CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03414060FMCVVFUpdated May 5, 2026

Feasibility of the Menstrual Cup for VVF

An interventional study of Menstrual Cup in Vaginal Fistula, Vesico Vaginal Fistula and Obstetric; Injury, sponsored by University of Ghana Medical School. Completed at 1 site in Ghana. Open to female participants aged 15 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-05.

Sponsored by University of Ghana Medical School · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
11
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
15 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study examines the feasibility and acceptability of the vaginal menstrual cup for short-term management of vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) among 11 women seeking treatment at a health facility in Ghana. The repeated measures design utilizes a 2-hr pad test to compare urinary leakage with and without the insertable cup, a questionnaire on acceptability and perceived effect is administered and a clinical exam is completed. Subsequently, semi-structured interviews will be carried out with up to 24 additional women seeking treatment at a health facility in Ghana. Interviews will cover women's experiences of living with fistula, including strategies for coping with urinary incontinence and resulting stigma, as well as user acceptability to the intervention.

Read the detailed description

Vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) is a debilitating maternal morbidity that largely results from complications of prolonged, obstructed labor when the trapped fetal head applies direct pressure to pelvic/vaginal tissues and causes widespread ischemia, tissue necrosis, and subsequent extensive fistula formation. Women living with VVF, the most common anatomical presentation of obstetric fistula, experience urinary incontinence which causes discomfort, malodor, and skin infection, as well as social and psychological consequences that increase their vulnerability to the negative effects of stigma and reduce their quality of life.

Traditional management requires surgical repair; however, many women either do not have access to surgery, or access is delayed due to various individual, social, or structural barriers. Non-surgical management, previously explored with non-invasive techniques for residual urinary incontinence, has been under-examined for fistula-related urinary incontinence. The menstrual cup may be a useful option for non-surgical management of obstetric fistula. Clinical and programmatic reports suggest a potential translation of the menstrual cup for collection or control of urine leakage in women with VVF; however, evidence has not been collected and examined systematically within a population in an endemic setting.

While surgical management of fistula remains the gold standard in treatment, research on non-surgical therapies is necessary.Therefore, this study aims to assess the feasibility (including efficacy, safety, and acceptability among users) of using the menstrual cup over a short period among women seeking care for VVF in a clinical setting and, unlike prior reports, includes standardized measures of leakage and prioritizes user perspectives.

A repeated measures design compared volume of leakage with the and without the cup to baseline leakage via a 2-hr pad test among women with VVF seeking surgical repair at a health facility in Ghana. A questionnaire was later administered followed by a physical exam. A paired t-test was used to analyze effect.

Beginning October 2018, semi-structured interviews with up to 24 women seeking treatment at a health facility in Ghana will be carried out on women's experience with fistula, including strategies for coping with urinary incontinence and resulting stigma, as well as their acceptability to the insertable device. This mixed methods approach is necessary to compare quantitative results and qualitative findings regarding what women are already doing to cope with incontinence and stigma, and their acceptability to this device to manage leaking and support coping.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vaginal Fistula
  • Vesico Vaginal Fistula
  • Obstetric; Injury

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • obstetric fistula
  • vesicovaginal fistula
  • menstrual cup
  • pad test
  • non-surgical management
  • feasibility
  • acceptability
  • innovation
  • coping
  • incontinence
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patient seeking surgical repair for VVF
  2. VVF confirmed by gynecologic examination
  3. Adequate vaginal capacity to accommodate the menstrual cup
  4. Fistula high in vagina (determined at gynecologic examination)
  5. Willingness to insert and remove the device by one's self

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Technically difficult to insert and or remove the menstrual cup (eg severely scarred vagina)
  2. Unable or unwilling to learn to insert and remove the menstrual cup
  3. Patient who declines consent or is incapable of consent
  4. Presence of rectovaginal fistula (RVF) or combined RVF and VVF
  5. Fistula low in the vagina precluding collection of urine by the menstrual cup
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
11 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention (Menstrual Cup)

    The menstrual cup is a 100% silicone, flexible reservoir cup that, when inserted correctly in the vagina, is sanitary and efficacious in preventing leakage of menstrual blood and in eliminating odor.

    Device: Menstrual Cup

Interventions

  • DeviceMenstrual Cup
05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Volume of urinary leakage (in ml)

    Measured by 2-hr pad test

    Time frame: Over 2 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Acceptability of the menstrual cup

    Using a Likert scale with values ranging from 1-5, acceptability is reported based on ease of use, insertion, wearing, removal, and cleaning. A summarizing acceptability scale is not reported.

    Time frame: Over 2 hours

  2. Adverse events

    Erythema, edema/induration, erosion, bleeding assessed by clinical exam

    Time frame: Over 2 hours

  3. Rate of enrollment through study completion

    Number of individuals who enroll out of the total number of individuals screened

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. Rate of consent through study completion

    Number of individuals who complete the consent form out of the total number of screened individuals meeting all other inclusion and exclusion criteria

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  5. Perceived assessment of leakage with use of the menstrual cup

    Proportion of participants that perceive a reduction in leakage (either marked or slight) with use of the menstrual cup compared to their usual strategy for fistula management. This question uses likert-type responses to note whether the respondent perceives their urine leakage markedly improved, slightly improved, no change, slightly worse, or markedly worse.

    Time frame: After 1 hour of use

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Mercy Women's Catholic Hospital
    Mankessim, Central Region, Ghana
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Available as supplementary documents in publication

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03414060
Lead sponsor
University of Ghana Medical School
Collaborators
New York University, NYU Langone Health, Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 29, 2018
Start date
Aug 8, 2016
Primary completion
Dec 2, 2016
Completion
Dec 2, 2016
Last update
May 5, 2026

Study contacts

Gabriel YK Ganyaglo, MD
principal investigator · Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion