ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03387033Updated Mar 1, 2021Results posted

Role of Virtual Reality (VR) in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)

An interventional study of Relaxation response and virtual reality (VR) session in Sickle Cell Disease, Virtual Reality and Anxiety, sponsored by Duke University. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 8 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-01.

Sponsored by Duke University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Why this study was terminated
enrollment closed due to lack of funding

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
8 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 25 studies in Anemia, Sickle Cell by Duke University — 2 open to participants now, 2 under way, none of them phase 3. Anemia, Sickle Cell · Duke University.

Enrollment
15th of 19
20 · median 40
Started
2018
with 2 others
No phase
14 of 25
2 open now
Registered
16th of 25
by date

Among the 25 studies in Anemia, Sickle Cell by Duke University, this one is the 15th largest by enrollment of the 19 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 3 that started in 2018, is one of 14 with no phase, and was the 16th registered.

Anemia, Sickle Cell

1,134 studies on the registry are indexed under Anemia, Sickle Cell; 238 are open to participants now.

Browse Anemia, Sickle Cell studies →

Open to participants now

2 of the 25 studies in Anemia, Sickle Cell by Duke University are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 2 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 177 Anemia, Sickle Cell studies recruiting now, 64 (36%) set no upper age limit and 97 (55%) stop at 75 or younger; 127 take children under 18; 29 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 8 Years and older · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 25 studies in Anemia, Sickle Cell by Duke University, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) and cancer often have complicated courses while hospitalized and often deal with pain, anxiety and depression. Advances in the field of technology provide potential avenues for innovative and improved care models for our patients. Virtual reality (VR) has been recently utilized to improve anxiety and pain in a variety of patient populations including children undergoing elective surgery and children experiencing intravenous cannulation in the Emergency Department. Patients with SCD and cancer, both adults and children, are a group of patients that can benefit from VR as part of their care. Over the past four years, our team has successfully implemented several self-developed mobile applications ("apps") for our patients, in addition to integrating objective data (heart rate, activity, stress) from wearable activity trackers. The investigators now propose implementing a feasibility study followed by a pilot study and randomized-controlled trial of the use of VR in patients with SCD and cancer. The investigators plan to assess pain and anxiety prior to the session as well as following the session in hospitalized patients and outpatients with SCD and cancer. The sessions will include a ten-minute relaxation response introductory narrative segment (deep breathing and mindfulness) followed by a ten-minute narrated and immersive VR. Heart rate will be tracked using an Apple iWatch for 30 minutes prior to the session, during the session, and following the session. We anticipate VR will not only be a feasible method to provide non-pharmacologic treatment, but will also significantly reduce pain and anxiety.

Read the detailed description

The investigators will perform a feasibility and pilot study evaluating relaxation response (narration leading through deep-breathing, mindfulness, and other relaxation techniques) followed by VR in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) and caner. The VR headset (NeuTab VR Virtual Reality Headset, Dynamic Virtual Viewer, or similar device) used will be compatible with an iPhone purchased by the PI. The VR session will be narrated by Jon Seskevich, RN. Patients will be provided with a second iPhone to play the recording while the other iPhone is used to display the VR session.

The patients will first be provided a consent form and consented. They will have the opportunity to ask questions prior to and following consent. They will subsequently give a pain score and fill out a GAD-7 (Generalized Anxiety Disorder) and PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire) form. They will be taught how to use the VR headset. Patients will listen to a recording by Jon Seskevich, RN of a ten-minute relaxation response. An iPhone will then be placed in the VR headset, the recording started, and the headset placed on the patient. The VR scene is available through Provata VR app and has been previously chosen prior to the start of the study. Following this, patients will again give a pain score as well as complete another GAD-7, PHQ-9, Presence Questionnaire, and Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) form. Patients will be asked to fill out pain score and general health questions via the TRU-Pain app. Patients will then be able to ask questions/provide further feedback.

03

Conditions studied

  • Sickle Cell Disease
  • Virtual Reality
  • Anxiety
  • Depression
  • Cancer
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • These patients must have a diagnosis of chronic or acute pain (current pain or baseline pain score >0) AND
  • These patients must have anxiety and depressive symptoms as measured by the GAD-7 or PHQ-9 questionnaires

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients \<8 years old
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    VR intervention session

    The patients will give a pain score as well as fill out GAD-7 and PHQ-9 scores initially. The VR intervention session consists of relaxation narration WITH Virtual Reality session for 20 minutes while wearing the VR device. They will then be again asked to give a pain score and fill out GAD-7, PHQ-9, and PGIC.

    Device: Relaxation response and virtual reality (VR) session

Interventions

  • DeviceRelaxation response and virtual reality (VR) session

    A 10-minute relaxation response (mindfulness and deep breathing) followed by 10-minute immersive VR session.

    Also known as: NeuTab VR Headset, Mindfulness, Deep breathing, Dynamic Virtual Viewer

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of VR Session as Measured by Patient Satisfaction Survey.

    Patient satisfaction with session measured on a Likert-type scale with the following options: Very unsatisfied, unsatisfied, not unsatisfied or satisfied, satisfied, very satisfied. Participants were also asked if they agree with the statement that the 'VR device was helpful'.

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Pain Score

    Change in pain score as measured by visual analog pain score (0-10), where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 30 mins

  2. Change in Anxiety-related Symptoms as Measured by Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) Score

    GAD-7 total score for the seven items ranges from 0 to 21, calculated by assigning scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 to the response categories, respectively, of "not at all," "several days," "more than half the days," and "nearly every day." A total score of 0-4 = minimal anxiety, 5-9 = mild anxiety, 10-14 = moderate anxiety, 15-21 = severe anxiety. A negative score change indicates a decrease in anxiety symptoms and a positive score change indicates an increase in anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 30 mins

  3. Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score

    The PHQ-9 has a total range of 0-27, where 0 = No depression, 1-4 = Minimal depression, 5-9 = Mild depression, 10-14 = Moderate depression, 15-19 = Moderately severe depression, 20-27 = Severe depression. A negative score change indicates a decrease in depressive symptoms and a positive score change indicates an increase in depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, up to 30 mins

07

Results

Posted Mar 1, 2021

Participant flow

A total of 20 patients were enrolled into the study from the outpatient sickle cell clinic (15%), inpatient unit (15%) and sickle cell day hospital (70%).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneVR Intervention Session
Started20
Completed20
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryFeasibility of VR Session as Measured by Patient Satisfaction Survey.

Patient satisfaction with session measured on a Likert-type scale with the following options: Very unsatisfied, unsatisfied, not unsatisfied or satisfied, satisfied, very satisfied. Participants were also asked if they agree with the statement that the 'VR device was helpful'.

Time frame:
Day 1
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Feasibility of VR Session as Measured by Patient Satisfaction Survey.
ParticipantsVR Intervention Session
'Satisfied' to 'very satisfied'9
Agree with the statement that the 'VR device was helpful'11
SecondaryChange in Pain Score

Change in pain score as measured by visual analog pain score (0-10), where 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain.

Time frame:
Baseline, up to 30 mins
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Pain Score
score on a scaleVR Intervention Session
Change in Pain Score-0.88 ± 0.53
Statistical analysis
  • VR Intervention Session · Paired t-test · p = <0.005
SecondaryChange in Anxiety-related Symptoms as Measured by Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) Score

GAD-7 total score for the seven items ranges from 0 to 21, calculated by assigning scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 to the response categories, respectively, of "not at all," "several days," "more than half the days," and "nearly every day." A total score of 0-4 = minimal anxiety, 5-9 = mild anxiety, 10-14 = moderate anxiety, 15-21 = severe anxiety. A negative score change indicates a decrease in anxiety symptoms and a positive score change indicates an increase in anxiety symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline, up to 30 mins
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Anxiety-related Symptoms as Measured by Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) Score
score on a scaleVR Intervention Session
Change in Anxiety-related Symptoms as Measured by Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) Score-1.80 ± 1.62
Statistical analysis
  • VR Intervention Session · Paired t-test · p = <0.05
SecondaryChange in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score

The PHQ-9 has a total range of 0-27, where 0 = No depression, 1-4 = Minimal depression, 5-9 = Mild depression, 10-14 = Moderate depression, 15-19 = Moderately severe depression, 20-27 = Severe depression. A negative score change indicates a decrease in depressive symptoms and a positive score change indicates an increase in depressive symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline, up to 30 mins
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score
score on a scaleVR Intervention Session
Change in Depressive Symptoms as Measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score-1.85 ± 1.57
Statistical analysis
  • VR Intervention Session · Paired t-test · p = <0.05

Adverse events

Collected over During virtual reality (VR) session, up to 30 minutes. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
VR Intervention Session0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)VR Intervention Session
Median28.5 (19 to 57)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)VR Intervention Session
Female13
Male7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)VR Intervention Session
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino20
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)VR Intervention Session
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American20
White0
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)VR Intervention Session
United States20
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) Type
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) Type(Participants)VR Intervention Session
SS9
SC7
Other4
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Chow CH, Van Lieshout RJ, Schmidt LA, Dobson KG, Buckley N. Systematic Review: Audiovisual Interventions for Reducing Preoperative Anxiety in Children Undergoing Elective Surgery. J Pediatr Psychol. 2016 Mar;41(2):182-203. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsv094. Epub 2015 Oct 17. PubMed 26476281 ↗
  • Jonassaint CR, Shah N, Jonassaint J, De Castro L. Usability and Feasibility of an mHealth Intervention for Monitoring and Managing Pain Symptoms in Sickle Cell Disease: The Sickle Cell Disease Mobile Application to Record Symptoms via Technology (SMART). Hemoglobin. 2015;39(3):162-8. doi: 10.3109/03630269.2015.1025141. Epub 2015 Apr 1. PubMed 25831427 ↗
  • Shah N, Jonassaint J, De Castro L. Patients welcome the Sickle Cell Disease Mobile Application to Record Symptoms via Technology (SMART). Hemoglobin. 2014;38(2):99-103. doi: 10.3109/03630269.2014.880716. Epub 2014 Feb 10. PubMed 24512633 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Currently have collaborators at Pitt interested and may expand study pending feasibility and pilot study results.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Feb 2018 to primary completion in Apr 2019, 14 months.

Results were first posted in Mar 2021, 1 year 10 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in May 2020.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 14, 2017
First posted
Dec 29, 2017
StartActual
Feb 5, 2018
Primary completionActual
Apr 25, 2019
CompletionActual
Apr 25, 2019
Results delay requested
May 19, 2020
Results first posted
Mar 1, 2021
Last update
Mar 1, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 1, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03387033
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 29, 2017
Start date
Feb 5, 2018
Primary completion
Apr 25, 2019
Completion
Apr 25, 2019
Results posted
Mar 1, 2021
Last update
Mar 1, 2021

Study contacts

Nirmish Shah, MD
principal investigator · Duke University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Feb 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion