ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03460704PROMIS-IIUpdated Oct 15, 2026Results posted

Trial in Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis Patients With Chronic Lung Infections Treated With Colistimethate Sodium.

A Phase 3 interventional study of CMS and Placebo in Non Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis, sponsored by Zambon SpA. Terminated at 89 sites in 12 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-15.

Sponsored by Zambon SpA · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

Why this study was terminated
The study was brought to an early close in March 2022 due to major ongoing recruitment issues primarily related to the COVID-19 pandemic and concerns regarding the continued randomization and exposure of subjects to placebo in the study.
Updated Oct 15, 2026Posted results revised14 sites added+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
287
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of the trial was to investigate the effect of the use of inhaled colistimethate sodium (CMS), administered twice a day (b.i.d.) via a specific nebulizer for 12 months, compared to placebo in subjects with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB) chronically infected with P. aeruginosa on the annualised frequency of pulmonary exacerbations.

Read the detailed description

This was a randomised, multi-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group interventional trial in subjects with NCFB chronic P. aeruginosa infection. Subjects were randomised to CMS or placebo in a 1:1 ratio. The study consisted of 7 clinic visits with a follow-up phone call 12.5 month after randomisation or 2 weeks after discontinuation of treatment. Additional clinic visits, where feasible, and weekly phone calls were conducted during or after pulmonary exacerbations (or any episodes of pneumonia) until resolution.

Every effort was made to have all planned and unscheduled visits at the study site. Mandatory on-site visits were Screening Visit (Visit 1) and Randomisation (Visit 2). However, if one of the visits after Visit 2 could not be performed at site due to COVID-19, remote visits (e.g., by telephone) were permitted. If the final visit (Visit 7) had to be conducted remotely, the subjects were asked to return to the clinic for on-site assessments at the earliest opportunity.

After consulting with the US Food and Drug Administration, the study was brought to an early close primarily due to the difficulty of recruiting subjects in the context of the COVID pandemic, but also due to the potential for loss of scientific equipoise and the ethical implications of continuing to expose subjects to placebo given the positive results from PROMIS I. Recruitment to PROMIS II was stopped as of 27 October 2021, with the study terminated as of 15 March 2022. The study was not stopped prematurely due to any safety or futility concerns and the accrued data were fully analysed and are presented.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • NCFB
  • NCFB pulmonary exacerbation
  • Bronchiectasis
03

In context

Bronchiectasis

404 studies on the registry are indexed under Bronchiectasis; 125 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 287 is above the median of 60 across 263 interventional studies indexed under Bronchiectasis.

Browse Bronchiectasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Zambon SpA is the lead sponsor of 23 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. are able and willing to give , following a detailed explanation of partecipation in the protocol and signed consent obtained;
  2. aged 18 years or older of either gender;
  3. diagnosed with NCFB by computerised tomography (CT) or high-resolution CT(HRCT) as recorded in the subject's notes and this is their predominant condition being treated;
  4. had at least 2 NCFB pulmonary exacerbations requiring oral or inhaled antibiotics or 1 NCFB pulmonary exacerbation requiring intravenous antibiotics in the 12 months preceding the Screening Visit (Visit 1) and had no pulmonary exacerbation with or without treatment during the period between Visit 1 and Visit 2;
  5. have a documented history of P. aeruginosa infection;
  6. are clinically stable and have not required a change in pulmonary treatment for at least 30 days before the Screening Visit (Visit 1);
  7. have pre-bronchodilator ≥25% of predicted;
  8. had a positive sputum culture for P. aeruginosa from an adequate sample taken at the Screening Visit (Visit 1) or during the screening period.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. known bronchiectasis as a consequence of cystic fibrosis (CF);
  2. known history of hypogammaglobulinaemia requiring treatment with immunoglobulin, unless fully replaced and considered immuno-competent by the Investigator;
  3. myasthenia gravis or porphyria;
  4. severe cardiovascular disease such as severe uncontrolled hypertension, ischaemic heart disease or cardiac arrhythmia and any other conditions that would confound the evaluation of safety, in the opinion of the Investigator;
  5. had major surgery in the 3 months prior to the Screening Visit (Visit 1) or planned inpatient major surgery during the study period;
  6. receiving treatment for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA);
  7. massive haemoptysis (greater than or equal to 300 mL or requiring blood transfusion) in the preceding 4 weeks before Screening Visit (Visit 1) or between Visit 1 and Visit 2;
  8. respiratory failure that would compromise patient safety or confound the evaluation of safety or efficacy of the study in the opinion of the Investigator;
  9. current active , except for basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin without ;
  10. taking medications (such as azathioprine, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, sirolimus, mycophenolate, rituximab), and/or anti cytokine medications (such as anti-IL-6 and anti-tumour alpha necrosis factor products) in the preceding year before the Screening Visit (Visit 1);
  11. known history of (HIV);
  12. current treatment for non-tuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) lung disease or tuberculosis;
  13. known or suspected to be allergic or unable to tolerate colistimethate sodium (intravenous or inhaled) or other polymixins, including evidence of bronchial hyper-reactivity following inhaled colistimethate sodium;
  14. treatment with long term (≥ 30 days) prednisone at a dose of greater than 15 mg a day (or equivalent dose of any other ) started within six months of the Screening Visit (Visit 1);
  15. new maintenance treatment with any oral macrolides ( (e.g. azithromycin/erythromycin/clarithromycin) within 30 days of the Screening Visit (Visit 1) or started between Visit 1 and Visit 2;
  16. use of any intravenous or intramuscular or oral or inhaled anti-pseudomonal antibiotic (except chronic macrolides with a stable dose) within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit (Visit 1) and between Visit 1 and Visit 2;
  17. pregnant or breast feeding or plan to become pregnant over the next two years or of child- bearing potential and unwilling to use a reliable method of for at least one month before randomisation and throughout their involvement in the trial;
  18. significant abnormality in clinical evaluations and/or laboratory tests (physical examination, vital signs, haematology, clinical chemistry, impaired renal function, defined as serum creatinine levels ≥2.0x , ) endangering the safe participation of the patient in the study at the Screening Visit (Visit 1) and during the study;
  19. participated in another , interventional trial within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit (Visit 1);
  20. in the opinion of the Investigator not suitable for inclusion for whatever reason.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(12)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
287 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CMS (Colistimethate Sodium)

    Inhaled colistimethate sodium twice daily. The active pharmaceutical ingredient consisting of pure CMS one million international units (MIU) / 80 mg of CMS / 33 mg colistin base activity (CBA) was provided as a powder for nebuliser solution in 10R Internation Organization for Standardization (ISO) glass vials.

    Drug: CMS

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Saline solution inhaled twice daily, provided and administered at the same way of the IMP.

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugCMS

    1 MIU equivalent to 80 mg colistimethate sodium diluted in 1 mL saline solution 0.45%. Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) glass vials were shrink wrapped in opaque white plastic and provided in boxes of 30 vials (two weeks of b.i.d. dosing). The 1 MIU/ml CMS/0.45% saline solution was transferred from the glass vial into a specific nebuliser system fitted with a 0.3 mL medication chamber, for administration by inhalation. This delivered a nominal dose of 0.3 MIU/24 mg CMS (11 mg CBA) from the device. The first dose of the IMP was administered at the site under the supervision of the site staff and subjects were instructed how to prepare and self-administer the IMP at home via a specific nebuliser system, b.i.d. (morning and evening) over aperiod of 12 month. At least 10 minutes (min) before each administration, an inhaled short-acting bronchodilator (e.g. salbutamol/albuterol), supplied by the Sponsor, could be taken to improve tolerability.

    Also known as: Promixin

  • OtherPlacebo

    1 mL saline solution 0.45%. The placebo was made up of identical empty glass vials to which the same saline solution diluent was added in exactly the same way as the reconstitution of the active treatment by injecting the diluent through the rubber stopper. The glass vials were shrink wrapped with opaque white plastic to mantain the blind.

    Also known as: Saline Solution

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Annual Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis (NCFB) Pulmonary Exacerbation Rate

    The primary efficacy assessment for an individual subject was the frequency of pulmonary exacerbations (exacerbation rate). A pulmonary exacerbation was defined as the presence concurrently of at least three of the following eight symptoms/signs for at least 24 hours: * increased cough; * increased sputum volume and/or consistency; * increased sputum purulence; * new or increased haemoptysis; * increased wheezing; * increased dyspnoea; * increased fatigue/malaise and * episodes of fever (temperature ≥38°C). AND It was clinically determined that the subject required and was prescribed systemic antibiotic therapy. AND The episode of exacerbation lasted for at least 24 hours. The overall episode of exacerbation needs to last at least 24 hours, but individual symptoms/signs can last less than 24 hours (e.g, a temperature)

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to First NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation

    Time to First NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation (PE) (days) = start date of first NCFB PE - date of randomization. Subjects who completed or discontinued the trial with no NCFB PE are censored at the date of treatment completion/discontinuation.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Change From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score

    The Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a validated 50-item symptom questionnaire developed to measure health status and Quality of Life (QoL) in subjects with obstructive airway diseases. The scores range from 0 (best possible health status) to 100 (worst possible health status). The total score is calculated as: (sum of the weights of the positive items of all domains / sum of the weights of all items of all domains)\*100. Change from Baseline was calculated as the SGRQ total score at the visit minus Baseline. Change from baseline in SGRQ total score at Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6 and Visit 7 were analysed using a linear mixed model for repeated measures including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, use of stable concomitant therapy with oral macrolides and pooled site, i.e. country, as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed and the Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.

    Time frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT

  3. P. Aeruginosa Density: Change From Baseline at Visit 3 and at Visit 7

    The P. aeruginosa density as determined by the change in log10 CFU/mL sputum from baseline (Visit 2) to Day 28 (Visit 3) was compared between the treatment groups by an ANCOVA model including treatment, pooled site, i.e. country and use of stable concomitant therapy with oral macrolides as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate. Least square means in each treatment group, least square mean difference between treatments, their 95% CIs and associated p-value were estimated.

    Time frame: Visit 3 (28 days) and Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT

  4. P. Aeruginosa Density: Change From Baseline

    Summary statistics of the P. aeruginosa density (i.e. quantification, log10 CFU/mL sputum) and absolute change from baseline were provided by treatment group for each trial visit.

    Time frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT

  5. Mean Annual Severe Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis (NCFB) Pulmonary Exacerbation Rate

    A severe pulmonary exacerbation was defined as requiring intravenous antibiotics and/or hospitalisation.

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Time to First Severe NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation

    Time to First severe NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation (PE) (days) = start date of first severe NCFB PE - date of randomization. Subjects who completed or discontinued the trial with no severe NCFB PE are censored at the date of treatment completion/discontinuation. Severe exacerbations are defined as those requiring IV antibiotics and/or hospitalisation.

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation Free Days

    Annualised number of exacerbation-free days = (follow-up time \[days\] - sum of durations of NCFB pulmonary exacerbations \[days\]) / follow-up time (years). For NCFB pulmonary exacerbations with a resolution date after the treatment completion/discontinuation, the number of days of duration after the treatment completion/discontinuation will be subtracted from the sum of durations of NCFB pulmonary exacerbations. Non-parametric ANCOVA model with a randomisation-based methodology was used. The model included treatment group, country, and use of stable concomitant therapy with oral macrolides as covariates.

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Days of Work Absence

    Number of Days Work Absence is computed for each subject by summing all days of work absence.

    Time frame: 12 months

  9. Days of Work Absence Per Employment Month

    Number of Days Work Absence per Employment Month = Number of Days of Work Absence / Overall Employment Time (months). Number of Days Work Absence is computed for each subject by summing all days of work absence.

    Time frame: 12 months

  10. Subjects With Hospitalisations Due to NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbations

    The number and percentage of subjects with at least one hospitalisation for a NCFB pulmonary exacerbation are provided. Percentages were computed on the total number of subjects with at least one pulmonary exacerbation.

    Time frame: 12 months

  11. Mean Annual Hospitalisation for NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation Rate

    The annual rate of hospitalisation for NCFB pulmonary exacerbation

    Time frame: 12 months

  12. Change From Baseline in QoL-B Physical Functioning Domain Score

    The Quality of Life Bronchiectasis (QoL-B) is a validated self-administered, patient reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related QoL for subjects with NCFB. It contains 37 items in 8 scales (Respiratory Symptoms, Physical, Role, Emotional and Social Functioning, Vitality, Health Perceptions and Treatment Burden). Each QoL-B domain is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, higher scores indicate better health status. For the Physical Functioning Domain, the items 1, 2, 3, 4, 16 are considered. Change from baseline in QoL-B domain score at Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6 and Visit 7 were analysed using a linear mixed model for repeated measures including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, use of stable concomitant therapy with oral macrolides and pooled site, i.e. country, as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed and the Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.

    Time frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT

  13. Change From Baseline in QoL-B Role Functioning Domain Score

    The Quality of Life Bronchiectasis (QoL-B) is a validated self-administered, patient reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related QoL for subjects with NCFB. It contains 37 items in 8 scales (Respiratory Symptoms, Physical, Role, Emotional and Social Functioning, Vitality, Health Perceptions and Treatment Burden). Each QoL-B domain is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, higher scores indicate better health status. For the Role Functioning Domain, the items 17, 20, 25, 27, 28 are considered. Change from baseline in QoL-B domain score at Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6 and Visit 7 were analysed using a linear mixed model for repeated measures including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, use of stable concomitant therapy with oral macrolides and pooled site, i.e. country, as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed and the Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.

    Time frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT

  14. Change From Baseline in QoL-B Vitality Domain Score

    The Quality of Life Bronchiectasis (QoL-B) is a validated self-administered, patient reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related QoL for subjects with NCFB. It contains 37 items in 8 scales (Respiratory Symptoms, Physical, Role, Emotional and Social Functioning, Vitality, Health Perceptions and Treatment Burden). Each QoL-B domain is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, higher scores indicate better health status. For the Vitality Domain the items 6, 8, 9 are considered. Change from baseline in QoL-B domain score at Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6 and Visit 7 were analysed using a linear mixed model for repeated measures including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, use of stable concomitant therapy with oral macrolides and pooled site, i.e. country, as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed and the Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.

    Time frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT

  15. Change From Baseline in QoL-B Emotional Functioning Domain Score

    The Quality of Life Bronchiectasis (QoL-B) is a validated self-administered, patient reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related QoL for subjects with NCFB. It contains 37 items in 8 scales (Respiratory Symptoms, Physical, Role, Emotional and Social Functioning, Vitality, Health Perceptions and Treatment Burden). Each QoL-B domain is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, higher scores indicate better health status. For the Emotional Functioning Domain the items 7, 10, 11, 23 are considered. Change from baseline in QoL-B domain score at Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6 and Visit 7 were analysed using a linear mixed model for repeated measures including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, use of stable concomitant therapy with oral macrolides and pooled site, i.e. country, as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed and the Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.

    Time frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT

  16. Change From Baseline in QoL-B Social Functioning Domain Score

    The Quality of Life Bronchiectasis (QoL-B) is a validated self-administered, patient reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related QoL for subjects with NCFB. It contains 37 items in 8 scales (Respiratory Symptoms, Physical, Role, Emotional and Social Functioning, Vitality, Health Perceptions and Treatment Burden). Each QoL-B domain is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, higher scores indicate better health status. For the Social Functioning Domain the items 18, 19, 22, 26 are considered. Change from baseline in QoL-B domain score at Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6 and Visit 7 were analysed using a linear mixed model for repeated measures including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, use of stable concomitant therapy with oral macrolides and pooled site, i.e. country, as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed and the Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.

    Time frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT

  17. Change From Baseline in QoL-B Treatment Burden Domain Score

    The Quality of Life Bronchiectasis (QoL-B) is a validated self-administered, patient reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related QoL for subjects with NCFB. It contains 37 items in 8 scales (Respiratory Symptoms, Physical, Role, Emotional and Social Functioning, Vitality, Health Perceptions and Treatment Burden). Each QoL-B domain is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, higher scores indicate better health status. For the Treatment Burden Domain the items 12, 13, 14 are considered. Change from baseline in QoL-B domain score at Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6 and Visit 7 were analysed using a linear mixed model for repeated measures including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, use of stable concomitant therapy with oral macrolides and pooled site, i.e. country, as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed and the Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.

    Time frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT

  18. Change From Baseline in QoL-B Health Perceptions Domain Score

    The Quality of Life Bronchiectasis (QoL-B) is a validated self-administered, patient reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related QoL for subjects with NCFB. It contains 37 items in 8 scales (Respiratory Symptoms, Physical, Role, Emotional and Social Functioning, Vitality, Health Perceptions and Treatment Burden). Each QoL-B domain is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, higher scores indicate better health status. For the Health Perceptions Domain the items 5, 15, 21, 24 are considered. Change from baseline in QoL-B domain score at Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6 and Visit 7 were analysed using a linear mixed model for repeated measures including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, use of stable concomitant therapy with oral macrolides and pooled site, i.e. country, as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed and the Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.

    Time frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT

  19. Change From Baseline in QoL-B Respiratory Symptoms Domain Score

    The Quality of Life Bronchiectasis (QoL-B) is a validated self-administered, patient reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related QoL for subjects with NCFB. It contains 37 items in 8 scales (Respiratory Symptoms, Physical, Role, Emotional and Social Functioning, Vitality, Health Perceptions and Treatment Burden). Each QoL-B domain is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, higher scores indicate better health status. For the Respiratory Symptoms Domain the items from 29 to 37 are considered. Change from baseline in QoL-B domain score at Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6 and Visit 7 were analysed using a linear mixed model for repeated measures including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, use of stable concomitant therapy with oral macrolides and pooled site, i.e. country, as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed and the Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.

    Time frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT

07

Results

Posted Dec 29, 2023

Participant flow

Recruitment was halted with 287 subjects randomised.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCMS (Colistimethate Sodium)Placebo
Started152135
Modified intention to treat population - (mitt)152135
Safety population - (saf)152135
Per-protocol population - (pp)11298
Completed9489
Not completed5846
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1114
Withdrew: Study terminated by the sponsor2919
Withdrew: Adverse event105
Withdrew: Death32
Withdrew: Non-compliance with study drug30
Withdrew: Protocol-specified withdrawal criterion met05
Withdrew: Other21

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Annual Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis (NCFB) Pulmonary Exacerbation Rate

The primary efficacy assessment for an individual subject was the frequency of pulmonary exacerbations (exacerbation rate). A pulmonary exacerbation was defined as the presence concurrently of at least three of the following eight symptoms/signs for at least 24 hours: * increased cough; * increased sputum volume and/or consistency; * increased sputum purulence; * new or increased haemoptysis; * increased wheezing; * increased dyspnoea; * increased fatigue/malaise and * episodes of fever (temperature ≥38°C). AND It was clinically determined that the subject required and was prescribed systemic antibiotic therapy. AND The episode of exacerbation lasted for at least 24 hours. The overall episode of exacerbation needs to last at least 24 hours, but individual symptoms/signs can last less than 24 hours (e.g, a temperature)

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Least squares mean · events/year
Mean Annual Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis (NCFB) Pulmonary Exacerbation Rate
events/yearCMS (Colistimethate Sodium)Placebo
Mean Annual Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis (NCFB) Pulmonary Exacerbation Rate0.889 (0.722 to 1.093)0.885 (0.710 to 1.103)
Statistical analysis
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · negative binomial model (Wald) 2-sided · p = 0.97889 · Ls mean rate ratio: 1.004 · 95% CI 0.747 to 1.349
SecondaryTime to First NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation

Time to First NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation (PE) (days) = start date of first NCFB PE - date of randomization. Subjects who completed or discontinued the trial with no NCFB PE are censored at the date of treatment completion/discontinuation.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Median · days
Time to First NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation
daysCMS (Colistimethate Sodium)Placebo
Time to First NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation267.0 (189.0 to 357.0)214.0 (177.0 to 279.0)
Statistical analysis
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.60266 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.928 · 95% CI 0.671 to 1.2842-sided p-value
SecondaryChange From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score

The Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a validated 50-item symptom questionnaire developed to measure health status and Quality of Life (QoL) in subjects with obstructive airway diseases. The scores range from 0 (best possible health status) to 100 (worst possible health status). The total score is calculated as: (sum of the weights of the positive items of all domains / sum of the weights of all items of all domains)\*100. Change from Baseline was calculated as the SGRQ total score at the visit minus Baseline. Change from baseline in SGRQ total score at Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6 and Visit 7 were analysed using a linear mixed model for repeated measures including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, use of stable concomitant therapy with oral macrolides and pooled site, i.e. country, as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed and the Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.

Time frame:
Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score
scores on a scaleCMS (Colistimethate Sodium)Placebo
Visit 3 (28 days)-1.758 (-4.299 to 0.783)-4.502 (-7.213 to -1.790)
Visit 4 (3 months)-3.901 (-6.520 to -1.281)-4.603 (-7.375 to -1.831)
Visit 5 (6 months)-4.598 (-7.325 to -1.871)-5.518 (-8.359 to -2.677)
Visit 6 (9 months)-2.953 (-6.302 to 0.396)-4.544 (-7.989 to -1.100)
Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT-5.044 (-8.463 to -1.625)-3.200 (-6.984 to 0.584)
Statistical analysis
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.10951 · Mean difference (final values): 2.744 · 95% CI -0.621 to 6.108
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.68928 · Mean difference (final values): 0.702 · 95% CI -2.752 to 4.156
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.61488 · Mean difference (final values): 0.920 · 95% CI -2.676 to 4.516
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.48855 · Mean difference (final values): 1.591 · 95% CI -2.931 to 6.113
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.46033 · Mean difference (final values): -1.844 · 95% CI -6.777 to 3.090
SecondaryP. Aeruginosa Density: Change From Baseline at Visit 3 and at Visit 7

The P. aeruginosa density as determined by the change in log10 CFU/mL sputum from baseline (Visit 2) to Day 28 (Visit 3) was compared between the treatment groups by an ANCOVA model including treatment, pooled site, i.e. country and use of stable concomitant therapy with oral macrolides as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate. Least square means in each treatment group, least square mean difference between treatments, their 95% CIs and associated p-value were estimated.

Time frame:
Visit 3 (28 days) and Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
Reported as:
Least squares mean · log10 CFU/mL
P. Aeruginosa Density: Change From Baseline at Visit 3 and at Visit 7
log10 CFU/mLCMS (Colistimethate Sodium)Placebo
Visit 3 (28 days)-1.679 (-1.975 to -1.383)-0.081 (-0.365 to 0.203)
Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT-0.639 (-1.121 to -0.156)0.074 (-0.396 to 0.545)
Statistical analysis
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.00001 · Mean difference (final values): -1.598 · 95% CI -1.978 to -1.219
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.03802 · Mean difference (final values): -0.713 · 95% CI -1.385 to -0.041
SecondaryP. Aeruginosa Density: Change From Baseline

Summary statistics of the P. aeruginosa density (i.e. quantification, log10 CFU/mL sputum) and absolute change from baseline were provided by treatment group for each trial visit.

Time frame:
Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
Reported as:
Mean · log10 CFU/mL
P. Aeruginosa Density: Change From Baseline
log10 CFU/mLCMS (Colistimethate Sodium)Placebo
Visit 3 (28 days)-1.79 ± 1.6160.02 ± 1.312
Visit 5 (6 months)-1.33 ± 1.5010.13 ± 1.487
Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT-0.62 ± 1.600-0.06 ± 1.376
SecondaryMean Annual Severe Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis (NCFB) Pulmonary Exacerbation Rate

A severe pulmonary exacerbation was defined as requiring intravenous antibiotics and/or hospitalisation.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Least squares mean · events/year
Mean Annual Severe Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis (NCFB) Pulmonary Exacerbation Rate
events/yearCMS (Colistimethate Sodium)Placebo
Mean Annual Severe Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis (NCFB) Pulmonary Exacerbation Rate0.161 (0.101 to 0.256)0.121 (0.070 to 0.209)
Statistical analysis
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · negative binomial model (Wald) 2-sided · p = 0.39284 · Ls mean rate ratio: 1.334 · 95% CI 0.689 to 2.585
SecondaryTime to First Severe NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation

Time to First severe NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation (PE) (days) = start date of first severe NCFB PE - date of randomization. Subjects who completed or discontinued the trial with no severe NCFB PE are censored at the date of treatment completion/discontinuation. Severe exacerbations are defined as those requiring IV antibiotics and/or hospitalisation.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Median · days
Time to First Severe NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation
daysCMS (Colistimethate Sodium)Placebo
Time to First Severe NCFB Pulmonary ExacerbationNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Log Rank · p = 0.377652-sided p-value for comparison of survival curves
SecondaryNCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation Free Days

Annualised number of exacerbation-free days = (follow-up time \[days\] - sum of durations of NCFB pulmonary exacerbations \[days\]) / follow-up time (years). For NCFB pulmonary exacerbations with a resolution date after the treatment completion/discontinuation, the number of days of duration after the treatment completion/discontinuation will be subtracted from the sum of durations of NCFB pulmonary exacerbations. Non-parametric ANCOVA model with a randomisation-based methodology was used. The model included treatment group, country, and use of stable concomitant therapy with oral macrolides as covariates.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Least squares mean · days
NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation Free Days
daysCMS (Colistimethate Sodium)Placebo
NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation Free Days342.592 (336.871 to 348.313)344.683 (338.611 to 350.756)
Statistical analysis
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.62306 · Mean difference (final values): -2.091 · 95% CI -10.458 to 6.276
SecondaryDays of Work Absence

Number of Days Work Absence is computed for each subject by summing all days of work absence.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · days
Days of Work Absence
daysCMS (Colistimethate Sodium)Placebo
Days of Work Absence1.0 ± 6.400.5 ± 2.70
Statistical analysis
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.37964 · Mean difference (final values): 0.5 · 95% CI -0.620 to 1.621
SecondaryDays of Work Absence Per Employment Month

Number of Days Work Absence per Employment Month = Number of Days of Work Absence / Overall Employment Time (months). Number of Days Work Absence is computed for each subject by summing all days of work absence.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Mean · days per month
Days of Work Absence Per Employment Month
days per monthCMS (Colistimethate Sodium)Placebo
Days of Work Absence Per Employment Month0.3 ± 1.700.1 ± 0.36
Statistical analysis
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.31473 · Mean difference (final values): 0.220 · 95% CI -0.213 to 0.653
SecondarySubjects With Hospitalisations Due to NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbations

The number and percentage of subjects with at least one hospitalisation for a NCFB pulmonary exacerbation are provided. Percentages were computed on the total number of subjects with at least one pulmonary exacerbation.

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Subjects With Hospitalisations Due to NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbations
ParticipantsCMS (Colistimethate Sodium)Placebo
Subjects with NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation7264
Subjects with >=1 Hospitalisation for NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation1210
SecondaryMean Annual Hospitalisation for NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation Rate

The annual rate of hospitalisation for NCFB pulmonary exacerbation

Time frame:
12 months
Reported as:
Least squares mean · events/year
Mean Annual Hospitalisation for NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation Rate
events/yearCMS (Colistimethate Sodium)Placebo
Mean Annual Hospitalisation for NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation Rate0.107 (0.063 to 0.182)0.097 (0.054 to 0.175)
Statistical analysis
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · negative binomial model (Wald) 2-sided · p = 0.80591 · Ls mean rate ratio: 1.099 · 95% CI 0.516 to 2.343
SecondaryChange From Baseline in QoL-B Physical Functioning Domain Score

The Quality of Life Bronchiectasis (QoL-B) is a validated self-administered, patient reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related QoL for subjects with NCFB. It contains 37 items in 8 scales (Respiratory Symptoms, Physical, Role, Emotional and Social Functioning, Vitality, Health Perceptions and Treatment Burden). Each QoL-B domain is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, higher scores indicate better health status. For the Physical Functioning Domain, the items 1, 2, 3, 4, 16 are considered. Change from baseline in QoL-B domain score at Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6 and Visit 7 were analysed using a linear mixed model for repeated measures including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, use of stable concomitant therapy with oral macrolides and pooled site, i.e. country, as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed and the Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.

Time frame:
Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in QoL-B Physical Functioning Domain Score
scores on a scaleCMS (Colistimethate Sodium)Placebo
Visit 3 (28 days)2.082 (-1.522 to 5.686)4.457 (0.601 to 8.313)
Visit 4 (3 months)1.985 (-1.987 to 5.957)2.756 (-1.448 to 6.960)
Visit 5 (6 months)4.918 (0.493 to 9.343)1.764 (-2.802 to 6.331)
Visit 6 (9 months)3.583 (-1.198 to 8.365)3.135 (-1.816 to 8.086)
Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT2.006 (-2.137 to 6.148)0.818 (-3.503 to 5.140)
Statistical analysis
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.32470 · Mean difference (final values): -2.375 · 95% CI -7.115 to 2.365
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.77371 · Mean difference (final values): -0.771 · 95% CI -6.046 to 4.504
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.29414 · Mean difference (final values): 3.154 · 95% CI -2.757 to 9.064
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.89153 · Mean difference (final values): 0.448 · 95% CI -6.026 to 6.923
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.67247 · Mean difference (final values): 1.187 · 95% CI -4.336 to 6.710
SecondaryChange From Baseline in QoL-B Role Functioning Domain Score

The Quality of Life Bronchiectasis (QoL-B) is a validated self-administered, patient reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related QoL for subjects with NCFB. It contains 37 items in 8 scales (Respiratory Symptoms, Physical, Role, Emotional and Social Functioning, Vitality, Health Perceptions and Treatment Burden). Each QoL-B domain is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, higher scores indicate better health status. For the Role Functioning Domain, the items 17, 20, 25, 27, 28 are considered. Change from baseline in QoL-B domain score at Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6 and Visit 7 were analysed using a linear mixed model for repeated measures including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, use of stable concomitant therapy with oral macrolides and pooled site, i.e. country, as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed and the Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.

Time frame:
Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in QoL-B Role Functioning Domain Score
scores on a scaleCMS (Colistimethate Sodium)Placebo
Visit 3 (28 days)2.178 (-1.086 to 5.442)5.953 (2.471 to 9.435)
Visit 4 (3 months)3.299 (-0.179 to 6.776)5.931 (2.261 to 9.601)
Visit 5 (6 months)4.104 (0.302 to 7.906)6.657 (2.725 to 10.590)
Visit 6 (9 months)1.464 (-2.694 to 5.623)3.338 (-0.940 to 7.615)
Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT3.131 (-0.550 to 6.811)4.310 (0.485 to 8.134)
Statistical analysis
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.08487 · Mean difference (final values): -3.775 · 95% CI -8.073 to 0.522
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.25975 · Mean difference (final values): -2.632 · 95% CI -7.221 to 1.956
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.32078 · Mean difference (final values): -2.554 · 95% CI -7.609 to 2.502
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.50986 · Mean difference (final values): -1.873 · 95% CI -7.466 to 3.720
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.63567 · Mean difference (final values): -1.179 · 95% CI -6.073 to 3.715
SecondaryChange From Baseline in QoL-B Vitality Domain Score

The Quality of Life Bronchiectasis (QoL-B) is a validated self-administered, patient reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related QoL for subjects with NCFB. It contains 37 items in 8 scales (Respiratory Symptoms, Physical, Role, Emotional and Social Functioning, Vitality, Health Perceptions and Treatment Burden). Each QoL-B domain is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, higher scores indicate better health status. For the Vitality Domain the items 6, 8, 9 are considered. Change from baseline in QoL-B domain score at Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6 and Visit 7 were analysed using a linear mixed model for repeated measures including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, use of stable concomitant therapy with oral macrolides and pooled site, i.e. country, as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed and the Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.

Time frame:
Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in QoL-B Vitality Domain Score
scores on a scaleCMS (Colistimethate Sodium)Placebo
Visit 3 (28 days)1.601 (-1.775 to 4.977)1.522 (-2.093 to 5.137)
Visit 4 (3 months)2.449 (-0.902 to 5.799)2.142 (-1.400 to 5.684)
Visit 5 (6 months)3.832 (-0.323 to 7.987)1.614 (-2.664 to 5.892)
Visit 6 (9 months)2.567 (-1.944 to 7.078)-0.290 (-4.920 to 4.340)
Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT4.081 (0.601 to 7.561)3.282 (-0.331 to 6.895)
Statistical analysis
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.97272 · Mean difference (final values): 0.079 · 95% CI -4.473 to 4.631
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.89209 · Mean difference (final values): 0.307 · 95% CI -4.142 to 4.755
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.43853 · Mean difference (final values): 2.217 · 95% CI -3.414 to 7.849
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.36102 · Mean difference (final values): 2.857 · 95% CI -3.299 to 9.013
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.73452 · Mean difference (final values): 0.799 · 95% CI -3.837 to 5.435
SecondaryChange From Baseline in QoL-B Emotional Functioning Domain Score

The Quality of Life Bronchiectasis (QoL-B) is a validated self-administered, patient reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related QoL for subjects with NCFB. It contains 37 items in 8 scales (Respiratory Symptoms, Physical, Role, Emotional and Social Functioning, Vitality, Health Perceptions and Treatment Burden). Each QoL-B domain is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, higher scores indicate better health status. For the Emotional Functioning Domain the items 7, 10, 11, 23 are considered. Change from baseline in QoL-B domain score at Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6 and Visit 7 were analysed using a linear mixed model for repeated measures including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, use of stable concomitant therapy with oral macrolides and pooled site, i.e. country, as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed and the Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.

Time frame:
Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in QoL-B Emotional Functioning Domain Score
scores on a scaleCMS (Colistimethate Sodium)Placebo
Visit 3 (28 days)2.582 (-0.265 to 5.428)1.245 (-1.819 to 4.308)
Visit 4 (3 months)2.810 (-0.213 to 5.833)2.564 (-0.651 to 5.778)
Visit 5 (6 months)2.023 (-1.286 to 5.331)3.123 (-0.269 to 6.515)
Visit 6 (9 months)0.981 (-3.103 to 5.065)-0.409 (-4.584 to 3.766)
Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT2.795 (-0.207 to 5.797)3.880 (0.754 to 7.005)
Statistical analysis
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.49671 · Mean difference (final values): 1.337 · 95% CI -2.531 to 5.205
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.90581 · Mean difference (final values): 0.246 · 95% CI -3.846 to 4.338
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.62660 · Mean difference (final values): -1.101 · 95% CI -5.553 to 3.352
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.62567 · Mean difference (final values): 1.390 · 95% CI -4.224 to 7.005
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.59776 · Mean difference (final values): -1.085 · 95% CI -5.128 to 2.958
SecondaryChange From Baseline in QoL-B Social Functioning Domain Score

The Quality of Life Bronchiectasis (QoL-B) is a validated self-administered, patient reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related QoL for subjects with NCFB. It contains 37 items in 8 scales (Respiratory Symptoms, Physical, Role, Emotional and Social Functioning, Vitality, Health Perceptions and Treatment Burden). Each QoL-B domain is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, higher scores indicate better health status. For the Social Functioning Domain the items 18, 19, 22, 26 are considered. Change from baseline in QoL-B domain score at Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6 and Visit 7 were analysed using a linear mixed model for repeated measures including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, use of stable concomitant therapy with oral macrolides and pooled site, i.e. country, as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed and the Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.

Time frame:
Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in QoL-B Social Functioning Domain Score
scores on a scaleCMS (Colistimethate Sodium)Placebo
Visit 3 (28 days)4.265 (0.312 to 8.218)3.686 (-0.549 to 7.921)
Visit 4 (3 months)5.287 (1.013 to 9.561)5.474 (0.932 to 10.016)
Visit 5 (6 months)4.285 (-0.395 to 8.964)1.438 (-3.436 to 6.313)
Visit 6 (9 months)3.485 (-1.440 to 8.410)1.541 (-3.527 to 6.609)
Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT3.118 (-0.973 to 7.209)-0.551 (-4.804 to 3.702)
Statistical analysis
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.82873 · Mean difference (final values): 0.579 · 95% CI -4.682 to 5.840
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.94878 · Mean difference (final values): -0.187 · 95% CI -5.912 to 5.538
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.37437 · Mean difference (final values): 2.846 · 95% CI -3.454 to 9.146
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.56430 · Mean difference (final values): 1.944 · 95% CI -4.695 to 8.582
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.18157 · Mean difference (final values): 3.669 · 95% CI -1.725 to 9.062
SecondaryChange From Baseline in QoL-B Treatment Burden Domain Score

The Quality of Life Bronchiectasis (QoL-B) is a validated self-administered, patient reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related QoL for subjects with NCFB. It contains 37 items in 8 scales (Respiratory Symptoms, Physical, Role, Emotional and Social Functioning, Vitality, Health Perceptions and Treatment Burden). Each QoL-B domain is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, higher scores indicate better health status. For the Treatment Burden Domain the items 12, 13, 14 are considered. Change from baseline in QoL-B domain score at Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6 and Visit 7 were analysed using a linear mixed model for repeated measures including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, use of stable concomitant therapy with oral macrolides and pooled site, i.e. country, as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed and the Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.

Time frame:
Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in QoL-B Treatment Burden Domain Score
scores on a scaleCMS (Colistimethate Sodium)Placebo
Visit 3 (28 days)-2.508 (-6.319 to 1.303)-3.006 (-7.219 to 1.207)
Visit 4 (3 months)-3.609 (-7.599 to 0.381)-2.236 (-6.533 to 2.061)
Visit 5 (6 months)1.098 (-3.446 to 5.641)0.158 (-4.367 to 4.684)
Visit 6 (9 months)-0.544 (-5.324 to 4.236)-7.371 (-12.418 to -2.324)
Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT-1.041 (-5.397 to 3.316)-2.363 (-6.919 to 2.193)
Statistical analysis
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.85513 · Mean difference (final values): 0.498 · 95% CI -4.879 to 5.875
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.62639 · Mean difference (final values): -1.373 · 95% CI -6.927 to 4.182
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.76352 · Mean difference (final values): 0.939 · 95% CI -5.213 to 7.091
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.04602 · Mean difference (final values): 6.827 · 95% CI 0.122 to 13.532
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.66633 · Mean difference (final values): 1.322 · 95% CI -4.718 to 7.363
SecondaryChange From Baseline in QoL-B Health Perceptions Domain Score

The Quality of Life Bronchiectasis (QoL-B) is a validated self-administered, patient reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related QoL for subjects with NCFB. It contains 37 items in 8 scales (Respiratory Symptoms, Physical, Role, Emotional and Social Functioning, Vitality, Health Perceptions and Treatment Burden). Each QoL-B domain is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, higher scores indicate better health status. For the Health Perceptions Domain the items 5, 15, 21, 24 are considered. Change from baseline in QoL-B domain score at Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6 and Visit 7 were analysed using a linear mixed model for repeated measures including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, use of stable concomitant therapy with oral macrolides and pooled site, i.e. country, as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed and the Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.

Time frame:
Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in QoL-B Health Perceptions Domain Score
scores on a scaleCMS (Colistimethate Sodium)Placebo
Visit 3 (28 days)4.746 (1.695 to 7.798)4.819 (1.544 to 8.094)
Visit 4 (3 months)4.905 (1.578 to 8.232)5.143 (1.609 to 8.678)
Visit 5 (6 months)8.185 (4.548 to 11.822)5.658 (1.908 to 9.408)
Visit 6 (9 months)6.248 (2.470 to 10.026)5.959 (2.086 to 9.832)
Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT5.474 (2.222 to 8.726)4.042 (0.658 to 7.426)
Statistical analysis
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.97188 · Mean difference (final values): -0.073 · 95% CI -4.154 to 4.008
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.91675 · Mean difference (final values): -0.238 · 95% CI -4.719 to 4.243
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.30870 · Mean difference (final values): 2.527 · 95% CI -2.354 to 7.409
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.91082 · Mean difference (final values): 0.289 · 95% CI -4.796 to 5.374
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.51532 · Mean difference (final values): 1.432 · 95% CI -2.897 to 5.760
SecondaryChange From Baseline in QoL-B Respiratory Symptoms Domain Score

The Quality of Life Bronchiectasis (QoL-B) is a validated self-administered, patient reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, functioning and health-related QoL for subjects with NCFB. It contains 37 items in 8 scales (Respiratory Symptoms, Physical, Role, Emotional and Social Functioning, Vitality, Health Perceptions and Treatment Burden). Each QoL-B domain is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, higher scores indicate better health status. For the Respiratory Symptoms Domain the items from 29 to 37 are considered. Change from baseline in QoL-B domain score at Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6 and Visit 7 were analysed using a linear mixed model for repeated measures including treatment, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, use of stable concomitant therapy with oral macrolides and pooled site, i.e. country, as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate. An unstructured covariance matrix was assumed and the Kenward-Roger adjustment was used for the degrees of freedom.

Time frame:
Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
Reported as:
Least squares mean · scores on a scale
Change From Baseline in QoL-B Respiratory Symptoms Domain Score
scores on a scaleCMS (Colistimethate Sodium)Placebo
Visit 3 (28 days)5.133 (2.532 to 7.734)4.013 (1.224 to 6.802)
Visit 4 (3 months)4.223 (1.328 to 7.118)5.532 (2.455 to 8.609)
Visit 5 (6 months)5.960 (2.811 to 9.109)4.750 (1.505 to 7.995)
Visit 6 (9 months)6.982 (3.197 to 10.767)4.586 (0.708 to 8.463)
Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT4.947 (2.172 to 7.722)4.594 (1.707 to 7.482)
Statistical analysis
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.52712 · Mean difference (final values): 1.120 · 95% CI -2.363 to 4.603
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.51001 · Mean difference (final values): -1.309 · 95% CI -5.219 to 2.600
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.57417 · Mean difference (final values): 1.210 · 95% CI -3.028 to 5.448
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.36309 · Mean difference (final values): 2.396 · 95% CI -2.790 to 7.583
  • CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) vs Placebo · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.85128 · Mean difference (final values): 0.353 · 95% CI -3.346 to 4.052

Adverse events

Collected over All AEs occurring from Visit 2 (day 0 = first IMP administration) until the follow-up phone call (2 weeks +/- 3 days after the end of treatment = totally up to 54 weeks +/- 3 days from the study Day 0.. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
CMS (Colistimethate Sodium) (SAF)3/152 (2%)27/152 (17.8%)123/152 (80.9%)
Placebo (SAF)2/135 (1.5%)17/135 (12.6%)104/135 (77%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 31
Most frequent serious events
EventCMS (Colistimethate Sodium) (SAF)Placebo (SAF)
Infective exacerbation of bronchiectasisInfections and infestations12/15210/135
COVID-19Infections and infestations3/1520/135
AsthmaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/1520/135
HaemoptysisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/1520/135
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/1521/135
Pseudomonas infectionInfections and infestations0/1521/135
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1521/135
Respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1521/135
Head injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1521/135
Wrist fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/1521/135
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 34
Most frequent other events
EventCMS (Colistimethate Sodium) (SAF)Placebo (SAF)
Infective exacerbation of bronchiectasisInfections and infestations69/15267/135
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders11/1529/135
HeadacheNervous system disorders7/1528/135
HaemoptysisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders9/1525/135
COVID-19Infections and infestations8/1524/135
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders7/1526/135
BronchospasmRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders7/1523/135
SinusitisInfections and infestations6/1526/135
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders5/1526/135
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations2/1526/135

Baseline characteristics

The modified Intention-To-Treat (mITT) Population is the Full Analysis Set and comprised all subjects who provided informed consent, were randomised and received at least 1 dose or partial dose of the IMP.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)CMS (Colistimethate Sodium)PlaceboTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years8573158
>=65 years6762129
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)CMS (Colistimethate Sodium)PlaceboTotal
Mean59.9 ± 15.1959.6 ± 14.7359.7 ± 14.95
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)CMS (Colistimethate Sodium)PlaceboTotal
Female10494198
Male484189
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)CMS (Colistimethate Sodium)PlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian202
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American336
White146130276
More than one race112
Unknown or Not Reported011
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)CMS (Colistimethate Sodium)PlaceboTotal
Greece213
New Zealand426
Canada91019
Argentina5652108
United States302050
Poland222648
Italy101
Israel134
Australia7613
France181230
Portugal112
Germany123
08

Study locations

89 sites
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Newport Beach, California 92663, United States
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Palm Springs, California 92262, United States
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Reseda, California 91324, United States
  • Zambon investigative site
    San Diego, California 92103, United States
  • Zambon Investgative Site
    San Diego, California 92120-5241, United States
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Centennial, Colorado 80112, United States
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Jacksonville, Florida 32204, United States
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Kissimmee, Florida 34741, United States
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Orlando, Florida 32803, United States
  • Zambon investigative Site
    St. Petersburg, Florida 33704, United States
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    St. Petersburg, Florida 33707, United States
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Weston, Florida 33331, United States
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Michigan City, Indiana 46360, United States
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Louisville, Kentucky 40202, United States
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Chesterfield, Missouri 63017-3625, United States
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756-1000, United States
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    New York, New York 10016, United States
  • Zambon investigative site
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514, United States
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Durham, North Carolina 27705, United States
  • Zambon investigative site
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27265, United States
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Portland, Oregon 97239, United States
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Tyler, Texas 75708, United States
  • ZambonInvestigative Site
    Abingdon, Virginia 24210, United States
  • Zambon investigative site
    Richmond, Virginia 23219, United States
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Northwest, Washington 20007, United States
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Buenos Aires, 1425, Argentina
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Buenos Aires, 1426, Argentina
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Buenos Aires, 1704, Argentina
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Buenos Aires, 1842, Argentina
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Buenos Aires, 1888, Argentina
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Buenos Aires, B1602DQD, Argentina
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Buenos Aires, B1900BNJ, Argentina
  • Zambon investigative site
    Buenos Aires, C1425AZB, Argentina
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Quilmes, B1878FNR, Argentina
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    San Miguel de Tucumán, 4000, Argentina
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Santa Fe, S3000ASF, Argentina
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Adelaide, 5000, Australia
  • Zambon investigative site
    Concord, 2139, Australia
  • Zambon investigative site
    Greenslopes, 4120, Australia
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Kent Town, 5067, Australia
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    South Brisbane, 4101, Australia
  • Zambon investigative site
    Spearwood, 6163, Australia
  • Zambon investigative Site
    Burlington, L7N 3V2, Canada
  • Zambon investigative site
    Kelowna, VIY 3H2, Canada
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    London, N6A 5W9, Canada
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Montreal, H2X03E4, Canada
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Ottawa, K1H8L6, Canada
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Québec, G1V 4G5, Canada
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Winnipeg, R2H 2A6, Canada
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Amiens, 80054, France
  • Zambon investigative site
    Brest, 29200, France
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Créteil, 94010, France
  • Zambon investigative site
    La Tronche, 38700, France
  • Zambon investigative site
    Lyon, 69004, France
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Montpellier, 34295, France
  • Zambon investigative site
    Nice, 51069, France
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Pessac, 33604, France
  • Zambon investigative site
    Reims, 51092, France
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Toulouse, 31059, France
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Frankfurt, 60596, Germany
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Hanover, 30625, Germany
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Athens, 11527, Greece
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Haifa, 34362, Israel
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Jerusalem, 9703102, Israel
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Kfar Saba, 4428164, Israel
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Milan, 20122, Italy
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Monza, 20900, Italy
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Christchurch, 8011, New Zealand
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Havelock North, 4130, New Zealand
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Mount Cook, 6021, New Zealand
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Tauranga, 3110, New Zealand
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Bialystok, 15-044, Poland
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Bielsko-Biala, 43-300, Poland
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Grudziądz, 86300, Poland
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Krakow, 31-066, Poland
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Legnica, 59220, Poland
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Lodz, 94-048, Poland
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Lublin, 20-089, Poland
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski, 27-400, Poland
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Piaseczno, 05-500, Poland
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Proszowice, 32-100, Poland
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Rzeszów, 35-205, Poland
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Sosnowiec, 41-200, Poland
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Warsaw, 01-456, Poland
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Wroclaw, 51-162, Poland
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Guimarães, 4835-044, Portugal
  • Zambon Investigative Site
    Lisbon, 1649035, Portugal
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jan 2018 to primary completion in Mar 2022, 49 months.

Results were first posted in Dec 2023, 1 year 9 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 14, 2018
First posted
Mar 9, 2018
StartActual
Jan 29, 2018
Primary completionActual
Mar 15, 2022
CompletionActual
Mar 15, 2022
Results first posted
Dec 29, 2023
Last update
Oct 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Results
Posted results revised
revised Oct 15, 2026
Sites
14 sites added, 14 sites removed
Show 14 added (5 Poland, 3 Argentina, 2 United States, 2 Canada, 1 Italy, 1 Portugal)
  • Zambon investigative Site · St. Petersburg, United States
  • Zambon Investigative Site · St. Petersburg, United States
  • Zambon Investigative Site · Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Zambon Investigative Site · Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Zambon Investigative Site · San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina
  • Zambon Investigative Site · Montreal, Canada
  • Zambon Investigative Site · Québec, Canada
  • Zambon Investigative Site · Milan, Italy
  • Zambon Investigative Site · Bialystok, Poland
  • Zambon Investigative Site · Krakow, Poland
  • Zambon Investigative Site · Lodz, Poland
  • Zambon Investigative Site · Warsaw, Poland
  • Zambon Investigative Site · Wroclaw, Poland
  • Zambon Investigative Site · Lisbon, Portugal
Show 14 removed
  • Zambon investigative Site · Saint Petersburg, United States
  • Zambon Investigative Site · Saint Petersburg, United States
  • Zambon Investigative Site · Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Zambon Investigative Site · Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Zambon Investigative Site · Tucumán, Argentina
  • Zambon Investigative Site · Montréal, Canada
  • Zambon Investigative Site · Quebec City, Canada
  • Zambon Investigative Site · Milano, Italy
  • Zambon Investigative Site · Białystok, Poland
  • Zambon Investigative Site · Cracovia, Poland
  • Zambon Investigative Site · Warszawa, Poland
  • Zambon Investigative Site · Wrocław, Poland
  • Zambon Investigative Site · Łódź, Poland
  • Zambon Investigative Site · Lisboa, Portugal
Oct 15, 2026
Secondary outcomes
19 added
What changed in the outcomes
  • AddedTime to First NCFB Pulmonary ExacerbationTime frame: 12 months
  • AddedChange From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total ScoreTime frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
  • AddedP. Aeruginosa Density: Change From Baseline at Visit 3 and at Visit 7Time frame: Visit 3 (28 days) and Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
  • AddedP. Aeruginosa Density: Change From BaselineTime frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
  • AddedMean Annual Severe Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis (NCFB) Pulmonary Exacerbation RateTime frame: 12 months
  • AddedTime to First Severe NCFB Pulmonary ExacerbationTime frame: 12 months
  • AddedNCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation Free DaysTime frame: 12 months
  • AddedDays of Work AbsenceTime frame: 12 months
  • AddedDays of Work Absence Per Employment MonthTime frame: 12 months
  • AddedSubjects With Hospitalisations Due to NCFB Pulmonary ExacerbationsTime frame: 12 months
  • AddedMean Annual Hospitalisation for NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation RateTime frame: 12 months
  • AddedChange From Baseline in QoL-B Physical Functioning Domain ScoreTime frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
  • AddedChange From Baseline in QoL-B Role Functioning Domain ScoreTime frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
  • AddedChange From Baseline in QoL-B Vitality Domain ScoreTime frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
  • AddedChange From Baseline in QoL-B Emotional Functioning Domain ScoreTime frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
  • AddedChange From Baseline in QoL-B Social Functioning Domain ScoreTime frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
  • AddedChange From Baseline in QoL-B Treatment Burden Domain ScoreTime frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
  • AddedChange From Baseline in QoL-B Health Perceptions Domain ScoreTime frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
  • AddedChange From Baseline in QoL-B Respiratory Symptoms Domain ScoreTime frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
Oct 15, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 15, 2026
    Posted results revised
    14 sites added, 14 sites removed
    Show 14 added (5 Poland, 3 Argentina, 2 United States, 2 Canada, 1 Italy, 1 Portugal)
    • Zambon investigative Site · St. Petersburg, United States
    • Zambon Investigative Site · St. Petersburg, United States
    • Zambon Investigative Site · Buenos Aires, Argentina
    • Zambon Investigative Site · Buenos Aires, Argentina
    • Zambon Investigative Site · San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina
    • Zambon Investigative Site · Montreal, Canada
    • Zambon Investigative Site · Québec, Canada
    • Zambon Investigative Site · Milan, Italy
    • Zambon Investigative Site · Bialystok, Poland
    • Zambon Investigative Site · Krakow, Poland
    • Zambon Investigative Site · Lodz, Poland
    • Zambon Investigative Site · Warsaw, Poland
    • Zambon Investigative Site · Wroclaw, Poland
    • Zambon Investigative Site · Lisbon, Portugal
    Show 14 removed
    • Zambon investigative Site · Saint Petersburg, United States
    • Zambon Investigative Site · Saint Petersburg, United States
    • Zambon Investigative Site · Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
    • Zambon Investigative Site · Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
    • Zambon Investigative Site · Tucumán, Argentina
    • Zambon Investigative Site · Montréal, Canada
    • Zambon Investigative Site · Quebec City, Canada
    • Zambon Investigative Site · Milano, Italy
    • Zambon Investigative Site · Białystok, Poland
    • Zambon Investigative Site · Cracovia, Poland
    • Zambon Investigative Site · Warszawa, Poland
    • Zambon Investigative Site · Wrocław, Poland
    • Zambon Investigative Site · Łódź, Poland
    • Zambon Investigative Site · Lisboa, Portugal
    Secondary outcomes 19 added
    What changed in the outcomes
    • AddedTime to First NCFB Pulmonary ExacerbationTime frame: 12 months
    • AddedChange From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total ScoreTime frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
    • AddedP. Aeruginosa Density: Change From Baseline at Visit 3 and at Visit 7Time frame: Visit 3 (28 days) and Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
    • AddedP. Aeruginosa Density: Change From BaselineTime frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
    • AddedMean Annual Severe Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis (NCFB) Pulmonary Exacerbation RateTime frame: 12 months
    • AddedTime to First Severe NCFB Pulmonary ExacerbationTime frame: 12 months
    • AddedNCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation Free DaysTime frame: 12 months
    • AddedDays of Work AbsenceTime frame: 12 months
    • AddedDays of Work Absence Per Employment MonthTime frame: 12 months
    • AddedSubjects With Hospitalisations Due to NCFB Pulmonary ExacerbationsTime frame: 12 months
    • AddedMean Annual Hospitalisation for NCFB Pulmonary Exacerbation RateTime frame: 12 months
    • AddedChange From Baseline in QoL-B Physical Functioning Domain ScoreTime frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
    • AddedChange From Baseline in QoL-B Role Functioning Domain ScoreTime frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
    • AddedChange From Baseline in QoL-B Vitality Domain ScoreTime frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
    • AddedChange From Baseline in QoL-B Emotional Functioning Domain ScoreTime frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
    • AddedChange From Baseline in QoL-B Social Functioning Domain ScoreTime frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
    • AddedChange From Baseline in QoL-B Treatment Burden Domain ScoreTime frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
    • AddedChange From Baseline in QoL-B Health Perceptions Domain ScoreTime frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
    • AddedChange From Baseline in QoL-B Respiratory Symptoms Domain ScoreTime frame: Up to Visit 7 (12 months) / EoT
    + 3 other changes: identifiers, verification date and index terms

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03460704
Lead sponsor
Zambon SpA
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 9, 2018
Start date
Jan 29, 2018
Primary completion
Mar 15, 2022
Completion
Mar 15, 2022
Results posted
Dec 29, 2023
Last update
Oct 15, 2026

Study contacts

Paola Castellani, MD
principal investigator · Zambon S.p.A.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion