ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03377231Updated Dec 20, 2017

Prevention and Treatment of Stretch Marks With Stratamark™

A Phase 4 interventional study of Stratamark® in Stretch Mark, sponsored by Stratpharma AG. Completed. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-12-20.

Sponsored by Stratpharma AG · Phase 4, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2013, registered Dec 2017).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
272
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Stretch marks (striae distensae) are a form of scarring that is a natural result of pregnancy, obesity and in some instances occur due to puberty or steroid use. For some people, the stretch marks do not cause a problem, but in many circumstances they can cause physical symptoms such as itchiness, tenderness and pain. For many people stretch marks are also embarrassing and can have detrimental effects on a patient's mood and self-esteem. Stretch marks that result from pregnancy most commonly occur on the abdomen, breasts and thighs.

Topical silicone gel was developed nearly thirty years ago to be used in the treatment of widespread hypertrophic scars (abnormal scars, which may be red or raised/depressed itchy or painful). Since this time it has been used successfully on most scar types. . Since stretch marks are a form of scarring it is thought that topical silicone gel may be helpful for this scar type also. Stratamark™ has been developed using different forms of silicone polymers, in a gel format, that dries to form a very thin and flexible silicone gel sheet making it a convenient therapy for the treatment and prevention of stretch marks.

The aim of this clinical research study is to prove or disprove the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Stratamark™ in the prevention and treatment of stretch marks. In addition, the knowledge gained from this study may be of benefit to many future patients

02

Conditions studied

  • Stretch Mark

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pregnancy, Striae gravidarum, Striae distensae, Women's health
03

In context

Striae Distensae

44 studies on the registry are indexed under Striae Distensae; 7 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 272 is above the median of 30 across 43 interventional studies indexed under Striae Distensae.

Browse Striae Distensae studies →

Lead sponsor

Stratpharma AG is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Prevention arm - Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy pregnant woman (nulliparous or multiparous) entering into their third trimester (26-28 weeks, visit 1)
  • Not having striae on their abdomen at the time of trial enrollment

Prevention arm - Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any significant medical or surgical conditions
  • Current medications liable to interfere with study results or change the skin's response to therapy

Treatment arm - Inclusion Critera:

  • Confirmed SD on their abdomen post-delivery

Treatment arm - Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any significant medical or surgical conditions
  • Current medications liable to interfere with study results or change the skin's response to therapy
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
272 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Prevention

    Device: Stratamark®

  • Experimental
    Treatment

    Device: Stratamark®

Interventions

  • DeviceStratamark®

    Film-forming dressing for the prevention and treatment of stretch marks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Product efficacy in prevention of stretch marks

    Investigator-assessed prevalence of stretch marks in the patients treated with Stratamark vs. a literature-based control group. Measurement tool: dichotomous scale for the occurrence of stretch marks (0 no stretch marks - 1 appearance of stretch marks).

    Time frame: 5 months

  2. Product efficacy in treatment of stretch marks

    Investigator-assessed improvement in stretch marks severity of patients treated with Stratamark from baseline to last assessment. Measurement tool: likert scale for stretch marks severity (0 to 6 - 0 being no stretch marks and 6 being severe).

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Severity of stretch marks developed in prevention

    Investigator-assessed severity of stretch marks developed in prevention patients. Measurement tool: likert scale for stretch marks severity (0 to 6 - 0 being no stretch marks and 6 being severe).

    Time frame: 5 months

  2. Patient product evaluation in prevention of stretch marks

    Patient-perceived product efficacy, tolerability, ease of use and feel on skin at trial completion. Measurement tool: likert scale for product evaluation (0 to 4 - 0 being unsatisfactory and 4 being excellent).

    Time frame: 5 months

  3. Product efficacy in treatment of stretch marks

    Investigator-assessed improvement in stretch marks color of patients treated with Stratamark from baseline to last assessment. Measurement tool: likert scale for stretch marks color assessment (-4 to +4 - -4 being stark white compared to surrounding skin and +4 being purple). 0 being normal skin color, is considered to be the optimal value.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Product efficacy in treatment of stretch marks

    Investigator-assessed improvement in stretch marks pruritus of patients treated with Stratamark from baseline to last assessment. Measurement tool: likert scale for stretch marks pruritus assessment (0-10 - 0 being no pruritus and 10 being worst possible pruritus).

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Patient product evaluation in treatment of stretch marks

    Patient-perceived product efficacy, tolerability, ease of use and feeling on skin at trial completion. Measurement tool: likert scale for product evaluation (0 to 4 - 0 being unsatisfactory and 4 being excellent).

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Patient evaluation of stretch marks in treatment

    Patient-perceived change in color and noticeability of stretch marks at trial completion. Measurement tool: likert scale for stretch marks patient evaluation (-4 to +4 - -4 being much worse and +4 being cleared).

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jul 2013 to primary completion in May 2016, 34 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 8, 2017
First posted
Dec 19, 2017
StartActual
Jul 11, 2013
Primary completionActual
May 16, 2016
CompletionActual
May 16, 2016
Last update
Dec 20, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 20, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03377231
Lead sponsor
Stratpharma AG
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 19, 2017
Start date
Jul 11, 2013
Primary completion
May 16, 2016
Completion
May 16, 2016
Last update
Dec 20, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion