ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT03390504THORUpdated Nov 3, 2026Results posted

A Study of Erdafitinib Compared With Vinflunine or Docetaxel or Pembrolizumab in Participants With Advanced Urothelial Cancer and Selected Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR) Gene Aberrations

A Phase 3 interventional study of Erdafitinib and Vinflunine in Urothelial Cancer, sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Active, not recruiting at 345 sites in 27 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-03.

Sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC (part of Johnson & Johnson) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 3, 20261 site added1 site removedGo to Updates ↓

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
629
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficacy of erdafitinib versus chemotherapy or pembrolizumab in participants with advanced urothelial cancer harboring selected fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) aberrations who have progressed after 1 or 2 prior treatments, at least 1 of which includes an anti-programmed death ligand 1(PD-[L]1) agent (cohort 1) or 1 prior treatment not containing an anti-PD-(L) 1 agent (cohort 2).

Read the detailed description

A study of erdafitinib versus standard of care, consisting of chemotherapy (docetaxel or vinflunine) or anti-PD-(L) 1 agent pembrolizumab, in participants with advanced urothelial cancer and selected FGFR aberrations who have progressed on or after 1 or 2 prior treatments, at least 1 of which includes an anti-PD-(L) 1 agent (cohort 1) or 1 prior treatment not containing an anti-PD-(L) 1 agent (cohort 2). It will consist of screening, treatment phase (from randomization until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or decision by investigator to discontinue treatment, post-treatment follow-up (from end-of-treatment to participants death, withdraws consent, lost to follow-up study completion for the respective cohort, whichever comes first). The study will have long term extension (LTE) period after clinical cutoff date is achieved for final analysis of each cohort and participants eligible in the opinion of the investigator, will continue to benefit from the study intervention. Efficacy, pharmacokinetics, biomarkers, patient reported outcomes, medical resource utilization and safety will be assessed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urothelial Cancer
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Janssen Research & Development, LLC is the lead sponsor of 932 studies on the registry; 76 are open to participants now.

Of its 285 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 137 (48%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Histologic demonstration of transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium. Minor components ( less than [\<] 50 percent [%] overall) of variant histology such as glandular or squamous differentiation, or evolution to more aggressive phenotypes such as sarcomatoid or micropapillary change are acceptable
  • or surgically unresectable urothelial cancer
  • Documented progression of disease, defined as any progression that requires a change in treatment, prior to randomization
  • Cohort 1: Prior treatment with an anti-PD-(L) 1 agent as monotherapy or as combination therapy; no more than 2 . Cohort 2: No prior treatment with an anti-PD-(L) 1 agent; only 1 line of prior systemic treatment. Subjects who received or adjuvant chemotherapy and showed disease progression within 12 months of the last dose are considered to have received systemic therapy in the metastatic setting.
  • A woman of who is sexually active must have a negative pregnancy test (beta human chorionic gonadotropin [beta hCG]) at Screening (urine or serum)
  • Participants must meet appropriate molecular eligibility criteria
  • (ECOG) performance status Grade 0, 1, or 2
  • Adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Treatment with any other agent or participation in another clinical study with therapeutic intent within 30 days prior to randomization
  • Active (that is, requiring treatment change in the last 24 months). The only allowed exceptions are: urothelial cancer, skin cancer treated within the last 24 months that is considered completely cured, localized prostate cancer with a gleason score of 6 (treated within the last 24 months or untreated and under surveillance) and localized prostate cancer with a gleason score of 3+4 that has been treated more than 6 months prior to full study screening and considered to have a very low risk of recurrence.
  • Symptomatic central nervous system
  • Received prior fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor treatment
  • Known allergies, , or intolerance to erdafitinib or its
  • Current central serous retinopathy (CSR) or retinal pigment epithelial detachment of any grade.
  • History of uncontrolled cardiovascular disease
  • Impaired wound healing capacity defined as skin/decubitus ulcers, chronic leg ulcers, known gastric ulcers, or unhealed incisions
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(9)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
629 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cohort 1 (Arm 1A): Erdafitinib

    Participants will be screened based on Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Clinical Trial Assay (FGFRi CTA) to determine molecular eligibility and participants who meet molecular eligibility criteria will be eligible for full study screening. Participants enrolled in the study (treated with prior anti-programmed cell death protein PD-\[L\] 1 agent) will swallow erdafitinib tablets orally at a starting dose of 8 milligram (mg), once daily for 21 days in a 21-day cycle until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or decision by the investigator to discontinue treatment. Dose adjustment are based on phosphate level and observed toxicity (adverse events \[AEs\]). Participants who enter in Long-term extension (LTE) phase will continue to receive the erdafitinib tablet as per investigator's decision.

    Drug: Erdafitinib · Device: Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor inhibitor Clinical Trial Assay (FGFRi CTA)

  • Experimental
    Cohort 1 (Arm 1B): Vinflunine or Docetaxel

    Participants will be screened based on FGFRi CTA to determine molecular eligibility and participants who meet molecular eligibility criteria will be eligible for full study screening. Participants enrolled in the study (treated with prior anti-PD-\[L\] 1 agent) will receive vinflunine 320 milligram per meter square (mg/m\^2) as a 20-minute intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks or docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 as a 1 hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. Treatment with either agent (choice of investigator) will be administered until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or decision by the investigator to discontinue treatment. Dose adjustments are based on observed toxicities. Participants who enter in LTE phase will continue to receive Vinflunine or Docetaxel until the participant can commercially receive chemotherapy within the local healthcare system.

    Drug: Vinflunine · Drug: Docetaxel · Device: Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor inhibitor Clinical Trial Assay (FGFRi CTA)

  • Experimental
    Cohort 2 (Arm 2A): Erdafitinib

    Participants will be screened based on FGFRi CTA to determine molecular eligibility and participants who meet molecular eligibility criteria will be eligible for full study screening. Participants enrolled in the study (no prior treatment with anti-PD-\[L\] 1 agent) will swallow erdafitinib tablets orally at a starting dose of 8 mg, once daily for 21 days in a 21-day cycle until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or decision by the investigator to discontinue treatment. Dose adjustments are based on phosphate level and observed toxicity (AEs). Participants who enter in LTE phase will continue to receive the erdafitinib tablet as per investigator's decision.

    Drug: Erdafitinib · Device: Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor inhibitor Clinical Trial Assay (FGFRi CTA)

  • Experimental
    Cohort 2 (Arm 2B): Pembrolizumab

    Participants will be screened based on FGFRi CTA to determine molecular eligibility and participants who meet molecular eligibility criteria will be eligible for full study screening. Participants enrolled in the study (no prior treatment with anti-PD-\[L\] 1 agent) will receive pembrolizumab 200 mg as a 30-minute intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks, until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or decision by the investigator to discontinue treatment. Dose adjustments are based on observed toxicities. Participants who enter in LTE phase will continue to receive the pembrolizumab until 2 years after the first dose of pembrolizumab (at start of study) or until the participant can commercially receive pembrolizumab within the local healthcare system, whichever comes first.

    Drug: Pembrolizumab · Device: Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor inhibitor Clinical Trial Assay (FGFRi CTA)

Interventions

  • Participants will swallow erdafitinib tablets orally at a starting dose of 8 mg.

    Also known as: JNJ-42756493

  • Participants will receive vinflunine 320 mg/m\^2 as a 20-minute intravenous infusion.

  • Participants will receive docetaxel 75 mg/m\^2 as a 1 hour intravenous infusion.

  • Participants will receive pembrolizumab 200 mg as a 30-minute intravenous infusion.

  • DeviceFibroblast Growth Factor Receptor inhibitor Clinical Trial Assay (FGFRi CTA)

    FGFRi CTA will be used to determine molecular eligibility.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    Overall survival was measured from the date of randomization to the date of the participant's death.

    Time frame: From randomization (3 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1) until death due to any cause (maximum up to 51.7 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version (v) 1.1

    PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression or relapse from complete response (CR) based on investigator assessment using RECIST v 1.1, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. As per RECIST v 1.1, CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in the short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeters (mm). Progressive disease (PD) was defined as at least 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of diameters of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum of diameters recorded on study (including baseline) and an absolute increase of greater than or equal to (\>=) 5 mm or appearance of at least 1 new lesion.

    Time frame: From randomization (3 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1) until disease progression or relapse from CR or death (maximum up to 51.7 months)

  2. Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST Version 1.1

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved CR or partial response (PR) as determined by investigator per RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in the short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

    Time frame: From start of the treatment (Day 1 Cycle 1) up to maximum of 51.7 months

  3. Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scales of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bladder Cancer (FACT-Bl)

    The FACT-Bl consisted of 39 items, with 5-point Likert scales, covering 5 primary domains: physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being and additional concerns for participants with bladder cancer. The response options ranged from 0 to 4 where, 0='Not at all" and 4= "very much." FACT-Bl total score ranged from 0 (worst) to 156 (best). The higher the score, the better the quality of life (QOL). The baseline value was defined as the value collected at the time closest to but prior to the randomization.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Cycle 11 (each cycle was of 21 days)

  4. Time Until Symptom Deterioration

    Time until symptom deterioration was defined as the first time to increase in urinary bladder cancer symptoms score from the day of randomization beyond a meaningful change threshold compared to baseline. The urinary bladder cancer symptom score was subset of FACT-Bl which included 3 items related to urinary symptoms, 5-point Likert scale. Response options ranged from 0 to 4, 0 = Not at all, 1= A little bit, 2= Somewhat, 3=Quite a bit, 4 = Very much. A response of 0 indicated no symptoms and 4 indicated severe symptoms. Total sum scores ranged from 0 to 12, higher scores indicate relatively poor quality of life.

    Time frame: Randomization (3 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1) up to maximum of 51.7 months

  5. Percentage of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Patient-Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)

    The PGI-S was a single item patient-reported measure assessing participants' impression of severity in bladder cancer symptoms. It uses a 4-point Likert scale as follows: symptoms are: 0-"absent (no symptoms)", 1-"mild", 2-"moderate", 3="severe" and 4= "very severe". Percentage of participants with shift from baseline in PGIS score were reported. A negative shift from baseline in PGIS score indicated Improvement and positive shift from baseline in PGIS score indicated Worsening. The baseline value was defined as the value collected at the time closest to but prior to the randomization.

    Time frame: Baseline, 51.7 months

  6. Change From Baseline in Utility Scale of the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)

    The EQ-5D-5L was a generic measure of health status. The EQ-5D-5L was a 5-item questionnaire that assessed 5 domains included mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Health utility values generated from the EQ-5D generally range from 0 (a state as bad as being dead) to 1 (full health), with higher scores indicating better QoL. The EQ visual analog scale (VAS) recorded the patient's self-rated health on a VAS, ranged from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state), with higher scores indicating better QoL. The baseline value was defined as the value collected at the time closest to but prior to the randomization.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Cycle 11 (each cycle was of 21 days)

  7. Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)

    The EQ-5D-5L was a generic measure of health status. The EQ-5D-5L was a 5-item questionnaire that assessed 5 domains included mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Health utility values generated from the EQ-5D generally range from 0 (a state as bad as being dead) to 1 (full health), with higher scores indicating better QoL. The EQ VAS recorded the patient's self-rated health on a VAS, ranged from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state), with higher scores indicating better QoL. The baseline value was defined as the value collected at the time closest to but prior to the randomization.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Cycle 11 (each cycle was of 21 days)

  8. Duration of Response (DOR) as Per RECIST Version 1.1

    DOR was defined as time from the date of initial documentation of an overall response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease (PD) (or relapse for participants who experience CR) or death. As per RECIST Version 1.1: CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in the short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. PD was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum of diameters recorded on study (including baseline) and an absolute increase of \>=5 mm or appearance of at least 1 new lesion.

    Time frame: From date of first documented response to date of first documented PD or death whichever occurred first (maximum up to 51.7 months)

  9. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. TEAEs were the events between first dose of study drug and up to 30 days after last dose or before start of new anticancer therapy, whichever occurred first. All TEAEs including serious and non-serious events were reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: From start of the treatment (Day 1 Cycle 1) up to 30 days after last dose of study drug or start of subsequent anticancer therapy (maximum up to 51.7 months)

  10. Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline Grade Less Than or Equal to (<=) 2 to Grade Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 3 Post-Baseline in Laboratory Parameter: Hematology

    Hematology parameters included: hemoglobin, platelet count, white blood cell (WBC) count, and absolute neutrophil count (ANC). According to national cancer institute (NCI)-common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.03: Grade 1= mild, Grade 2= moderate, Grade 3= severe, Grade 4= life-threatening, urgent intervention indicated, Grade 5= death related to AE and Grade 0= normal. In this outcome measure number of participants with shifts from baseline (BL) Grade \<= 2 to Grade \>=3 post-baseline in any of hematology parameters are reported. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only those categories in which at least one participant had data were reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: From baseline up to 30 days after last dose or start of new anticancer therapy, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 51.7 months)

  11. Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline Grade <= 2 to Grade >=3 Post-Baseline in Laboratory Parameter: Chemistry

    Chemistry parameters included: albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin, chloride, creatinine, bicarbonate, corrected calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, serum phosphate, serum parathyroid hormone. According to NCI-CTCAE version 4.03: Grade 1= mild, Grade 2= moderate, Grade 3= severe, Grade 4= life-threatening, urgent intervention indicated, Grade 5= death related to AE and Grade 0= normal. In this outcome measure number of participants with shifts from baseline (BL) Grade \<= 2 to Grade \>=3 post-baseline in any of chemistry parameters are reported. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only those categories in which at least one participant had data were reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: From baseline up to 30 days after last dose or start of new anticancer therapy, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 51.7 months)

  12. Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Electrocardiograms (ECG) Parameters

    Number of participants with abnormalities in ECG parameters were reported. The ECG variables included heart rate, RR interval, PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval and QT corrected according to Fridericia's formula (QTcF). ECG abnormality criteria include: Heart rate: Low \<50 beats per minute (bpm); High \> 100 bpm, RR interval: Low \< 600 milliseconds (ms); High \> 1000 ms, QT interval: High \> 500 ms, QTc interval: High \> (450 ms for males, 470 ms for females); increase to \>500 ms.

    Time frame: Day 1 of Cycle 2 and 4 (Each Cycle 21 days)

  13. Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Weight

    Changes from baseline in vital signs (weight) was reported. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug.

    Time frame: Baseline, 51.7 months

  14. Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-baseline Ophthalmologic Examination: Amsler Grid Test

    Number of participants with shift from baseline to worst post-baseline in Amsler grid test was reported. Baseline and post-baseline visit findings included normal, abnormal CS (clinically significant) and abnormal NCS (not clinically significant). Clinical significance was determined by investigator's assessment. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only categories in which at least one participant had data for worsening post-baseline measurement was reported.

    Time frame: From baseline up to maximum of 51.7 months

  15. Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-baseline Ophthalmologic Examination: Visual Acuity

    Number of participants with shift from baseline to worst post-baseline in visual acuity (VA) was reported. Worst post-baseline was defined as the visual acuity value that resulted in the largest change from baseline value for either eye. Baseline value was considered for the eye that reported the worst-post baseline value. Baseline and post-baseline visit visual acuity findings included: \<= 20/30, \>20/30 to \<= 20/40, \>20/40 to \<= 20/80, \>20/80 to \<= 20/120, \>20/120 to \<= 20/160, \>20/160 to \<= 20/200, \>20/200. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only categories in which at least one participant had data for worsening in visual acuity from baseline value to worst post-baseline measurement was reported.

    Time frame: From baseline up to maximum of 51.7 months

  16. Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-baseline Ophthalmologic Examination: Optical Coherence Tomography: Subretinal Fluid

    Number of participants with shift from baseline to worst post-baseline in optical coherence tomography for subretinal fluid was reported. At the baseline visit, findings may have been absent or present/visible. At all post-baseline visits, findings were compared to baseline and results may have been increased, decreased, stable or resolved. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only category (shift from absent at baseline to increased at post-baseline) in which at least one participant had data for worsening post-baseline measurement was reported.

    Time frame: From baseline up to maximum of 51.7 months

  17. Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-baseline Ophthalmologic Examination: Optical Coherence Tomography: Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE) Elevation

    Number of participants with shift from baseline to worst post-baseline in optical coherence tomography for RPE elevation was reported. At the baseline visit, findings may have been absent or present/visible. At all post-baseline visits, findings were compared to baseline and results may have been increased, decreased, stable or resolved. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only categories in which at least one participant had data for worsening post-baseline measurement was reported.

    Time frame: From baseline up to maximum of 51.7 months

  18. Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-baseline Ophthalmologic Examination: Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy: Retinal Assessment

    Number of participants with shift from baseline to worst post-baseline in slit lamp biomicroscopy examination for retinal assessment was reported. Baseline and post-baseline visit findings included normal, abnormal CS and abnormal NCS. Clinical significance was determined by investigator's assessment. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only categories in which at least one participant had data for worsening post-baseline measurement was reported.

    Time frame: From baseline up to maximum of 51.7 months

  19. Oral Clearance (CL/F) of Erdafitinib

    Clearance was a measure of the rate at which a drug was metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes.

    Time frame: Day 14 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 2: pre-dose and 2-4 hours post-dose (each cycle was of 21 days)

  20. Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Time 't' (AUC[0-t]) of Erdafitinib

    Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from time zero to the time t (AUC\[0-t\]) was reported.

    Time frame: Day 14 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 2: pre-dose and 2-4 hours post-dose (each cycle is of 21 days)

07

Results

Posted May 14, 2025

Participant flow

With the implementation of Protocol Amendment 6 (20 January 2023), long term extension (LTE) phase was added in the study.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg
Started143135175176
Treated142117173173
Completed137114168167
Not completed62179
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up2401
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject31552
Withdrew: Other1226

Outcome measures

PrimaryOverall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was measured from the date of randomization to the date of the participant's death.

Time frame:
From randomization (3 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1) until death due to any cause (maximum up to 51.7 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Overall Survival (OS)
MonthsCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg
Overall Survival (OS)12.06 (10.25 to 16.36)8.74 (6.67 to 10.71)10.91 (9.23 to 12.58)11.07 (9.72 to 13.63)
Statistical analysis
  • Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg vs Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2) · Log Rank · p = =0.0031 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.65 · 95% CI 0.48 to 0.86
  • Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg vs Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg · Stratified log-rank test · p = =0.2121 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.16 · 95% CI 0.92 to 1.48
SecondaryProgression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version (v) 1.1

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression or relapse from complete response (CR) based on investigator assessment using RECIST v 1.1, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. As per RECIST v 1.1, CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in the short axis to less than (\<) 10 millimeters (mm). Progressive disease (PD) was defined as at least 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of diameters of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum of diameters recorded on study (including baseline) and an absolute increase of greater than or equal to (\>=) 5 mm or appearance of at least 1 new lesion.

Time frame:
From randomization (3 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1) until disease progression or relapse from CR or death (maximum up to 51.7 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version (v) 1.1
MonthsCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg
Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version (v) 1.15.39 (4.37 to 5.62)2.73 (2.10 to 4.17)4.44 (4.07 to 5.49)2.69 (1.64 to 3.02)
SecondaryObjective Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST Version 1.1

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved CR or partial response (PR) as determined by investigator per RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in the short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Time frame:
From start of the treatment (Day 1 Cycle 1) up to maximum of 51.7 months
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST Version 1.1
Percentage of participantsCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg
Objective Response Rate (ORR) Per RECIST Version 1.146.912.640.021.6
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scales of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bladder Cancer (FACT-Bl)

The FACT-Bl consisted of 39 items, with 5-point Likert scales, covering 5 primary domains: physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being and additional concerns for participants with bladder cancer. The response options ranged from 0 to 4 where, 0='Not at all" and 4= "very much." FACT-Bl total score ranged from 0 (worst) to 156 (best). The higher the score, the better the quality of life (QOL). The baseline value was defined as the value collected at the time closest to but prior to the randomization.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Cycle 11 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on scale
Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scales of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bladder Cancer (FACT-Bl)
Score on scaleCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg
Change From Baseline in Physical Functioning Scales of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bladder Cancer (FACT-Bl)-3.70 ± 2.365-5.28 ± 2.746-4.56 ± 1.946-0.26 ± 1.980
SecondaryTime Until Symptom Deterioration

Time until symptom deterioration was defined as the first time to increase in urinary bladder cancer symptoms score from the day of randomization beyond a meaningful change threshold compared to baseline. The urinary bladder cancer symptom score was subset of FACT-Bl which included 3 items related to urinary symptoms, 5-point Likert scale. Response options ranged from 0 to 4, 0 = Not at all, 1= A little bit, 2= Somewhat, 3=Quite a bit, 4 = Very much. A response of 0 indicated no symptoms and 4 indicated severe symptoms. Total sum scores ranged from 0 to 12, higher scores indicate relatively poor quality of life.

Time frame:
Randomization (3 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1) up to maximum of 51.7 months
Reported as:
Median · Months
Time Until Symptom Deterioration
MonthsCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg
Time Until Symptom Deterioration1.5 (0.82 to 2.83)2.8 (1.51 to 5.32)2.1 (1.41 to 3.48)2.1 (1.38 to 4.17)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Patient-Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)

The PGI-S was a single item patient-reported measure assessing participants' impression of severity in bladder cancer symptoms. It uses a 4-point Likert scale as follows: symptoms are: 0-"absent (no symptoms)", 1-"mild", 2-"moderate", 3="severe" and 4= "very severe". Percentage of participants with shift from baseline in PGIS score were reported. A negative shift from baseline in PGIS score indicated Improvement and positive shift from baseline in PGIS score indicated Worsening. The baseline value was defined as the value collected at the time closest to but prior to the randomization.

Time frame:
Baseline, 51.7 months
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Shift From Baseline in Patient-Global Impression of Severity (PGIS)
Percentage of participantsCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg
-4 Improvement0000
-30000
-25.78.83.84.0
-115.117.513.515.2
0 No Change34.033.344.246.5
+130.226.320.217.2
+27.510.511.513.1
+37.53.54.83.0
+4 Worsening001.91
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Utility Scale of the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)

The EQ-5D-5L was a generic measure of health status. The EQ-5D-5L was a 5-item questionnaire that assessed 5 domains included mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Health utility values generated from the EQ-5D generally range from 0 (a state as bad as being dead) to 1 (full health), with higher scores indicating better QoL. The EQ visual analog scale (VAS) recorded the patient's self-rated health on a VAS, ranged from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state), with higher scores indicating better QoL. The baseline value was defined as the value collected at the time closest to but prior to the randomization.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Cycle 11 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Utility Scale of the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
Score on a scaleCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg
Change From Baseline in Utility Scale of the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)-0.06 ± 0.023-0.06 ± 0.026-0.04 ± 0.023-0.04 ± 0.024
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)

The EQ-5D-5L was a generic measure of health status. The EQ-5D-5L was a 5-item questionnaire that assessed 5 domains included mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Health utility values generated from the EQ-5D generally range from 0 (a state as bad as being dead) to 1 (full health), with higher scores indicating better QoL. The EQ VAS recorded the patient's self-rated health on a VAS, ranged from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state), with higher scores indicating better QoL. The baseline value was defined as the value collected at the time closest to but prior to the randomization.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Cycle 11 (each cycle was of 21 days)
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
Score on a scaleCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg
Change From Baseline in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)-0.80 ± 2.242-0.29 ± 2.626-4.16 ± 2.149-2.28 ± 2.198
SecondaryDuration of Response (DOR) as Per RECIST Version 1.1

DOR was defined as time from the date of initial documentation of an overall response (CR or PR) to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease (PD) (or relapse for participants who experience CR) or death. As per RECIST Version 1.1: CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must had reduction in the short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. PD was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of measured lesions taking as references the smallest sum of diameters recorded on study (including baseline) and an absolute increase of \>=5 mm or appearance of at least 1 new lesion.

Time frame:
From date of first documented response to date of first documented PD or death whichever occurred first (maximum up to 51.7 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Duration of Response (DOR) as Per RECIST Version 1.1
MonthsCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg
Duration of Response (DOR) as Per RECIST Version 1.14.86 (3.84 to 6.90)5.62 (2.79 to 6.01)4.67 (3.68 to 6.90)15.21 (7.39 to 27.79)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. TEAEs were the events between first dose of study drug and up to 30 days after last dose or before start of new anticancer therapy, whichever occurred first. All TEAEs including serious and non-serious events were reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
From start of the treatment (Day 1 Cycle 1) up to 30 days after last dose of study drug or start of subsequent anticancer therapy (maximum up to 51.7 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)142114173167
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline Grade Less Than or Equal to (<=) 2 to Grade Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 3 Post-Baseline in Laboratory Parameter: Hematology

Hematology parameters included: hemoglobin, platelet count, white blood cell (WBC) count, and absolute neutrophil count (ANC). According to national cancer institute (NCI)-common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.03: Grade 1= mild, Grade 2= moderate, Grade 3= severe, Grade 4= life-threatening, urgent intervention indicated, Grade 5= death related to AE and Grade 0= normal. In this outcome measure number of participants with shifts from baseline (BL) Grade \<= 2 to Grade \>=3 post-baseline in any of hematology parameters are reported. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only those categories in which at least one participant had data were reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
From baseline up to 30 days after last dose or start of new anticancer therapy, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 51.7 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline Grade Less Than or Equal to (<=) 2 to Grade Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 3 Post-Baseline in Laboratory Parameter: Hematology
ParticipantsCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg
Anemia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)1211
Anemia: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)56910
Anemia: Grade 2 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)10445
Hemoglobin Increased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)1000
Neutrophil Count Decreased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)2900
Neutrophil Count Decreased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL)02011
Neutrophil Count Decreased: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL)0100
Platelet Count Decreased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)2102
Platelet Count Decreased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL)0101
Platelet Count Decreased: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)0010
White Blood Cell Decreased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)01012
White Blood Cell Decreased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL)01011
White Blood Cell Decreased: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)0200
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline Grade <= 2 to Grade >=3 Post-Baseline in Laboratory Parameter: Chemistry

Chemistry parameters included: albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin, chloride, creatinine, bicarbonate, corrected calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, serum phosphate, serum parathyroid hormone. According to NCI-CTCAE version 4.03: Grade 1= mild, Grade 2= moderate, Grade 3= severe, Grade 4= life-threatening, urgent intervention indicated, Grade 5= death related to AE and Grade 0= normal. In this outcome measure number of participants with shifts from baseline (BL) Grade \<= 2 to Grade \>=3 post-baseline in any of chemistry parameters are reported. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only those categories in which at least one participant had data were reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
From baseline up to 30 days after last dose or start of new anticancer therapy, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 51.7 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline Grade <= 2 to Grade >=3 Post-Baseline in Laboratory Parameter: Chemistry
ParticipantsCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg
ALT Increased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)4041
ALT Increased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL)0002
ALT Increased: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)1110
ALP Increased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)1114
ALP Increased: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)5012
ALP Increased: Grade 2 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)1150
ALP Increased: Grade 2 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL)1000
AST Increased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)3012
AST Increased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL)1002
AST Increased: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)1023
AST Increased: Grade 2 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)———1
Blood Bilirubin Increased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)1141
Blood Bilirubin Increased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL)0001
Blood Bilirubin Increased: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)0—01
Blood Bilirubin Increased: Grade 2 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)—01—
Creatinine Increased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)0003
Creatinine Increased: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL)0010
Creatinine Increased: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)1021
Creatinine Increased: Grade 2 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)2023
Hypercalcemia (Corrected): Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)3000
Hypercalcemia (Corrected): Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)001—
Hypercalcemia (Corrected): Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL)101—
Hypercalcemia (Corrected): Grade 2 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)0—01
Hyperkalemia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)2051
Hyperkalemia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL)0001
Hyperkalemia: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)0012
Hyperkalemia: Grade 2 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)0012
Hypermagnesemia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)3121
Hypermagnesemia: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)—011
Hypernatremia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)0001
Hyperphosphatemia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)6010
Hyperphosphatemia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL)1000
Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)0001
Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)010—
Hypocalcemia (Corrected): Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL)1000
Hypocalcemia (Corrected): Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)001—
Hypokalemia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)0140
Hypokalemia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL)0010
Hypokalemia: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)———1
Hypokalemia: Grade 2 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)0200
Hypomagnesemia: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)0011
Hypomagnesemia: Grade 2 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)———1
Hyponatremia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)142144
Hyponatremia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL)3110
Hyponatremia: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)5484
Hyponatremia: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 4 (Post BL)0031
Hypophosphatemia: Grade 0 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)81142
Hypophosphatemia: Grade 1 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)1—10
Hypophosphatemia: Grade 2 (BL) to Grade 3 (Post BL)1110
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Abnormalities in Electrocardiograms (ECG) Parameters

Number of participants with abnormalities in ECG parameters were reported. The ECG variables included heart rate, RR interval, PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval and QT corrected according to Fridericia's formula (QTcF). ECG abnormality criteria include: Heart rate: Low \<50 beats per minute (bpm); High \> 100 bpm, RR interval: Low \< 600 milliseconds (ms); High \> 1000 ms, QT interval: High \> 500 ms, QTc interval: High \> (450 ms for males, 470 ms for females); increase to \>500 ms.

Time frame:
Day 1 of Cycle 2 and 4 (Each Cycle 21 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Abnormalities in Electrocardiograms (ECG) Parameters
ParticipantsCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg
Cycle 2 Day 131205547
Cycle 4 Day 129133840
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Vital Signs: Weight

Changes from baseline in vital signs (weight) was reported. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug.

Time frame:
Baseline, 51.7 months
Reported as:
Mean · Kilograms
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Weight
KilogramsCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg
Change From Baseline in Vital Signs: Weight-5.95 ± 6.183-1.23 ± 3.580-4.13 ± 5.531-1.26 ± 4.334
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-baseline Ophthalmologic Examination: Amsler Grid Test

Number of participants with shift from baseline to worst post-baseline in Amsler grid test was reported. Baseline and post-baseline visit findings included normal, abnormal CS (clinically significant) and abnormal NCS (not clinically significant). Clinical significance was determined by investigator's assessment. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only categories in which at least one participant had data for worsening post-baseline measurement was reported.

Time frame:
From baseline up to maximum of 51.7 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-baseline Ophthalmologic Examination: Amsler Grid Test
ParticipantsCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg
Normal (BL) to Abnormal CS (post-BL)2024
Normal (BL) to Abnormal NCS (post-BL)911
Abnormal NCS (BL) to Abnormal CS (post-BL)53
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-baseline Ophthalmologic Examination: Visual Acuity

Number of participants with shift from baseline to worst post-baseline in visual acuity (VA) was reported. Worst post-baseline was defined as the visual acuity value that resulted in the largest change from baseline value for either eye. Baseline value was considered for the eye that reported the worst-post baseline value. Baseline and post-baseline visit visual acuity findings included: \<= 20/30, \>20/30 to \<= 20/40, \>20/40 to \<= 20/80, \>20/80 to \<= 20/120, \>20/120 to \<= 20/160, \>20/160 to \<= 20/200, \>20/200. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only categories in which at least one participant had data for worsening in visual acuity from baseline value to worst post-baseline measurement was reported.

Time frame:
From baseline up to maximum of 51.7 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-baseline Ophthalmologic Examination: Visual Acuity
ParticipantsCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg
<= 20/30 (BL) To >20/30 to <= 20/40 (Post BL)1011
<= 20/30 (BL) To >20/40 to <= 20/80 (Post BL)25
<= 20/30 (BL) To >20/80 to <= 20/120 (Post BL)21
<= 20/30 (BL) To >20/120 to <= 20/160 (Post BL)11
<= 20/30 (BL) To >20/160 to <= 20/200 (Post BL)51
<= 20/30 (BL) To >20/200 (post BL)01
>20/30 to <= 20/40 (BL) To >20/40 to <= 20/80 (Post BL)04
>20/30 to <= 20/40 (BL) To >20/160 to <= 20/200 (Post BL)01
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-baseline Ophthalmologic Examination: Optical Coherence Tomography: Subretinal Fluid

Number of participants with shift from baseline to worst post-baseline in optical coherence tomography for subretinal fluid was reported. At the baseline visit, findings may have been absent or present/visible. At all post-baseline visits, findings were compared to baseline and results may have been increased, decreased, stable or resolved. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only category (shift from absent at baseline to increased at post-baseline) in which at least one participant had data for worsening post-baseline measurement was reported.

Time frame:
From baseline up to maximum of 51.7 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-baseline Ophthalmologic Examination: Optical Coherence Tomography: Subretinal Fluid
ParticipantsCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-baseline Ophthalmologic Examination: Optical Coherence Tomography: Subretinal Fluid26
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-baseline Ophthalmologic Examination: Optical Coherence Tomography: Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE) Elevation

Number of participants with shift from baseline to worst post-baseline in optical coherence tomography for RPE elevation was reported. At the baseline visit, findings may have been absent or present/visible. At all post-baseline visits, findings were compared to baseline and results may have been increased, decreased, stable or resolved. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only categories in which at least one participant had data for worsening post-baseline measurement was reported.

Time frame:
From baseline up to maximum of 51.7 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-baseline Ophthalmologic Examination: Optical Coherence Tomography: Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE) Elevation
ParticipantsCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg
Absent (BL) to Increased (Post BL)4
Present/visible (BL) to Increased (Post BL)2
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-baseline Ophthalmologic Examination: Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy: Retinal Assessment

Number of participants with shift from baseline to worst post-baseline in slit lamp biomicroscopy examination for retinal assessment was reported. Baseline and post-baseline visit findings included normal, abnormal CS and abnormal NCS. Clinical significance was determined by investigator's assessment. The baseline value for safety assessment was defined as the value collected at the time closest to, but prior to, the administration of the first dose of study drug. Only categories in which at least one participant had data for worsening post-baseline measurement was reported.

Time frame:
From baseline up to maximum of 51.7 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline to Worst Post-baseline Ophthalmologic Examination: Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy: Retinal Assessment
ParticipantsCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg
Normal (BL) to Abnormal CS (post-BL)34
Normal (BL) to Abnormal NCS (post-BL)56
Abnormal NCS (BL) to Abnormal CS (post-BL)10
SecondaryOral Clearance (CL/F) of Erdafitinib

Clearance was a measure of the rate at which a drug was metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes.

Time frame:
Day 14 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 2: pre-dose and 2-4 hours post-dose (each cycle was of 21 days)
Reported as:
Mean · Liter per hour
Oral Clearance (CL/F) of Erdafitinib
Liter per hourCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg
Oral Clearance (CL/F) of ErdafitinibNA ± NANA ± NA
SecondaryArea Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Time 't' (AUC[0-t]) of Erdafitinib

Area under the plasma concentration time-curve from time zero to the time t (AUC\[0-t\]) was reported.

Time frame:
Day 14 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 2: pre-dose and 2-4 hours post-dose (each cycle is of 21 days)
Reported as:
Mean · Nanogram hour per milliliter
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Time 't' (AUC[0-t]) of Erdafitinib
Nanogram hour per milliliterCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Time 't' (AUC[0-t]) of ErdafitinibNA ± NANA ± NA

Adverse events

Collected over All-cause mortality: From randomization (3 days prior to Cycle 1 Day 1) up to maximum of 51.7 months; serious AEs and other AEs: From Day 1 Cycle 1 up to maximum of 51.7 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mg91/143 (63.6%)63/142 (44.4%)141/142 (99.3%)
Cohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)90/135 (66.7%)50/117 (42.7%)104/117 (88.9%)
Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mg141/175 (80.6%)69/173 (39.9%)173/173 (100%)
Cohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg131/176 (74.4%)81/173 (46.8%)157/173 (90.8%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 199
Most frequent serious events
EventCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg
Febrile NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/1428/1170/1730/173
Urinary Tract InfectionInfections and infestations7/1423/1176/1739/173
HaematuriaRenal and urinary disorders5/1421/1173/1735/173
Intestinal ObstructionGastrointestinal disorders1/1420/1176/1732/173
Acute Kidney InjuryRenal and urinary disorders3/1420/1176/1736/173
Febrile Bone Marrow AplasiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/1424/1170/1730/173
PneumoniaInfections and infestations2/1422/1171/1735/173
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders0/1423/1170/1730/173
General Physical Health DeteriorationGeneral disorders1/1423/1172/1734/173
PyrexiaGeneral disorders2/1423/1171/1732/173
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 75
Most frequent other events
EventCohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mg
HyperphosphataemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders117/1420/117134/1732/173
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders90/14222/11792/17323/173
StomatitisGastrointestinal disorders74/14217/11783/1736/173
Dry MouthGastrointestinal disorders61/1424/11763/1738/173
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders40/14239/11751/17344/173
Decreased AppetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders40/14225/11757/17321/173
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders44/14232/11740/17338/173
Palmar-Plantar Erythrodysaesthesia SyndromeSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders44/1422/11738/1730/173
DysgeusiaNervous system disorders43/1428/11742/1731/173
AstheniaGeneral disorders22/14229/11748/17337/173

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mgTotal
<=18 years00000
Between 18 and 65 years61476770245
>=65 years8288108106384
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mgTotal
Mean65.0 ± 10.2367.9 ± 9.0767.0 ± 8.4965.9 ± 10.2066.4 ± 9.55
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mgTotal
Female43383344158
Male10097142132471
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mgTotal
Hispanic or Latino345517
Not Hispanic or Latino119100126139484
Unknown or Not Reported21314432128
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mgTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native00000
Asian39423736154
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00000
Black or African American01405
White856695111357
More than one race01012
Unknown or Not Reported19253928111
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Cohort 1: Arm 1A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/9 mgCohort 1: Arm 1B: Chemotherapy (Vinflunine 320 mg/m^2 or Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2)Cohort 2: Arm 2A: Erdafitinib 8 mg/ 9 mgCohort 2: Arm 2B: Pembrolizumab 200 mgTotal
ARGENTINA11002
AUSTRALIA621514
AUSTRIA22228
BELGIUM526215
BRAZIL43111129
CANADA20248
CHINA811101544
FRANCE20283425107
GERMANY6101926
GREECE446519
HUNGARY21126
ISRAEL23117
ITALY1411151555
JAPAN1515111051
NETHERLANDS40105
POLAND00101
PORTUGAL00415
RUSSIAN FEDERATION227920
SOUTH KOREA121310641
SPAIN1412151657
TAIWAN426416
TURKEY31131936
UKRAINE009716
UNITED KINGDOM672621
UNITED STATES656219
Bulgaria10001
08

Study locations

345 sites

Showing the first 100 of 345 sites across 27 countries. Choose a country and city above to see the rest.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kato M, Yoshida M, Horio H, Furukawa Y, Ote T, Ohe C. Sample-Related Factors Associated With FGFR Testing Validity in Urothelial Cancer: A Japanese THOR Post Hoc Analysis. Cancer Sci. 2026 Nov 9:10.1111/cas.70588. doi: 10.1111/cas.70588. Online ahead of print. PubMed 43004726 ↗
  • Nakagawa R, Hori T, Kamijima T, Kadomoto S, Makino T, Naito R, Iwamoto H, Yaegashi H, Shigehara K, Nohara T, Izumi K, Mizokami A. Response-durability phenotypes and clinical benefit with erdafitinib: a THOR trial post hoc analysis. BJU Int. 2026 Nov 9. doi: 10.1111/bju.70533. Online ahead of print. PubMed 43001410 ↗
  • Loriot Y, Matsubara N, Park SH, Huddart RA, Burgess EF, Houede N, Banek S, Guadalupi V, Ku JH, Valderrama BP, Tran B, Triantos S, Kean Y, Akapame S, Deprince K, Mukhopadhyay S, Stone NL, Siefker-Radtke AO; THOR Cohort 1 Investigators. Erdafitinib or Chemotherapy in Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2023 Nov 23;389(21):1961-1971. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2308849. Epub 2023 Oct 21. PubMed 37870920 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2018 to primary completion in Apr 2024, 72 months.

Results were first posted in May 2025, 1 year after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 20, 2017
First posted
Jan 4, 2018
StartActual
Mar 23, 2018
Primary completionActual
Apr 15, 2024
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Results first posted
May 14, 2025
Last update
Nov 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Sites
1 site added, 1 site removed
Show site
  • The Chaim Sheba Medical Center · Tel HaShomer, Israel
Show 1 removed
  • The Chaim Sheba Medical Center · Tel Litwinsky, Israel
Nov 3, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Nov 3, 2026
    1 site added, 1 site removed
    Show site
    • The Chaim Sheba Medical Center · Tel HaShomer, Israel
    Show 1 removed
    • The Chaim Sheba Medical Center · Tel Litwinsky, Israel
    + 1 other change: verification date
  2. Sep 25, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03390504
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 4, 2018
Start date
Mar 23, 2018
Primary completion
Apr 15, 2024
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Results posted
May 14, 2025
Last update
Nov 3, 2026

Study contacts

Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
study director · Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Erdafitinib

Start the discussion