An interventional study of improved Warren-type style and Roux-en-Y style in Postcholecystectomy Syndrome, sponsored by Southwest Hospital, China. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-01-17.
Sponsored by Southwest Hospital, China · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
To observe and compare the short-term and long-term effects of different biliary and intestinal reconstruction methods for the treatment of congenital cystic dilatation of bile duct .
The purpose of the study: length of operation time, postoperative intestinal function recovery time as the main index, application prospective clinical study to observe the differences were followed by two different laparoscopic biliary intestinal kiss the short-term and long-term effect of the treatment of congenital cystic dilatation of the bile duct, provide a higher level of evidence based medicine dilatation of patients for congenital bile duct cysts. The choice of second is based on the study, effective, objective evaluation of different laparoscopic biliary enteric reconstruction for the treatment of congenital cystic dilatation of the bile duct is feasible, clear surgical indications, contraindications and summarized the technical points, establish guidelines for clinical diagnosis and treatment of congenital cystic dilation of the bile duct disease.
Exclusion Criteria:
Minimally invasive treatment improved Warren-type cholangiocarcinoma reconstruction is easy
Procedure: improved Warren-type style
Early open cholecystectomy reconstruction surgery using Roux-en-Y style
Procedure: Roux-en-Y style
Select 60 cases of biliary dilatation in patients undergoing laparoscopic cyst excision plus modified Warren cholangiobiliary reconstruction.
Select 60 cases of biliary dilatation in patients undergoing laparoscopic cyst excision Roux-en-Y cholangiobiliary reconstruction.
operation time
Two surgical methods operation time
Time frame: 2 years
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Jan 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Postcholecystectomy Syndrome
Southwest Hospital, China