ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03372213SNAPUpdated Dec 13, 2017

Healthfulness of Food From Grocery Stores Versus Eating Out Among People Receiving Food Benefits (SNAP)

An observational study in Diet Habit, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Completed. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 64 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-12-13.

Sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
4,237
Ages
20 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this cross-sectional study was to characterize the dietary intake of SNAP participants and nonparticipants by food source, including grocery stores, sit-down restaurants, and fast food.

Read the detailed description

The study used 4,237 low-income adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (2003-2006 and 2011-2014). De-identified data was collected from demographic questionnaires and 24 hour dietary recalls. We assessed intake of calories, solid fats, added sugars, and servings of non-starchy vegetables, whole fruits, and whole grains, by food source in SNAP participants and income-eligible nonparticipants. Associations between SNAP participation and dietary intake were analyzed using multivariate linear regression controlling for relevant sociodemographic characteristics.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diet Habit

Browse trials for

03

In context

Feeding Behavior

985 studies on the registry are indexed under Feeding Behavior; 178 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 4,237 is above the median of 183 across 270 observational studies indexed under Feeding Behavior.

Browse Feeding Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill is the lead sponsor of 1,372 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 161 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 139 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

4,237 low-income adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (2003-2006 and 2011-2014)

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults ages 20 - 64
  • At or below 200% of the federal poverty level
  • Completed at least one 24-hour dietary recall

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Younger than 20 years old or 65 years and older
  • Income above 200% the federal poverty level
  • No participation in dietary recall
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
4,237 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • 2003-2004

    Adults 20-64 at or below 130% of the federal poverty level who completed one 24-hour dietary recall

  • 2005-2006

    Adults 20-64 at or below 130% of the federal poverty level who completed one 24-hour dietary recall

  • 2011-2012

    Adults 20-64 at or below 130% of the federal poverty level who completed one 24-hour dietary recall

  • 2013-2014

    Adults 20-64 at or below 130% of the federal poverty level who completed one 24-hour dietary recall

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Caloric intake

    Number of calories consumed by SNAP participants compared to nonparticipants in 2003-2006 and 2011-2014 by source of food (including grocery stores, fast food restaurants, sit-down restaurants and other sources). SNAP participants will be compared to income-eligible nonparticipants at income levels up to 200% of the federal poverty level.

    Time frame: 2003-2014

  2. Solid fat

    Number of grams of solid fat and percent of intake from solid fat consumed by SNAP participants compared to nonparticipants in 2003-2006 and 2011-2014 by source of food (including grocery stores, fast food restaurants, sit-down restaurants and other sources). SNAP participants will be compared to income-eligible nonparticipants at income levels up to 200% of the federal poverty level.

    Time frame: 2003-2014

  3. Added sugar

    Number of grams of added sugar and percent of intake from added sugar consumed by SNAP participants compared to nonparticipants in 2003-2006 and 2011-2014 by source of food (including grocery stores, fast food restaurants, sit-down restaurants and other sources). SNAP participants will be compared to income-eligible nonparticipants at income levels up to 200% of the federal poverty level.

    Time frame: 2003-2014

  4. Non-starchy vegetables

    Cup-equivalent servings of non-starchy vegetables consumed by SNAP participants compared to nonparticipants in 2003-2006 and 2011-2014 by source of food (including grocery stores, fast food restaurants, sit-down restaurants and other sources). SNAP participants will be compared to income-eligible nonparticipants at income levels up to 200% of the federal poverty level.

    Time frame: 2003-2014

  5. Whole fruit

    Cup-equivalent servings of whole fruits consumed by SNAP participants compared to nonparticipants in 2003-2006 and 2011-2014 by source of food (including grocery stores, fast food restaurants, sit-down restaurants and other sources). SNAP participants will be compared to income-eligible nonparticipants at income levels up to 200% of the federal poverty level.

    Time frame: 2003-2014

  6. Whole grains

    Ounce-equivalents of whole grains consumed by SNAP participants compared to nonparticipants in 2003-2006 and 2011-2014 by source of food (including grocery stores, fast food restaurants, sit-down restaurants and other sources). SNAP participants will be compared to income-eligible nonparticipants at income levels up to 200% of the federal poverty level.

    Time frame: 2003-2014

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 13, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03372213
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 13, 2017
Start date
Jan 1, 2003
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2014
Completion
Dec 31, 2014
Last update
Dec 13, 2017

Study contacts

Barry Popkin, PhD
principal investigator · University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion