven days of follow-up safety data from the last enrolled participant in Group 1, an interim safety review occurred. Once no safety issues were identified, enrollment of participants into the next dose level began with the enrollment of 3 participants at a rate of 1 participant per day. After at least 7 days of follow-up for the first 3 vaccinated participants in Group 2 (1x10\^11 PU), an interim safety review occurred before the enrollment of additional participants into Group 2. No safety issues were identified and an additional 17 participants were enrolled to complete Group 2. Participants were followed for approximately 48 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Marburg Virus Disease

Keywords

  • Marburg virus
  • Marburg vaccine
  • cAd3-Marburg vaccine
03

In context

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) is the lead sponsor of 2,446 studies on the registry; 179 are open to participants now.

Of its 405 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 302 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. 18 to 50 years old
  2. Available for clinical follow-up through Week 48 after enrollment
  3. Able to provide proof of identity to the satisfaction of the study clinician completing the enrollment process. Proof of identity includes a valid U.S. government-issued or state-issued photo identification (ID) such as a driver's license, military ID, or U.S. passport.
  4. Able and willing to provide a personal mobile phone number or home phone number at which the participant can be reliably contacted. Participants will be contacted primarily for study visit 2A (Appendix 1), as a reminder of an upcoming visit, and after missed visits for rescheduling purposes.
  5. Able and willing to complete the process and demonstrate understanding with a passing score (90% or greater) on the Assessment of Understanding (AOU) by the third attempt.
  6. In good general health without medical history.
  7. Physical examination and laboratory results without clinically significant findings and a (BMI) ≤ 40 within the 56 days prior to enrollment.
  8. Laboratory Criteria within 56 days prior to enrollment:

    1. ≥ 11.5 g/dL for women; ≥13.0 g/dL for men.
    2. White blood cells (WBC) = 3,300-12,000 cells/mm\^3.
    3. Total lymphocyte count ≥ 800 cells/mm\^3.
    4. = 125,000 - 400,000/mm\^3.
    5. (ALT) ≤ 1.25 x .
    6. Serum creatinine ≤ 1 x upper limit of normal.
    7. -uninfected as evidenced by a negative FDA-approved HIV diagnostic blood test.

    Female-Specific Criteria:

  9. Negative β-HCG (human chorionic gonadotropin) pregnancy test; serum β-HCG at screening (or urine if screening is the same day as enrollment) and urine β-HCG at enrollment if woman is of .
  10. Agrees to use an effective means of from at least 21 days prior to enrollment through 24 weeks after study vaccination if assessed to be of reproductive potential.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Volunteer has received any of the following substances:

  1. Ebola or Marburg vaccine in a prior clinical trial or prior receipt of a cAd3 vectored investigational vaccine.
  2. medications within 2 weeks prior to enrollment.
  3. Blood products within 112 days (16 weeks) prior to enrollment.
  4. Investigational research agents within 28 days (4 weeks) prior to enrollment.
  5. within 28 days (4 weeks) prior to enrollment.
  6. Subunit or killed vaccines within 14 days (2 weeks) prior to enrollment.
  7. Current anti-tuberculosis prophylaxis or therapy.

    Female-specific criteria:

  8. Woman who is pregnant, breast-feeding or planning to become pregnant during the first 24 weeks after study vaccine administration.

    Volunteer has a history of any of the following conditions:

  9. Serious adverse reactions to vaccines such as anaphylaxis, urticaria (hives), respiratory difficulty, angioedema, or abdominal pain.
  10. Allergic reaction to in the study vaccine including gentamycin, neomycin or streptomycin.
  11. Clinically significant disease or immunodeficiency.
  12. Asthma that is not well controlled.
  13. Positive syphilis serology. False-positive results will also exclude a participant.
  14. Diabetes mellitus (type I or II).
  15. Thyroid disease that is not well controlled.
  16. A history of hereditary angioedema (HAE), acquired angioedema (AAE), or idiopathic forms of angioedema.
  17. Idiopathic urticaria within the last 1 year.
  18. Hypertension that is not well controlled.
  19. Bleeding disorder diagnosed by a doctor (e.g. factor deficiency, coagulopathy, or disorder requiring special precautions) or significant bruising or bleeding difficulties with intramuscular (IM) injections or blood draws.
  20. A that is active, currently being treated, or not surgically cured.
  21. Seizure in the past 3 years or treatment for seizure disorder in the past 3 years.
  22. Asplenia or functional asplenia.
  23. Psychiatric condition that precludes compliance with the protocol; past or present psychoses; or within five years prior to enrollment, history of a suicide plan or attempt.
  24. Any medical, psychiatric, social condition, occupational reason or other responsibility that, in the judgment of the investigator, is a to protocol participation or impairs a volunteer's ability to give .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(17)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Reproductive potential

Able to have children. For women this usually means from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery; for men, unless permanently sterile. Read who the line is about — participants, women, men, or their partners.

Criteria about it usually ask for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Live vaccines

Vaccines made with a weakened form of the germ, such as measles–mumps–rubella (MMR), chickenpox and yellow fever. They can be risky when the immune system is weakened. Flu injections are not live; the nasal flu spray is.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group 1: cAd3-Marburg vaccine (1x10^10 PU)

    cAd3-Marburg vaccine (1x10\^10 PU) administered intramuscularly (IM) with needle and syringe in a volume of 1 mL

    Biological: cAd3-Marburg vaccine

  • Experimental
    Group 2: cAd3-Marburg vaccine (1x10^11 PU)

    cAd3-Marburg vaccine (1x10\^11 PU) administered IM with needle and syringe in a volume of 1 mL

    Biological: cAd3-Marburg vaccine

Interventions

  • BiologicalcAd3-Marburg vaccine

    The recombinant chimpanzee adenovirus Type 3-vectored Marburg vaccine, VRC-MARADC087-00-VP (cAd3-Marburg) is composed of a cAd3 vector that expresses Marburg wild type glycoprotein (WT GP).

    Also known as: VRC-MARADC087-00-VP

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Reporting Local Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms for 7 Days After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration

    Participants recorded the occurrence of solicited symptoms on a diary card for 7 days after the study product administration and reviewed the diary card with clinic staff at a follow up visit. Participants were counted once for each symptom at the worst severity if they indicated experiencing the symptom more than one time at any severity during the reporting period. The number reported for "Any Local Symptom" is the number of participants reporting any local symptom at the worst severity. Reactogenicity grading (Mild, Moderate, Severe) was done using the Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials (FDA Guidance - September 2007).

    Time frame: 7 days after study product administration

  2. Number of Participants Reporting Systemic Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms for 7 Days After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration

    Participants recorded the occurrence of solicited symptoms on a diary card for 7 days after the study product administration and reviewed the diary card with clinic staff at a follow up visit. Participants were counted once for each symptom at the worst severity if they indicated experiencing the symptom more than one time at any severity during the reporting period. The number reported for "Any Systemic Symptom" is the number of participants reporting any systemic symptom at the worst severity. The majority of the reactogenicity grading (Mild, Moderate, Severe) was done using the Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials (FDA Guidance - September 2007).The Division of AIDS AE Grading Table Corrected (Version 2.1-July 2017) was used to grade reported events of joint pain (arthralgia).

    Time frame: 7 days after study product administration

  3. Total Number of Participants Reporting Any Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms for 7 Days After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration

    Participants recorded the occurrence of solicited symptoms on a diary card for 7 days after the study product administration.

    Time frame: 7 days after study product administration

  4. Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Measures of Safety

    Any abnormal laboratory results recorded as unsolicited AEs are summarized. Labs included hematology (hemoglobin, hemoglobin change from baseline, hematocrit percent, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), platelets, and white blood cell (WBC), red blood cell (RBC) and lymphocyte counts) and chemistry (alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and creatinine). Complete blood count (CBC) with total lymphocyte count results were collected at screening (≤ 56 days before enrollment), Day 0 prior to study product administration (baseline), Day 3, and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 24. Creatinine and ALT results were collected at screening, Day 0, Day 3 and Weeks 2, 4 and 8. Institutional laboratory normal ranges as well as the Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventative Vaccine Clinical Trials FDA Guidance, September 2007 were used.

