CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03440060Updated May 13, 2019

Procalcitonin-guided Antibiotic Therapy During Severe Exacerbation of COPD

An interventional study of procalcitonin in Acute Exacerbation Copd, sponsored by University Hospital, Mahdia. Status unknown at 1 site in Tunisia. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-05-13.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Mahdia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study assess whether a procalcitonin guided antibiotic therapy can reduce significantly unnecessary antibiotic prescription during severe exacerbation of COPD requiring mechanical ventilation without compromising patients' outcome. The first group of patients will receive systematically empiric antibiotic therapy and the second group will receive antibiotics only if procalcitonin value is at or greater than 0.25 ng/ml.

Read the detailed description

Recently, procalcitonin gained interest as the most reliable biomarker in predicting bacterial origin in low respiratory tract infections and sepsis.

Procalcitonin was shown to be non-inferior to standard guidelines in guiding antibiotic therapy during COPD exacerbation, without worsening patients' outcomes, and with a significant reduction in antibiotic exposure.

Its use to guide antibiotic treatment during COPD exacerbation may be more challenging because of the frequent colonization of the airways in patients with COPD, and thus it needs further evaluation.

Additionally, until today, no interventional studies evaluating procalcitonin protocol have been conducted in ventilated COPD patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Exacerbation Copd

Keywords

  • procalcitonin
  • mechanical ventilation
  • COPD exacerbation
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients > 40 years old who consent to the study protocol
  • COPD diagnosis based on GOLD guidelines

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who did not consent
  • Asthma
  • Malignancy
  • Immunocompromised
  • Survival for at least 1 year is unlikely
  • Patients already enrolled in this study
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    standard group

    participants receive systematically empiric antibiotic therapy on admission with amoxicillin- acid clavulanic or levofloxacin in case of allergy

  • Active comparator
    Procalcitonin group

    participants receive antibiotics only if the procalcitonin value is at or greater than 0.25 ng/ml

    Diagnostic Test: procalcitonin

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testprocalcitonin

    procalcitonin value will be obtained within 24 hours after ICU admission in both groups and will be taken into account in the procalcitonin group only

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. time to recovery

    defined by resolution of symptoms ( cough, sputum purulence and respiratory rate less than 25 breath per minute) and NIV withdrawal (normal pH for 24 consecutive hours after stopping NIV), for patients with home NIV investigators retain stabilization after returning to the same number of hours of NIV before current exacerbation and pH normalization for 24 consecutive hours

    Time frame: 28 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Antibiotic exposure at day 90

    number of days the patient received antibiotics for any infection within 90 days from the day of admission

    Time frame: 90 days

  2. Hospital readmission for another exacerbation at day 90

    another readmission for another episode of COPD exacerbation within 90 days after a first discharge

    Time frame: 90 days

  3. NIV failure

    clinical deterioration requiring invasive ventilation or death

    Time frame: 28 days

  4. ICU length of say (days)

    number of days spent in the ICU during the index exacerbation

    Time frame: 90 days

  5. Hospital length of stay (days)

    number of days spent in hospital during the index exacerbation

    Time frame: 90 days

  6. ICU mortality

    Time frame: 28 days

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Mathioudakis AG, Chatzimavridou-Grigoriadou V, Corlateanu A, Vestbo J. Procalcitonin to guide antibiotic administration in COPD exacerbations: a meta-analysis. Eur Respir Rev. 2017 Jan 31;26(143):160073. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0073-2016. Print 2017 Jan. PubMed 28143877 ↗
  • Christ-Crain M, Jaccard-Stolz D, Bingisser R, Gencay MM, Huber PR, Tamm M, Muller B. Effect of procalcitonin-guided treatment on antibiotic use and outcome in lower respiratory tract infections: cluster-randomised, single-blinded intervention trial. Lancet. 2004 Feb 21;363(9409):600-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15591-8. PubMed 14987884 ↗
  • Schuetz P, Christ-Crain M, Thomann R, Falconnier C, Wolbers M, Widmer I, Neidert S, Fricker T, Blum C, Schild U, Regez K, Schoenenberger R, Henzen C, Bregenzer T, Hoess C, Krause M, Bucher HC, Zimmerli W, Mueller B; ProHOSP Study Group. Effect of procalcitonin-based guidelines vs standard guidelines on antibiotic use in lower respiratory tract infections: the ProHOSP randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009 Sep 9;302(10):1059-66. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1297. PubMed 19738090 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03440060
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Mahdia
Responsible party
Nejla Tilouche (principal investigator, University Hospital, Mahdia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 20, 2018
Start date
Oct 5, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2020 (estimated)
Last update
May 13, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion