ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03401099CRAFTUpdated Nov 13, 2023

Cryoballoon Ablation as First Line Treatment of Atrial Flutter

An interventional study of Radiofrequency ablation of CTI and Cryoballoon PVI in Atrial Flutter Typical, sponsored by Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. Completed at 10 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-13.

Sponsored by Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
113
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Current guidelines recommend radiofrequency catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus as treatment for symptomatic/drug-refractory atrial flutter, in spite of the fact that recurrences of flutter and incidence of post-ablation atrial fibrillation are common.

In this study, the investigators assess the hypothesis that the use of cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation ('novel' treatment) to achieve the electrical disconnection between the pulmonary veins and the heart will lead to higher rates of freedom from abnormal heart rhythms (atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, or atrial tachycardia) and more improved quality of life than treatment using heat energy (radiofrequency ablation) directed at the cavotricuspid isthmus ('conventional treatment').

Read the detailed description

Atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation are believed to share the same initiating triggers in the form of pulmonary vein ectopy. Cavo-tricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter almost always results from short bursts of antecedent atrial fibrillation. Radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI) is the current accepted first-line treatment for atrial flutter, although post-ablation atrial fibrillation commonly occurs, even in the absence of pre-existing atrial fibrillation.

Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) has become an established treatment for atrial fibrillation. In patients with both atrial flutter and fibrillation, PVI alone has been shown to control both types of atrial arrhythmia, with no benefit derived from supplemental RF CTI ablation.

This study aims to demonstrate that standalone cryoballoon PVI for typical atrial flutter without RF CTI ablation will lead to a significant difference in preventing recurrence of atrial arrhythmia compared to radiofrequency ablation of the CTI, and should be offered as first-line therapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Flutter Typical

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Radiofrequency ablation
  • Cavo-tricuspid isthmus
  • Pulmonary Vein Isolation
  • Cryoballoon ablation
03

In context

Atrial Flutter

223 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Flutter; 51 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 113 is below the median of 150 across 155 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Flutter.

Browse Atrial Flutter studies →

Lead sponsor

Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 33 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

    1. Age 18-80 years
    1. Patients referred for catheter ablation for typical atrial flutter. The atrial flutter may be either persistent or paroxysmal, with at least one episode having been documented on 12-lead . In the view of the treating physician, the ECG morphology should be compatible with a CTI-dependent circuit, either counterclockwise or clockwise.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    1. Any evidence of previously documented atrial fibrillation
    1. Previous cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation or atrial fibrillation ablation
    1. Atrial flutter documented solely on Ambulatory monitoring
    1. Atrial flutter morphology on suggestive of a left atrial flutter
    1. History of atrial flutter with 1:1 atrioventricular conduction and haemodynamic compromise
    1. Indwelling atrial-septal defect occluder device, or any anatomical reason that precludes left atrial access
    1. Left atrial diameter (PLAX M-mode) >5.5 cm
    1. Severe left ventricular dysfunction (LV \< 30% on Echocardiography)
    1. Recent stroke/ within 3 months
    1. Inability or unwillingness to take oral anticoagulant treatment
    1. Morbid obesity ( ≥40)
    1. Extreme frailty (A score of 7,8 or worse on the Clinical Frailty Scale)
    1. Implanted metal prosthetic valve(s) in mitral position
    1. Indwelling cardiac resynchronisation therapy device, pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator
    1. Advanced Renal dysfunction (\<30 ml/min)
    1. Pregnancy
    1. Severe valvular heart disease of any kind as assessed by the investigator
    1. Previous valve replacement surgery or other prosthetic heart valve
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
113 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Radiofrequency ablation of CTI

    Radiofrequency ablation of CTI (cavo-tricuspid isthmus), which is the 'conventional' treatment of atrial flutter

    Procedure: Radiofrequency ablation of CTI

  • Active comparator
    Cryoballoon PVI

    Cryoballoon PVI (Pulmonary Vein Isolation), which is the 'novel treatment'

