ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03399916Updated Oct 31, 2019

Ecological Momentary Determinants of Sedentary Behavior

An interventional study of Prompt sent in Sedentary Behavior, sponsored by Arizona State University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-31.

Sponsored by Arizona State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2016, registered Dec 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
17
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A two phase trial to understand the personal, behavioral, environmental, and contextual factors that underpin sedentary behavior and to systematically test a series of contextual prompt characteristics that may lead to subsequent change in sedentary behavior.

Read the detailed description

Phase 1: This is an observational study that will utilized Ecological Momentary Assessment, to determine which personal (e.g. fatigue, mood, and stress level), behavioral (e.g. watching TV, working at desk, and eating meals), environmental (e.g. being at home or work, time of the day, and weather) and contextual factors were associated with sedentary behavior. Three EMAs per day will be sent randomly sent to participants on weekdays (Monday to Friday), for four consecutive weeks (total of 20 days). During these days, participants will also wear an activPAL device to objectively measure sedentary behavior. The purpose of the study is to identify the combination of factors most likely to precede and proceed short (\<30 min) and long (≥30 min) bouts of sedentary behavior.

Phase 2: A micro-randomized trial will be used to evaluate the efficacy of an email-based prompt to elicit a proximal effect (e.g., a postural response defined as a transition from seated to standing or seated to moving within 5 minutes to interrupt prolonged sitting) compared to a no prompt condition. A secondary aim of this study is to determine whether prompts that encourage standing are more likely to elicit a response than those that encourage moving. An exploratory aim is to examine whether varying the content of the stand or move prompt to include combinations of short term goals and employer approval, influence the magnitude of response.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sedentary Behavior

Browse trials for

03

In context

Sedentary Behavior

1,273 studies on the registry are indexed under Sedentary Behavior; 300 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 17 is below the median of 60 across 1,076 interventional studies indexed under Sedentary Behavior.

Browse Sedentary Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

Arizona State University is the lead sponsor of 238 studies on the registry; 42 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Full-time employees
  • Males or females
  • Ages 18-65
  • Sedentary working habits (as indicated by >7 hrs/day of sedentary time at work in the Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire)
  • Willing to engage in the study assessment and intervention for 10 weeks.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-ambulatory, pregnant
  • Non-English speaking
  • Diagnosis of psychiatric problems or taking psychiatric medications
  • Medical history that prohibits prolonged standing.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
17 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Prompt

    An email based prompt was sent- containing either a stand or move message. Exploratory variations of the prompt were designed to include the addition of a goal e.g., stand for the next 5-minutes, and/or employer support e.g., PTS says "stand for the next 5 minutes".

    Behavioral: Prompt sent

  • No intervention
    No Prompt

    Prompt delivery was sequentially randomized to be sent (ST) or not sent (NST) to all participants (probability of 0.5), at eight decision points per day (between 9am and 5pm), to achieve a total of 3200 randomizations across participants (160 per participant). Therefore 50% of the time, no prompt was sent.

Interventions

  • BehavioralPrompt sent
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Minutes of sitting behavior (minutes/8h workday)

    Objectively measured minutes of sitting, standardized to an 8h workday.

    Time frame: 40 days

  2. Minutes of standing behavior (minutes/8h workday)

    Objectively measured minutes of standing, standardized to an 8h workday.

    Time frame: 40 days

  3. Minutes of light-intensity physical activity (minutes/8h workday)

    Objectively measured minutes of light-intensity physical activity, standardized to an 8h workday.

    Time frame: 40 days

  4. Minutes of moderate-vigorous physical activity (minutes/8h workday)

    Objectively measured minutes of moderate-vigorous physical activity, standardized to an 8h workday.

    Time frame: 40 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Momentary affective state (4-item Likert Scales)

    Affective states will be assessed using an ecological momentary survey based on the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (4-point Likert scale ranging from "not at all" to "extremely") (Range: 1-4) questionnaire. The ecological momentary assessment questions were designed to assess a range of contextual information (i.e., current office location, posture, social interaction) and physical and emotional feeling states (i.e., calmness, energy, happiness, stress, sadness, pain level, productivity, and willingness to stand/move). Each of these questions will be evaluated individually andaveraged to evaluate positive (i.e., calmness, energy, happiness) and negative (i.e., sadness and stress) affective states. An open-source app (Personal Analytic Companion App) will be used to deliver EMA questions randomly throughout a participant's workday. This will allow us to measure self-reported levels of positive or negative affect.

    Time frame: 20 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Arizona State University
    Phoenix, Arizona 85004, United States
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2016 to primary completion in Feb 2017, 4 months.

Of 733 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Sedentary Behavior, half reached primary completion within 14 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 31. This study's 4 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 741 studies reached it within 14 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 31.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 22, 2017
First posted
Jan 17, 2018
StartActual
Oct 2016
Primary completionActual
Feb 2017
CompletionActual
Feb 2017
Last update
Oct 31, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 31, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03399916
Collaborators
American College of Sports Medicine
Responsible party
Matthew P Buman, PhD (Associate Professor, Arizona State University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 17, 2018
Start date
Oct 2016
Primary completion
Feb 2017
Completion
Feb 2017
Last update
Oct 31, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion