A Phase 4 interventional study of Chlorhexidine Gluconate and HUBS with Hibiclens in General Skin Cleansing, sponsored by Caroline Scott. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-03-13.
Sponsored by Caroline Scott · Phase 4, Interventional, and Supportive care
The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of removal of spores and dirt from the skin using a single cloth bath against a cloth bath with extra rinse step, to establish whether the extra rinse stage will lead to the removal of a higher level of spores and dirt.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the ability of two test materials to remove Clostridium difficile (ATCC #700057) spores with a tripartite soil load from subjects' forearms. For this study, removal of Clostridium difficile and the associated organic soil load will be used as an indicator of potential removal efficacy for difficult-to-remove microorganisms and associated organic matter from human skin.
All test materials are currently marketed products
Exclusion Criteria:
Ready to use disinfectant cloth
Drug: Chlorhexidine Gluconate
Dry cloths to be used with water and disinfectant
Combination Product: HUBS with Hibiclens
A cloth to cleanse and disinfect the skin
A dry cloth to be used in combination with water and antimicrobial soap to cleanse and disinfect the skin
Removal of Clostridium difficile and the associated organic soil load will be used as an indicator of potential removal efficacy for difficult-to-remove microorganisms and associated organic matter from human skin
As a measure of the ability of the test materials to remove spores from the skin, reductions will be calculated by subtracting the population of spores recovered from a treated sites from the population recovered from the baseline sites.
Time frame: 2 hours
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.