A Phase 3 interventional study of Erdafitinib and Vinflunine in Urothelial Cancer, sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Active, not recruiting at 345 sites in 27 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-03.
Sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC (part of Johnson & Johnson) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →
The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficacy of erdafitinib versus chemotherapy or pembrolizumab in participants with advanced urothelial cancer harboring selected fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) aberrations who have progressed after 1 or 2 prior treatments, at least 1 of which includes an anti-programmed death ligand 1(PD-[L]1) agent (cohort 1) or 1 prior treatment not containing an anti-PD-(L) 1 agent (cohort 2).
A study of erdafitinib versus standard of care, consisting of chemotherapy (docetaxel or vinflunine) or anti-PD-(L) 1 agent pembrolizumab, in participants with advanced urothelial cancer and selected FGFR aberrations who have progressed on or after 1 or 2 prior treatments, at least 1 of which includes an anti-PD-(L) 1 agent (cohort 1) or 1 prior treatment not containing an anti-PD-(L) 1 agent (cohort 2). It will consist of screening, treatment phase (from randomization until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or decision by investigator to discontinue treatment, post-treatment follow-up (from end-of-treatment to participants death, withdraws consent, lost to follow-up study completion for the respective cohort, whichever comes first). The study will have long term extension (LTE) period after clinical cutoff date is achieved for final analysis of each cohort and participants eligible in the opinion of the investigator, will continue to benefit from the study intervention. Efficacy, pharmacokinetics, biomarkers, patient reported outcomes, medical resource utilization and safety will be assessed.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC is the lead sponsor of 932 studies on the registry; 76 are open to participants now.
Of its 285 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 137 (48%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.
A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.
“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.
Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.
Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).
Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.
Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.
Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.
Metastases
Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Line of therapy
A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.
“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Adjuvant and neoadjuvant
Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Childbearing potential
Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).
Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
ECOG performance status
A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.
Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Investigational drug or device
A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.
It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Cancer (malignancy)
Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.
Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Hypersensitivity
An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Excipients
The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Participants will be screened based on Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Clinical Trial Assay (FGFRi CTA) to determine molecular eligibility and participants who meet molecular eligibility criteria will be eligible for full study screening. Participants enrolled in the study (treated with prior anti-programmed cell death protein PD-\[L\] 1 agent) will swallow erdafitinib tablets orally at a starting dose of 8 milligram (mg), once daily for 21 days in a 21-day cycle until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or decision by the investigator to discontinue treatment. Dose adjustment are based on phosphate level and observed toxicity (adverse events \[AEs\]). Participants who enter in Long-term extension (LTE) phase will continue to receive the erdafitinib tablet as per investigator's decision.
Drug: Erdafitinib · Device: Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor inhibitor Clinical Trial Assay (FGFRi CTA)
Participants will be screened based on FGFRi CTA to determine molecular eligibility and participants who meet molecular eligibility criteria will be eligible for full study screening. Participants enrolled in the study (treated with prior anti-PD-\[L\] 1 agent) will receive vinflunine 320 milligram per meter square (mg/m\^2) as a 20-minute intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks or docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 as a 1 hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. Treatment with either agent (choice of investigator) will be administered until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or decision by the investigator to discontinue treatment. Dose adjustments are based on observed toxicities. Participants who enter in LTE phase will continue to receive Vinflunine or Docetaxel until the participant can commercially receive chemotherapy within the local healthcare system.
Drug: Vinflunine · Drug: Docetaxel · Device: Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor inhibitor Clinical Trial Assay (FGFRi CTA)
Participants will be screened based on FGFRi CTA to determine molecular eligibility and participants who meet molecular eligibility criteria will be eligible for full study screening. Participants enrolled in the study (no prior treatment with anti-PD-\[L\] 1 agent) will swallow erdafitinib tablets orally at a starting dose of 8 mg, once daily for 21 days in a 21-day cycle until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or decision by the investigator to discontinue treatment. Dose adjustments are based on phosphate level and observed toxicity (AEs). Participants who enter in LTE phase will continue to receive the erdafitinib tablet as per investigator's decision.
Drug: Erdafitinib · Device: Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor inhibitor Clinical Trial Assay (FGFRi CTA)
Participants will be screened based on FGFRi CTA to determine molecular eligibility and participants who meet molecular eligibility criteria will be eligible for full study screening. Participants enrolled in the study (no prior treatment with anti-PD-\[L\] 1 agent) will receive pembrolizumab 200 mg as a 30-minute intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks, until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or decision by the investigator to discontinue treatment. Dose adjustments are based on observed toxicities. Participants who enter in LTE phase will continue to receive the pembrolizumab until 2 years after the first dose of pembrolizumab (at start of study) or until the participant can commercially receive pembrolizumab within the local healthcare system, whichever comes first.
Drug: Pembrolizumab · Device: Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor inhibitor Clinical Trial Assay (FGFRi CTA)
Participants will swallow erdafitinib tablets orally at a starting dose of 8 mg.
Also known as: JNJ-42756493
Participants will receive vinflunine 320 mg/m\^2 as a 20-minute intravenous infusion.
Participants will receive docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 as a 1 hour intravenous infusion.
Participants will receive pembrolizumab 200 mg as a 30-minute intravenous infusion.
FGFRi CTA will be used to determine molecular eligibility.
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival was measured from the date of randomization to the date of the participant's death.
Time frame: From randomization (3 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1) until death due to any cause (maximum up to 51.7 months)
Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version (v) 1.1
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression or relapse from complete response (CR) based on investigator assessment using RECIST v 1.1, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. As per RECIST v 1.1, CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in the short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeters (mm). Progressive disease (PD) was defined as at least 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of diameters of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum of diameters recorded on study (including baseline) and an absolute increase of greater than or equal to (\>=) 5 mm or appearance of at least 1 new lesion.
Time frame: From randomization (3 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1) until disease progression or relapse from CR or death (maximum up to 51.7 months)
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST Version 1.1
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved CR or partial response (PR) as determined by investigator per RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in the short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Time frame: From start of the treatment (Day 1 Cycle 1) up to maximum of 51.7 months
Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scales of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bladder Cancer (FACT-Bl)
The FACT-Bl consisted of 39 items, with 5-point Likert scales, covering 5 primary domains: physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being and additional concerns for participants with bladder cancer. The response options ranged from 0 to 4 where, 0='Not at all" and 4= "very much." FACT-Bl total score ranged from 0 (worst) to 156 (best). The higher the score, the better the quality of life (QOL). The baseline value was defined as the value collected at the time closest to but prior to the randomization.
Time frame: Baseline up to Cycle 11 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Time Until Symptom Deterioration
Time until symptom deterioration was defined as the first time to increase in urinary bladder cancer symptoms score from the day of randomization beyond a meaningful change threshold compared to baseline. The urinary bladder cancer symptom score was subset of FACT-Bl which included 3 items related to urinary symptoms, 5-point Likert scale. Response options ranged from 0 to 4, 0 = Not at all, 1= A little bit, 2= Somewhat, 3=Quite a bit, 4 = Very much. A response of 0 indicated no symptoms and 4 indicated severe symptoms. Total sum scores ranged from 0 to 12, higher scores indicate relatively poor quality of life.
Time frame: Randomization (3 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1) up to maximum of 51.7 months
Percentage of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Patient-Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)
The PGI-S was a single item patient-reported measure assessing participants' impression of severity in bladder cancer symptoms. It uses a 4-point Likert scale as follows: symptoms are: 0-"absent (no symptoms)", 1-"mild", 2-"moderate", 3="severe" and 4= "very severe". Percentage of participants with shift from baseline in PGIS score were reported. A negative shift from baseline in PGIS score indicated Improvement and positive shift from baseline in PGIS score indicated Worsening. The baseline value was defined as the value collected at the time closest to but prior to the randomization.
Time frame: Baseline, 51.7 months
Change From Baseline in Utility Scale of the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
The EQ-5D-5L was a generic measure of health status. The EQ-5D-5L was a 5-item questionnaire that assessed 5 domains included mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Health utility values generated from the EQ-5D generally range from 0 (a state as bad as being dead) to 1 (full health), with higher scores indicating better QoL. The EQ visual analog scale (VAS) recorded the patient's self-rated health on a VAS, ranged from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state), with higher scores indicating better QoL. The baseline value was defined as the value collected at the time closest to but prior to the randomization.
