An interventional study of Exercise Promotion in Exercise, sponsored by Brown University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-08-15.
Sponsored by Brown University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science
Regular aerobic exercise is associated with reduced risk of multiple cancers, yet the majority of adults are inactive. Across health behavior theories, the expectations people have about the outcomes of exercise influence their decision to exercise. Extending prior work, a fine-grained analysis of the relationship between perceived outcomes and daily exercise behavior will be achieved using ecological momentary assessment methods to measure perceived outcomes, and accelerometry to measure exercise objectively. The results of this research will inform exercise promotion efforts by determining how perceptions and temporal factors interact to predict exercise behavior.
There is strong evidence for an association between regular physical activity and reduced risk for cancers of the breast and colon. The majority of adults do not engage in enough physical activity. Motivating adults to exercise is critical to cancer prevention efforts. However, additional work is needed to improve the theoretical frameworks applied to exercise promotion. The most often cited theories of health promotion include the outcomes of a target behavior as important determinants. The perceptions people have about the outcomes of exercise, and more generally attitudes about exercise, are associated with exercise participation. Conceptualizations of perceived outcomes are categorized by whether they are instrumental (i.e. utility-based) or affective (i.e. feeling-based) in nature. Recent efforts to compare the relative predictive power of instrumental and affective attitudes suggest that affective attitudes may better predict exercise behavior. Aim 1 of this proposal seeks to compare the relative influence of instrumental versus affective attitudes on exercise behavior. Another distinction can be made between perceptions that are held temporally proximal versus distal to exercise behavior. In the vast majority of relevant research in the exercise field, perceptions are assessed and then future exercise behavior is assessed months later via self-report. However, day to day perceptions and exercise behavior is largely unknown. The temporal distance of perceptions from the decision to exercise can be significantly shortened using ecological momentary assessments. Aim 2 of this proposal seeks to compare the relative predictive power of temporally distal versus proximal perceptions on exercise behavior. Finally, aim 3 will examine the interaction between instrumental/affective and temporally proximal/distal attitudes for predicting exercise behavior. The proposed research seeks to contribute to cancer prevention efforts by examining underlying perceptions that motivate the day to day decision to exercise. In particular, technological advances in mobile platforms to deliver interventions to people wherever they are requires better support for how to apply these methods. Using theory-based, empirically supported concepts, this longitudinal study will follow previously inactive adults over 12 weeks using electronic diaries to measure their perceptions and exercise behavior change while they receive an exercise intervention. This study will provide a fine-grained examination of the determinants of exercise targeted in exercise promotion interventions. The results will inform future efforts to promote exercise using mobile technologies by determining what types of beliefs (instrumental/affective) and what times (temporal proximity to behavior) are most critical times to intervene.
1,573 studies on the registry are indexed under Behavior; 313 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 50 is below the median of 120 across 1,197 interventional studies indexed under Behavior.
Browse Behavior studies →Brown University is the lead sponsor of 290 studies on the registry; 40 are open to participants now.
Of its 26 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 19 (73%) have results posted.
Compared within Behavior, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Motor Activity. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants receive a print-based exercise promotion program across 12 weeks and are asked to monitor their exercise behavior using an app on their cell phone.
Behavioral: Exercise Promotion
Evidence-based techniques (goal-setting, reduced barriers) for increasing exercise behavior
Exercise behavior
Examine the association between attitudes and exercise behavior defined by the time of the start and end of each exercise session
Time frame: 1 day
Plan to share: No — Upon request, data may be shared with other researchers
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from May 2016 to primary completion in Jan 2019, 31 months.
Of 741 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Behavior, half reached primary completion within 14 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 32. This study's 31 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 757 studies reached it within 13 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 32.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.