    Time frame: Through 48 weeks after study product administration

  5. Number of Participants With One or More Unsolicited Non-Serious Adverse Events (AEs)

    Unsolicited AEs and attribution assessments were recorded in the study database from receipt of the study product administration through the visit scheduled for 28 days after study product administration. At other time periods greater than 28 days after the study product administration, only serious AEs (SAEs reported as a separate outcome and in the AE module), and new chronic medical conditions that required ongoing medical management were recorded through the last study visit. The relationship between an AE and the study product was assessed by the investigator based on clinical judgment and the definitions outlined in the protocol. A participant with multiple experiences of the same event is counted once using the event of worst severity.

    Time frame: Through 28 days after study product administration

  6. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    SAEs were recorded from receipt of the study product administration through the last expected study visit at Week 48. The relationship between a SAE and the study product was assessed by the investigator based on clinical judgment and the definitions outlined in the protocol. A participant with multiple experiences of the same event is counted once using the event of worst severity.

    Time frame: Through 48 weeks after study product administration

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Titers of Antibodies to the Recombinant Chimpanzee Adenovirus Serotype 3 (cAd3) Vector at 28 Days After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration

    Vaccine-induced, cAd3-specific antibody responses as measured by neutralization assay. Participant blood samples were tested for cAd3-specific neutralizing activity, prior to and following vaccination, using a luciferase reporter gene virus neutralization assay as previously described (Clin Vaccine Immunol 2014; 21:783-6, References Section).

    Time frame: Through 28 days after study product administration

  2. Mean Titers of Antibodies to the Human Adenovirus Serotype 5 (Ad5) Vector at 28 Days After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration

    Vaccine-induced, Ad5-specific antibody responses as measured by neutralization assay. Participant blood samples were tested for Ad5-specific neutralizing activity, prior to and following vaccination, using a luciferase reporter gene virus neutralization assay as previously described (Clin Vaccine Immunol 2014; 21:783-6, References Section).

    Time frame: Through 28 days after study product administration

  3. Percentage of Participants With a Positive Marburg-Specific Antibody Response After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration

    A positive response occurs if there is a significant increase in the ELISA post vaccination compared to baseline. For each participant, a t-test was performed to compare the post vaccination titers versus those at baseline. A participant is defined as a positive responder if the one-sided t-test has a p-value \< 0.05.

    Time frame: Through 28 days after study product administration

  4. Magnitude of Marburg-Specific Antibody Responses After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration

    Geometric mean titer (GMT) was calculated along with 95% confidence intervals at Week 4 for each dose group.

    Time frame: Through 28 days after study product administration

  5. Percentage of Participants With Positive Marburg-specific T Cell Responses After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration

    T cell response was measured by Intracellular Cytokine Staining (ICS) assays using Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) at 4 weeks after vaccination. The percentage of participants with T cell responses with Clopper-Pearson 95% Confidence Intervals are presented. Positivity is defined as a response over calculated thresholds determined by the trial statistician.

    Time frame: Through 28 days after study product administration

  6. Magnitude of Marburg-specific T Cell Responses After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration

    Median and interquartile ranges presented for total cytokine responses for both CD4 and CD8 memory T cells based on a T cell response with any cytokine at Week 4 for each dose group.

    Time frame: Through 28 days after study product administration

07

Results

Posted Jan 14, 2021

Participant flow

Healthy adults were recruited at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) Clinical Trials Center (CTC) in Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGroup 1: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU)Group 2: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^11 PU)
Started2020
Received product administration2020
Completed2017
Not completed03
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up01
Withdrew: Moved from area02

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants Reporting Local Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms for 7 Days After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration

Participants recorded the occurrence of solicited symptoms on a diary card for 7 days after the study product administration and reviewed the diary card with clinic staff at a follow up visit. Participants were counted once for each symptom at the worst severity if they indicated experiencing the symptom more than one time at any severity during the reporting period. The number reported for "Any Local Symptom" is the number of participants reporting any local symptom at the worst severity. Reactogenicity grading (Mild, Moderate, Severe) was done using the Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials (FDA Guidance - September 2007).

Time frame:
7 days after study product administration
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Reporting Local Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms for 7 Days After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration
ParticipantsGroup 1: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU)Group 2: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^11 PU)Overall Incidence cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU and 1X10^11 PU)
Pain — None9413
Pain — Mild101222
Pain — Moderate145
Pain — Severe000
Swelling — None202040
Swelling — Mild000
Swelling — Moderate000
Swelling — Severe000
Redness — None202040
Redness — Mild000
Redness — Moderate000
Redness — Severe000
Any Local Symptom — None9413
Any Local Symptom — Mild101222
Any Local Symptom — Moderate145
Any Local Symptom — Severe000
PrimaryNumber of Participants Reporting Systemic Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms for 7 Days After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration

Participants recorded the occurrence of solicited symptoms on a diary card for 7 days after the study product administration and reviewed the diary card with clinic staff at a follow up visit. Participants were counted once for each symptom at the worst severity if they indicated experiencing the symptom more than one time at any severity during the reporting period. The number reported for "Any Systemic Symptom" is the number of participants reporting any systemic symptom at the worst severity. The majority of the reactogenicity grading (Mild, Moderate, Severe) was done using the Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials (FDA Guidance - September 2007).The Division of AIDS AE Grading Table Corrected (Version 2.1-July 2017) was used to grade reported events of joint pain (arthralgia).

Time frame:
7 days after study product administration
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Reporting Systemic Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms for 7 Days After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration
ParticipantsGroup 1: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU)Group 2: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^11 PU)Overall Incidence cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU and 1X10^11 PU)
Unusually Tired/Feeling Unwell (Malaise) — None15722
Unusually Tired/Feeling Unwell (Malaise) — Mild21113
Unusually Tired/Feeling Unwell (Malaise) — Moderate325
Unusually Tired/Feeling Unwell (Malaise) — Severe000
Muscle Aches (Myalgia) — None151126
Muscle Aches (Myalgia) — Mild5611
Muscle Aches (Myalgia) — Moderate033
Muscle Aches (Myalgia) — Severe000
Headache — None14923
Headache — Mild4812
Headache — Moderate235
Headache — Severe000
Chills — None171431
Chills — Mild303
Chills — Moderate066
Chills — Severe000
Nausea — None181836
Nausea — Mild224
Nausea — Moderate000
Nausea — Severe000
Temperature (Fever) — None201737
Temperature (Fever) — Mild022
Temperature (Fever) — Moderate000
Temperature (Fever) — Severe011
Arthralgia — None181331
Arthralgia — Mild257
Arthralgia — Moderate022
Arthralgia — Severe000
Any Systemic Symptom — None10313
Any Systemic Symptom — Mild51015
Any Systemic Symptom — Moderate5611
Any Systemic Symptom — Severe011
PrimaryTotal Number of Participants Reporting Any Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms for 7 Days After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration

Participants recorded the occurrence of solicited symptoms on a diary card for 7 days after the study product administration.

Time frame:
7 days after study product administration
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Total Number of Participants Reporting Any Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms for 7 Days After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration
ParticipantsGroup 1: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU)Group 2: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^11 PU)Overall Incidence cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU and 1X10^11 PU)
Total Number of Participants who had Any Local Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms111627
Total Number of Participants who had Any Systemic Reactogenicity Signs and Symptoms101727
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Measures of Safety

Any abnormal laboratory results recorded as unsolicited AEs are summarized. Labs included hematology (hemoglobin, hemoglobin change from baseline, hematocrit percent, mean corpuscular volume (MCV), platelets, and white blood cell (WBC), red blood cell (RBC) and lymphocyte counts) and chemistry (alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and creatinine). Complete blood count (CBC) with total lymphocyte count results were collected at screening (≤ 56 days before enrollment), Day 0 prior to study product administration (baseline), Day 3, and Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 24. Creatinine and ALT results were collected at screening, Day 0, Day 3 and Weeks 2, 4 and 8. Institutional laboratory normal ranges as well as the Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventative Vaccine Clinical Trials FDA Guidance, September 2007 were used.