Time frame: Baseline up to Cycle 11 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
The EQ-5D-5L was a generic measure of health status. The EQ-5D-5L was a 5-item questionnaire that assessed 5 domains included mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Health utility values generated from the EQ-5D generally range from 0 (a state as bad as being dead) to 1 (full health), with higher scores indicating better QoL. The EQ VAS recorded the patient's self-rated health on a VAS, ranged from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state), with higher scores indicating better QoL. The baseline value was defined as the value collected at the time closest to but prior to the randomization.
Time frame: Baseline up to Cycle 11 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Duration of Response (DOR) as Per RECIST Version 1.1
DOR was defined as time from the date of initial documentation of an overall response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease (PD) (or relapse for participants who experience CR) or death. As per RECIST Version 1.1: CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in the short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. PD was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum of diameters recorded on study (including baseline) and an absolute increase of \>=5 mm or appearance of at least 1 new lesion.
Time frame: From date of first documented response to date of first documented PD or death whichever occurred first (maximum up to 51.7 months)
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. TEAEs were the events between first dose of study drug and up to 30 days after last dose or before start of new anticancer therapy, whichever occurred first. All TEAEs including serious and non-serious events were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From start of the treatment (Day 1 Cycle 1) up to 30 days after last dose of study drug or start of subsequent anticancer therapy (maximum up to 51.7 months)
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline Grade Less Than or Equal to (<=) 2 to Grade Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 3 Post-Baseline in Laboratory Parameter: Hematology
Hematology parameters included: hemoglobin, platelet count, white blood cell (WBC) count, and absolute neutrophil count (ANC). According to national cancer institute (NCI)-common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.03: Grade 1= mild, Grade 2= moderate, Grade 3= severe, Grade 4= life-threatening, urgent intervention indicated, Grade 5= death related to AE and Grade 0= normal. In this outcome measure number of participants with shifts from baseline (BL) Grade \<= 2 to Grade \>=3 post-baseline in any of hematology parameters are reported. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only those categories in which at least one participant had data were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From baseline up to 30 days after last dose or start of new anticancer therapy, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 51.7 months)
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline Grade <= 2 to Grade >=3 Post-Baseline in Laboratory Parameter: Chemistry
Chemistry parameters included: albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin, chloride, creatinine, bicarbonate, corrected calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, serum phosphate, serum parathyroid hormone. According to NCI-CTCAE version 4.03: Grade 1= mild, Grade 2= moderate, Grade 3= severe, Grade 4= life-threatening, urgent intervention indicated, Grade 5= death related to AE and Grade 0= normal. In this outcome measure number of participants with shifts from baseline (BL) Grade \<= 2 to Grade \>=3 post-baseline in any of chemistry parameters are reported. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only those categories in which at least one participant had data were reported in this outcome measure.
Time frame: From baseline up to 30 days after last dose or start of new anticancer therapy, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 51.7 months)
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Electrocardiograms (ECG) Parameters
Number of participants with abnormalities in ECG parameters were reported. The ECG variables included heart rate, RR interval, PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval and QT corrected according to Fridericia's formula (QTcF). ECG abnormality criteria include: Heart rate: Low \<50 beats per minute (bpm); High \> 100 bpm, RR interval: Low \< 600 milliseconds (ms); High \> 1000 ms, QT interval: High \> 500 ms, QTc interval: High \> (450 ms for males, 470 ms for females); increase to \>500 ms.
Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 2 and 4 (Each Cycle 21 days)
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Weight
Changes from baseline in vital signs (weight) was reported. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug.
Time frame: Baseline, 51.7 months
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-baseline Ophthalmologic Examination: Amsler Grid Test
Number of participants with shift from baseline to worst post-baseline in Amsler grid test was reported. Baseline and post-baseline visit findings included normal, abnormal CS (clinically significant) and abnormal NCS (not clinically significant). Clinical significance was determined by investigator's assessment. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only categories in which at least one participant had data for worsening post-baseline measurement was reported.
Time frame: From baseline up to maximum of 51.7 months
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-baseline Ophthalmologic Examination: Visual Acuity
Number of participants with shift from baseline to worst post-baseline in visual acuity (VA) was reported. Worst post-baseline was defined as the visual acuity value that resulted in the largest change from baseline value for either eye. Baseline value was considered for the eye that reported the worst-post baseline value. Baseline and post-baseline visit visual acuity findings included: \<= 20/30, \>20/30 to \<= 20/40, \>20/40 to \<= 20/80, \>20/80 to \<= 20/120, \>20/120 to \<= 20/160, \>20/160 to \<= 20/200, \>20/200. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only categories in which at least one participant had data for worsening in visual acuity from baseline value to worst post-baseline measurement was reported.
Time frame: From baseline up to maximum of 51.7 months
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-baseline Ophthalmologic Examination: Optical Coherence Tomography: Subretinal Fluid
Number of participants with shift from baseline to worst post-baseline in optical coherence tomography for subretinal fluid was reported. At the baseline visit, findings may have been absent or present/visible. At all post-baseline visits, findings were compared to baseline and results may have been increased, decreased, stable or resolved. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only category (shift from absent at baseline to increased at post-baseline) in which at least one participant had data for worsening post-baseline measurement was reported.
Time frame: From baseline up to maximum of 51.7 months
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-baseline Ophthalmologic Examination: Optical Coherence Tomography: Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE) Elevation
Number of participants with shift from baseline to worst post-baseline in optical coherence tomography for RPE elevation was reported. At the baseline visit, findings may have been absent or present/visible. At all post-baseline visits, findings were compared to baseline and results may have been increased, decreased, stable or resolved. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only categories in which at least one participant had data for worsening post-baseline measurement was reported.
Time frame: From baseline up to maximum of 51.7 months
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-baseline Ophthalmologic Examination: Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy: Retinal Assessment
Number of participants with shift from baseline to worst post-baseline in slit lamp biomicroscopy examination for retinal assessment was reported. Baseline and post-baseline visit findings included normal, abnormal CS and abnormal NCS. Clinical significance was determined by investigator's assessment. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only categories in which at least one participant had data for worsening post-baseline measurement was reported.
Time frame: From baseline up to maximum of 51.7 months
Oral Clearance (CL/F) of Erdafitinib
Clearance was a measure of the rate at which a drug was metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes.
Time frame: Day 14 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 2: pre-dose and 2-4 hours post-dose (each cycle was of 21 days)
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Time 't' (AUC[0-t]) of Erdafitinib
Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from time zero to the time t (AUC\[0-t\]) was reported.
Time frame: Day 14 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 2: pre-dose and 2-4 hours post-dose (each cycle is of 21 days)
With the implementation of Protocol Amendment 6 (20 January 2023), long term extension (LTE) phase was added in the study.
| Milestone | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 143 | 135 | 175 | 176 |
| Treated | 142 | 117 | 173 | 173 |
| Completed | 137 | 114 | 168 | 167 |
| Not completed | 6 | 21 | 7 | 9 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 3 | 15 | 5 | 2 |
| Withdrew: Other | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
Overall survival was measured from the date of randomization to the date of the participant's death.
| Months | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival (OS) | 12.06 (10.25 to 16.36) | 8.74 (6.67 to 10.71) | 10.91 (9.23 to 12.58) | 11.07 (9.72 to 13.63) |
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression or relapse from complete response (CR) based on investigator assessment using RECIST v 1.1, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. As per RECIST v 1.1, CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in the short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeters (mm). Progressive disease (PD) was defined as at least 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of diameters of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum of diameters recorded on study (including baseline) and an absolute increase of greater than or equal to (\>=) 5 mm or appearance of at least 1 new lesion.
| Months | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version (v) 1.1 | 5.39 (4.37 to 5.62) | 2.73 (2.10 to 4.17) | 4.44 (4.07 to 5.49) | 2.69 (1.64 to 3.02) |
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved CR or partial response (PR) as determined by investigator per RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in the short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
| Percentage of participants | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST Version 1.1 | 46.9 | 12.6 | 40.0 | 21.6 |
The FACT-Bl consisted of 39 items, with 5-point Likert scales, covering 5 primary domains: physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being and additional concerns for participants with bladder cancer. The response options ranged from 0 to 4 where, 0='Not at all" and 4= "very much." FACT-Bl total score ranged from 0 (worst) to 156 (best). The higher the score, the better the quality of life (QOL). The baseline value was defined as the value collected at the time closest to but prior to the randomization.
| Score on scale | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scales of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bladder Cancer (FACT-Bl) | -3.70 ± 2.365 | -5.28 ± 2.746 | -4.56 ± 1.946 | -0.26 ± 1.980 |
Time until symptom deterioration was defined as the first time to increase in urinary bladder cancer symptoms score from the day of randomization beyond a meaningful change threshold compared to baseline. The urinary bladder cancer symptom score was subset of FACT-Bl which included 3 items related to urinary symptoms, 5-point Likert scale. Response options ranged from 0 to 4, 0 = Not at all, 1= A little bit, 2= Somewhat, 3=Quite a bit, 4 = Very much. A response of 0 indicated no symptoms and 4 indicated severe symptoms. Total sum scores ranged from 0 to 12, higher scores indicate relatively poor quality of life.
| Months | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time Until Symptom Deterioration | 1.5 (0.82 to 2.83) | 2.8 (1.51 to 5.32) | 2.1 (1.41 to 3.48) | 2.1 (1.38 to 4.17) |
The PGI-S was a single item patient-reported measure assessing participants' impression of severity in bladder cancer symptoms. It uses a 4-point Likert scale as follows: symptoms are: 0-"absent (no symptoms)", 1-"mild", 2-"moderate", 3="severe" and 4= "very severe". Percentage of participants with shift from baseline in PGIS score were reported. A negative shift from baseline in PGIS score indicated Improvement and positive shift from baseline in PGIS score indicated Worsening. The baseline value was defined as the value collected at the time closest to but prior to the randomization.
| Percentage of participants | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -4 Improvement | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| -3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| -2 | 5.7 | 8.8 | 3.8 | 4.0 |
| -1 | 15.1 | 17.5 | 13.5 | 15.2 |
| 0 No Change | 34.0 | 33.3 | 44.2 | 46.5 |
| +1 | 30.2 | 26.3 | 20.2 | 17.2 |
| +2 | 7.5 | 10.5 | 11.5 | 13.1 |
| +3 | 7.5 | 3.5 | 4.8 | 3.0 |
| +4 Worsening | 0 | 0 | 1.9 | 1 |
The EQ-5D-5L was a generic measure of health status. The EQ-5D-5L was a 5-item questionnaire that assessed 5 domains included mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Health utility values generated from the EQ-5D generally range from 0 (a state as bad as being dead) to 1 (full health), with higher scores indicating better QoL. The EQ visual analog scale (VAS) recorded the patient's self-rated health on a VAS, ranged from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state), with higher scores indicating better QoL. The baseline value was defined as the value collected at the time closest to but prior to the randomization.
| Score on a scale | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Utility Scale of the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) | -0.06 ± 0.023 | -0.06 ± 0.026 | -0.04 ± 0.023 | -0.04 ± 0.024 |
The EQ-5D-5L was a generic measure of health status. The EQ-5D-5L was a 5-item questionnaire that assessed 5 domains included mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Health utility values generated from the EQ-5D generally range from 0 (a state as bad as being dead) to 1 (full health), with higher scores indicating better QoL. The EQ VAS recorded the patient's self-rated health on a VAS, ranged from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state), with higher scores indicating better QoL. The baseline value was defined as the value collected at the time closest to but prior to the randomization.
| Score on a scale | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) | -0.80 ± 2.242 | -0.29 ± 2.626 | -4.16 ± 2.149 | -2.28 ± 2.198 |
DOR was defined as time from the date of initial documentation of an overall response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease (PD) (or relapse for participants who experience CR) or death. As per RECIST Version 1.1: CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in the short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. PD was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum of diameters recorded on study (including baseline) and an absolute increase of \>=5 mm or appearance of at least 1 new lesion.
| Months | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duration of Response (DOR) as Per RECIST Version 1.1 | 4.86 (3.84 to 6.90) | 5.62 (2.79 to 6.01) | 4.67 (3.68 to 6.90) | 15.21 (7.39 to 27.79) |
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. TEAEs were the events between first dose of study drug and up to 30 days after last dose or before start of new anticancer therapy, whichever occurred first. All TEAEs including serious and non-serious events were reported in this outcome measure.
| Participants | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | 142 | 114 | 173 | 167 |
Hematology parameters included: hemoglobin, platelet count, white blood cell (WBC) count, and absolute neutrophil count (ANC). According to national cancer institute (NCI)-common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.03: Grade 1= mild, Grade 2= moderate, Grade 3= severe, Grade 4= life-threatening, urgent intervention indicated, Grade 5= death related to AE and Grade 0= normal. In this outcome measure number of participants with shifts from baseline (BL) Grade \<= 2 to Grade \>=3 post-baseline in any of hematology parameters are reported. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only those categories in which at least one participant had data were reported in this outcome measure.
| Participants | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anemia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Anemia: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 5 | 6 | 9 | 10 |
| Anemia: Grade 2 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 10 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Hemoglobin Increased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Neutrophil Count Decreased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Neutrophil Count Decreased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL) | 0 | 20 | 1 | 1 |
| Neutrophil Count Decreased: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Platelet Count Decreased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Platelet Count Decreased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Platelet Count Decreased: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| White Blood Cell Decreased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 0 | 10 | 1 | 2 |
| White Blood Cell Decreased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL) | 0 | 10 | 1 | 1 |
| White Blood Cell Decreased: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Chemistry parameters included: albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin, chloride, creatinine, bicarbonate, corrected calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, serum phosphate, serum parathyroid hormone. According to NCI-CTCAE version 4.03: Grade 1= mild, Grade 2= moderate, Grade 3= severe, Grade 4= life-threatening, urgent intervention indicated, Grade 5= death related to AE and Grade 0= normal. In this outcome measure number of participants with shifts from baseline (BL) Grade \<= 2 to Grade \>=3 post-baseline in any of chemistry parameters are reported. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only those categories in which at least one participant had data were reported in this outcome measure.
| Participants | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALT Increased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
| ALT Increased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| ALT Increased: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| ALP Increased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| ALP Increased: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| ALP Increased: Grade 2 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| ALP Increased: Grade 2 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| AST Increased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| AST Increased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| AST Increased: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| AST Increased: Grade 2 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | — | — | — | 1 |
| Blood Bilirubin Increased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| Blood Bilirubin Increased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Blood Bilirubin Increased: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| Blood Bilirubin Increased: Grade 2 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| Creatinine Increased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Creatinine Increased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Creatinine Increased: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Creatinine Increased: Grade 2 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Hypercalcemia (Corrected): Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hypercalcemia (Corrected): Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Hypercalcemia (Corrected): Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL) | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Hypercalcemia (Corrected): Grade 2 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 0 | — | 0 | 1 |
| Hyperkalemia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 2 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
| Hyperkalemia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Hyperkalemia: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Hyperkalemia: Grade 2 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Hypermagnesemia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Hypermagnesemia: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | — | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Hypernatremia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Hyperphosphatemia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Hyperphosphatemia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 0 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Hypocalcemia (Corrected): Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hypocalcemia (Corrected): Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 0 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Hypokalemia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| Hypokalemia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Hypokalemia: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | — | — | — | 1 |
| Hypokalemia: Grade 2 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Hypomagnesemia: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Hypomagnesemia: Grade 2 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | — | — | — | 1 |
| Hyponatremia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 14 | 2 | 14 | 4 |
| Hyponatremia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL) | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Hyponatremia: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 5 | 4 | 8 | 4 |
| Hyponatremia: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL) | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| Hypophosphatemia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 8 | 1 | 14 | 2 |
| Hypophosphatemia: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 1 | — | 1 | 0 |
| Hypophosphatemia: Grade 2 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Number of participants with abnormalities in ECG parameters were reported. The ECG variables included heart rate, RR interval, PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval and QT corrected according to Fridericia's formula (QTcF). ECG abnormality criteria include: Heart rate: Low \<50 beats per minute (bpm); High \> 100 bpm, RR interval: Low \< 600 milliseconds (ms); High \> 1000 ms, QT interval: High \> 500 ms, QTc interval: High \> (450 ms for males, 470 ms for females); increase to \>500 ms.
| Participants | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cycle 2 Day 1 | 31 | 20 | 55 | 47 |
| Cycle 4 Day 1 | 29 | 13 | 38 | 40 |
Changes from baseline in vital signs (weight) was reported. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug.
| Kilograms | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Weight | -5.95 ± 6.183 | -1.23 ± 3.580 | -4.13 ± 5.531 | -1.26 ± 4.334 |
Number of participants with shift from baseline to worst post-baseline in Amsler grid test was reported. Baseline and post-baseline visit findings included normal, abnormal CS (clinically significant) and abnormal NCS (not clinically significant). Clinical significance was determined by investigator's assessment. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only categories in which at least one participant had data for worsening post-baseline measurement was reported.
| Participants | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg |
|---|---|---|
| Normal (BL) to Abnormal CS (post-BL) | 20 | 24 |
| Normal (BL) to Abnormal NCS (post-BL) | 9 | 11 |
| Abnormal NCS (BL) to Abnormal CS (post-BL) | 5 | 3 |
Number of participants with shift from baseline to worst post-baseline in visual acuity (VA) was reported. Worst post-baseline was defined as the visual acuity value that resulted in the largest change from baseline value for either eye. Baseline value was considered for the eye that reported the worst-post baseline value. Baseline and post-baseline visit visual acuity findings included: \<= 20/30, \>20/30 to \<= 20/40, \>20/40 to \<= 20/80, \>20/80 to \<= 20/120, \>20/120 to \<= 20/160, \>20/160 to \<= 20/200, \>20/200. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only categories in which at least one participant had data for worsening in visual acuity from baseline value to worst post-baseline measurement was reported.
| Participants | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg |
|---|---|---|
| <= 20/30 (BL) To >20/30 to <= 20/40 (Post BL) | 10 | 11 |
| <= 20/30 (BL) To >20/40 to <= 20/80 (Post BL) | 2 | 5 |
| <= 20/30 (BL) To >20/80 to <= 20/120 (Post BL) | 2 | 1 |
| <= 20/30 (BL) To >20/120 to <= 20/160 (Post BL) | 1 | 1 |
| <= 20/30 (BL) To >20/160 to <= 20/200 (Post BL) | 5 | 1 |
| <= 20/30 (BL) To >20/200 (post BL) | 0 | 1 |
| >20/30 to <= 20/40 (BL) To >20/40 to <= 20/80 (Post BL) | 0 | 4 |
| >20/30 to <= 20/40 (BL) To >20/160 to <= 20/200 (Post BL) | 0 | 1 |
Number of participants with shift from baseline to worst post-baseline in optical coherence tomography for subretinal fluid was reported. At the baseline visit, findings may have been absent or present/visible. At all post-baseline visits, findings were compared to baseline and results may have been increased, decreased, stable or resolved. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only category (shift from absent at baseline to increased at post-baseline) in which at least one participant had data for worsening post-baseline measurement was reported.
| Participants | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg |
|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-baseline Ophthalmologic Examination: Optical Coherence Tomography: Subretinal Fluid | 26 |
Number of participants with shift from baseline to worst post-baseline in optical coherence tomography for RPE elevation was reported. At the baseline visit, findings may have been absent or present/visible. At all post-baseline visits, findings were compared to baseline and results may have been increased, decreased, stable or resolved. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only categories in which at least one participant had data for worsening post-baseline measurement was reported.
| Participants | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg |
|---|---|
| Absent (BL) to Increased (Post BL) | 4 |
| Present/visible (BL) to Increased (Post BL) | 2 |
Number of participants with shift from baseline to worst post-baseline in slit lamp biomicroscopy examination for retinal assessment was reported. Baseline and post-baseline visit findings included normal, abnormal CS and abnormal NCS. Clinical significance was determined by investigator's assessment. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only categories in which at least one participant had data for worsening post-baseline measurement was reported.
| Participants | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg |
|---|---|---|
| Normal (BL) to Abnormal CS (post-BL) | 3 | 4 |
| Normal (BL) to Abnormal NCS (post-BL) | 5 | 6 |
| Abnormal NCS (BL) to Abnormal CS (post-BL) | 1 | 0 |
Clearance was a measure of the rate at which a drug was metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes.
| Liter per hour | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg |
|---|---|---|
| Oral Clearance (CL/F) of Erdafitinib | NA ± NA | NA ± NA |
Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from time zero to the time t (AUC\[0-t\]) was reported.
| Nanogram hour per milliliter | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg |
|---|---|---|
| Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Time 't' (AUC[0-t]) of Erdafitinib | NA ± NA | NA ± NA |
Collected over All-cause mortality: From randomization (3 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1) up to maximum of 51.7 months; serious AEs and other AEs: From Day 1 Cycle 1 up to maximum of 51.7 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | 91/143 (63.6%) | 63/142 (44.4%) | 141/142 (99.3%) |
| Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) | 90/135 (66.7%) | 50/117 (42.7%) | 104/117 (88.9%) |
| Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg | 141/175 (80.6%) | 69/173 (39.9%) | 173/173 (100%) |
| Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg | 131/176 (74.4%) | 81/173 (46.8%) | 157/173 (90.8%) |
| Event | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Febrile NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 0/142 | 8/117 | 0/173 | 0/173 |
| Urinary Tract InfectionInfections and infestations | 7/142 | 3/117 | 6/173 | 9/173 |
| HaematuriaRenal and urinary disorders | 5/142 | 1/117 | 3/173 | 5/173 |
| Intestinal ObstructionGastrointestinal disorders | 1/142 | 0/117 | 6/173 | 2/173 |
| Acute Kidney InjuryRenal and urinary disorders | 3/142 | 0/117 | 6/173 | 6/173 |
| Febrile Bone Marrow AplasiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 0/142 | 4/117 | 0/173 | 0/173 |
| PneumoniaInfections and infestations | 2/142 | 2/117 | 1/173 | 5/173 |
| NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 0/142 | 3/117 | 0/173 | 0/173 |
| General Physical Health DeteriorationGeneral disorders | 1/142 | 3/117 | 2/173 | 4/173 |
| PyrexiaGeneral disorders | 2/142 | 3/117 | 1/173 | 2/173 |
| Event | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HyperphosphataemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 117/142 | 0/117 | 134/173 | 2/173 |
| DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders | 90/142 | 22/117 | 92/173 | 23/173 |
| StomatitisGastrointestinal disorders | 74/142 | 17/117 | 83/173 | 6/173 |
| Dry MouthGastrointestinal disorders | 61/142 | 4/117 | 63/173 | 8/173 |
| AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 40/142 | 39/117 | 51/173 | 44/173 |
| Decreased AppetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders | 40/142 | 25/117 | 57/173 | 21/173 |
| ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders | 44/142 | 32/117 | 40/173 | 38/173 |
| Palmar-Plantar Erythrodysaesthesia SyndromeSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 44/142 | 2/117 | 38/173 | 0/173 |
| DysgeusiaNervous system disorders | 43/142 | 8/117 | 42/173 | 1/173 |
| AstheniaGeneral disorders | 22/142 | 29/117 | 48/173 | 37/173 |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 61 | 47 | 67 | 70 | 245 |
| >=65 years | 82 | 88 | 108 | 106 | 384 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 65.0 ± 10.23 | 67.9 ± 9.07 | 67.0 ± 8.49 | 65.9 ± 10.20 | 66.4 ± 9.55 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 43 | 38 | 33 | 44 | 158 |
| Male | 100 | 97 | 142 | 132 | 471 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 17 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 119 | 100 | 126 | 139 | 484 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 21 | 31 | 44 | 32 | 128 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asian | 39 | 42 | 37 | 36 | 154 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| White | 85 | 66 | 95 | 111 | 357 |
| More than one race | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 19 | 25 | 39 | 28 | 111 |
| Region of Enrollment(Participants) | Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg | Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) | Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg | Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARGENTINA | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| AUSTRALIA | 6 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 14 |
| AUSTRIA | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| BELGIUM | 5 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 15 |
| BRAZIL | 4 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 29 |
| CANADA | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| CHINA | 8 | 11 | 10 | 15 | 44 |
| FRANCE | 20 | 28 | 34 | 25 | 107 |
| GERMANY | 6 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 26 |
| GREECE | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 19 |
| HUNGARY | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| ISRAEL | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| ITALY | 14 | 11 | 15 | 15 | 55 |
| JAPAN | 15 | 15 | 11 | 10 | 51 |
| NETHERLANDS | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| POLAND | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| PORTUGAL | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| RUSSIAN FEDERATION | 2 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 20 |
| SOUTH KOREA | 12 | 13 | 10 | 6 | 41 |
| SPAIN | 14 | 12 | 15 | 16 | 57 |
| TAIWAN | 4 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 16 |
| TURKEY | 3 | 1 | 13 | 19 | 36 |
| UKRAINE | 0 | 0 | 9 | 7 | 16 |
| UNITED KINGDOM | 6 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 21 |
| UNITED STATES | 6 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 19 |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Showing the first 100 of 345 sites across 27 countries. Choose a country and city above to see the rest.
PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.
Ran from Mar 2018 to primary completion in Apr 2024, 72 months.
Results were first posted in May 2025, 1 year after primary completion.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Erdafitinib
Janssen Research & Development, LLC →