ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03400033Updated Jul 12, 2021Results posted

Anemia Studies in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD): Erythropoiesis Via a Novel Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor (PHI) Daprodustat-Three-times Weekly Dosing in Dialysis (ASCEND-TD)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Daprodustat tablets and Matching placebo tablets in Anaemia, sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline. Completed at 91 sites in 13 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-07-12.

Sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
407
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 30 studies testing GSK1278863 in Anemia — 1 open to participants now, 1 under way, 1 of them phase 3. GSK1278863 · Anemia.

Enrollment
4th of 30
407 · median 76
Started
2018
with 2 others
Phase 3
9 of 30
1 open now
Registered
22nd of 30
by date
Lead sponsor
28 of 30
GlaxoSmithKline

Among the 30 studies testing GSK1278863 in Anemia, this one is the 4th largest by enrollment, is one of 3 that started in 2018, is one of 9 in phase 3, and was the 22nd registered.

Anemia

1,810 studies on the registry are indexed under Anemia; 215 are open to participants now.

Browse Anemia studies →

Open to participants now

1 of the 30 studies testing GSK1278863 in Anemia is open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

About GSK1278863

GSK1278863: first FDA approval 2023 (JESDUVROQ). What it is approved for, and how studies give it, is on its page →

Who these studies take

Of the 122 Anemia studies recruiting now, 67 (55%) set no upper age limit and 37 (30%) stop at 75 or younger; 34 take children under 18; 23 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 99 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 30 studies testing GSK1278863 in Anemia, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This Phase 3 study in hemodialysis-dependent subjects with anemia will evaluate the efficacy and safety of daprodustat administered three-times weekly compared to epoetin alfa, the current standard of care. This study includes a 4 week Screening Period, a 52 week Treatment Period and a 4 to 6 week follow-up period. Each subject will remain in the study for up to 62 weeks. Approximately 402 subjects will be randomized to receive either daprodustat three times weekly or epoetin alfa three-times weekly or once weekly, depending on dose level.

03

Conditions studied

  • Anaemia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • CKD, EPO, rhEPO, Hemodialysis dependent, Daprodustat
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject must be 18 to 99 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the .
  • Use of any approved rhEPO or analog for at least 8 weeks prior to the screening visit and continuing during the screening period until randomization (Day 1).
  • concentration (measured by HemoCue) within the following range: Week -4: Hgb 8 to 11.5 grams/deciliter (5 to 7.1 millimoles/liter). If Hgb is 11.6 to 11.9 grams/deciliter (7.2 to 7.4 millimoles/liter), up to two retests are allowed; the retest value must be between 8 to 11.5 grams/deciliter (5 to 7.1 millimoles/liter). Day 1: Hgb 8 to 11 grams/deciliter (5 to 6.8 millimoles/liter) and receiving at least the minimum rhEPO or analog dose 3. Hgb>11 to 11.5 grams/deciliter (6.8 to 7.1 millimoles/liter) and receiving greater than the minimum rhEPO or analog dose 3.
  • On hemodialysis (including hemofiltration or hemodiafiltration) >90 days prior to screening and continuing during the screening period.
  • On hemodialysis (in-center) >=3 times per week.
  • Male and female subjects are eligible. A female subject is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant, not breastfeeding, and at least one of the following conditions applies: Not a woman of (WOCBP), or A WOCBP who agrees to follow the guidance from at least 28 days prior to first dose of study treatment and for at least 28 days after the last dose of study treatment.
  • Capable of giving signed informed consent.
  • In France, a subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study if he or she is either affiliated to or beneficiary of a social security category.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Planned living-related or living-unrelated kidney transplant within 52 weeks after randomization (Day 1).
  • Ferritin: \<=100 nanograms/milliliter (\<=100 micrograms/liter), at screening.
  • Transferrin saturation (TSAT): \<=20 percent, at screening. If TSAT is 18 to 20 percent, then a retest using a new blood sample can be obtained within 7 days of the final laboratory report; the final retest value must be >20 percent to confirm eligibility.
  • Aplasias: History of bone marrow aplasia or pure red cell aplasia.
  • Conditions, other than anemia of CKD, which can affect erythropoiesis.
  • Myocardial infarction (MI) or acute coronary syndrome within 8 weeks prior to screening through to randomization (Day 1).
  • Stroke or within 8 weeks prior to screening through to randomization (Day 1).
  • Heart failure (HF): Chronic Class IV HF, as defined by the (NYHA) functional classification system.
  • Current uncontrolled hypertension as determined by the investigator that would contraindicate the use of rhEPO.
  • Bazett's correction of (QTcB): at Day 1: QTcB >500 milliseconds, or QTcB >530 milliseconds in subjects with bundle branch block. There is no QTc (corrected QT) exclusion for subjects with a predominantly ventricular paced rhythm.
  • Liver Disease: presence of any one of the following liver-related laboratory values or conditions, at screening, is exclusionary: >2x (ULN); >1.5x ULN; or Current unstable liver or biliary disease per investigator assessment, generally defined by the presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminemia, esophageal or gastric varices, persistent jaundice, or cirrhosis.
  • Evidence of actively bleeding gastric, duodenal or esophageal ulcer disease OR gastro intestinal bleeding \<= 8 weeks prior to screening through to randomization (Day 1).
  • History of within 2 years prior to screening through to randomization (Day 1), currently receiving treatment for cancer, or complex kidney cyst (e.g., Bosniak Category IIF, III or IV) >3 centimeters.
  • Use of a strong inhibitor of Cytochrome P4502C8 [CYP2C8] (e.g. gemfibrozil) or a strong inducer of CYP2C8 (e.g. rifampin/rifampicin).
  • History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions or to in the product (daprodustat) or epoetin alfa.
  • Use of another investigational agent within 30 days or within five half-lives of the investigational agent (whichever is longer) or currently participating in a study of an investigational device prior to screening through to randomization (Day 1).
  • Any prior treatment with daprodustat for treatment duration of >30 days.
  • Any other condition, clinical or laboratory abnormality, or examination finding that the investigator considers would put the subject at unacceptable risk, which may affect study compliance (e.g. intolerance to rhEPO) or prevent understanding of the aims or investigational procedures or possible consequences of the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(15)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
407 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Daprodustat

    Subjects randomized to this arm will receive daprodustat tablets titrated doses from 2 to 48 milligrams orally three-times weekly along with saline by IV route for the 52 weeks treatment period.

    Drug: Daprodustat tablets · Drug: Saline vials or bags

  • Active comparator
    Epoetin alfa

    Subjects randomized to this arm will receive matching placebo tablets to daprodustat orally three-times weekly and Epoetin alfa by IV route for the 52 weeks treatment period.

    Drug: Matching placebo tablets · Drug: Epoetin alfa vials

Interventions

  • Round, biconvex, white, film-coated tablet in unit dose strengths 2 and 4 milligrams (7 millimeter tablets), 6, 8 and 10 milligrams (9 millimeter tablets) administered by the oral route.

  • DrugMatching placebo tablets

    Matching placebo to daprodustat tablets supplied as round, biconvex, white, film-coated tablet in unit dose strengths 2 and 4 milligrams (7 millimeter tablets), 6, 8 and 10 milligrams (9 millimeter tablets) administered by the oral route.

  • DrugEpoetin alfa vials

    Single-dose, preservative-free vials in unit dose strengths of 2000, 3000, 4000 and 10,000 Units/milliliter administered by the IV route.

  • DrugSaline vials or bags

    0.9% sodium chloride saline vials or bags administered by the IV route.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels Over the Evaluation Period (Week 28 to Week 52)

    Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements. Hemoglobin during the evaluation period was defined as the mean of all available post-randomization hemoglobin values (on and off-treatment) during the evaluation period (Week 28 to Week 52). For the primary analysis, the missing post-Baseline hemoglobin values were imputed using pre-specified multiple imputations. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as the average of post-randomization values during the evaluation period minus Baseline value. Analysis was performed using the Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with terms for treatment, Baseline hemoglobin, and region.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and evaluation period (Week 28 to Week 52)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Average Monthly On-treatment Intravenous (IV) Iron Dose Per Participant

    Average monthly IV iron dose (mg) per participant during Day 1 to Week 52 was determined by calculating the total IV iron dose per participant from Day 1 to Week 52 while the participant was on study treatment and dividing by (the number of days the participant was on study treatment divided by 30.4375 days). Analysis was performed using the ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, Baseline monthly IV iron dose, and region.

    Time frame: Day 1 to Week 52

  2. Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as the post-randomization visit value minus Baseline value. Analysis was performed using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) model fitted to hemoglobin data collected after Baseline up to Week 52, excluding values collected during the stabilization period (Day 1 to Week 28). The model included factors for treatment, time, region, Baseline hemoglobin and Baseline hemoglobin by time and treatment by time interaction terms.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 52

  3. Percentage of Time With Hemoglobin in the Analysis Range (10 to 11.5 Grams/Deciliter) Over Evaluation Period (Week 28 to Week 52)

    Participants received treatment during the study to achieve or maintain hemoglobin level in the target range. Percentage of time for which hemoglobin level was maintained within the analysis range (10 to 11.5 grams/deciliter) has been presented.

    Time frame: Week 28 to Week 52

  4. Number of Hemoglobin Responders in the Hemoglobin Analysis Range (10 to 11.5 Grams/Deciliter) Over Evaluation Period (Week 28 to Week 52)

    Mean hemoglobin during the evaluation period was defined as the mean of all evaluable hemoglobin values during the evaluation period (Week 28 to Week 52) including any evaluable unscheduled hemoglobin values that were taken during this time period. Hemoglobin responders were defined as the number of participants with a mean hemoglobin during the evaluation period that falls within the hemoglobin analysis range of 10-11.5 grams/deciliter.

    Time frame: Week 28 to Week 52

  5. Percentage of Participants Permanently Stopping Study Treatment Due to Meeting Rescue Criteria

    Percentage of participants permanently stopping study treatment due to meeting rescue criteria has been presented.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

  6. Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) at Week 52

    Measurements for SBP, DBP and MAP were taken with the participant in a semi-supine or seated position in the dialysis chair after at least a 5-minute rest period. MAP is the average BP in an individual's arteries during a single cardiac cycle. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as the on-treatment visit value minus Baseline value. Analysis was performed using MMRM model with treatment group, time, region, Baseline value, Baseline value\*time, treatment group\*time as variables.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week -4 ) and Week 52

  7. Change From Baseline in SBP, DBP and MAP at End of Treatment

    Measurements for SBP, DBP and MAP were taken with the participant in a semi-supine or seated position in the dialysis chair after at least a 5-minute rest period. MAP is the average BP in an individual's arteries during a single cardiac cycle. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as the last on-treatment visit value minus Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model with terms for treatment group, region and Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error have been presented.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week -4) and end of treatment (last on-treatment value until Week 52)

  8. Blood Pressure (BP) Exacerbation Event Rate Per 100 Participant Years

    BP exacerbation event is defined (based on post-dialysis BP) as SBP \>=25 mmHg increased from Baseline or SBP \>=180 mmHg; or DBP \>=15 mmHg increased from Baseline or DBP \>=110 mmHg. The BP exacerbation events per 100 participant years was estimated using the Negative Binomial Model.

    Time frame: Up to 52 weeks

  9. Number of Participants With at Least One BP Exacerbation Event During the Study

    BP exacerbation (based on post-dialysis BP) is defined as: SBP \>= 25 mmHg increased from Baseline or SBP \>=180mmHg; or DBP \>=15 mmHg increase from Baseline or DBP \>=110 mmHg. Number of participants with at least 1 BP exacerbation event have been reported.

    Time frame: Up to 52 weeks

  10. Change From Baseline at Weeks 8, 12, 28 and 52 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)

    The PGI-S is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of disease severity of their anemia of Chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is measured on a 5-point disease severity scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 4 (very severe), higher score indicates more disease severity. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in on-treatment PGI-S scores was defined as the on-treatment visit value minus Baseline value. Analysis was performed using MMRM model fitted from Baseline up to Week 52 with factors for treatment, time, region, Baseline value and Baseline value by time and treatment by time interactions.

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Weeks 8, 12, 28, 52

  11. Pre-dose Trough Concentration (Ctau) of Daprodustat (GSK1278863) and Its Metabolites GSK2391220 (M2), GSK2487818 (M4), GSK2506102 (M5), GSK2506104 (M3), GSK2531398 (M6) and GSK2531401 (M13)

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of daprodustat (GSK1278863) and its metabolites: GSK2391220 (M2), GSK2487818 (M4), GSK2506102 (M5), GSK2506104 (M3), GSK2531398 (M6) and GSK2531401 (M13).

    Time frame: Pre-dose on Day 1; Pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post-dose on any one post-Baseline visit day between Week 8 and Week 52

  12. Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Daprodustat (GSK1278863) and Its Metabolites GSK2391220 (M2), GSK2487818 (M4), GSK2506102 (M5), GSK2506104 (M3), GSK2531398 (M6) and GSK2531401 (M13)

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of daprodustat (GSK1278863) and its metabolites: GSK2391220 (M2), GSK2487818 (M4), GSK2506102 (M5), GSK2506104 (M3), GSK2531398 (M6) and GSK2531401 (M13).

    Time frame: Pre-dose on Day 1; Pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post-dose on any one post-Baseline visit day between Week 8 and Week 52

07

Results

Posted Jul 12, 2021

Participant flow

This was a multicenter study conducted at 90 centers in 13 countries. Participants were randomized to receive either Daprodustat or Epoetin alfa.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDaprodustatEpoetin Alfa
Started270137
Completed269135
Not completed12
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject12

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels Over the Evaluation Period (Week 28 to Week 52)

Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements. Hemoglobin during the evaluation period was defined as the mean of all available post-randomization hemoglobin values (on and off-treatment) during the evaluation period (Week 28 to Week 52). For the primary analysis, the missing post-Baseline hemoglobin values were imputed using pre-specified multiple imputations. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as the average of post-randomization values during the evaluation period minus Baseline value. Analysis was performed using the Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with terms for treatment, Baseline hemoglobin, and region.

Time frame:
Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and evaluation period (Week 28 to Week 52)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Grams per deciliter (g/dL)
Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels Over the Evaluation Period (Week 28 to Week 52)
Grams per deciliter (g/dL)DaprodustatEpoetin Alfa
Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels Over the Evaluation Period (Week 28 to Week 52)-0.04 ± 0.0450.02 ± 0.066
Statistical analysis
  • Daprodustat vs Epoetin Alfa · Least square (ls) mean difference: -0.05 · 95% CI -0.21 to 0.10
SecondaryMean Average Monthly On-treatment Intravenous (IV) Iron Dose Per Participant

Average monthly IV iron dose (mg) per participant during Day 1 to Week 52 was determined by calculating the total IV iron dose per participant from Day 1 to Week 52 while the participant was on study treatment and dividing by (the number of days the participant was on study treatment divided by 30.4375 days). Analysis was performed using the ANCOVA model with terms for treatment, Baseline monthly IV iron dose, and region.

Time frame:
Day 1 to Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Milligrams
Mean Average Monthly On-treatment Intravenous (IV) Iron Dose Per Participant
MilligramsDaprodustatEpoetin Alfa
Mean Average Monthly On-treatment Intravenous (IV) Iron Dose Per Participant98.11 ± 11.049106.23 ± 15.569
Statistical analysis
  • Daprodustat vs Epoetin Alfa · ANCOVA · p = 0.3354 · Ls mean difference: -8.12 · 95% CI -45.66 to 29.41
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels at Week 52

Blood samples were collected from participants for hemoglobin measurements. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as the post-randomization visit value minus Baseline value. Analysis was performed using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) model fitted to hemoglobin data collected after Baseline up to Week 52, excluding values collected during the stabilization period (Day 1 to Week 28). The model included factors for treatment, time, region, Baseline hemoglobin and Baseline hemoglobin by time and treatment by time interaction terms.

Time frame:
Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Grams per deciliter
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels at Week 52
Grams per deciliterDaprodustatEpoetin Alfa
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Levels at Week 52-0.03 ± 0.0690.11 ± 0.098
Statistical analysis
  • Daprodustat vs Epoetin Alfa · Ls mean difference: -0.14 · 95% CI -0.37 to 0.10
SecondaryPercentage of Time With Hemoglobin in the Analysis Range (10 to 11.5 Grams/Deciliter) Over Evaluation Period (Week 28 to Week 52)

Participants received treatment during the study to achieve or maintain hemoglobin level in the target range. Percentage of time for which hemoglobin level was maintained within the analysis range (10 to 11.5 grams/deciliter) has been presented.

Time frame:
Week 28 to Week 52
Reported as:
Median · Percentage of days
Percentage of Time With Hemoglobin in the Analysis Range (10 to 11.5 Grams/Deciliter) Over Evaluation Period (Week 28 to Week 52)
Percentage of daysDaprodustatEpoetin Alfa
Percentage of Time With Hemoglobin in the Analysis Range (10 to 11.5 Grams/Deciliter) Over Evaluation Period (Week 28 to Week 52)70.83 (50.98 to 91.07)61.76 (29.69 to 85.19)
Statistical analysis
  • Daprodustat vs Epoetin Alfa · Van Elteren's test · p = 0.0034 · Median difference (final values): 11.18 · 95% CI 2.83 to 19.56Hodges-Lehmann Estimate of Treatment Difference has been reported.
SecondaryNumber of Hemoglobin Responders in the Hemoglobin Analysis Range (10 to 11.5 Grams/Deciliter) Over Evaluation Period (Week 28 to Week 52)

Mean hemoglobin during the evaluation period was defined as the mean of all evaluable hemoglobin values during the evaluation period (Week 28 to Week 52) including any evaluable unscheduled hemoglobin values that were taken during this time period. Hemoglobin responders were defined as the number of participants with a mean hemoglobin during the evaluation period that falls within the hemoglobin analysis range of 10-11.5 grams/deciliter.

Time frame:
Week 28 to Week 52
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Hemoglobin Responders in the Hemoglobin Analysis Range (10 to 11.5 Grams/Deciliter) Over Evaluation Period (Week 28 to Week 52)
ParticipantsDaprodustatEpoetin Alfa
Number of Hemoglobin Responders in the Hemoglobin Analysis Range (10 to 11.5 Grams/Deciliter) Over Evaluation Period (Week 28 to Week 52)17268
Statistical analysis
  • Daprodustat vs Epoetin Alfa · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0007 · Difference in response rate: 0.1645 · 95% CI 0.06 to 0.27
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Permanently Stopping Study Treatment Due to Meeting Rescue Criteria

Percentage of participants permanently stopping study treatment due to meeting rescue criteria has been presented.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Permanently Stopping Study Treatment Due to Meeting Rescue Criteria
Percentage of participantsDaprodustatEpoetin Alfa
Percentage of Participants Permanently Stopping Study Treatment Due to Meeting Rescue Criteria2.22.2
Statistical analysis
  • Daprodustat vs Epoetin Alfa · Wald test · p = 0.5308 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.06 · 95% CI 0.26 to 4.22Hazard ratio is estimated using a Cox proportional hazard regression model adjusted for treatment group and region.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) at Week 52

Measurements for SBP, DBP and MAP were taken with the participant in a semi-supine or seated position in the dialysis chair after at least a 5-minute rest period. MAP is the average BP in an individual's arteries during a single cardiac cycle. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as the on-treatment visit value minus Baseline value. Analysis was performed using MMRM model with treatment group, time, region, Baseline value, Baseline value\*time, treatment group\*time as variables.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week -4 ) and Week 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) at Week 52
Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)DaprodustatEpoetin Alfa
SBP-3.18 ± 1.4700.55 ± 2.252
DBP-2.52 ± 0.764-0.29 ± 1.176
MAP-2.72 ± 0.907-0.12 ± 1.389
Statistical analysis
  • Daprodustat vs Epoetin Alfa · MMRM · p = 0.083 · Ls mean difference: -3.73 · 95% CI -9.03 to 1.56SBP
  • Daprodustat vs Epoetin Alfa · MMRM · p = 0.057 · Ls mean difference: -2.23 · 95% CI -4.99 to 0.54DBP
  • Daprodustat vs Epoetin Alfa · MMRM · p = 0.059 · Ls mean difference: -2.60 · 95% CI -5.86 to 0.67MAP
SecondaryChange From Baseline in SBP, DBP and MAP at End of Treatment

Measurements for SBP, DBP and MAP were taken with the participant in a semi-supine or seated position in the dialysis chair after at least a 5-minute rest period. MAP is the average BP in an individual's arteries during a single cardiac cycle. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as the last on-treatment visit value minus Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model with terms for treatment group, region and Baseline value. Adjusted mean and standard error have been presented.

Time frame:
Baseline (Week -4) and end of treatment (last on-treatment value until Week 52)
Reported as:
Mean · Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)
Change From Baseline in SBP, DBP and MAP at End of Treatment
Millimeter of mercury (mmHg)DaprodustatEpoetin Alfa
SBP-1.4 ± 1.24-0.9 ± 1.75
DBP-1.8 ± 0.66-0.8 ± 0.93
MAP-1.7 ± 0.78-0.8 ± 1.09
Statistical analysis
  • Daprodustat vs Epoetin Alfa · ANCOVA · p = 0.407 · Mean difference (net): -0.50 · 95% CI -4.73 to 3.72SBP
  • Daprodustat vs Epoetin Alfa · ANCOVA · p = 0.179 · Mean difference (net): -1.05 · 95% CI -3.29 to 1.19DBP
  • Daprodustat vs Epoetin Alfa · ANCOVA · p = 0.261 · Mean difference (net): -0.86 · 95% CI -3.50 to 1.78MAP
SecondaryBlood Pressure (BP) Exacerbation Event Rate Per 100 Participant Years

BP exacerbation event is defined (based on post-dialysis BP) as SBP \>=25 mmHg increased from Baseline or SBP \>=180 mmHg; or DBP \>=15 mmHg increased from Baseline or DBP \>=110 mmHg. The BP exacerbation events per 100 participant years was estimated using the Negative Binomial Model.

Time frame:
Up to 52 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Events per 100 participant years
Blood Pressure (BP) Exacerbation Event Rate Per 100 Participant Years
Events per 100 participant yearsDaprodustatEpoetin Alfa
Blood Pressure (BP) Exacerbation Event Rate Per 100 Participant Years250.45 (210.69 to 297.72)356.91 (280.95 to 453.41)
Statistical analysis
  • Daprodustat vs Epoetin Alfa · Negative binomial model · p = 0.0093 · Ratio of exacerbation rate: 0.70 · 95% CI 0.52 to 0.94
SecondaryNumber of Participants With at Least One BP Exacerbation Event During the Study

BP exacerbation (based on post-dialysis BP) is defined as: SBP \>= 25 mmHg increased from Baseline or SBP \>=180mmHg; or DBP \>=15 mmHg increase from Baseline or DBP \>=110 mmHg. Number of participants with at least 1 BP exacerbation event have been reported.

Time frame:
Up to 52 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With at Least One BP Exacerbation Event During the Study
ParticipantsDaprodustatEpoetin Alfa
Number of Participants With at Least One BP Exacerbation Event During the Study15191
SecondaryChange From Baseline at Weeks 8, 12, 28 and 52 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)

The PGI-S is a 1-item questionnaire designed to assess participant's impression of disease severity of their anemia of Chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is measured on a 5-point disease severity scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 4 (very severe), higher score indicates more disease severity. Baseline value was the latest non-missing pre-dose assessment on or before the randomization date, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline in on-treatment PGI-S scores was defined as the on-treatment visit value minus Baseline value. Analysis was performed using MMRM model fitted from Baseline up to Week 52 with factors for treatment, time, region, Baseline value and Baseline value by time and treatment by time interactions.

Time frame:
Baseline (Pre-dose on Day 1) and Weeks 8, 12, 28, 52
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Scores on a scale
Change From Baseline at Weeks 8, 12, 28 and 52 in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)
Scores on a scaleDaprodustatEpoetin Alfa
Week 8; n=248, 126-0.10 ± 0.0480.05 ± 0.068
Week 12; n=243, 120-0.13 ± 0.050-0.01 ± 0.071
Week 28; n=211, 106-0.07 ± 0.0540.03 ± 0.077
Week 52; n=170, 85-0.11 ± 0.0630.04 ± 0.088
Statistical analysis
  • Daprodustat vs Epoetin Alfa · MMRM · p = 0.0323 · Ls mean difference: -0.15 · 95% CI -0.32 to 0.01Week 8
  • Daprodustat vs Epoetin Alfa · MMRM · p = 0.0921 · Ls mean difference: -0.12 · 95% CI -0.29 to 0.06Week 12
  • Daprodustat vs Epoetin Alfa · MMRM · p = 0.1291 · Ls mean difference: -0.11 · 95% CI -0.29 to 0.08Week 28
  • Daprodustat vs Epoetin Alfa · MMRM · p = 0.0859 · Ls mean difference: -0.15 · 95% CI -0.36 to 0.06Week 52
SecondaryPre-dose Trough Concentration (Ctau) of Daprodustat (GSK1278863) and Its Metabolites GSK2391220 (M2), GSK2487818 (M4), GSK2506102 (M5), GSK2506104 (M3), GSK2531398 (M6) and GSK2531401 (M13)

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of daprodustat (GSK1278863) and its metabolites: GSK2391220 (M2), GSK2487818 (M4), GSK2506102 (M5), GSK2506104 (M3), GSK2531398 (M6) and GSK2531401 (M13).

Time frame:
Pre-dose on Day 1; Pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post-dose on any one post-Baseline visit day between Week 8 and Week 52
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Nanograms per milliliter
Pre-dose Trough Concentration (Ctau) of Daprodustat (GSK1278863) and Its Metabolites GSK2391220 (M2), GSK2487818 (M4), GSK2506102 (M5), GSK2506104 (M3), GSK2531398 (M6) and GSK2531401 (M13)
Nanograms per milliliterDaprodustat 2 mgDaprodustat 4 mgDaprodustat 8 mgDaprodustat 12 mgDaprodustat 16 mgDaprodustat 20 mgDaprodustat 24 mgDaprodustat 32 mgDaprodustat 48 mg
Daprodustat; n=1, 2, 10, 18, 14, 9, 6, 3, 26.2400 ± NA1.1207 ± 494.710.1786 ± 77.350.3727 ± 277.880.3443 ± 100.780.3871 ± 161.050.1621 ± 42.170.2768 ± 140.820.3486 ± 68.34
GSK2391220; n=4, 17,42, 57, 40, 25, 16, 3, 30.8623 ± 241.170.5893 ± 255.590.6341 ± 123.921.1572 ± 184.511.1654 ± 191.571.1792 ± 168.591.4987 ± 136.351.6974 ± 6.821.3531 ± 19.28
GSK2487818; n=1, 4, 5, 20, 14, 7, 4, 3, 20.3620 ± NA0.2867 ± 111.670.1594 ± 16.910.2996 ± 105.550.3027 ± 69.120.2868 ± 109.230.2585 ± 30.720.2414 ± 29.660.2111 ± 80.56
GSK2506102; n=4, 17, 45, 59, 43, 27, 16, 3, 30.9951 ± 122.940.8372 ± 121.270.9634 ± 95.991.5100 ± 105.501.5480 ± 122.951.6555 ± 133.943.2099 ± 67.361.6892 ± 30.441.8595 ± 48.36
GSK2506104; n=6, 17, 45, 59, 43, 27, 16, 3, 30.9750 ± 408.491.9588 ± 163.272.0381 ± 124.743.5141 ± 136.723.3872 ± 182.273.6000 ± 173.626.5730 ± 99.824.2068 ± 15.444.1894 ± 23.78
GSK2531398; n=2, 7, 22, 41, 33, 20, 15, 3, 31.1778 ± 20.550.6069 ± 271.480.2362 ± 76.760.4444 ± 144.990.3917 ± 169.770.3728 ± 197.510.3992 ± 153.150.3963 ± 16.520.2280 ± 56.68
GSK2531401; n=6, 17, 45, 59, 44, 27, 16, 3, 31.4466 ± 190.803.5579 ± 102.684.0910 ± 148.036.8137 ± 102.345.6037 ± 130.978.4611 ± 128.7411.7372 ± 65.376.0453 ± 140.6316.2584 ± 41.06
SecondaryMaximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Daprodustat (GSK1278863) and Its Metabolites GSK2391220 (M2), GSK2487818 (M4), GSK2506102 (M5), GSK2506104 (M3), GSK2531398 (M6) and GSK2531401 (M13)

Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of daprodustat (GSK1278863) and its metabolites: GSK2391220 (M2), GSK2487818 (M4), GSK2506102 (M5), GSK2506104 (M3), GSK2531398 (M6) and GSK2531401 (M13).

Time frame:
Pre-dose on Day 1; Pre-dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post-dose on any one post-Baseline visit day between Week 8 and Week 52
Reported as:
Geometric mean · Nanograms per milliliter
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Daprodustat (GSK1278863) and Its Metabolites GSK2391220 (M2), GSK2487818 (M4), GSK2506102 (M5), GSK2506104 (M3), GSK2531398 (M6) and GSK2531401 (M13)
Nanograms per milliliterDaprodustat 2 mgDaprodustat 4 mgDaprodustat 8 mgDaprodustat 12 mgDaprodustat 16 mgDaprodustat 20 mgDaprodustat 24 mgDaprodustat 32 mgDaprodustat 48 mg
Daprodustat; n=8, 20, 49, 57, 45, 28, 16, 3, 344.5832 ± 227.6551.9261 ± 227.59113.4049 ± 179.69143.8790 ± 233.09126.6824 ± 288.50212.5087 ± 152.47290.3163 ± 87.39197.7071 ± 36.53310.1938 ± 190.69
GSK2391220; n=8, 19, 50, 59, 45, 28, 16, 3, 32.6298 ± 60.934.0224 ± 134.916.3826 ± 198.788.9535 ± 126.769.5131 ± 167.9211.8995 ± 172.3522.3378 ± 95.609.3582 ± 71.7831.6698 ± 84.08
GSK2487818; n=7, 18, 47, 56, 45, 28, 16, 3, 32.0320 ± 73.453.2703 ± 143.756.3474 ± 175.798.0134 ± 146.436.4276 ± 278.049.6617 ± 207.1819.9693 ± 94.098.4327 ± 64.9829.3042 ± 72.06
GSK2506102; n=8, 19, 51, 59, 45, 28, 16, 3, 30.8328 ± 101.921.4018 ± 84.932.0385 ± 85.592.8357 ± 68.153.2007 ± 89.863.5712 ± 96.486.4555 ± 59.572.4981 ± 71.387.1245 ± 87.62
GSK2506104; n=8, 19, 51, 59, 45, 28, 16, 3, 33.2020 ± 81.235.2039 ± 98.707.5220 ± 131.8110.8186 ± 84.3111.5783 ± 130.7413.8509 ± 125.2724.4926 ± 84.969.5457 ± 73.5830.4034 ± 79.13
GSK2531398; n=8, 17, 46, 59, 45, 27, 16, 3, 31.2731 ± 57.922.3676 ± 84.233.7348 ± 131.103.8017 ± 177.364.0850 ± 209.296.1029 ± 137.4010.7532 ± 98.464.6296 ± 72.0014.7844 ± 81.18
GSK2531401; n=7, 19, 51, 59, 45, 28, 16, 3, 32.0473 ± 100.054.0012 ± 88.645.4631 ± 120.638.8488 ± 80.178.4814 ± 93.8310.7368 ± 90.8314.7926 ± 59.247.1458 ± 174.9820.1044 ± 67.56

Adverse events

Collected over Treatment emergent serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (non-serious AEs) were collected up to 52 weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Daprodustat18/270 (6.7%)80/270 (29.6%)74/270 (27.4%)
Epoetin Alfa10/136 (7.4%)47/136 (34.6%)42/136 (30.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 169
Most frequent serious events
EventDaprodustatEpoetin Alfa
PneumoniaInfections and infestations9/2705/136
Arteriovenous fistula thrombosisInjury, poisoning and procedural complications7/2703/136
Angina unstableCardiac disorders0/2703/136
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/2703/136
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/2703/136
Cerebrovascular accidentNervous system disorders4/2700/136
Head injuryInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/2702/136
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/2702/136
HypotensionVascular disorders1/2702/136
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders1/2702/136
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventDaprodustatEpoetin Alfa
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders23/27014/136
HypertensionVascular disorders22/27014/136
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders15/27013/136
HeadacheNervous system disorders11/27013/136
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders6/27011/136
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders7/2709/136
HypotensionVascular disorders12/2709/136
PyrexiaGeneral disorders7/2708/136

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)DaprodustatEpoetin AlfaTotal
19-64 Years16796263
>= 65 Years10341144
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)DaprodustatEpoetin AlfaTotal
Female12156177
Male14981230
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)DaprodustatEpoetin AlfaTotal
BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN493281
AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKAN NATIVE112
ASIAN - CENTRAL/SOUTH ASIAN HERITAGE101
ASIAN - EAST ASIAN HERITAGE16925
ASIAN - SOUTH EAST ASIAN HERITAGE303
NATIVE HAWAIIAN OR OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER101
WHITE - ARABIC/NORTH AFRICAN HERITAGE145
WHITE - WHITE/CAUCASIAN/EUROPEAN HERITAGE19390283
MIXED WHITE RACE101
MIXED RACE112
UNKNOWN303
08

Study locations

91 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Mesa, Arizona 85210, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Fresno, California 93720, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Los Angeles, California 90025, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Paramount, California 90723, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Middlebury, Connecticut 06762, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hollywood, Florida 33024, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Miami, Florida 33169, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Tampa, Florida 33614, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Macon, Georgia 31201, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Meridian, Idaho 83642, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Pittsfield, Massachusetts 01201, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Kansas City, Missouri 64111, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    College Point, New York 11356, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73116, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Houston, Texas 77004, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Houston, Texas 77099, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Lufkin, Texas 75904, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Alexandria, Virginia 22304, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Hampton, Virginia 23666, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Norfolk, Virginia 23510, United States
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires 7600, Argentina
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Pergamino, Buenos Aires B2700CPM, Argentina
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Sarandi, Buenos Aires B1872EEB, Argentina
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Rosario, Santa Fe 2000, Argentina
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Salvador, Bahia 40415-065, Brazil
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Curitiba, Paraná 80440-020, Brazil
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Passo Fundo, Rio Grande Do Sul 99010-080, Brazil
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul 90610-000, Brazil
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Sao Jose do Rio Preto, São Paulo 15090-000, Brazil
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30150-221, Brazil
  • GSK Investigational Site
    São Paulo, 04039-000, Brazil
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Oshawa, Ontario L1G 2B9, Canada
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Bayonne, 64109, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Epagny Metz-Tessy, 74370, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Le Mans, 72037, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Nice Cedex 1, 06001, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Strasbourg, 67000, France
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Bologna, Emilia-Romagna 40138, Italy
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Modena, Emilia-Romagna 41124, Italy
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Pavia, Lombardia 27100, Italy
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Verona, Veneto 37126, Italy
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Anyang-Si, Gyeonggi-do, 14068, Korea, Republic of
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Busan, 49201, Korea, Republic of
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 10326, Korea, Republic of
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Incheon, 405-760, Korea, Republic of
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Seoul, 07061, Korea, Republic of
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Seoul, 07441, Korea, Republic of
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Seoul, 134-727, Korea, Republic of
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Katowice, 40-027, Poland
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Lodz, 92-213, Poland
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Sandomierz, 27-600, Poland
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Tarnowskie Gory, 42-612, Poland
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Zyrardow, 96-300, Poland
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Constanta, 900591, Romania
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Resita, 320166, Romania
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Kazan, 420012, Russian Federation
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Kolomna, 140407, Russian Federation
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Krasnodar, 350029, Russian Federation
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Krasnogorsk, 143400, Russian Federation
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Mytischi, 141009, Russian Federation
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Novorossiysk, 353915, Russian Federation
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Novosibirsk, 630087, Russian Federation
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Omsk, 644111, Russian Federation
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Orenburg, 460040, Russian Federation
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Penza, 440034, Russian Federation
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Podolsk, 142110, Russian Federation
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Saint-Petersburg, 194354, Russian Federation
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Saint-Petersburg, 197374, Russian Federation
  • GSK Investigational Site
    St-Petersburg, 197110, Russian Federation
  • GSK Investigational Site
    St. Petersburg, 193318, Russian Federation
  • GSK Investigational Site
    St. Petersburg, 194104, Russian Federation
  • GSK Investigational Site
    St. Petersburg, 196247, Russian Federation
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Ufa, 450071, Russian Federation
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Yaroslavl, 150062, Russian Federation
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Almeria, 04009, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Badalona, 08916, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Barcelona, 08036, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Gerona, 17007, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Granollers, Barcelona, 08041, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Madrid, 28100, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Manises (Valencia), 46940, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Sanlúcar De Barrameda (Cádiz), 11540, Spain
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Bradford, BD5 0NA, United Kingdom
  • GSK Investigational Site
    London, SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Sheffield, S5 7AU, United Kingdom
  • GSK Investigational Site
    Swansea, SA6 6NL, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Natale P, Palmer SC, Jaure A, Hodson EM, Ruospo M, Cooper TE, Hahn D, Saglimbene VM, Craig JC, Strippoli GF. Hypoxia-inducible factor stabilisers for the anaemia of chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 25;8(8):CD013751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013751.pub2. PubMed 36005278 ↗
  • Coyne DW, Singh AK, Lopes RD, Bailey CK, DiMino TL, Huang C, Connaire J, Rastogi A, Kim SG, Orias M, Shah S, Patel V, Cobitz AR, Wanner C. Three Times Weekly Dosing of Daprodustat versus Conventional Epoetin for Treatment of Anemia in Hemodialysis Patients: ASCEND-TD: A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Noninferiority Trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022 Sep;17(9):1325-1336. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00550122. Epub 2022 Aug 2. PubMed 35918106 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report

Time frame: IPD will be made available within 6 months of publishing the results of the primary endpoints of the study.

Access criteria: Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.

Data sharing details ↗ · clinicalstudydatarequest.com

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Sep 2018 to primary completion in Jun 2020, 21 months.

Results were first posted in Jul 2021, 1 year after primary completion.

Of 98 industry-sponsored phase 3 interventional studies under Anemia, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 49. This study's 21 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 150 studies reached it within 30 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 51.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 8, 2018
First posted
Jan 17, 2018
StartActual
Sep 5, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jun 19, 2020
CompletionActual
Jun 19, 2020
Results first posted
Jul 12, 2021
Last update
Jul 12, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 12, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03400033
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 17, 2018
Start date
Sep 5, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 19, 2020
Completion
Jun 19, 2020
Results posted
Jul 12, 2021
Last update
Jul 12, 2021

Study contacts

GSK Clinical Trials
study director · GlaxoSmithKline

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: GSK1278863

Start the discussion