Time frame:
Through 48 weeks after study product administration
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Measures of Safety
ParticipantsGroup 1: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU)Group 2: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^11 PU)Overall Incidence cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU and 1X10^11 PU)
ALT101
WBC Count044
Hemoglobin246
Total Number of Participants who had Any Abnormal Laboratory Results Reported as AEs3811
PrimaryNumber of Participants With One or More Unsolicited Non-Serious Adverse Events (AEs)

Unsolicited AEs and attribution assessments were recorded in the study database from receipt of the study product administration through the visit scheduled for 28 days after study product administration. At other time periods greater than 28 days after the study product administration, only serious AEs (SAEs reported as a separate outcome and in the AE module), and new chronic medical conditions that required ongoing medical management were recorded through the last study visit. The relationship between an AE and the study product was assessed by the investigator based on clinical judgment and the definitions outlined in the protocol. A participant with multiple experiences of the same event is counted once using the event of worst severity.

Time frame:
Through 28 days after study product administration
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With One or More Unsolicited Non-Serious Adverse Events (AEs)
ParticipantsGroup 1: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU)Group 2: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^11 PU)Overall Incidence cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU and 1X10^11 PU)
Related to Study Product055
Unrelated to Study Product61117
Total Number of Participants who had One or More Non-Serious Unsolicited AE61622
PrimaryNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

SAEs were recorded from receipt of the study product administration through the last expected study visit at Week 48. The relationship between a SAE and the study product was assessed by the investigator based on clinical judgment and the definitions outlined in the protocol. A participant with multiple experiences of the same event is counted once using the event of worst severity.

Time frame:
Through 48 weeks after study product administration
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
ParticipantsGroup 1: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU)Group 2: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^11 PU)Overall Incidence cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU and 1X10^11 PU)
Related to Study Product000
Unrelated to Study Product202
Total Number of Participants who had an SAE202
SecondaryMean Titers of Antibodies to the Recombinant Chimpanzee Adenovirus Serotype 3 (cAd3) Vector at 28 Days After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration

Vaccine-induced, cAd3-specific antibody responses as measured by neutralization assay. Participant blood samples were tested for cAd3-specific neutralizing activity, prior to and following vaccination, using a luciferase reporter gene virus neutralization assay as previously described (Clin Vaccine Immunol 2014; 21:783-6, References Section).

Time frame:
Through 28 days after study product administration
Reported as:
Mean · 90% inhibitory concentration(IC90)titer
Mean Titers of Antibodies to the Recombinant Chimpanzee Adenovirus Serotype 3 (cAd3) Vector at 28 Days After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration
90% inhibitory concentration(IC90)titerGroup 1: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU)Group 2: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^11 PU)
Week 0 (Baseline, Pre-Administration)49.3 (27.0 to 89.9)48.8 (22.9 to 89.9)
Week 4 (28 Days After Product Administration)414.6 (232.6 to 739.0)437.1 (255.8 to 746.8)
SecondaryMean Titers of Antibodies to the Human Adenovirus Serotype 5 (Ad5) Vector at 28 Days After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration

Vaccine-induced, Ad5-specific antibody responses as measured by neutralization assay. Participant blood samples were tested for Ad5-specific neutralizing activity, prior to and following vaccination, using a luciferase reporter gene virus neutralization assay as previously described (Clin Vaccine Immunol 2014; 21:783-6, References Section).

Time frame:
Through 28 days after study product administration
Reported as:
Mean · 90% inhibitory concentration(IC90)titer
Mean Titers of Antibodies to the Human Adenovirus Serotype 5 (Ad5) Vector at 28 Days After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration
90% inhibitory concentration(IC90)titerGroup 1: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU)Group 2: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^11 PU)
Week 0 (Baseline, Pre-Administration)101.1 (25.7 to 396.8)224.2 (61.0 to 396.8)
Week 4 (28 Days after Product Administration)181.6 (50.7 to 650.2)405.1 (116.6 to 1407.4)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With a Positive Marburg-Specific Antibody Response After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration

A positive response occurs if there is a significant increase in the ELISA post vaccination compared to baseline. For each participant, a t-test was performed to compare the post vaccination titers versus those at baseline. A participant is defined as a positive responder if the one-sided t-test has a p-value \< 0.05.

Time frame:
Through 28 days after study product administration
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of responders
Percentage of Participants With a Positive Marburg-Specific Antibody Response After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration
Percentage of respondersGroup 1: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU)Group 2: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^11 PU)
Percentage of Participants With a Positive Marburg-Specific Antibody Response After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration95 (75 to 100)95 (75 to 100)
SecondaryMagnitude of Marburg-Specific Antibody Responses After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration

Geometric mean titer (GMT) was calculated along with 95% confidence intervals at Week 4 for each dose group.

Time frame:
Through 28 days after study product administration
Reported as:
Geometric mean · titer
Magnitude of Marburg-Specific Antibody Responses After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration
titerGroup 1: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU)Group 2: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^11 PU)
Magnitude of Marburg-Specific Antibody Responses After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration420.78 (209.30 to 845.98)545.11 (275.63 to 1078.07)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Positive Marburg-specific T Cell Responses After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration

T cell response was measured by Intracellular Cytokine Staining (ICS) assays using Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) at 4 weeks after vaccination. The percentage of participants with T cell responses with Clopper-Pearson 95% Confidence Intervals are presented. Positivity is defined as a response over calculated thresholds determined by the trial statistician.

Time frame:
Through 28 days after study product administration
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of responders
Percentage of Participants With Positive Marburg-specific T Cell Responses After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration
Percentage of respondersGroup 1: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU)Group 2: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^11 PU)
Percentage of Participants who produced at least one CD4 cytokine70 (46 to 88)95 (75 to 100)
Percentage of Participants who produced at least one CD8 cytokine30 (12 to 54)20 (6 to 44)
SecondaryMagnitude of Marburg-specific T Cell Responses After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration

Median and interquartile ranges presented for total cytokine responses for both CD4 and CD8 memory T cells based on a T cell response with any cytokine at Week 4 for each dose group.

Time frame:
Through 28 days after study product administration
Reported as:
Median · percent of subset
Magnitude of Marburg-specific T Cell Responses After the cAd3-Marburg Vaccine Administration
percent of subsetGroup 1: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU)Group 2: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^11 PU)
CD40.10 (0.07 to 0.16)0.11 (0.08 to 0.13)
CD80.08 (0.05 to 0.25)0.11 (0.08 to 0.21)

Adverse events

Collected over Solicited adverse events (AEs) were reported for 7 days after the study product administration. Unsolicited AEs were recorded from receipt of the study product administration through the visit scheduled for 28 days after study product administration. At other time periods greater than 28 days after the study product administration, only serious AEs (SAEs), and new chronic medical conditions that required ongoing medical management were recorded through the last study visit.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Group 1: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU)0/20 (0%)2/20 (10%)11/20 (55%)
Group 2: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^11 PU)0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)16/20 (80%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventGroup 1: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU)Group 2: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^11 PU)
Staphylococcal infectionInfections and infestations1/200/20
Breast CancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/200/20
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 22
Most frequent other events
EventGroup 1: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU)Group 2: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^11 PU)
Administration site painGeneral disorders11/2016/20
MalaiseGeneral disorders5/2013/20
HeadacheNervous system disorders6/2011/20
MyalgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders5/209/20
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/207/20
ChillsGeneral disorders3/206/20
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/204/20
Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionInfections and infestations1/204/20
PyrexiaGeneral disorders0/203/20
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders2/202/20

Baseline characteristics

Population includes all enrolled participants.

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Group 1: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU)Group 2: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^11 PU)Total
18-20 years101
21-30 years4711
31-40 years7815
41-50 years8513
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Group 1: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU)Group 2: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^11 PU)Total
Female121325
Male8715
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Group 1: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU)Group 2: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^11 PU)Total
Hispanic or Latino246
Not Hispanic or Latino181634
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Group 1: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU)Group 2: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^11 PU)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native011
Asian235
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander101
Black or African American10414
White71118
More than one race011
Unknown or Not Reported000
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(Participants)Group 1: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^10 PU)Group 2: cAd3-Marburg Vaccine (1x10^11 PU)Total
18.5-24.9 kg/m^26814
25.0-29.9 kg/m^210717
30.0-40.0 kg/m^2459
08

Study locations

1 site
  • WRAIR Clinical Trials Center,
    Silver Spring, Maryland 20910, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Sarwar UN, Costner P, Enama ME, Berkowitz N, Hu Z, Hendel CS, Sitar S, Plummer S, Mulangu S, Bailer RT, Koup RA, Mascola JR, Nabel GJ, Sullivan NJ, Graham BS, Ledgerwood JE; VRC 206 Study Team. Safety and immunogenicity of DNA vaccines encoding Ebolavirus and Marburgvirus wild-type glycoproteins in a phase I clinical trial. J Infect Dis. 2015 Feb 15;211(4):549-57. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu511. Epub 2014 Sep 14. PubMed 25225676 ↗
  • Kibuuka H, Berkowitz NM, Millard M, Enama ME, Tindikahwa A, Sekiziyivu AB, Costner P, Sitar S, Glover D, Hu Z, Joshi G, Stanley D, Kunchai M, Eller LA, Bailer RT, Koup RA, Nabel GJ, Mascola JR, Sullivan NJ, Graham BS, Roederer M, Michael NL, Robb ML, Ledgerwood JE; RV 247 Study Team. Safety and immunogenicity of Ebola virus and Marburg virus glycoprotein DNA vaccines assessed separately and concomitantly in healthy Ugandan adults: a phase 1b, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Lancet. 2015 Apr 18;385(9977):1545-54. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62385-0. Epub 2014 Dec 23. PubMed 25540891 ↗
  • Ledgerwood JE, DeZure AD, Stanley DA, Coates EE, Novik L, Enama ME, Berkowitz NM, Hu Z, Joshi G, Ploquin A, Sitar S, Gordon IJ, Plummer SA, Holman LA, Hendel CS, Yamshchikov G, Roman F, Nicosia A, Colloca S, Cortese R, Bailer RT, Schwartz RM, Roederer M, Mascola JR, Koup RA, Sullivan NJ, Graham BS; VRC 207 Study Team. Chimpanzee Adenovirus Vector Ebola Vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 9;376(10):928-938. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1410863. Epub 2014 Nov 26. PubMed 25426834 ↗
  • Paris R, Kuschner RA, Binn L, Thomas SJ, Colloca S, Nicosia A, Cortese R, Bailer RT, Sullivan N, Koup RA. Adenovirus type 4 and 7 vaccination or adenovirus type 4 respiratory infection elicits minimal cross-reactive antibody responses to nonhuman adenovirus vaccine vectors. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2014 May;21(5):783-6. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00011-14. Epub 2014 Mar 12. PubMed 24623627 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2018 to primary completion in Dec 2019, 14 months.

Results were first posted in Jan 2021, 1 year after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 14, 2018
First posted
Mar 23, 2018
StartActual
Oct 9, 2018
Primary completionActual
Dec 19, 2019
CompletionActual
Dec 19, 2019
Results first posted
Jan 14, 2021
Last update
Aug 11, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 11, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03475056
Collaborators
US Military HIV Research Program
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 23, 2018
Start date
Oct 9, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 19, 2019
Completion
Dec 19, 2019
Results posted
Jan 14, 2021
Last update
Aug 11, 2022

Study contacts

Melinda Hamer, M.D.
principal investigator · WRAIR Clinical Trials Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion