An interventional study of Sweet food consumption in Repeated Sweet Food Consumption, sponsored by Bournemouth University. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-16.
Sponsored by Bournemouth University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science
Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →
Among 25 studies in Food Preferences with a site in United Kingdom — none open to participants now, none under way, none of them phase 3. Food Preferences · United Kingdom.
Among the 25 studies in Food Preferences with a site in United Kingdom, this one is the 19th largest by enrollment of the 21 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 4 that started in 2018, is one of 21 with no phase, and was the 6th registered.
155 studies on the registry are indexed under Food Preferences; 19 are open to participants now.
Browse Food Preferences studies →None of the 25 studies in Food Preferences with a site in United Kingdom is open now. The open studies under Food Preferences, anywhere →
Of the 15 Food Preferences studies recruiting now, 2 (13%) set no upper age limit and 12 (80%) stop at 75 or younger; 5 take children under 18; 12 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.
The full table on the hub →This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
25 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
First in 2010; this study’s year is marked. 4 started in 2018.
This study's enrollment of 36 is below the median of 133 across 121 interventional studies indexed under Food Preferences.
Median enrollment 112 across the 21 interventional studies, 61 across the 4 observational. Of the 23 that completed or were terminated, 3 (13%) have results posted.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
None of the 25 has an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
Bournemouth University is the lead sponsor of 52 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.
Bournemouth University has 2 studies filed under Food Preferences — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
None of the studies under way reaches primary completion within a year.
Among the 25 studies in Food Preferences with a site in United Kingdom, from their registry updates:
Nothing recorded among them since 2026-09-25.
This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.
This study will assess the impact of repeated sweet versus non-sweet food consumption on subsequent sweet and non-sweet food preferences and intakes
Participants will be randomized to receive instructions to either increase or decrease sweet food consumption for 6 days, and impacts on food preferences and intakes will be assessed at baseline and after 1 week. Preferences for sweet and non-sweet foods will be assessed during two taste tests at each assessment time, where six different foods will be rated. Sweet and non-sweet food consumption will also be measured at two meals at each assessment time - breakfast and lunch. Identical buffet meals composed of sweet and non-sweet foods suitable for consumption at breakfast and lunch will be provided ad-libitum.
Inclusion Criteria:
Race / ethnicity will not be requested.
Participants are asked to increase their consumption of sweet foods throughout their diet. Participants will be supported through an individual dietary interview where sweet foods will be highlighted and additional sweet food consumption recommended.
Behavioral: Sweet food consumption
Participants are asked to decrease their consumption of sweet foods throughout their diet. Participants will be supported through an individual dietary interview where sweet foods will be highlighted and substitutions for sweet food consumption will be recommended.
Behavioral: Sweet food consumption
Comparison of the impacts of sweet and non-sweet food consumption
Food Preferences
Ratings of three sweet and three non-sweet foods during a taste test (two tests). Measures are made on a visual analogue scale from 0 (not at all) to 100 (extremely), where higher scores denote higher preferences.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 1 week
Food Intake
Amount of sweet and non-sweet foods consumed during breakfast and lunch. Measures are made of grams of each sweet food consumed.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 1 week
Hunger Ratings
Ratings of subjective perceptions (two meals). Measures are made on a visual analogue scale from 0 (not at all) to 100 (extremely), where higher scores denote higher hunger.
Time frame: Change from Baseline to 1 week
| Milestone | Increase Sweet Food Consumption | Decrease Sweet Food Consumption |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 21 | 15 |
| Completed | 21 | 15 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 |
Ratings of three sweet and three non-sweet foods during a taste test (two tests). Measures are made on a visual analogue scale from 0 (not at all) to 100 (extremely), where higher scores denote higher preferences.
| units on a scale | Increase Sweet Food Consumption | Decrease Sweet Food Consumption |
|---|---|---|
| Food Preferences | 7 ± 19 | 1 ± 13 |
Amount of sweet and non-sweet foods consumed during breakfast and lunch. Measures are made of grams of each sweet food consumed.
| grams sweet food | Increase Sweet Food Consumption | Decrease Sweet Food Consumption |
|---|---|---|
| Food Intake | -24 ± 189 | -15 ± 183 |
Ratings of subjective perceptions (two meals). Measures are made on a visual analogue scale from 0 (not at all) to 100 (extremely), where higher scores denote higher hunger.
| units on a scale | Increase Sweet Food Consumption | Decrease Sweet Food Consumption |
|---|---|---|
| Hunger Ratings | 7 ± 28 | -2 ± 35 |
Collected over 1 week. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Increase Sweet Food Consumption | 0/21 (0%) | 0/21 (0%) | 0/21 (0%) |
| Decrease Sweet Food Consumption | 0/15 (0%) | 0/15 (0%) | 0/15 (0%) |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Increase Sweet Food Consumption | Decrease Sweet Food Consumption | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 21.0 ± 1.0 | 21.3 ± 0.8 | 21.1 ± 0.9 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Increase Sweet Food Consumption | Decrease Sweet Food Consumption | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 15 | 9 | 24 |
| Male | 6 | 6 | 12 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants) | Increase Sweet Food Consumption | Decrease Sweet Food Consumption | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Count of participants | — | — | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Increase Sweet Food Consumption | Decrease Sweet Food Consumption | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 21 | 15 | 36 |
PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.
Plan to share: Yes — The full study protocol is currently available from the PI on reasonable request. All generated data will be available from the PI, following completion and publication of the work on reasonable request.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan
Time frame: Data will be available following completion and publication of the study. Data will be stored for ten years following publication of the work.
Access criteria: Direct contact and reasonable request of the PI
Ran from Feb 2018 to primary completion in Aug 2019, 17 months.
Results were first posted in May 2024, 4 years 9 months after primary completion.
Of 92 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Food Preferences, half reached primary completion within 5 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 1 and three quarters within 17. This study's 17 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 92 studies reached it within 5 months; a quarter within 1 and three quarters within 17.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Bournemouth University