An observational study in Childhood Solid Tumor, sponsored by The University of Hong Kong. Completed at 1 site in Hong Kong. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 19 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-06-28.
Sponsored by The University of Hong Kong · Observational
The aim of the study is to examine the impact of cancer and treatment-related effects on the physical and psychosocial well-being and quality of life among Hong Kong Chinese survivors of childhood solid tumors.
In general, cancer can be divided into two main categories: blood cancer and solid tumors. Leukemia refer to the cancers in blood while solid tumors refer to the cancers which involve the formation of an abnormal mass without any liquid or cysts. Patients suffer from leukemia are usually have better prognosis which result in better psychological well-being when compared with those suffer from solid tumors (Rodin et al., 2010). The development of solid tumors in children is different from that in adult. Some of the solid tumors such as osteosarcoma, neuroblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, Wilms' tumor and retinoblastoma are exclusively found in children. Other types of solid tumors such as brain tumor can also be found in children.
Yet, most of recent studies in Hong Kong have focused in general childhood cancer survivors or their family members but no study has been conducted to focus on the physical and psychological well-being of survivors of childhood solid tumors (Li, Lopez, Chung, Ho, \& Chiu, 2013; Wills, 2009). Therefore, the quality of life and psychological well-being of solid tumors survivors are always be overestimated. The actual psychological needs of solid tumors survivors may be overlooked. There is thus an imperative need to investigate the impact of cancer and treatment-related effects on the physical and psychosocial well-being and quality of life among Hong Kong Chinese survivors of childhood solid tumors.
Hong Kong Chinese under the age of 19 years who completed the entire course of treatment at least 6 months and were diagnosed with childhood solid tumors or leukemia under the age of 19 years.
Exclusion Criteria:
Survivors of Childhood Solid Tumors were invited to fill in a set of questionnaires.
Other: questionnaires
Survivors of Childhood Leukemia were invited to fill in a set of questionnaires.
Other: questionnaires
Participants were asked to respond to the questionnaires including the Chinese version of the Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 Generic Core Scale (PedsQL 4.0), the Chinese version of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC), the Chinese version of Rosenberg self-esteem scale, the Chinese version of the Herth Hope Index (HHI) and the Chinese version of Resilience Scale for Children (RS10).
Quality of Life at baseline
The Pediatric Quality-of-Life Inventory 4.0 Generic core sales (PedsQL 4.0) consists of 23 items which are designed to measure the quality of life in four particular domains including physical ability, psychological states, social relationships and school functioning. PedsQL 4.0 is a five-point Likert scale for patients to response regarding to the experience over the last month. Higher scores represent better quality of life. Participants will be asked to respond to the Pediatric Quality-of-Life Inventory 4.0 Generic core sales (PedsQL 4.0) at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline
Levels of self-esteem at baseline
The self-esteem of the participants will be measured by the Chinese version of the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (RSES). RSES consists of 10 items with a four-point response Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 4 (strongly disagree) and the total scores is ranging from 10 to 40. Higher scores represent higher levels of self-esteem. Participants will be asked to respond to the Chinese version of the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (RSES) at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline
Number of depressive symptoms at baseline
The number of depressive symptoms of the participants will be measured by the Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression Scale for children (CES-DC). It is able to assess the numbers of depressive symptoms due to the experience of past week. The scale consists of 20 items with four-point Likert scale for patients to response and the total score is ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores represent greater numbers of depressive symptoms while lower scores represent fewer numbers of depressive symptoms. Participants will be asked to respond to the Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression Scale for children (CES-DC) at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline
Level of sense of hope at baseline
The sense of hope of the participants will be measured by the Chinese version of Herth Hope Index (HHI). It is a 12-item psychometric scale to measure the sense of hope. Each item contains four-point scale ("strong disagree" = "1", "disagree" = "2", "agree" = "3", "strong agree" = "4"). The total score of the 12 items ranging from 12 to 48 and higher scores imply increasing hopefulness. Participants will be asked to respond to the Chinese version of the Herth Hope Index (HHI) at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline
Resilience ability at baseline
Resilience Scale for Children (RS10) is a 10-item scale to assess the adjustment ability for adapting adverse conditions such as cancer. The scale consists of 10 items with four-point Likert scale ("not at all like me"= "1", "not much like me" = "2", "somewhat like me" = "3", "a lot like me" = "4"). The total score is ranging from 10 to 40 which higher scores represent higher level of resilience. Participants will be asked to respond to the Chinese version of the Resilience Scale for Children (RS10) at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
The University of Hong Kong