An interventional study of Short arm cast and Long arm cast in Radius Fracture Distal, sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona. Completed at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-09-29.
Sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →
This study prospectively compares the performance of an above-elbow cast (long arm cast) and a below-elbow cast (short arm cast) to maintain reduction in conservatively managed distal radius fractures.
The choice of cast length in conservative management of distal radius fractures still represents a much debated controversy. Classic teaching was to immobilize the elbow to reduce risk of secondary displacement; however, short arm casts are felt to be equally effective with less complications and higher patient comfort. There is currently no conclusive evidence for or against immobilization of the elbow in patients treated with cast immobilization.
330 studies on the registry are indexed under Wrist Fractures; 72 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 353 is above the median of 63 across 265 interventional studies indexed under Wrist Fractures.
Browse Wrist Fractures studies →Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona is the lead sponsor of 95 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient treated with below-elbow cast
Procedure: Short arm cast
Patients treated with above-elbow cast
Procedure: Long arm cast
Application of a below-elbow cast
Also known as: below-elbow cast, antebrachio-metacarpal cast
Application of an above-elbow cast
Also known as: above-elbow cast, brachio-metacarpal cast
Secondary displacement ratio
Percentage of fractures that displace during treatment as subjectively assessed on radiographs by investigators.
Time frame: 35 days
Variation of radial length
Difference between radial length values as objectively measured on postreduction radiographs and endtreatment radiographs.
Time frame: 35 days
Variation of radial inclination
Difference between radial inclination values as objectively measured on postreduction radiographs and endtreatment radiographs.
Time frame: 35 days
Variation of volar tilt
Difference between volar tilt vaues as objectively measured on postreduction radiographs and endtreatment radiographs.
Time frame: 35 days
Post-treatment elbow range of motion (ROM)
Degrees of extension, flexion, pronation and supination of the elbow measured at the end of the treatment.
Time frame: 35 days
DASH score
Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score measured at the end of the treatment relating to patient's comfort during treatment.
Time frame: 35 days
SF-12
Short Form 12 health questionnaire administered at the end of the treatment relating to patient's quality of life during treatment.
Time frame: 35 days
Ran from Mar 2017 to primary completion in Feb 2020, 34 months.
Of 126 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Wrist Fractures, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 50. This study's 34 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 127 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 50.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona