An interventional study of Albendazole Pill 400mg (GSK) in Soil-transmitted Helminth Infections, sponsored by University Ghent. Completed at 4 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 18 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-21.
Sponsored by University Ghent · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
Soil-transmitted helminths (STHs) are a group of parasitic worms that infect millions of children in sub-tropical and tropical countries, resulting in malnutrition, growth stunting, intellectual retardation and cognitive deficits. To control the morbidity due to these worms, school-based deworming programs are implemented, in which anthelminthic drugs are administered to children without prior diagnosis. The continued fight against these worms is aided by the London declaration on neglected tropical diseases, which helps sustain and expand global drug donation program, resulting in an unprecedented growth of deworming programs. However, the high degree of drug pressure makes deworming programs vulnerable to the development of anthelmintic resistance because they only rely on one drug with sometimes suboptimal efficacy and there is no availability of alternative drugs. Moreover, at present, there is no surveillance system to monitor the emergence and spread of anthelmintic resistance. It remains unclear to what extent the efficacy of drugs may have dropped and whether anthelmintic resistance is already present.
This project aims to strengthen the monitoring and surveillance of drug efficacy and anthelmintic resistance in STH programs. As such, it will support deworming programs in their quest to eliminate STHs as a public health problem.
The specific objectives of the first work package are to validate diagnostic tools to monitor drug efficacy and the spread of anthelmintic resistance, and to validate molecular markers for benzimidazole resistance.
This study will be conducted at four different sites (Ethiopia, Tanzania, Lao PDR and Brazil) and will focus on school-aged children (age 5-14). At baseline subjects will be asked to provide a recent stool sample which will be processed using 3 different microscopic techniques (KK, Mini-Flotac and FECPAKG2). All children will be treated with a single-oral dose of albendazole (ALB) 400 mg and 14-21 days after treatment, a second stool sample will be collected from all children to again determine the fecal egg counts. At each sampling, stool is stored in preservative. Stored stool will be shipped to Belgium for DNA extraction and quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis. A subset of the samples will be analysed by pyrosequencing to evaluate the single nucleotide polymorphisms in the b-tubulin gene. Pooling of the stored samples will also be performed to compare with the values obtained from analysing individual samples.
Background Soil-transmitted helminths (STHs) are a group of parasitic worms that infect millions of children in sub-tropical and tropical countries, resulting in malnutrition, growth stunting, intellectual retardation and cognitive deficits. To control the morbidity due to these worms, school-based deworming programs are implemented, in which anthelminthic drugs are administered to children without prior diagnosis. The continued fight against these worms is aided by the London Declaration on Neglected Tropical Diseases, which helps sustain and expand global drug donation program, resulting in an unprecedented growth of deworming programs. to illustrate, in the last four years the coverage of mass drug administration (MDA) has doubled from 30 to 60%, and ongoing global efforts are made to ultimately reach the milestone of 75% by 2020.
Threats While the laudable long-term aim is to eliminate STHs as a public health problem by 2020, and to eventually declare targeted geographical areas free from infections, this high degree of drug pressure makes deworming programs vulnerable to the development of anthelmintic resistance because the programs only rely on one drug with sometimes suboptimal efficacy and there is no availability of alternative drugs.
Challenges
At present, there is no surveillance system to monitor the emergence and spread of anthelmintic resistance. It remains unclear to what extent the efficacy of drugs may have dropped and whether anthelmintic resistance is already present. However, developing such a system is not straightforward. Deworming programs typically operate in resource-constrained settings, and program managers require some flexibility to minimize both financial and technical resources, while ensuring a reliable assessment of the drug efficacy. The most important obstacles to globally monitor patterns of changing drug efficacy and spread of anthelmintic resistance are the following:
The specific objectives of the first part of the project are to validate diagnostic tools to monitor drug efficacy and the spread of anthelmintic resistance, and to validate molecular markers for benzimidazole resistance.
Study protocol This study will conducted at four different sites at Africa (Ethiopia and Tanzania), Asia (Lao PDR) and Latin-America (Brazil). The selection of these sites is based on their experience in assessing drug efficacy and evaluating the performance of diagnostic tools, the availability of well-equipped diagnostic facilities and skilled personnel, and their national MDA history.
The study will focus on school-aged children (age of 5 to 14 years). At baseline subjects will be asked to provide a recent (within 4 hours) stool sample of at least 9 grams. All stool samples will be processed using the FECPAKG2, a duplicate Kato-Katz thick smear (the most commonly applied fecal egg count (FEC) technique) and Mini-Flotac (a novel technique that has a sensitivity at least equal to that of Kato-Katz). All children providing a stool sample will be provided a single-oral dose of ALB 400 mg under supervision. Fourteen to 21 days after treatment, a second stool sample will be collected from all the children that proved positive for any STH species at baseline to determine the FECs.
At each sampling, 2x 1 gram of stool is stored in preservative for downstream molecular analysis. Stored stool will be shipped to Belgium for DNA extraction and qPCR analysis. A subset of the samples will be analysed by Pyrosequencing to evaluate the single nucleotide polymorphisms in the b-tubulin gene.
Pooling of the stored samples will also be performed to compare with the values obtained from analysing individual samples.
Data handling Data will first be recorded on specific study record forms. These results will then be entered into the custom designed Excel-files by two different data entry clerks to minimize errors in data due to incorrect data entry.
Study management Studies in the different sites will be organized and supported out of Ghent University. The project team members will travel to each individual trial site to train local personnel in the different coprological techniques and to get them acquainted with the trial protocol and documents.
Exclusion Criteria:
All participants that meet all inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be enrolled in the study and receive a subject identifier (SubjectID). At baseline, all participants will receive a single treatment of albendazole 400mg and their stool will be examined for helminth eggs. Two to three weeks after treatment a follow-up examination of their stool is performed.
Drug: Albendazole Pill 400mg (GSK)
One single dose of 400mg Albendazole is provided at baseline.
Also known as: Albendazole 400mg form GlaxoSmithKline (Batch Nr: 335726)
Validation of the performance of FECPAKG2 to assess drug efficacy
We will validate the performance of the FECPAKG2 as well as its ability to assess drug efficacy by means of egg reduction rates.
Time frame: up to 12 months
In depth evaluation of the FECPAKG2 technique to assess drug efficacy
We will check the variation in egg counts obtained in repeated measurements and by different technicians and make a cost assessment.
Time frame: up to 12 months
Validation of b-tubulin gene as a molecular marker for benzimidazole resistance
This will be done through assessment of the polymorphisms at the b-tubulin gene using a pyrosequencing approach. We will compare results obtained from the 4 different study sites which have a varying MDA history as well as results obtained from responders, poor responders and non-responders within each different site.
Time frame: up to 24 months
Comparing the sensitivity of quantitative PCR with traditional diagnostic tools (Kato-Katz, Mini-FLOTAC and FECPAKG2) for the detection of soil-transmitted helminth infections.
It is commonly accepted that molecular tools are more sensitive to traditional diagnostic tools, however studies comparing qPCR with a wide range of traditional microscopic techniques are scarce. In this project we will evaluate the performance of qPCR in terms of sensitivity to detect infection compared to the results obtained by coprological analysis of samples by Kato-Katz, Mini-FLOTAC and FECPAKG2.
Time frame: up to 12 months
Comparing the use of individual and pooled stool samples to assess polymorphisms in the β-tubulin gene.
Pyrosequencing results for β-tubulin gene from individual samples will be compared to those from pooled samples. This will shed a light on whether or not pooling stool samples provides similar information regarding the presence of single nucleotide polymorphisms as when compared to evaluating individual samples. This is important because pooling samples would allow important cuts in both technical and financial resources to process the samples.
Time frame: up to 24 months
Plan to share: Yes — De-identified results will be shared online and with collaborating researchers for further extensive analysis.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University Ghent