    Procedure: Cryoballoon PVI

Interventions

  • ProcedureRadiofrequency ablation of CTI

    Delivery of radiofrequency energy to the cavotricuspid isthmus (region of right atrial tissue between the tricuspid annulus and the inferior vena cava) until bidirectional block is achieved

    Also known as: CTI ablation

  • ProcedureCryoballoon PVI

    Cryoballoon application to the pulmonary veins aiming for Pulmonary Vein Isolation

    Also known as: Cryoablation Pulmonary Vein Isolation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to first recurrence of sustained, symptomatic supraventricular arrhythmia (Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter or Atrial Tachycardia) following a blanking period of 4 weeks after a single ablation procedure

    'Sustained' is defined as lasting \>30 seconds. 'Symptomatic' is defined as acute onset awareness of palpitations, breathlessness, dizziness, fatigue or chest pain associated with patient activation of the loop recorder.

    Time frame: After 4 weeks of ablation treatment (blanking period) up to 12 months of follow up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to first symptomatic or asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation lasting ≥2 min

    How long it takes until first occurrence of atrial fibrillation (associated with symptoms or no symptoms) lasting 2 or more minutes after blanking period. Two minutes is the minimum duration detectable by the loop recorder

    Time frame: After 4 weeks of ablation treatment (blanking period) up to 12 months of follow up

  2. Total Burden of Atrial fibrillation over 12 months

    The total occurrence of atrial fibrillation recorded by the loop recorder (symptomatic or asymptomatic) during the follow-up period

    Time frame: After 4 weeks of ablation treatment (blanking period) up to 12 months of follow up

  3. Time to first symptomatic or asymptomatic atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia

    Occurrence of atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia with/without symptoms following the blanking period

    Time frame: After 4 weeks of ablation treatment (blanking period) up to 12 months of follow up

  4. Incidence of any significant arrhythmia

    Incidence of any arrhythmia requiring medical visit to primary or secondary care, or hospitalisation, or leading to death

    Time frame: After first ablation procedure, through study completion, an average of 12 months

  5. Total burden of abnormal heart rhythm measured by the implantable loop recorder

    Total arrhythmic burden up to end of follow up or up to time of intervention (either cardioversion or ablation), whichever comes first.

    Time frame: After first ablation procedure through study completion or time of intervention, whichever comes first, assessed up to 12 months

  6. Incidence of repeat electrophysiological interventional procedure (repeat catheter ablation, or DCCV) over the follow-up period.

    Occurrence of repeat ablations/cardioversion

    Time frame: After 4 weeks of ablation treatment (blanking period) up to 12 months of follow up

  7. Incidence of procedural complications

    Composite of cardiac tamponade requiring drainage, persistent phrenic nerve palsy lasting \>24 hours, serious vascular complications requiring intervention or delaying discharge, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, requirement for a permanent pacemaker, atrio-esophageal fistula, or death

    Time frame: During and after ablation procedure, through study completion, an average of 12 months

  8. Incidence of all-cause hospitalisations

    Any hospital admission post-ablation

    Time frame: After first ablation procedure, through study completion, an average of 12 months

  9. Quality of Life questionnaire

    Quality of life as assessed by the standard EuroQol Group's 5-dimensional questionnaire. This comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) and the visual analogue scale. The single digits for the five dimensions will be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.

    Time frame: At baseline and at 12 months

  10. Procedural duration

    Duration of ablation measured in minutes for either treatment

    Time frame: Only during the first ablation procedure

  11. Total Fluoroscopy times

    The total time in minutes during which patient will be exposed to radiation under each of the two treatment techniques

    Time frame: Only during the first ablation procedure

07

Study locations

10 sites
  • University Hospital Basel
    Basel, Switzerland
  • University Hospital Inselspital Bern
    Bern, Switzerland
  • Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
    Papworth Everard, Cambridge CB23 3RE, United Kingdom
  • Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
    Leeds, United Kingdom
  • Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
    Liverpool, L14 3PE, United Kingdom
  • Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe Hospital
    Manchester, M23 9LT, United Kingdom
  • South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, James Cook University Hospital
    Middlesbrough, TS4 3BW, United Kingdom
  • The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Freeman Hospital
    Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, United Kingdom
  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital
    Oxford, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
  • University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust
    Plymouth, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wazni O, Marrouche NF, Martin DO, Gillinov AM, Saliba W, Saad E, Klein A, Bhargava M, Bash D, Schweikert R, Erciyes D, Abdul-Karim A, Brachman J, Gunther J, Pisano E, Potenza D, Fanelli R, Natale A. Randomized study comparing combined pulmonary vein-left atrial junction disconnection and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation versus pulmonary vein-left atrial junction disconnection alone in patients presenting with typical atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2003 Nov 18;108(20):2479-83. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000101684.88679.AB. Epub 2003 Nov 10. PubMed 14610012 ↗
  • Schneider R, Lauschke J, Tischer T, Schneider C, Voss W, Moehlenkamp F, Glass A, Diedrich D, Bansch D. Pulmonary vein triggers play an important role in the initiation of atrial flutter: Initial results from the prospective randomized Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Atrial Flutter (Triple A) trial. Heart Rhythm. 2015 May;12(5):865-71. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.01.040. Epub 2015 Jan 28. PubMed 25638698 ↗
  • De Bortoli A, Shi LB, Ohm OJ, Hoff PI, Schuster P, Solheim E, Chen J. Incidence and clinical predictors of subsequent atrial fibrillation requiring additional ablation after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for typical atrial flutter. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2017 Jun;51(3):123-128. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2017.1304570. Epub 2017 Mar 23. PubMed 28335638 ↗
  • Gupta D, Ding WY, Calvert P, Williams E, Das M, Tovmassian L, Tayebjee MH, Haywood G, Martin CA, Rajappan K, Bates MGD, Temple IP, Reichlin T, Chen Z, Balasubramaniam RN, Ronayne C, Clarkson N, Morgan M, Barton J, Kemp I, Mahida S, Sticherling C. Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation as First-Line Treatment for Typical Atrial Flutter. Heart. 2023 Feb 14;109(5):364-371. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321729. PubMed 36396438 ↗
  • Ding WY, Williams E, Das M, Tovmassian L, Tayebjee M, Haywood G, Martin C, Rajappan K, Bates M, Temple IP, Reichlin T, Chen Z, Balasubramaniam R, Ronayne C, Clarkson N, Mahida S, Sticherling C, Gupta D. Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation as first line treatment for typical atrial flutter (CRAFT): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Apr;60(3):427-432. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00746-6. Epub 2020 May 8. PubMed 32385774 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is no plan to share Individual Participant Data with other researchers. Supporting information that will be shared are only: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), and Clinical Study Report (CSR) Data will be available after about 6 months for about 5 years. Criteria for which Individual Participant Data and any additional supporting information will be shared, including with whom, for what types of analyses, and by what mechanism: These will be shared with research co-workers, for results, statistical analysis and conclusions. Communication of anonymized data will be done via secure mails and emails.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2018 to primary completion in Dec 2021, 39 months.

Of 55 interventional studies with no phase under Atrial Flutter, half reached primary completion within 31 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 63. This study's 39 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 14, 2017
First posted
Jan 17, 2018
StartActual
Aug 17, 2018
Primary completionActual
Dec 1, 2021
CompletionActual
Nov 1, 2023
Last update
Nov 13, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 13, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03401099
Lead sponsor
Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Collaborators
Medtronic International Trading Sarl
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 17, 2018
Start date
Aug 17, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2021
Completion
Nov 1, 2023
Last update
Nov 13, 2023

Study contacts

Dhiraj Gupta, MBBS MD FRCP
study chair · Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion