ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03373474Updated May 6, 2021

Warm Acupuncture for Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema

An interventional study of local distribution points association and local-distal points association in Breast Cancer Lymphedema, sponsored by Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-06.

Sponsored by Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
108
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to clarify whether local-distal point association is more effective than local point association by warm acupuncture in the management of breast cancer related lymphedema.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer Lymphedema
03

In context

Breast Cancer Lymphedema

124 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Cancer Lymphedema; 40 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 108 is above the median of 48 across 97 interventional studies indexed under Breast Cancer Lymphedema.

Browse Breast Cancer Lymphedema studies →

Lead sponsor

Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • At least 6 months after breast cancer surgery and presents with persistent breast cancer related upper extremity lymphedema for at least 3 months. Upper extremity lymphedema is defined as more than 2cm circumference difference or 5% volume difference between the affected and unaffected arms.
  • Stage II or III lymphedema according to the 2016 consensus by the international society of lymphology.
  • Performance Score (KPS) ≥ 70
  • Men or women aged 18 to 80 years
  • Out-patients
  • Estimated > 6 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral breast cancer related lymphedema
  • Taking diuretic
  • History of primary lymphedema
  • A diagnosis of severe heart, liver, kidney or hematologic disease
  • Edema caused by upper extremity disability or other conditions such as heart failure, kidney disease or malnutrition
  • Have hypoproteinemia
  • Inflammation, scar, or trauma at the site of operation, or other active skin infections
  • Unable to self-care, had a history of psychological disorders, or unable to communicate
  • Received lymphedema treatment within the past 1 month
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • The presence of electronic medical device implants
  • Deny to sign the informed written consent, or unwilling to conform to randomization
  • Participation in other clinical trials during the study period
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
108 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    local distribution points association

    Participants will receive warm acupuncture with the local distribution acupoints association on the affected arm only.

    Other: local distribution points association

  • Experimental
    local-distal points association

    Participants will receive warm acupuncture with the local-distal acupoints association on the affected arm, unaffected arm, abdomen, and legs.

    Other: local-distal points association

  • No intervention
    waiting-list

    Patients in the waiting-list group will not receive any acupuncture treatment during the study. However, for ethical consideration, 20 free acupuncture treatments will be offered after the study is completed.

Interventions

  • Otherlocal distribution points association

    Participants will receive acupuncture treatments using the local points set plus the local-addition points set (local distribution association) described below. Warming acupuncture will be applied at HT2, LI11, and TE9 if permitted. Local points set: TE5, LI11, TE9, HT3, TE13, and Xiajiquan on the affected arm. Local-addition points set: LU5, PC3, SI7, TE4, TE3, HT2, TE10, LI15, and 2 other points according to the symptom on the affected arm.

  • Otherlocal-distal points association

    Participants will receive acupuncture treatments using the local points set plus the distal points set (local-distal association) described below. Warming acupuncture will be applied similarly to the local distribution group, with the addition of Ren6, Ren9, bilateral SP9, and LI11 on the unaffected arm. Local points set: TE5, LI11, TE9, HT3, TE13, and Xiajiquan on the affected arm. Distal points set: TE5, LI11, HT3, TE13 on the unaffected arm; CV4, CV6, CV9, CV12, bilateral SP6 and SP9.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Upper extremity circumference

    Various assessment methods are available but circumference measure is simple, convenient with low cost, and reliable. Therefore, the primary outcome measures will be the mean change in inter-limb circumference difference from baseline to the end of the 8-week intervention. The circumference will be measured by the measurement tape (Gulick Attachment, Baseline, America) at the wrist crease, 10 cm above the wrist crease, elbow crease, 10 cm above the elbow crease, where the lymphedema is most severe and its corresponding location on the unaffected limb.

    Time frame: 80 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Upper extremity volume

    Volume measurement is also commonly used for the evaluation of lymphedema and the mean change in inter-limb volume difference from baseline to the end of the 8-week intervention will be included as the second primary outcome measure. The volume of the affected and unaffected limb will be measured by the volumetric measuring device (Baseline, America) using the water displacement method, which is considered as the most reliable method for volume measurements.

    Time frame: 80 weeks

  2. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE 4.03) - edema limbs criteria

    Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE 4.03) will be used to grade the severity of swelling using the edema limbs criteria. A grading of mild, moderate or severe swelling will be assessed based on the inter-limb circumference or volume discrepancy, anatomic architecture, appearance, or activities of daily living. The CTCAE 4.03 will allow us to evaluate the clinical significance of circumference change.

    Time frame: 80 weeks

  3. Stages of lymphedema from the international society of lymphology

    Stages of lymphedema from the international society of lymphology will be used to grade the severity of lymphedema. Staging of 0, I, II, or III will be assessed based on severity of swelling, ability to reduce swelling by elevation, and skin changes.

    Time frame: 80 weeks

  4. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Outcome Measure

    Disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) is a scale consists of two concepts: functional status (part A) and symptoms (part B) respectively. The functional status part is further divided into three dimensions: physical, social, and psychological. The total score of the DASH ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing worse symptoms and function. The DASH has good validity and responsiveness and it is recommended to assess upper extremity function in breast cancer survivors. The validated Chinese version of the DASH will be used in this study.

    Time frame: 80 weeks

  5. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)

    The medical outcome study 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) is a commonly used instrument to assess quality of life that has good validity. The SF-36 includes the following eight concepts: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, social functioning, bodily pain, general mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, vitality, and general health perception. The validated Chinese version of the SF-36 will be used in this study.

    Time frame: 80 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Baokang Hospital Affiliated to Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
    Tianjin, Tianjin, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Yeh CH, Zhao TY, Zhao MD, Wu Y, Guo YM, Pan ZY, Dong RW, Chen B, Wang B, Wen JR, Li D, Guo Y, Pan XF. Comparison of effectiveness between warm acupuncture with local-distal points combination and local distribution points combination in breast cancer-related lymphedema patients: a study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Trials. 2019 Jul 5;20(1):403. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3491-4. PubMed 31277678 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 6, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03373474
Lead sponsor
Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Collaborators
National Basic Research Program, China, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Research Institute
Responsible party
Yi Guo (The Dean of Acupuncture and Moxibustion College, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 14, 2017
Start date
Jan 18, 2018
Primary completion
May 26, 2020
Completion
Dec 26, 2020
Last update
May 6, 2021

Study contacts

XingFang Pan
principal investigator · Baokang Hospital Affiliated to Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion