ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03389828Updated May 29, 2026

Qualitative Assessment of the Work-Sleep Relationship

An observational study in Sleep Health, sponsored by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS). Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 25 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-29.

Sponsored by National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
263
Ages
25 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

Sleep that does not last long and is low-quality is tied to a range of serious health issues. These range from obesity to early death. Research has shown that black people who are professionals or managers are more likely to have this kind of sleep than their white counterparts. Black people are also at higher risk than whites for health problems caused by insufficient sleep. Researchers want to learn more about why these differences exist.

Objective:

To study reasons for racial differences in the work-sleep relationship.

Eligibility:

Adults at least 25 years old who:

  • Are non-Hispanic black or non-Hispanic white
  • Are employed and work 38 or more hours a week
  • Live around Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill, NC, or Washington, DC

Design:

Participants will be screened with questions. They will give sociodemographic data like job title, annual income level, and gender. They will give their contact information.

Participants will have 1 study visit. They will be in a closed, private conference room. They will join a focus group. The focus groups will be organized by to race, gender, and occupational class.

Participants will give informed consent before the focus group begins.

During the focus group, participants will be asked about their perceptions of health in general, and their typical work day. They will be asked about sleep.

Participants will also fill out a short questionnaire about their job and sleep habits.

Focus groups will be audio recorded. The entire session will last 90 to 120 minutes.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVE:

Prior research has documented racial differences in sleep health by occupational class. While increasing professional responsibility has been associated with shorter sleep duration among non-Hispanic Blacks, increasing professional responsibility appears to be associated with a lower prevalence of short sleep duration among non-Hispanic Whites. The objective of the present study is to investigate reasons for these racial differences in the work-sleep relationship.

STUDY POPULATION:

The study population will range between a minimum of 238 and a maximum of 408 focus groups participants (7-12 members acceptable per focus group). All non-Hispanic black and white adults 25 years of age or older who are currently working at least 38 hours a week will be eligible for inclusion in the study. To mitigate the influence of known cultural differences in sleep behaviors, participation will be limited to English speakers born in the continental United Sates.

DESIGN:

We will conduct 34 demographically homogenous focus groups consisting of 7-12 participants each. Focus groups will be stratified based race, sex, and occupational class, and will be conducted in both North Carolina and the metropolitan DC area. Focus groups will take place in-person and be conducted by a trained facilitator according to a scripted, semi-structured focus group guide. Audio recordings of the focus groups will be transcribed verbatim by a professional transcription service. De-identified transcripts will be reviewed by the study team to identify qualitative themes in the data, which will be coded in an appropriate software program using a double-coding process. Qualitative data analysis will be conducted to identify potential reasons for racial differences in sleep health by occupational class. We will additionally assess variation by other sociodemographic determinants, including sex, education, income, and geographic region.

OUTCOMES MEASURES:

Outcome measures include the themes/patterns regarding potential system-level influences, beliefs, and behaviors that may explain racial differences in the association between occupational class and sleep health.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sleep Health

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Focus Group
  • Health Disparities
  • Occupational Health
  • Behaviors
  • Natural History
03

In context

Behavior

1,573 studies on the registry are indexed under Behavior; 313 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 263 is above the median of 235 across 341 observational studies indexed under Behavior.

Browse Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) is the lead sponsor of 183 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Community sample - residents from Durham, NC and the surrounding areas as well as residents from Silver Spring, MD and the surrounding areas.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Non-Hispanic Black or non-Hispanic White
  • Female or Male
  • 25 years of age or older
  • Employed (38 plus hours/week)
  • Residing in the area around Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill, NC or Silver Spring, MD

Exclusion criteria

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

  • Born outside the continental United States
  • Not fluent in English
  • Unwilling to provide answers to all screening questions
  • Unwilling to provide
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
263 participants (actual)

Groups and cohorts

  • 1

    The study population will consist of approximately 340 focus groups participants.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Outcome measures include the themes/patterns regarding potential system-level influences, beliefs, and behaviors that may explain racial differences in the association between occupational class and sleep health.

    Data will be analyzed via qualitative coding software to identify themes/patterns in the narratives of participants in focus groups and interviews.

    Time frame: At the time of the focus group and in more detail during data analysis (coding)

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Social and Scientific Systems, Inc.
    Silver Spring, Maryland 20910, United States
  • Social and Scientific Systems, Inc.
    Durham, North Carolina 27703, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Jackson CL, Redline S, Kawachi I, Williams MA, Hu FB. Racial disparities in short sleep duration by occupation and industry. Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Nov 1;178(9):1442-51. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt159. Epub 2013 Sep 9. PubMed 24018914 ↗
  • Luckhaupt SE, Tak S, Calvert GM. The prevalence of short sleep duration by industry and occupation in the National Health Interview Survey. Sleep. 2010 Feb;33(2):149-59. doi: 10.1093/sleep/33.2.149. PubMed 20175398 ↗
  • Krueger PM, Friedman EM. Sleep duration in the United States: a cross-sectional population-based study. Am J Epidemiol. 2009 May 1;169(9):1052-63. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp023. Epub 2009 Mar 18. PubMed 19299406 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03389828
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 4, 2018
Start date
May 8, 2018
Primary completion
Sep 28, 2020
Completion
Sep 28, 2020
Last update
May 29, 2026

Study contacts

Chandra L Jackson, Ph.D.
principal investigator · National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion