CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03403296Updated Jan 18, 2018

A Validation Study of Relationships Among Genomic Gene Expression Profile, Prognosis and Prediction of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Benefit With Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin in Gastric Cancer Stage II and III (6th AJCC) Patients After D2 Surgery (CLASSIC)

An observational study in Stage II-III Gastric Cancer, sponsored by Yonsei University. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-01-18.

Sponsored by Yonsei University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
640
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to validate a pre-defined single-patient classifier algorithm for predicting prognosis and benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy for patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy for stage II and III gastric cancer. This algorithm classifies gastric cancer into five groups according to its molecular characteristics based on RNA expression levels. The prognosis and response from adjuvant chemotherapy will be different according to prognostic and predictive clusters respectively based on these groups, thus this algorithm can identify as patients which will have benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy or which will not. Consequently, this algorithm can be translated into clinical practice to help doctors who decide the necessity of adjuvant chemotherapy after D2 gastrectomy for patients who had diagnosed stage II and III gastric cancer.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to validate a pre-defined single-patient classifier algorithm for predicting prognosis and benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy for patients who underwent D2 gastrectomy for stage II and III gastric cancer. This algorithm classifies gastric cancer into five groups according to its molecular characteristics based on RNA expression levels. The prognosis and response from adjuvant chemotherapy will be different according to prognostic and predictive clusters respectively based on these groups, thus this algorithm can identify as patients which will have benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy or which will not. Consequently, this algorithm can be translated into clinical practice to help doctors who decide the necessity of adjuvant chemotherapy after D2 gastrectomy for patients who had diagnosed stage II and III gastric cancer.

The cohort for this validation study is from patients who were enrolled the CLASSIC (Capecitabine and oxaliplatin Adjuvant Study in Stomach Cancer) trial, a randomized, open-label, multicenter, parallel-group, phase 3 study which compared the effect of adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) after D2 gastrectomy with surgery alone strategy. This trial was conducted between June, 2006 and June, 2009. The patient were from both surgery alone arm and surgery plus adjuvant XELOX arm, and have tumor blocks available for RNA extraction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stage II-III Gastric Cancer

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

approximately 640 FFPE sample blocks from patients among 1035 enrolled in the CLASSIC trial (satisfied with below criteria)

Inclusion criteria

  • aged 18 years or older
  • histologically confirmed, American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (6th edition) 2 stage II (T2N1, T1N2, T3N0), IIIA (T3N1, T2N2, T4N0), or IIIB (T3N2) gastric adenocarcinoma with no evidence of metastatic disease
  • previous D2 surgery with achieved R0 resection
  • Karnofsky performance status of >70%
  • adequate renal function (creatinine clearance >50 mL/min or serum creatinine ≤1·5 times the upper limit of normal), hepatic function (total bilirubin ≤1·5 times the upper limit of normal, aspartate or alanine aminotransferase ≤2·5 times the upper limit of normal), and hematological function (absolute neutrophil count ≥1·5 × 109/L or platelet count ≥100 × 109/L)
  • adequate hepatic function
  • formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor blocks, pathologic reports, and clinical information were all available.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiotherapy for GC prior to surgery
  • no available FFPE tumor blocks
  • insufficient RNA quality to be analyzed.
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
640 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • CLASSIC cohort

    Patients with stage II-III GC who underwent D2 resection were randomized (1:1) after surgery to receive adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin (eight three-week cycles of oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m² twice daily on days 1-14 plus intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² on day 1) for 6 months or observation alone. Assessment whether patients were disease free were done by abdominal CT or MRI and chest radiograph at regular intervals as planned by protocol.

    Genetic: nProfiler I Stomach Cancer Assay Kit

Interventions

  • GeneticnProfiler I Stomach Cancer Assay Kit

    qPCR by nProfiler I Stomach Cancer Assay Kit

    Also known as: nProfiler I Stomach Cancer Assay Kit (Novomics Co., Korea)

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. overall survival(OS)

    the time from randomization to the date of death from any cause.

    Time frame: 5 years

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine
    Seoul, 03722, Korea, Republic of
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Noh SH, Park SR, Yang HK, Chung HC, Chung IJ, Kim SW, Kim HH, Choi JH, Kim HK, Yu W, Lee JI, Shin DB, Ji J, Chen JS, Lim Y, Ha S, Bang YJ; CLASSIC trial investigators. Adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): 5-year follow-up of an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Nov;15(12):1389-96. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70473-5. Epub 2014 Oct 15. PubMed 25439693 ↗
  • Bang YJ, Kim YW, Yang HK, Chung HC, Park YK, Lee KH, Lee KW, Kim YH, Noh SI, Cho JY, Mok YJ, Kim YH, Ji J, Yeh TS, Button P, Sirzen F, Noh SH; CLASSIC trial investigators. Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): a phase 3 open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012 Jan 28;379(9813):315-21. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61873-4. Epub 2012 Jan 7. PubMed 22226517 ↗
  • Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, Kinoshita T, Fujii M, Nashimoto A, Furukawa H, Nakajima T, Ohashi Y, Imamura H, Higashino M, Yamamura Y, Kurita A, Arai K; ACTS-GC Group. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 1;357(18):1810-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa072252. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2008 May 1;358(18):1977. PubMed 17978289 ↗
  • Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature. 2014 Sep 11;513(7517):202-9. doi: 10.1038/nature13480. Epub 2014 Jul 23. PubMed 25079317 ↗
  • Cristescu R, Lee J, Nebozhyn M, Kim KM, Ting JC, Wong SS, Liu J, Yue YG, Wang J, Yu K, Ye XS, Do IG, Liu S, Gong L, Fu J, Jin JG, Choi MG, Sohn TS, Lee JH, Bae JM, Kim ST, Park SH, Sohn I, Jung SH, Tan P, Chen R, Hardwick J, Kang WK, Ayers M, Hongyue D, Reinhard C, Loboda A, Kim S, Aggarwal A. Molecular analysis of gastric cancer identifies subtypes associated with distinct clinical outcomes. Nat Med. 2015 May;21(5):449-56. doi: 10.1038/nm.3850. Epub 2015 Apr 20. PubMed 25894828 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03403296
Lead sponsor
Yonsei University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 18, 2018
Start date
Jul 13, 2016
Primary completion
Jul 12, 2017
Completion
Jul 12, 2017
Last update
Jan 18, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion