CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03416153Updated Aug 7, 2026Results posted

Individualized Adaptive De-escalated Radiotherapy for HPV-related Oropharynx Cancer

A Phase 2 interventional study of Carboplatin and Radiation Therapy in Oropharynx Cancer, sponsored by University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-07.

Sponsored by University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
91
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective study aims to utilize pre- and mid-treatment PET-CT to guide de-escalation of radiation therapy in HPV-related squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx.

02

Conditions studied

  • Oropharynx Cancer
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients must have FDG-avid and histologically or cytologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx (tonsil, base of tongue, oropharyngeal wall, soft palate) that is p16 positive by immunohistochemistry or HPV positive by in situ hybridization.
  • AJCC eighth edition staging stage 1 and stage 2
  • Appropriate stage for protocol entry, including no distant metastases, based upon the following minimum diagnostic workup:
  • History/physical examination, including documentation of weight within 4 weeks prior to registration;
  • FDG-PET/CT scan for staging and RT plan within 4 weeks prior to registration;
  • Zubrod Performance Status (A quantification of the functional status of cancer patients that runs from 0 to 5, with 0 denoting perfect health and 5 death) 0-1 within 4 weeks prior to registration;
  • Age ≥ 18;
  • Able to tolerate PET/CT imaging required to be performed
  • CBC/differential obtained within 4 weeks prior to registration on study, with adequate bone marrow function;
  • Serum creatinine within normal institutional limits or a creatinine clearance ≥ 45 ml/min within 4 weeks prior to registration;
  • Women of childbearing potential and male participants must agree to use a medically effective means of birth control throughout their participation in the treatment phase of the study.
  • The patient must provide study-specific informed consent prior to study entry.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cT4, cN3 or cM1 disease
  • "Matted nodes" as determined by review with Neuroradiology
  • Gross total excision of both primary and nodal disease with curative intent; this includes tonsillectomy, local excision of primary site, and nodal excision that removes all clinically and radiographically evident disease. In other words, to participate in this protocol, the patient must have clinically or radiographically evident gross disease for which disease response can be assessed.
  • Carcinoma of the neck of unknown primary site origin (even if p16 positive);
  • Prior invasive malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) unless disease free for a minimum of 3 years
  • Any prior therapy for the study cancer; note that prior chemotherapy for a different cancer is allowable if > 3 years prior to study;
  • Prior radiotherapy to the region of the study cancer that would result in overlap of radiation therapy fields;
  • Severe, active co-morbidity;
  • Pregnancy or women of childbearing potential and men who are sexually active and not willing/able to use medically acceptable forms of contraception;
  • Poorly controlled diabetes
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
91 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard Treatment

    Patients will receive a single prescription of 70 Gy in 35 fractions with RT given once daily, 5 days a week along with weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel (standard therapy)

    Drug: Carboplatin · Radiation: Radiation Therapy · Drug: Paclitaxel

  • Experimental
    De-escalation Treatment

    Patients will initially receive a single prescription of 70 Gy in 35 fractions with RT given once daily, 5 days a week along with weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel (standard therapy). If certain parameters are met radiation therapy will be reduced to 54Gy to high risk Planned Target Volume (PTV) and 43.2Gy to low risk PTV all in 27 fractions.

    Drug: Carboplatin · Radiation: Radiation Therapy · Drug: Paclitaxel

Interventions

  • DrugCarboplatin

    AUC=1 weekly during radiation therapy. Carboplatin will be given once a week in combination with paclitaxel (standard treatment), concurrent with radiation therapy. Given IV.

  • RadiationRadiation Therapy

    Patients will initially receive a single prescription of 70 Gy to PTV1 in 35 fractions with RT given once daily, 5 days a week along with weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel (standard therapy). Dose will be reduced to 54Gy to high risk PTV and 43.2Gy to low risk PTV all in 27 fractions for patients who meet pPET-CT and iPET-CT parameters.

  • DrugPaclitaxel

    30 mg/m2 weekly during radiation therapy. Paclitaxel will be given once a week in combination with carboplatin (standard treatment), concurrent with radiation therapy. Given IV.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Percentage of Patients With Local Regional Recurrence (LRR) of Disease

    RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) will be used to evaluate response and recurrence. All patients will be analyzed together as the goal of the study is to estimate risk of LRR in this patient population treated with this particular strategy in which some patients continue to receive standard therapy while others are de-escalated. Results will also be estimated and reported separately for patients receiving standard or de-escalated therapy.

    Time frame: 1 Year

  2. Change in Metabolic Tumor Volume 50% (MTV 50%)

    The change in metabolic tumor volume (MTV)50% at the mid-treatment timepoint will be calculated as percent change from baseline and used as a continuous variable in a Cox model for an outcome of time to LRR. Will also evaluate more non-parametrically, the relation between hazard of LRR and mid-treatment MTV50% using a kernel estimator in a Cox model.

    Time frame: 2 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patterns of Failure

    Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants who experienced Locoregional relapse versus distant relapse

    Time frame: at 3 months and 2 years

  2. Overall Survival

    Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants who are still alive at 3 months and 2 years.

    Time frame: at 3 months, and 2 Years

  3. Progression- Free Survival

    Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants who are still in progression free survival at 3 months and 2 years

    Time frame: at 3 months and 2 years

  4. Incidence of Toxicity

    Toxicity outcomes will be estimated as proportions of patients with available toxicity data at 1, 3 and 12 months. XQ, Xerostomia Questionnaire, is scored on a scale of 0-100 with higher score indicating worse xerostomia. HN, FACT-HN, is scored on a scale of 0-190 with higher score indicating a better quality of life.

    Time frame: 1, 3 and 12 months

  5. Detectable Circulating Tumor Deoxyribonucleic Acid (ctDNA) in Participants

    Median values of ctDNA molecules present throughout the study. The week 6/7 measurement is taken as the first measurement that was available during weeks 6 and 7 to minimize missing data and to account for minor timing deviations in sample collection during weeks 6 and 7

    Time frame: from Baseline up to 7 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Quality of Life Assessed Per the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACTHN)

    Quality of life (QOL) outcomes and swallowing study results will be summarized descriptively by timepoint. If there is substantial missingness in the QOL outcomes the study will assess for informative missingness by comparing earlier QOL scores and change in earlier QOL scores between patients missing QOL at later time points (e.g. 1 or 2 years).

    Time frame: 2 Years

06

Results

Posted May 22, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneStandard TreatmentDe-escalation Treatment
Started4936
Completed4735
Not completed21
Withdrew: Physician decision11
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10

Outcome measures

PrimaryThe Percentage of Patients With Local Regional Recurrence (LRR) of Disease

RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) will be used to evaluate response and recurrence. All patients will be analyzed together as the goal of the study is to estimate risk of LRR in this patient population treated with this particular strategy in which some patients continue to receive standard therapy while others are de-escalated. Results will also be estimated and reported separately for patients receiving standard or de-escalated therapy.

Time frame:
1 Year
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
The Percentage of Patients With Local Regional Recurrence (LRR) of Disease
percentage of participantsStandard TreatmentDe-escalation Treatment
The Percentage of Patients With Local Regional Recurrence (LRR) of Disease2 (0 to 6)3 (0 to 8)
PrimaryChange in Metabolic Tumor Volume 50% (MTV 50%)

The change in metabolic tumor volume (MTV)50% at the mid-treatment timepoint will be calculated as percent change from baseline and used as a continuous variable in a Cox model for an outcome of time to LRR. Will also evaluate more non-parametrically, the relation between hazard of LRR and mid-treatment MTV50% using a kernel estimator in a Cox model.

Time frame:
2 months
Reported as:
Mean · percent change from baseline
Change in Metabolic Tumor Volume 50% (MTV 50%)
percent change from baselineStandard TreatmentDe-escalation Treatment
Change in Metabolic Tumor Volume 50% (MTV 50%)-11.3 ± 66.7-71.1 ± 16.7
SecondaryPatterns of Failure

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants who experienced Locoregional relapse versus distant relapse

Time frame:
at 3 months and 2 years
Reported as:
Number · Estimate of percentage of participants
Patterns of Failure
Estimate of percentage of participantsStandard TreatmentDe-escalation Treatment
3 month Locoregional relapse0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)
3 month distant relapse0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)
2 year Locoregional relapse6.8 (0 to 13.9)9.1 (0 to 18.5)
2 year distant relapse4.1 (0 to 9.7)6.4 (0 to 14.6)
SecondaryOverall Survival

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants who are still alive at 3 months and 2 years.

Time frame:
at 3 months, and 2 Years
Reported as:
Number · Estimate of percentage of participants
Overall Survival
Estimate of percentage of participantsStandard TreatmentDe-escalation Treatment
3 months98.0 (94.1 to 100)100 (100 to 100)
2 years95.8 (90.2 to 100)97.0 (91.3 to 100)
SecondaryProgression- Free Survival

Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of participants who are still in progression free survival at 3 months and 2 years

Time frame:
at 3 months and 2 years
Reported as:
Number · Estimate of percentage of participants
Progression- Free Survival
Estimate of percentage of participantsStandard TreatmentDe-escalation Treatment
3 months98.0 (94.1 to 100)100 (100 to 100)
2 years87.5 (78.6 to 97.4)84.7 (73.2 to 98.0)
SecondaryIncidence of Toxicity

Toxicity outcomes will be estimated as proportions of patients with available toxicity data at 1, 3 and 12 months. XQ, Xerostomia Questionnaire, is scored on a scale of 0-100 with higher score indicating worse xerostomia. HN, FACT-HN, is scored on a scale of 0-190 with higher score indicating a better quality of life.

Time frame:
1, 3 and 12 months
Reported as:
Mean · Estimated mean score
Incidence of Toxicity
Estimated mean scoreStandard TreatmentDe-escalation Treatment
Xerostomia Questionnaire- 1 month45 (38.8 to 51.1)33.3 (26.4 to 40.3)
Xerostomia Questionnaire- 3 months35.7 (21.2 to 50.1)36.7 (23.3 to 50.0)
Xerostomia Questionnaire- 12 months26.6 (19.8 to 33.5)25.3 (17.7 to 32.9)
FACT-HN- 1 month26.1 (24.6 to 27.7)23.1 (21.4 to 24.8)
FACT-HN- 3 months23.5 (19.9 to 27.1)20.9 (17.6 to 24.2)
FACT-HN- 12 months16.9 (15.2 to 18.6)15.3 (13.4 to 17.2)
SecondaryDetectable Circulating Tumor Deoxyribonucleic Acid (ctDNA) in Participants

Median values of ctDNA molecules present throughout the study. The week 6/7 measurement is taken as the first measurement that was available during weeks 6 and 7 to minimize missing data and to account for minor timing deviations in sample collection during weeks 6 and 7

Time frame:
from Baseline up to 7 weeks
Reported as:
Median · ctDNA targets/mL
Detectable Circulating Tumor Deoxyribonucleic Acid (ctDNA) in Participants
ctDNA targets/mLStandard TreatmentDe-escalation Treatment
Baseline687 (80 to 2268)273 (81 to 963)
Week 151 (7 to 1231)66 (29 to 493)
Week 2174 (67 to 706)277 (74 to 681)
Week 3119 (8 to 648)58 (0 to 414)
Week 48 (0 to 133)0 (0 to 4)
Week 50 (0 to 10)0 (0 to 0)
Week 6/70 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)
Other pre-specifiedQuality of Life Assessed Per the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACTHN)

Quality of life (QOL) outcomes and swallowing study results will be summarized descriptively by timepoint. If there is substantial missingness in the QOL outcomes the study will assess for informative missingness by comparing earlier QOL scores and change in earlier QOL scores between patients missing QOL at later time points (e.g. 1 or 2 years).

Time frame:
2 Years

Results for this outcome have not been posted.

Adverse events

Collected over All adverse event data (serious and non-serious) collected from the time of the initial study treatment administration through up to 2 years of follow up, for a median of 36.2 months for Cohort A and 39.6 months for Cohort B.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Standard Treatment2/49 (4.1%)5/49 (10.2%)49/49 (100%)
De-escalation Treatment1/36 (2.8%)3/36 (8.3%)36/36 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent serious events
EventStandard TreatmentDe-escalation Treatment
Cardiac arrestCardiac disorders2/490/36
DysphagiaGastrointestinal disorders1/491/36
HyperglycemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/491/36
Thromboembolic eventVascular disorders0/491/36
Metabolism and nutrition disorders - Other, specifyMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/491/36
AnorexiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/490/36
AspirationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/490/36
DehydrationMetabolism and nutrition disorders1/490/36
Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/490/36
Lung infectionInfections and infestations1/490/36
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 53
Most frequent other events
EventStandard TreatmentDe-escalation Treatment
DysgeusiaGeneral disorders49/4935/36
FatigueGeneral disorders49/4927/36
Dry mouthGeneral disorders47/4933/36
Oral painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders47/4926/36
Mucositis oralGastrointestinal disorders46/4932/36
Dermatitis radiationSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders40/4927/36
DysphagiaGeneral disorders38/4925/36
Weight lossInvestigations36/4920/36
PainGeneral disorders32/4926/36
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders32/4922/36

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Standard TreatmentDe-escalation TreatmentTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years312354
>=65 years181331
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Standard TreatmentDe-escalation TreatmentTotal
Female628
Male433477
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Standard TreatmentDe-escalation TreatmentTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino473683
Unknown or Not Reported202
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Standard TreatmentDe-escalation TreatmentTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American123
White473380
More than one race011
Unknown or Not Reported101
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Standard TreatmentDe-escalation TreatmentTotal
United States493685
07

Study locations

2 sites
  • University of Michigan Hospital
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Apr 12, 2022
  • Informed consent form · Jul 12, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03416153
Lead sponsor
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
Collaborators
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 30, 2018
Start date
May 21, 2018
Primary completion
May 5, 2023
Completion
May 5, 2025
Results posted
May 22, 2025
Last update
Aug 7, 2026

Study contacts

Michelle Mierzwa, M.D.
principal investigator · University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion