A Phase 2 interventional study of Carboplatin and Radiation Therapy in Oropharynx Cancer, sponsored by University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-07.
Sponsored by University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
This prospective study aims to utilize pre- and mid-treatment PET-CT to guide de-escalation of radiation therapy in HPV-related squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients will receive a single prescription of 70 Gy in 35 fractions with RT given once daily, 5 days a week along with weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel (standard therapy)
Drug: Carboplatin · Radiation: Radiation Therapy · Drug: Paclitaxel
Patients will initially receive a single prescription of 70 Gy in 35 fractions with RT given once daily, 5 days a week along with weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel (standard therapy). If certain parameters are met radiation therapy will be reduced to 54Gy to high risk Planned Target Volume (PTV) and 43.2Gy to low risk PTV all in 27 fractions.
Drug: Carboplatin · Radiation: Radiation Therapy · Drug: Paclitaxel
AUC=1 weekly during radiation therapy. Carboplatin will be given once a week in combination with paclitaxel (standard treatment), concurrent with radiation therapy. Given IV.
Patients will initially receive a single prescription of 70 Gy to PTV1 in 35 fractions with RT given once daily, 5 days a week along with weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel (standard therapy). Dose will be reduced to 54Gy to high risk PTV and 43.2Gy to low risk PTV all in 27 fractions for patients who meet pPET-CT and iPET-CT parameters.
30 mg/m2 weekly during radiation therapy. Paclitaxel will be given once a week in combination with carboplatin (standard treatment), concurrent with radiation therapy. Given IV.
The Percentage of Patients With Local Regional Recurrence (LRR) of Disease
RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) will be used to evaluate response and recurrence. All patients will be analyzed together as the goal of the study is to estimate risk of LRR in this patient population treated with this particular strategy in which some patients continue to receive standard therapy while others are de-escalated. Results will also be estimated and reported separately for patients receiving standard or de-escalated therapy.
Time frame: 1 Year
Change in Metabolic Tumor Volume 50% (MTV 50%)
The change in metabolic tumor volume (MTV)50% at the mid-treatment timepoint will be calculated as percent change from baseline and used as a continuous variable in a Cox model for an outcome of time to LRR. Will also evaluate more non-parametrically, the relation between hazard of LRR and mid-treatment MTV50% using a kernel estimator in a Cox model.
Time frame: 2 months
Patterns of Failure
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants who experienced Locoregional relapse versus distant relapse
Time frame: at 3 months and 2 years
Overall Survival
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants who are still alive at 3 months and 2 years.
Time frame: at 3 months, and 2 Years
Progression- Free Survival
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants who are still in progression free survival at 3 months and 2 years
Time frame: at 3 months and 2 years
Incidence of Toxicity
Toxicity outcomes will be estimated as proportions of patients with available toxicity data at 1, 3 and 12 months. XQ, Xerostomia Questionnaire, is scored on a scale of 0-100 with higher score indicating worse xerostomia. HN, FACT-HN, is scored on a scale of 0-190 with higher score indicating a better quality of life.
Time frame: 1, 3 and 12 months
Detectable Circulating Tumor Deoxyribonucleic Acid (ctDNA) in Participants
Median values of ctDNA molecules present throughout the study. The week 6/7 measurement is taken as the first measurement that was available during weeks 6 and 7 to minimize missing data and to account for minor timing deviations in sample collection during weeks 6 and 7
Time frame: from Baseline up to 7 weeks
Quality of Life Assessed Per the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACTHN)
Quality of life (QOL) outcomes and swallowing study results will be summarized descriptively by timepoint. If there is substantial missingness in the QOL outcomes the study will assess for informative missingness by comparing earlier QOL scores and change in earlier QOL scores between patients missing QOL at later time points (e.g. 1 or 2 years).
Time frame: 2 Years
| Milestone | Standard Treatment | De-escalation Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 49 | 36 |
| Completed | 47 | 35 |
| Not completed | 2 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Physician decision | 1 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 1 | 0 |
RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) will be used to evaluate response and recurrence. All patients will be analyzed together as the goal of the study is to estimate risk of LRR in this patient population treated with this particular strategy in which some patients continue to receive standard therapy while others are de-escalated. Results will also be estimated and reported separately for patients receiving standard or de-escalated therapy.
| percentage of participants | Standard Treatment | De-escalation Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| The Percentage of Patients With Local Regional Recurrence (LRR) of Disease | 2 (0 to 6) | 3 (0 to 8) |
The change in metabolic tumor volume (MTV)50% at the mid-treatment timepoint will be calculated as percent change from baseline and used as a continuous variable in a Cox model for an outcome of time to LRR. Will also evaluate more non-parametrically, the relation between hazard of LRR and mid-treatment MTV50% using a kernel estimator in a Cox model.
| percent change from baseline | Standard Treatment | De-escalation Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Metabolic Tumor Volume 50% (MTV 50%) | -11.3 ± 66.7 | -71.1 ± 16.7 |
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants who experienced Locoregional relapse versus distant relapse
| Estimate of percentage of participants | Standard Treatment | De-escalation Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| 3 month Locoregional relapse | 0 (0 to 0) | 0 (0 to 0) |
| 3 month distant relapse | 0 (0 to 0) | 0 (0 to 0) |
| 2 year Locoregional relapse | 6.8 (0 to 13.9) | 9.1 (0 to 18.5) |
| 2 year distant relapse | 4.1 (0 to 9.7) | 6.4 (0 to 14.6) |
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants who are still alive at 3 months and 2 years.
| Estimate of percentage of participants | Standard Treatment | De-escalation Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| 3 months | 98.0 (94.1 to 100) | 100 (100 to 100) |
| 2 years | 95.8 (90.2 to 100) | 97.0 (91.3 to 100) |
Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants who are still in progression free survival at 3 months and 2 years
| Estimate of percentage of participants | Standard Treatment | De-escalation Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| 3 months | 98.0 (94.1 to 100) | 100 (100 to 100) |
| 2 years | 87.5 (78.6 to 97.4) | 84.7 (73.2 to 98.0) |
Toxicity outcomes will be estimated as proportions of patients with available toxicity data at 1, 3 and 12 months. XQ, Xerostomia Questionnaire, is scored on a scale of 0-100 with higher score indicating worse xerostomia. HN, FACT-HN, is scored on a scale of 0-190 with higher score indicating a better quality of life.
| Estimated mean score | Standard Treatment | De-escalation Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Xerostomia Questionnaire- 1 month | 45 (38.8 to 51.1) | 33.3 (26.4 to 40.3) |
| Xerostomia Questionnaire- 3 months | 35.7 (21.2 to 50.1) | 36.7 (23.3 to 50.0) |
| Xerostomia Questionnaire- 12 months | 26.6 (19.8 to 33.5) | 25.3 (17.7 to 32.9) |
| FACT-HN- 1 month | 26.1 (24.6 to 27.7) | 23.1 (21.4 to 24.8) |
| FACT-HN- 3 months | 23.5 (19.9 to 27.1) | 20.9 (17.6 to 24.2) |
| FACT-HN- 12 months | 16.9 (15.2 to 18.6) | 15.3 (13.4 to 17.2) |
Median values of ctDNA molecules present throughout the study. The week 6/7 measurement is taken as the first measurement that was available during weeks 6 and 7 to minimize missing data and to account for minor timing deviations in sample collection during weeks 6 and 7
| ctDNA targets/mL | Standard Treatment | De-escalation Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 687 (80 to 2268) | 273 (81 to 963) |
| Week 1 | 51 (7 to 1231) | 66 (29 to 493) |
| Week 2 | 174 (67 to 706) | 277 (74 to 681) |
| Week 3 | 119 (8 to 648) | 58 (0 to 414) |
| Week 4 | 8 (0 to 133) | 0 (0 to 4) |
| Week 5 | 0 (0 to 10) | 0 (0 to 0) |
| Week 6/7 | 0 (0 to 0) | 0 (0 to 0) |
Quality of life (QOL) outcomes and swallowing study results will be summarized descriptively by timepoint. If there is substantial missingness in the QOL outcomes the study will assess for informative missingness by comparing earlier QOL scores and change in earlier QOL scores between patients missing QOL at later time points (e.g. 1 or 2 years).
Results for this outcome have not been posted.
Collected over All adverse event data (serious and non-serious) collected from the time of the initial study treatment administration through up to 2 years of follow up, for a median of 36.2 months for Cohort A and 39.6 months for Cohort B.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Treatment | 2/49 (4.1%) | 5/49 (10.2%) | 49/49 (100%) |
| De-escalation Treatment | 1/36 (2.8%) | 3/36 (8.3%) | 36/36 (100%) |
| Event | Standard Treatment | De-escalation Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiac arrestCardiac disorders | 2/49 | 0/36 |
| DysphagiaGastrointestinal disorders | 1/49 | 1/36 |
| HyperglycemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 0/49 | 1/36 |
| Thromboembolic eventVascular disorders | 0/49 | 1/36 |
| Metabolism and nutrition disorders - Other, specifyMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 0/49 | 1/36 |
| AnorexiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 1/49 | 0/36 |
| AspirationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 1/49 | 0/36 |
| DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 1/49 | 0/36 |
| Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 1/49 | 0/36 |
| Lung infectionInfections and infestations | 1/49 | 0/36 |
| Event | Standard Treatment | De-escalation Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| DysgeusiaGeneral disorders | 49/49 | 35/36 |
| FatigueGeneral disorders | 49/49 | 27/36 |
| Dry mouthGeneral disorders | 47/49 | 33/36 |
| Oral painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 47/49 | 26/36 |
| Mucositis oralGastrointestinal disorders | 46/49 | 32/36 |
| Dermatitis radiationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 40/49 | 27/36 |
| DysphagiaGeneral disorders | 38/49 | 25/36 |
| Weight lossInvestigations | 36/49 | 20/36 |
| PainGeneral disorders | 32/49 | 26/36 |
| NauseaGastrointestinal disorders | 32/49 | 22/36 |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Standard Treatment | De-escalation Treatment | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 31 | 23 | 54 |
| >=65 years | 18 | 13 | 31 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Standard Treatment | De-escalation Treatment | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| Male | 43 | 34 | 77 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Standard Treatment | De-escalation Treatment | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 47 | 36 | 83 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Standard Treatment | De-escalation Treatment | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asian | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| White | 47 | 33 | 80 |
| More than one race | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Standard Treatment | De-escalation Treatment | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 49 | 36 | 85 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: Undecided
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center